Planview Daptiv vs Trello comparison

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"Trello simplifies collaboration, reducing long email chains that are hard to follow."

"I think task management, prioritization, rankings, and collaboration features are useful."

"Project management and work collaboration solution with amazing scalability and stability. Its user interface is modern and easy to understand, with drag and drop functionality."

"All the features are valuable but the data extraction is extremely helpful for automation."

"Just being able to manage tasks very easily is one of the best features Trello offers."

"The user interface is great. I find it very easy to create cards."

"The Trello board is very intuitive and simple to comprehend."

"Trello is quite easy to learn. The features that are available in the current version are enough to do your basic documentation and management."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"Many more categories could be enabled."

"Pricing can be improved."

"Trello was a little complicated initially because we didn't know how to use it, create a product backlog, or define the work items."

"The mobile version of Trello can be improved upon."

"It is somewhat challenging to move to the automation part of Trello."

"Improvement can be made in accessing cards via email for easier communication."

"I would like to see improvement in onboarding back-office team members."

"Trello cannot be integrated with other tools like Jira and Google Workspace."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The pricing starts from around $6 per license for a subscription, and there might be higher subscriptions available, possibly around $12 per month."

"I am tinkering with the free version."

"We are using the open-source version of Trello."

"We pay $10 per user per month for the product."

"The solution pricing is okay. The pricing is subscription-based and depends on the features that you need. If you need more features then you will need to pay more. You can use the basic features to lead your project management."

"I do believe that Trello has a licensed version, but I used the free version of the tool with limited capabilities."

"We are currently using the open-source option."

"The basic paid version is pretty expensive"