Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo

Top 10 Trellix Endpoint Security Alternatives

Vendor: Trellix
4.0 out of 5
2,606 followers
Post review

Top Trellix Endpoint Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Trellix Endpoint Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Cisco Secure Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Trellix Endpoint Security surpasses its competitors by providing advanced threat detection, real-time protection, and seamless integration capabilities, ensuring top-notch data security and streamlined operations for users.

Trellix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Trellix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers extensive central management with features like data loss prevention and drive encryption, appealing to enterprises scaling visibility. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon's ease of use, machine learning-based threat detection, and superior customer service attract those prioritizing effective threat intelligence.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon has a variable fee depending on deployment specifics; the primary difference lies in the upfront financial commitment versus customizable deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup cost, while CrowdStrike Falcon has a variable fee depending on deployment specifics; the primary difference lies in the upfront financial commitment versus customizable deployment expenses.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers extensive threat detection and customization capacities. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels due to its strong integration within the Microsoft ecosystem. Trellix provides competitive costs, while Microsoft Defender's extensive features justify its higher price. Trellix's straightforward deployment contrasts with Microsoft's seamless integration for existing users.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is higher, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a more affordable setup. Trellix requires a significant initial investment compared to the more budget-friendly Microsoft Defender.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is higher, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers a more affordable setup. Trellix requires a significant initial investment compared to the more budget-friendly Microsoft Defender.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels with its threat detection and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers extensive features and strong customer support. Trellix focuses on cost-effectiveness, while Cisco provides higher overall value with its comprehensive security suite despite higher costs.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security users report a lower setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint presents a moderate initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security users report a lower setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint presents a moderate initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in threat detection and tool integration, offering a cost-effective solution with good ROI. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Complete's autonomous response and threat hunting capabilities justify its higher cost. Trellix needs performance enhancements, while SentinelOne requires better reporting and integration options.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features. Trellix is budget-friendly, whereas SentinelOne is pricier but offers more comprehensive protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features. Trellix is budget-friendly, whereas SentinelOne is pricier but offers more comprehensive protection.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is praised for its cost-effectiveness and robust support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient excels with its extensive feature set, such as VPN and integration with Fortinet products. A tech buyer may prefer Trellix for its affordability or FortiClient for comprehensive security.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security promises a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security promises a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which involves a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is known for comprehensive protection, customizable configurations, and effective malware detection, with a cost-effective approach and strong support. In comparison, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers advanced detection and response features, integrated threat intelligence, and superior analytics justifying higher pricing.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security offers a lower setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a more complex setup process with potentially higher costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security offers a lower setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a more complex setup process with potentially higher costs.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security provides robust pricing and support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security excels in advanced features, justifying its higher cost. Symantec is perfect for straightforward deployment, while Trellix offers superior integration and machine learning capabilities.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is often described as moderate and straightforward, while Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is seen as higher and more complex.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is often described as moderate and straightforward, while Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is seen as higher and more complex.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust threat detection and response with easier deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint provides superior exploit prevention, advanced malware detection, and enhanced EDR features, though it requires more setup and has higher costs. Trellix is noted for integration needs; Intercept X, for analytics improvement.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is generally lower, while Intercept X Endpoint may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is generally lower, while Intercept X Endpoint may require a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in advanced threat detection and comprehensive security features. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers strong integration with security tools and excellent automation capabilities. Each solution appeals to buyers based on distinct strengths in threat analysis or integration and automation.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is high, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is high, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers a more affordable setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security appeals with its affordable pricing and strong customer service. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, while higher in cost, provides advanced features such as hybrid cloud security and mobile protection. Tech buyers might choose Trellix for simplicity and Kaspersky for comprehensive functionality.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security offers budget-friendly setup, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business entails a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security offers budget-friendly setup, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business entails a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive malware protection and intuitive management, ideal for users needing strong reporting tools and advanced threat detection. In comparison, Tanium provides robust real-time data and extensive endpoint visibility, appealing to those requiring superior endpoint management and real-time response capabilities.
