Planview AgilePlace vs Polarion ALM comparison

Planview and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Planview is ranked #18, while Siemens is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Planview holds a 1.9% mindshare in ALM, compared to Siemens’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Planview AgilePlace

Read 11 Planview AgilePlace reviews

1,918 Views
1,669 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Polarion ALM

Read 24 Polarion ALM reviews

4,598 Views
4,184 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Planview AgilePlace

Polarion ALM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Polarion ALM and Planview AgilePlace are two contenders in the project management arena. Polarion ALM appears to have the upper hand in tool integrations and compliance needs, while Planview AgilePlace excels in flexibility and customization.

Features: Polarion ALM provides comprehensive requirements management, excellent traceability, and robust audit capabilities, which are critical for highly regulated industries. In contrast, Planview AgilePlace stands out for its visualization capabilities, efficient workflow management, and support for Kanban and Scrum methodologies, benefiting agile environments.

Room for Improvement: Polarion ALM could improve in its user accessibility and customization, as it can be complex for new users. Additionally, it might benefit from enhanced planning and management tools. Planview AgilePlace could benefit from more advanced reporting features, further integration capabilities, and more detailed customization options for complex project needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview AgilePlace, with its cloud-based deployment, allows for easier adoption and minimal setup challenges, alongside strong customer support. Polarion ALM, typically requiring on-premises deployment, involves longer installation times but compensates with robust customer support to streamline this process.

Pricing and ROI: Polarion ALM might have higher initial costs due to its extensive on-premises installation, but delivers considerable ROI through its functionalities and long-term service agreements. Planview AgilePlace is seen as more cost-effective, offering flexible subscription plans and quicker ROI realization, suitable for budget-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview AgilePlace vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview AgilePlace vs. Polarion ALM

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,016 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview AgilePlace

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

18th

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

13th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

5th

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Planview AgilePlace is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 4.6%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Polarion ALM	4.6%
Planview AgilePlace	1.9%
Other	93.5%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

it_user1684173

PM Systems Analyst at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Simple and intuitive, useful for agile management, and helpful for planning based on our capacity and meeting our deadlines

Every feature is valuable. LeanKit is a Kanban-based tool where you have a visual interface that you can use to create various cards and to create boards to house those cards. You can create a board for managing project work. You can create a board to do PI planning. It is pretty close to the agile way of doing business. The Board Layout Editor is excellent in terms of flexibility. They have been improving its usability. Their development is very much agile, so for any feedback that we give them, they let us know if and when they would act on our request for enhancements or change, and then they make those changes. They are responsive.

Read full review

LasseMikkonen

CEO at byte

Has provided mature traceability and configuration features while supporting complex product development for mid-to-large companies

Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and test result management with it, it is very limited. Jama Connect has similar limitations, and both should really focus on developing the integrations and extendability. For example, Jama Connect does not even have an extension marketplace, whereas Polarion has a small one. However, compared to the Atlassian Marketplace where you can get whatever applications for whatever price, it is a totally different ballgame. I would highly recommend Polarion ALM add more AI features to it. I know they have started to do something, but for example, I have been developing widgets for IBM DOORS Next, AI widgets, so that you can write and analyze requirements with the AI, and I have also done the same for Jira, creating a couple of Jira applications in the marketplace as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I think we tripled our outputs roughly with half the resources."

"I would highly encourage others to implement LeanKit."

"The "Blocking" feature has helped our scrum masters track impediments and share them at the program level to stakeholders with accountability and detail so that they understand and the action items which can be noted easily."

"The transparency that it brings is valuable. I like to look at things from all angles, and sometimes, flip chart paper on a wall and sticky notes are better than something on a screen, but the way they've made it accessible from all points for anyone within an organization is great. As a project management guy, sometimes, you have to force people into new environments where they have to see what you're talking about. Any screen is a barrier, and people got to get into the screen. How do you know they do? You don't necessarily know, but you are getting around that barrier with a countermeasure of making it accessible to as many as possible. So, everyone can jump in there and see everything. It is fully transparent, and I like that. This is one thing that helps."

"We use the board and card hierarchies in terms of sprints so that we can see if we have cross-functional teams that are working on the same projects together, especially when projects have dependencies. The parent-child relationship within cards is really nice so that we can see what kind of dependencies there are when we're trying to get projects finished."

"It makes work visible, so everybody knows where everything is. It uses Kanban, and that makes work visible."

"The usability of it and the readability of it is so much better than what JIRA is."

"Our cycle times have reduced by 50%; they are now half as long as they used to be."

More Planview AgilePlace pros

"The features I find the most valuable are requirement tracking and schematics."

"The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it."

"There are similar solutions out there such as Jira and Confluence, but they are not as good."

"The software is stable."

"You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs."

"Polarion ALM is powerful in easily creating your own workflows for completely different kinds of things."

"It is a very stable solution."

"Polarion ALM is excellent for tracking who is working on what and how many people are involved in a project."

More Polarion ALM pros

Cons

"Sometimes, we use it for project management lessons learned, and it would be helpful if there was a template set up for something like that because we code different cards based on the category."

"Within the current features, if they can give some ability to show more icons on the card, it would be helpful. It would help us in showing more data on the cards."

"The biggest improvement would be the API and data connections and making the data more accessible or quicker to access. One of our team members has brought up actual-time tracking on a card as a potential improvement. They had an interest in knowing how long a specific card had been worked on by a specific user or somebody that was assigned to that card. But there's not really a way for them to start and stop a time that they were actually working on it, except for if we created a different lane and they dragged it into the lane and then stopped using it in the lane."

