Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Perforce Puppet vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Perforce and Red Hat are both solutions in the Configuration Management category. Perforce is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. Perforce holds a 3.8% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 11.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Microsoft Intune
Read 325 Microsoft Intune reviews
  • 30,664 Views
  • 3,066 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Perforce Puppet
Read 14 Perforce Puppet reviews
  • 1,487 Views
  • 1,338 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews
  • 10,071 Views
  • 5,539 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Perforce Puppet and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform are competitive products in automation and IT management. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is often preferred for its robust features, particularly for comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Perforce Puppet is known for strong configuration management, efficient server provisioning, and handling complex workflows. It excels in automated configuration management, offering agent-based functionality, and strong scalability for complex environments. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is recognized for its simplicity in automation, integration capabilities, and effective management of large-scale environments. It is distinct with its agentless architecture, utilizing SSH, and a YAML-based scripting that simplifies orchestration in various environments.

Room for Improvement: Perforce Puppet could improve with a simpler initial setup process and more intuitive user interface to reduce the onboarding complexity. Enhanced out-of-the-box integrations could also broaden its compatibility with additional platforms. Red Hat Ansible could focus on reducing the initial cost barrier, improving the GUI to enhance user experience, and expanding its agentless capabilities to further simplify configurations across more networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is noted for its streamlined deployment and effective customer service, facilitating easier adoption in large environments. Perforce Puppet, although offering scalability, faces challenges with complex initial setups that might slow onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Perforce Puppet generally offers a lower initial setup cost which appeals to budget-conscious organizations, ensuring quicker ROI. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform may require a higher initial investment but its comprehensive capabilities and long-term benefits promise substantial ROI for those leveraging its full potential over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,266 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Configuration Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
325
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (2nd), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
Perforce Puppet
Ranking in Configuration Management
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Ranking in Configuration Management
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
72
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (3rd), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 6.9%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce Puppet is 3.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 11.9%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform11.9%
Microsoft Intune6.9%
Perforce Puppet3.8%
Other77.4%
Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

AkashKamble - PeerSpot reviewer
AkashKamble
Sr MacOS specialist engineer at Cyber24
Enables management of multiple operating systems with a single license
The best feature is that it's a Microsoft product, so if anything goes wrong, we get quick support for anything required. Remote system functionality allows us to sit anywhere and take control of any device via remote management. We can enhance security for clients' laptops with built-in Microsoft Defender, which is available with the Microsoft Intune license. We use it for reporting purposes through endpoint analytics. When pushing scripting, there are two types available: remediation script and reservation script. Through endpoint analytics, you can push defender policies to clients. It helps with reporting, inventory updates, and monitoring tenant status health.
Read full review
reviewer2284542 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2284542
Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Automated configuration management ensures consistent server setups
The strength of Puppet is in automated configuration management. We can configure a server once and set rules with Puppet so that future server configurations are automatic and consistent with company requests. Puppet is declarative, meaning it finds the best state for itself and corrects any deviations in the configuration.
Read full review
Manas Kashyap - PeerSpot reviewer
Manas Kashyap
DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital
Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes
The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The synchronization of Intune with other Microsoft solutions is a valuable feature."
"The product has eased the deployment of Microsoft apps to the devices. We can manage it properly. We can control it and push the updates. Another company helped us with the deployment. However, we can do it internally."
"It works pretty well for us."
"The key benefit of Intune is its integration with the Microsoft ecosystem."
"We are transforming our flat network by adopting different cloud solutions, and our own applications are hosted in the cloud. Intune ensures our security throughout our entire cloud-based system, improving our security posture."
"I have seen a return on investment right from the start of the tool's usage."
"The device profiling which uses the official Outlook email enabled us to control the screenshot feature and prevent copying outside of the organization's application."
"The solution’s most valuable feature is its ease of use."
More Microsoft Intune pros
"Puppet Enterprise has reduced the time of production changes or environment changes."
"The agent-based feature helps me by being stable."
"The most valuable features are the agent, high load balancing, and overall robustness and features."
"The main purpose for this automation tool would be: deploying, controlling, ordering change for the system and IT Infrastructure."
"Puppet3 and 4 series provides optimum deployment solutions for infrastructure and applications."
"Anything that we manage through Puppet always runs perfectly."
"Puppet Enterprise is a stable solution."
"Puppet Enterprise has good functionalities."
More Perforce Puppet pros
"It increases our company's efficiency, automating all the simple tasks which used to take hours of somebody's time."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its configuration management, drift management, workflow templates with the visual UI, and graphical workflow representation."
"Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is quite stable. If you set it up correctly with the right configurations and there are no hiccups during installation and deployment, it will be stable. I'd give stability a rating of eight out of ten."
"The API for exposing all our infrastructure services is the most valuable feature."
"Automation is valuable. It saves us time in performing tedious tasks or repetitive tasks."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The automation manager is very good."
"It has an easy-to-use interface. It is REST API driven, and it integrates with Active Directory. It provides the ability to grant permissions to other users who would not necessarily have those permissions via the GUI so that they could run other people's jobs. For example, you could have the Oracle team grant permissions to the Linux team so that they can use each of those playbooks or each other's code. It is called shift-left."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros
 

