Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ping Identity Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server comparison

Ping Identity and WSO2 are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. Ping Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while WSO2 is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Ping Identity holds a 8.6% mindshare in CIaA, compared to WSO2’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.
Ping Identity Platform
Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews
  • 6,089 Views
  • 1,279 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
WSO2 Identity Server
Read 11 WSO2 Identity Server reviews
  • 1,137 Views
  • 489 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Ping Identity Platform and WSO2 Identity Server are key players in the identity management market. Ping Identity Platform is perceived to have an advantage in scalability and support, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is noted for its open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Ping Identity Platform delivers robust authentication, seamless integration capabilities, and advanced security measures, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive identity solutions. WSO2 Identity Server, with its open-source architecture, provides expandability and customization options, beneficial for businesses with specific technical needs.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could enhance its flexibility for developers and improve cost efficiency. More customizable options could also be beneficial. WSO2 Identity Server may need to enhance its support and onboarding processes for less technical users. Additionally, improving user interface aesthetics and streamlining certain functionalities could enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WSO2 Identity Server offers flexible cloud-based and on-premises deployment with detailed documentation and community support, catering to specific business requirements. Ping Identity Platform is known for its easy and straightforward deployment with extensive support and training resources, ideal for quick implementation and non-technical setups.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform's pricing might be perceived as high due to its extensive offerings, yet it often results in significant ROI in demanding environments. In contrast, WSO2 Identity Server is recognized for its cost-effective model, leveraging open-source benefits to provide savings on setup, making it attractive for budget-conscious businesses focused on flexible development.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 883,011 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
WSO2 Identity Server
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 8.6%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Identity Server is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ping Identity Platform8.6%
WSO2 Identity Server3.1%
Other88.3%
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

SV
Shruthi R Varikoti
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies
I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…
Read full review
Ritesh_Shah - PeerSpot reviewer
Ritesh_Shah
Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Utilizing key management and seamless single sign-on integration for enhanced user profile management
WSO2 Identity Server's key management feature stands out as a particularly impactful feature for enhancing security. Additionally, from a user perspective, the self-user portal and user profile management capabilities are highly valuable. It allows users to manage their profiles, change passwords, and offers a self-care portal type of functionality. The single sign-on capability integrates seamlessly with various platforms, including Google, Facebook, LDAP, and Active Directory, which supports rapid product launches.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It's pretty stable as a product."
"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."
"I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."
"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."
"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."
"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."
More Ping Identity Platform pros
"It's very easy to implement everything."
"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."
"The product provides easy integration between API manager and IT server components."
"We use the solution for customer identity management, authenticating customers coming in through a web portal."
"The solution gets the job done, and we don't have to do the main configuration."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."
"I am completely satisfied with WSO2 Identity Server and would definitely recommend it to other companies."
More WSO2 Identity Server pros
 

Cons

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."
"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in the solution, particularly in security."
"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."
"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."
"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."
"From the improvement perspective, they could bring IGA capability, which right now they only have in their SaaS offering."
"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."
More Ping Identity Platform cons
"I found the initial setup to be very complex."
"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."
"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."
"The solution seems to be pretty outdated."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There needs to be a good support model and easy-to-understand documentation."
"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."
"The solution's licensing model could be more flexible, and pricing could be improved."
More WSO2 Identity Server cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."
"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."
"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."
"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."
"The product is costly."
"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."
"The tool is quite affordable."
"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice
"At this time we are working with the open-source version."
"We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers."
"I rate the product price an eight out of ten. There is a need to pay more for the extra features provided by the solution."
"They should bring in some good pricing models to host the marketplace."
"WSO2 Identity Server is not an expensive solution."
"I have found the solutions license is priced competitively compared to others."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Transportation Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingID?
The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?
The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PingID?
The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Identity Server?
The pricing is currently the same as the API Manager, so it's not surprising. Since we used it primarily for SSO and the self portal, there were no additional pricing concerns.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WSO2 Identity Server?
Currently, all required features are supported. If new use cases for artificial intelligence arise, it could be beneficial to incorporate those. However, for our current projects, WSO2 Identity Ser...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WSO2 Identity Server?
We deployed WSO2 Identity Server to fulfill our single sign-on (SSO) requirements. Whenever we implement the API Manager, instead of using the API Manager's inbuilt key manager, we use WSO2 Identit...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 12% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 5% of the time
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 5% of the time
OneLogin vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
OneLogin vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 2% of the time
More Ping Identity Platform Competitors
Auth0 Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Auth0 Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server
Compared 25% of the time
Okta Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Okta Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server
Compared 22% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs WSO2 Identity Server
Compared 9% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WSO2 Identity Server
Compared 7% of the time
Ilex Meibo Identity Management vs WSO2 Identity Server Logo
Ilex Meibo Identity Management vs WSO2 Identity Server
Compared 7% of the time
More WSO2 Identity Server Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform
February 2026
Ping Identity Platform reportDownload Ping Identity Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
WSO2 Identity Server
January 2026
WSO2 Identity Server reportDownload WSO2 Identity Server product report
 

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
No data available
 

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
Ping Identity

WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems.

WSO2
 

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Nutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server
February 2026
Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server
Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ping Identity Platform vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.