Perforce QA Wizard Pro vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Perforce and Ranorex are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #39, while Ranorex is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7. Perforce holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Ranorex’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution.

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Read 1 Perforce QA Wizard Pro review

129 Views
90 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,429 Views
1,828 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Perforce QA Wizard Pro and Ranorex Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,649 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Perforce QA Wizard Pro

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

39th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

23rd

Average Rating

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Perforce QA Wizard Pro is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

AlonKalangel

DevOps Engineer at Intel Corporation

Dec 30, 2019

Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability

I don't think that using this solution has improved the way our organization functions. We are staying with it, for now, because it is complicated to change source control platforms The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list.…

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Aug 24, 2023

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

Our usage was at least seven to eight months ago. We have web-based and desktop Windows applications, and automating the desktop applications was challenging. Ranorex provided the necessary keywords, especially for our shallow testing needs. We did a couple of POCs using this solution. But at the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"The solution is fast and includes built-in libraries that record and playback."

"Object identification is good."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"The solution's technical support team could be responsive."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"The solution does not support dual or regression testing."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"Other OS Support, Ranorex Spy performance improvement (Especially for Silverlight controls)."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding languag...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 24% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 18% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 10% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download Perforce QA Wizard Pro product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

October 2024

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Learn More

Perforce

Ranorex

Overview

QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,Citrix

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.