Download Tanium vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Tanium, though powerful, tends to have a higher upfront setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Tanium, though powerful, tends to have a higher upfront setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is preferred for its affordability, simple deployment, and comprehensive threat detection. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat analytics and automated responses, justifying its higher cost and complex configuration for those seeking top-tier security features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires minimal setup costs while Trellix Endpoint Security demands a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires minimal setup costs while Trellix Endpoint Security demands a higher initial investment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, BigFix offers a comprehensive feature set, including advanced management and compliance tracking, attracting those who value extensive capabilities. Trellix is ideal for cost-effectiveness, while BigFix is chosen for its powerful features.
Download BigFix vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while BigFix's setup cost is higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while BigFix's setup cost is higher.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is favored for its advanced threat protection and flexible policy management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities. Trellix's competitive pricing attracts buyers, while Check Point's extensive features offer enhanced security benefits, justifying its higher cost.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is typically high but justified by the robust features, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more affordable setup cost, making it an economical option for budget-conscious users. The key difference lies in the initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is typically high but justified by the robust features, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers a more affordable setup cost, making it an economical option for budget-conscious users. The key difference lies in the initial investment required.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in pricing and support while offering robust threat detection and policy management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides advanced threat hunting and real-time alerts. Trellix is praised for its efficient deployment, with Carbon Black favored for its integration capabilities and long-term ROI.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may require higher initial investment, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may require higher initial investment, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers customizable threat detection and in-depth reporting with competitive pricing and a rapid ROI. In comparison, HP Wolf Security features advanced isolation technology and integrated hardware-software for superior, long-term value, despite higher complexity and cost.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate initial setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a lower upfront investment. While Trellix provides advanced features justifying the cost, HP Wolf emphasizes affordability with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate initial setup cost, while HP Wolf Security offers a lower upfront investment. While Trellix provides advanced features justifying the cost, HP Wolf emphasizes affordability with essential functionalities.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Trellix excels in robust threat detection and advanced analytics, while Cynet offers an all-in-one platform with more automation. In comparison, Trellix could enhance its reporting, whereas Cynet needs better scalability. Trellix is praised for pricing, but Cynet offers superior comprehensive protection.
Download Cynet vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security setup costs are considered higher compared to Cynet, which is noted for its more economical setup costs. Cynet is highlighted for being budget-friendly, whereas Trellix often incurs larger initial investments.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security setup costs are considered higher compared to Cynet, which is noted for its more economical setup costs. Cynet is highlighted for being budget-friendly, whereas Trellix often incurs larger initial investments.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.6 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers strong customer support, ample customization options, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business stands out for its comprehensive feature set, seamless integration with other Microsoft services, and overall better functionality, making it ideal for those valuing advanced integrated features.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection, real-time monitoring, and extensive reporting capabilities, appealing to larger enterprises with its responsive customer service and substantial ROI. In comparison, Malwarebytes stands out for robust malware protection, ease of deployment, and cost-effectiveness, attracting smaller businesses seeking user-friendly security.
Download Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security offers a straightforward setup at a moderate cost, while Malwarebytes minimizes initial costs with a simpler installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security offers a straightforward setup at a moderate cost, while Malwarebytes minimizes initial costs with a simpler installation process.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security offers strong support and competitive pricing, while Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response's extensive features justify its higher cost. In comparison, Trellix excels in ease of deployment and customer service. Both provide high ROI, with Cybereason being preferred for advanced security needs.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response. Cybereason offers a more cost-effective initial implementation than Trellix.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response. Cybereason offers a more cost-effective initial implementation than Trellix.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in ease of use and deployment, offering comprehensive threat prevention tools adaptable to various environments. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is preferred for advanced AI-driven threat detection, with predictive analysis providing a better price-to-value ratio.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has lower setup costs compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, making it a more budget-friendly option. BlackBerry Cylance offers advanced features, potentially justifying its higher initial investment for comprehensive security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has lower setup costs compared to BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity, making it a more budget-friendly option. BlackBerry Cylance offers advanced features, potentially justifying its higher initial investment for comprehensive security needs.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is appreciated for its competitive pricing and support, advanced threat detection, and automated response. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security, though more expensive, offers extensive features, including robust data encryption and comprehensive threat intelligence, making it attractive for long-term value.
Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360's setup cost is significantly lower, making it budget-friendly, while Trellix Endpoint Security presents a higher initial investment but offers advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360's setup cost is significantly lower, making it budget-friendly, while Trellix Endpoint Security presents a higher initial investment but offers advanced features.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is valued for its advanced threat protection and real-time monitoring, making it price-efficient. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security's broader feature set, including an efficient anti-malware engine and extensive reporting tools, justifies its higher price for comprehensive security needs.
Download Seqrite Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security is more budget-friendly upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost, whereas Seqrite Endpoint Security is more budget-friendly upfront.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in threat detection and response, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform uses deep learning for preemptive threat prevention. In comparison, Trellix offers competitive pricing, and Deep Instinct justifies its higher cost with superior AI technology. Tech buyers might choose Trellix for cost-effectiveness and Deep Instinct for advanced capabilities.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost noted by users, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is praised for a more affordable initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost noted by users, while Deep Instinct Prevention Platform is praised for a more affordable initial deployment.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and advanced threat detection capabilities. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security is noted for its comprehensive multi-layered protection and additional features like VPN and parental controls. Trellix offers seamless integration, while Bitdefender requires optimization for system resource usage.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has higher setup costs, while Bitdefender Total Security offers more affordable setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has higher setup costs, while Bitdefender Total Security offers more affordable setup options.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro ServerProtect
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is known for advanced threat detection, while Trend Micro ServerProtect offers comprehensive protection and smooth integration. In comparison, Trend Micro ServerProtect is seen as more beneficial due to its extensive feature set. Trellix provides shorter deployment times and consistent customer support.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup is noted for its cost-effectiveness, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect has a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup is noted for its cost-effectiveness, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect has a higher setup cost, highlighting a key difference between the two solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection, automatic updates, and multi-layered protection with detailed reporting tools and a robust firewall. In comparison, Webroot Business Endpoint Protection provides real-time protection with straightforward installation and minimal system impact, excelling in simplicity and low resource consumption.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is more budget-friendly with lower initial setup costs than Trellix Endpoint Security.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is more budget-friendly with lower initial setup costs than Trellix Endpoint Security.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and easy integration, with competitive pricing and solid ROI. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security provides robust ransomware protection and advanced machine learning, making it worth the higher cost for enhanced features. Each solution targets different priorities in endpoint protection.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. These differences highlight the contrast in the affordability of these two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. These differences highlight the contrast in the affordability of these two security solutions.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in threat intelligence and advanced malware protection, appealing for its cost-effective pricing and competitive support. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client offers real-time threat detection and seamless cloud integration, justifying its higher price with comprehensive features and quick deployment advantages.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is moderate and straightforward, whereas SonicWall Capture Client has a higher initial setup cost and involves a more complex process.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security's setup cost is moderate and straightforward, whereas SonicWall Capture Client has a higher initial setup cost and involves a more complex process.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trend Micro Smart Protection
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security is favored for ease of deployment and pricing while Trend Micro Smart Protection is noted for advanced features. Trellix provides comprehensive threat protection; in comparison, Trend Micro offers superior malware detection. Both have room for improvement but differ in functionalities and pricing.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro Smart Protection Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, with Trend Micro being generally more expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to Trend Micro Smart Protection, with Trend Micro being generally more expensive.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection and automated remediation. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection excels with superior malware detection and cloud-based management. Trellix receives praise for competitive pricing, while WithSecure enjoys preference for its innovative features and faster deployment.