Cons

"The reports aren't complete, and it's not easy to build custom reports. For example, Windows Autopilot isn't working well in cases where the computers don't have a good internet connection. Then the option is not good enough."
"Automatic updating is pretty rough. It doesn't give me as much control as I had in the past."
"There is room for improvement in server patch management and allowing direct uploads of EXE applications instead of needing to convert them to Intune format, which would save time."
"At the moment, we need more flexibility. We have some offices migrating to Windows 11 remotely. Sometimes, it is difficult to manage image installation because we have to collect some information before starting image deployment. Currently, Intune cannot collect the information needed for deploying new images."
"I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows."
"In future releases, I would like to see better integration with Apple products."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"Intune could be improved by organizing different solutions, like Defender and Sentinel, into a single package. This would allow us to focus on security while Microsoft manages other areas. Having a unified solution would drive better management of various sectors. Although the Intune user experience is good, we should continue enhancing it."
More Microsoft Intune cons
"It's a bit of a pain point to make sure that everything works once we've upgraded it because Puppet has been evolving pretty fast."
"The solution has really complex code, you have to understand the Ruby language. However, once you know the code then you can move ahead without any problems."
"Puppet Enterprise should improve the general extensibility for places where they can't install it."
"We would like Puppet to add more integration for applications."
"At the beginning the initial setup was kind of complex."
"Clients with less technical expertise may find Puppet complex to configure. Our team may struggle if technical team members leave the organization, leaving others uncertain about using the tool."
"There's a lot of scope for enhancement on the DevSecOps side. They should definitely include features for compliance, for both the Linux and Windows side of the devices, as well as for network devices. Compliance is something they need to work on."
"Puppet Enterprise is more complex and difficult to configure."
"It needs better documentation."
"Ansible has just been upgraded, and the only issue that we are seeing at the moment is that the user interface can be slow. We're currently investigating the refresh period with Red Hat when you click a job and run a job. It seems that the buffer no longer runs in real-time. We haven't discovered whether that's partially an issue with our environment, but Red Hat has come back and said that they're working on a couple of bugs in the background. We've upgraded to that version in the last six months, and that's the only issue that we've seen."
"Accessibility. Ansible uses a CLI by default. Those accustomed to it can find their way and adopt the YAML files easily over time. But, some users are more comfortable using UIs..."
"Documentation could be improved. Many times, if I'm looking for something, I have to Google it in a lot of places, then figure out what the best approach will be. There are some best practices documents, but they don't give you the information."
"In Community, there's a lot of effort towards testing, standardizing, and testing for module development to role development, which is why Molecule is now becoming real. Same thing with Zuul, which we are starting to implement. Zulu tests out modules from third-party sources, like ourselves, and verifies that the modules work before they are committed to the code. Currently, Ansible can't do this with all the modules out there."
"The solution is slightly expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"The area which I feel can be improved is the custom modules. For example, there are something like 106 official modules available in the Ansible library. A year ago, that number was somewhere around 58. While Ansible is improving day by day, this can be improved more. For instance, when you need to configure in the cloud, you need to write up a module for that."
"What I would like to see is a refined Dashboard to see, when I log in: Here are all my jobs, here are how many times they've executed; some kind graphical stitching-together of the workflows and jobs, and how they're connected. Also, those "failed hosts," what does that mean? We have a problem, a failed host can be anything. Is SSH the reason it failed? Is the job template why it failed? It doesn't really distinguish that."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheaper than our company's other MDM tools."
"The product is offered as part of a Microsoft standard bundle. The pricing can be competitive to Airwatch, and Maas360."
"I liked the tool's pricing until P2 came into effect. I am unsure about the current value versus the cost of the new licensing model."
"The cost of the license and the features are justified for myself as a technical person."
"The product is relatively pricey, but considering its benefits, I'd say it's fair. The benefits outweigh the expensive licensing fees, especially for large organizations, but medium-sized and smaller businesses may be unable to afford it."
"For Microsoft 365 E5 clients, cost is not an issue as this product is one of the benefits."
"It comes with the E5 plan. We bought the E5 plan from Microsoft."
"While Microsoft charges for actual usage, it lacks discount options."
More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice
"Puppet Enterprise can be an expensive solution for smaller businesses."
"The main thing that we noticed when we switched from the enterprise version to the community version was the difference in cost — the infrastructure is pretty expensive."
"Puppet Enterprise’s pricing is competitive."
"Depending on the size of the organization there is a point when the price of Puppet Enterprise should be lower. However, they provide really good functionality, features, and capabilities."
"I am using the community edition of the solution which is free."
"If you only need to use Ansible, it's free for any end-user, but when you require Ansible Tower, you need to pay per Ansible Tower server."
"The solution is inexpensive compared to other products."
"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints."
"We use the open-source version of the solution."
"The cost is high, but it still works well."
"Everything is generally fair. No one ever likes to pay a lot of money, but we are getting the value. We also get support with it. It has been fair and worthwhile."
"We have to be mindful of how we use Ansible because of the licensing model. I am not saying that it is unfair or we do not find value in it. Because we are trying to automate so many different things, we have to be mindful of what we are doing and how we are doing it because we are trying to stay in compliance with it."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user185772 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user185772
Senior Software Architect with 5,001-10,000 employees
Oct 27, 2015
Docker v. CFEngine v. Puppet Data Center Automation v. Chef v. Ansible
Originally posted at http://technologyconversations.com/2015/08/26/configuration-management-in-the-docker-world/ Anyone managing more than a few servers can confirm that doing such a task manually is a waste of time and risky. Configuration management (CM) exists for a long time and there is no…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Outsourcing Company
8%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business124
Midsize Enterprise51
Large Enterprise166
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise48
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
See all answers
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
See all answers
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Puppet Enterprise?
Regarding the cost, I find it expensive, always. I don't know how much the license would cost per year or per user ap...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Puppet Enterprise?
I don't know what could be improved in Perforce Puppet to make this tool better for the next release. I can't think o...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Puppet Enterprise?
My main use case for Perforce Puppet is for configuration management.
See all answers
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management h...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 10% of the time
IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune Logo
IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 8% of the time
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 8% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 5% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Intune Competitors
AWS Systems Manager vs Perforce Puppet Logo
AWS Systems Manager vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Perforce Puppet Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 11% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs Perforce Puppet Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 8% of the time
BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs Perforce Puppet Logo
BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 7% of the time
BigFix vs Perforce Puppet Logo
BigFix vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 6% of the time
More Perforce Puppet Competitors
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 6% of the time
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 4% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Intune
February 2026
Microsoft Intune reportDownload Microsoft Intune product report
Buyer's Guide
Perforce Puppet
February 2026
Perforce Puppet reportDownload Perforce Puppet product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
February 2026
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reportDownload Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
Puppet
Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS
 