"Our overall impression of Leankit has been very positive, however, our experience with the JIRA integration into our Leankit boards was much harder than we anticipated and that could be improved by simplifying it somehow."

"Some aspects of the reporting and dashboard could be improved."

"I do not know what it can do in the area of scrum."

"I do not know what it can do in the area of scrum. Maybe it has that functionality. I have never tried to set it up. You think of LeanKit from the perspective of Kanban. I don't know if there is a template for scrum, a scaled agile framework, or any of those scaling frameworks."

"We are a 750-employee company, so we got lucky that our board approved the kind of funding we needed for the solution. But, LeanKit probably needs to reduce its pricing."

More Planview AgilePlace cons

"The backlog management for Agile in Polarion ALM could be improved or enhanced in future releases."

"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."

"The weak point of Polarion ALM software is about reporting and time for extraction of the data...The quality of reporting needs to improve."

"The configuration aspect of the solution is not easy. A person needs a lot of programming knowledge in order to successfully handle the job."

"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based."

"The solution needs to improve its user experience and graphics."

"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience."

"I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."

More Polarion ALM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't know what it would be on its own. It was basically included with what we were already paying or using. So, it was a no-brainer. It wasn't like we had to sell the company on making a purchase or anything like that. There weren't any costs that came in after implementing it."

"I don't believe there are any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"In general, Planview's cost structure is reasonable. You get quite a lot of functionality for the license cost that you get."

"As far as I understand, it is not an expensive application."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

"It is an expensive product."

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,016 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

30%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

We are in our product development using Polarion ALM's functionalities. I am a power user, partly responsible for configuring the tool. We are using it for many things. The idea was to go for a req...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Polarion ALM?

The pricing of Polarion ALM and IBM ELM is pretty much aligned. They are not at the same level, but I would say aligned according to the capabilities of the tools, with DOORS being more expensive b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 17% of the time

Jira Align vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 16% of the time

Rally Software vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 6% of the time

More Planview AgilePlace Competitors

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 16% of the time

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Polarion ALM

Compared 7% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview AgilePlace

June 2026

Download Planview AgilePlace product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM

June 2026

Download Polarion ALM product report

Also Known As

Planview LeanKit, LeanKit

No data available

Overview

Planview AgilePlace provides an intuitive platform for managing and visualizing work, supporting task tracking, Kanban boards, and agile management while enhancing collaboration and transparency.

Planview AgilePlace is a tool for tracking and optimizing team workflows through visual boards and advanced features like swim lanes and lean methodologies. It integrates with Power BI, facilitates strategic planning through its card status updates and Scrum integration, and improves project prioritization with resource management and financial tracking. It stands out due to its intuitive design and ease of use. While effective, the platform could enhance integration with Enterprise One and JIRA, improve customization, and offer better time-tracking functionalities. Enhanced reporting, dashboard capabilities, and API access are also anticipated upgrades. Users desire further enhancements in AgilePlace's recurring card functionalities and industry-specific agile project management features.

What are the key features of Planview AgilePlace?

Customizable Kanban Boards: Design boards with swim lanes and dependencies for efficient task management.
Visible Work Tracking: Improve transparency with clear visual workflows and defined card status.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless connectivity with tools like Power BI for improved data analysis.
Efficient Reporting: Generate comprehensive reports to support strategic decisions.
LeanKit's Interface: Navigate tasks easily with an intuitive layout and agile features.

What benefits should users look for in Planview AgilePlace reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Foster teamwork through shared visual management tools.
Strategic Planning: Utilize Scrum integration and resource management for effective planning.
Improved Task Management: Streamline workflows with tailored Kanban boards and visible progress tracking.
Enterprise-wide Integration: Connect with systems like JIRA for comprehensive project oversight.
Usability and Visibility: Benefit from an intuitive platform that simplifies project tracking and execution.

Planview AgilePlace finds application in industries requiring agile management and task visualization, such as technology and finance. It supports project management from initial requests to closure, aligning team priorities and enhancing workflow management. Teams leverage its capabilities for planning, resource allocation, and capital project tracking, integrating seamlessly with enterprise systems to deliver outcomes efficiently.

Planview

Polarion ALM focuses on requirements management, offering structured management and traceability across projects. Known for integration and flexibility, it supports collaboration with user-friendly navigation.

Polarion ALM is recognized for its ability to streamline tasks, enabling comprehensive project management without external plugins. Its interface supports real-time collaboration and advanced reporting, while document control and workflow configuration provide additional value. Despite needing enhancements in integration and automation, it serves application lifecycle management across industries like medical device development and automotive, integrating with SVN and GitLab.

What are the key features of Polarion ALM?

Traceability: Ensures seamless tracking of project requirements.
Document Control: Manages comprehensive documentation efficiently.
Workflow Configuration: Simplifies tasks with customizable workflows.
Integration: Connects well with tools like SVN and GitLab.
Collaboration: Supports teamwork with real-time sync and interaction.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Efficiency: Reduces time through streamlined task management.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse project requirements.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs.
Compliance: Supports regulatory requirements effectively.
Comprehensive Features: Minimizes need for external plugins.

Polarion ALM finds application in sectors such as medical device development and automotive, utilized for application lifecycle management, requirements engineering, and documentation. Organizations benefit from its support for DevOps, task management, and traceability, effectively capturing customer needs and managing test cases.

Siemens

Sample Customers

REA Group, Thompson Reuters

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

Buyer's Guide

Planview AgilePlace vs. Polarion ALM

June 2026

Free Report: Planview AgilePlace vs. Polarion ALM

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview AgilePlace vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,016 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview AgilePlace vs. Polarion ALM report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.