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection involves a more complex setup and higher initial expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection involves a more complex setup and higher initial expenditures.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security is chosen for its cost-effectiveness, ease of deployment, and strong customer support. In comparison, Trellix Endpoint Security appeals to buyers seeking advanced threat detection and customizable features. Ivanti integrates well with other Ivanti products, while Trellix is preferred for its robust security measures.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has higher setup costs compared to Trellix Endpoint Security, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has higher setup costs compared to Trellix Endpoint Security, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust protection and intuitive management, preferred for quick deployment and reasonable pricing. In comparison, NetWitness NDR excels in network traffic analysis with superior threat detection, appealing to organizations requiring comprehensive network security despite a higher cost and more complex setup.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security setup costs are lower, focusing on ease of deployment, while NetWitness NDR commands a higher initial expense justified by its advanced detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security setup costs are lower, focusing on ease of deployment, while NetWitness NDR commands a higher initial expense justified by its advanced detection capabilities.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers advanced threat detection, making it an excellent choice for those prioritizing robust defense capabilities. In comparison, Sophos EPP Suite's integrated platform with antivirus and network security features provides a comprehensive, user-friendly solution that appeals to those seeking an all-in-one, easy-to-manage option.
Download Sophos EPP Suite vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Sophos EPP Suite offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Trellix provides comprehensive coverage despite the higher cost, whereas Sophos balances affordability with essential security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a moderate setup cost, while Sophos EPP Suite offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Trellix provides comprehensive coverage despite the higher cost, whereas Sophos balances affordability with essential security features.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive support, making it a reliable choice. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum's advanced features and streamlined deployment make it a favored option. Trellix excels in continuous monitoring, while Kaspersky's automated responses provide sophisticated protection.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a higher initial setup cost reflecting its advanced feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a higher initial setup cost reflecting its advanced feature set.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers comprehensive protection and integration capabilities, appealing to users prioritizing overall functionality. In comparison, Morphisec excels in advanced threat prevention against zero-day attacks, making it suitable for those needing superior security. Trellix provides better cost value, while Morphisec’s higher price is justified by advanced prevention features.
Download Morphisec vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a more affordable setup cost compared to Morphisec, making it a budget-friendly option. Morphisec offers more advanced security features, which may justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a more affordable setup cost compared to Morphisec, making it a budget-friendly option. Morphisec offers more advanced security features, which may justify its higher setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust malware protection and network security features, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection excels with auto-containment and advanced threat detection. In comparison, Comodo's support quality and reliable performance justify its higher cost. Trellix's intuitive deployment and competitive pricing appeal to cost-conscious buyers.
Download Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a high setup cost, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a more affordable setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a high setup cost, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection offers a more affordable setup cost.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in threat detection and real-time protection but comes with higher pricing. In comparison, Avast Business Hub offers robust features at a more cost-effective rate. Trellix stands out for its comprehensive support while Avast's feature set is considered superior for its price.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas Avast Business Hub offers lower setup costs appealing to small to medium-sized businesses. Trellix's higher setup costs reflect its advanced feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has moderate setup costs making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas Avast Business Hub offers lower setup costs appealing to small to medium-sized businesses. Trellix's higher setup costs reflect its advanced feature set.
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Xprotect
1 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Logo
Xprotect
1 out of 5

As part of the ColorTokens Xtended ZeroTrustTM cloud-delivered, software-defined platform, ColorTokens Xprotect utilizes a proactive Zero Trust architecture to provide complete processlevel control for endpoints. In a Zero Trust architecture only good behavior is allowed and any deviations from normal behavior are automatically blocked. Xprotect is designed with intelligent algorithms for in-depth analysis of every running process and file present in the endpoint system. The running processes are analyzed with the known good processes and
combined with contextual behavioral analysis to detect and stop suspicious activity. Xprotect enables businesses to easily deploy and manage endpoint security from the cloud-hosted
console, providing real business value in minutes.

View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)