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?
  • Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
  • Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
  • Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
  • Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
  • Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
  • Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
  • Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
  • Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Perforce Puppet offers automated configuration management and diverse platform support through agent-based functionality, enhancing systems with real-time reporting and efficient process automation.

Perforce Puppet provides comprehensive management for both infrastructure and applications, primarily on-prem servers, enabling automation of server updates, security compliance, and IT operations. It supports Linux and is expanding to Windows, facilitating continuous checks and compliance monitoring. With robust Internet-based features, scalability, role-based access control, and exemplary community support, it streamlines processes like remote package installation, file distribution, and user creation. Using Puppet Forge modules enhances its capabilities despite its steep learning curve and reliance on Ruby and DSL. While GUI limitations necessitate command line proficiency, its integration features and high cost can be a deterrent, prompting some to consider alternatives or the community version.

What are the key features of Perforce Puppet?
  • Agent-Based Functionality: Provides real-time system management and reporting.
  • Automated Configuration Management: Streamlines server and network processes with a declarative approach.
  • Scalability: Adapts to changing infrastructure needs efficiently.
  • Puppet Forge Modules: Extends capabilities for enhanced performance.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Ensures secure and organized access control.
What benefits do users gain from Perforce Puppet?
  • Versatility in Platform Management: Supports diverse environments for seamless integration.
  • Efficiency in Automation: Reduces manual server configuration tasks.
  • Community Support: Access to a strong network of developers and users.
  • Enhanced Security Compliance: Facilitates continuous monitoring and compliance checks.

Perforce Puppet is widely adopted in industries requiring rigorous configuration management and provisioning for on-prem servers. Enterprises automate IT operations and security compliance, applying it initially to Linux servers and progressing to Windows. It aids in public configurations for nodes, enabling efficient network, package, and software integrations while automating configuration and patch management processes.

Perforce

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
  • Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
  • Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
  • Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
  • Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.
What benefits and ROI should one consider?
  • Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
  • Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
  • Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
  • Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
  • Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Los Alamos National Laboratory, GitHub, IP Commerce, Cedexis, Spiceworks, Server Density, Swisstopo, Chockstone, Constant Contact, NICS, Citrix
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Buyer's Guide
Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
March 2026
Free Report: Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.