Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Perforce Puppet vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform comparison

Perforce and Red Hat are both solutions in the Configuration Management category. Perforce is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9. Perforce holds a 3.7% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 12.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Sponsored
Microsoft Intune
Read 320 Microsoft Intune reviews
  • 30,736 Views
  • 2,766 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Perforce Puppet
Read 14 Perforce Puppet reviews
  • 1,321 Views
  • 1,176 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Read 72 Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reviews
  • 9,831 Views
  • 5,407 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Perforce Puppet and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform are competitive products in automation and IT management. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is often preferred for its robust features, particularly for comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Perforce Puppet is known for strong configuration management, efficient server provisioning, and handling complex workflows. It excels in automated configuration management, offering agent-based functionality, and strong scalability for complex environments. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is recognized for its simplicity in automation, integration capabilities, and effective management of large-scale environments. It is distinct with its agentless architecture, utilizing SSH, and a YAML-based scripting that simplifies orchestration in various environments.

Room for Improvement: Perforce Puppet could improve with a simpler initial setup process and more intuitive user interface to reduce the onboarding complexity. Enhanced out-of-the-box integrations could also broaden its compatibility with additional platforms. Red Hat Ansible could focus on reducing the initial cost barrier, improving the GUI to enhance user experience, and expanding its agentless capabilities to further simplify configurations across more networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is noted for its streamlined deployment and effective customer service, facilitating easier adoption in large environments. Perforce Puppet, although offering scalability, faces challenges with complex initial setups that might slow onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Perforce Puppet generally offers a lower initial setup cost which appeals to budget-conscious organizations, ensuring quicker ROI. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform may require a higher initial investment but its comprehensive capabilities and long-term benefits promise substantial ROI for those leveraging its full potential over time.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 883,011 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune
Sponsored
Ranking in Configuration Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
320
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (2nd), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (1st), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (1st)
Perforce Puppet
Ranking in Configuration Management
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation ...
Ranking in Configuration Management
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
72
Ranking in other categories
Release Automation (3rd), Network Automation (1st), AWS Pro Service Providers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 7.4%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perforce Puppet is 3.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is 12.2%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Configuration Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform12.2%
Microsoft Intune7.4%
Perforce Puppet3.7%
Other76.7%
Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

AkashKamble - PeerSpot reviewer
AkashKamble
Sr MacOS specialist engineer at Cyber24
Enables management of multiple operating systems with a single license
The best feature is that it's a Microsoft product, so if anything goes wrong, we get quick support for anything required. Remote system functionality allows us to sit anywhere and take control of any device via remote management. We can enhance security for clients' laptops with built-in Microsoft Defender, which is available with the Microsoft Intune license. We use it for reporting purposes through endpoint analytics. When pushing scripting, there are two types available: remediation script and reservation script. Through endpoint analytics, you can push defender policies to clients. It helps with reporting, inventory updates, and monitoring tenant status health.
Read full review
reviewer2284542 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2284542
Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Automated configuration management ensures consistent server setups
The strength of Puppet is in automated configuration management. We can configure a server once and set rules with Puppet so that future server configurations are automatic and consistent with company requests. Puppet is declarative, meaning it finds the best state for itself and corrects any deviations in the configuration.
Read full review
Manas Kashyap - PeerSpot reviewer
Manas Kashyap
DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital
Automation has transformed server patching and has reduced months of work to minutes
The best features that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers is that it does not require any additional resources inside the servers. Python is the only requirement, and since Python is already present inside the servers, we can run it from our location and it automatically deploys things and does the work for us. The minimal requirements and easy deployment have definitely impacted my daily work and my team's efficiency. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is one of the best features that we depend on. We have evaluated other options, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was the best choice because it has saved us a tremendous amount of time. We do not need to manually intervene in the servers or install third-party software to maintain these things. It is very easy to write playbooks for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Ansible Galaxy contains many playbooks that are readily available and ready to be used. It is highly configurable with Jinja templating, making it easy to maintain. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has positively impacted my organization. Previously, we needed to go into the servers and maintain them manually, which used to take a lot of time. For 200 to 300 servers, the maintenance took about one to two months. New patches would arrive and we would have to repeat the process. Now, it is a one-night work or a 10 to 15 minutes task. We write a playbook, maintain an inventory, and roll out the updates and it starts working for us. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform uses conditional clauses and has rollback options, functioning like a standard coding language that is simple to use. There is definitely a reduction in errors with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform because we have playbooks written with all the necessary clauses and rollback options. Manual work automatically creates more errors, whereas in automation, we have written sets that we do not forget every time we run it. We have protected written sets that we execute consistently.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"If the product works, remote access will be a benefit. To this point we have not had reason to have confidence in achieving that access."
"The solution has reduced the risk of security breaches by 30%."
"The main value of Microsoft Intune is better asset management from a security perspective, ensuring that the security baseline is enforced on all devices, including mobile devices."
"The solution is stable."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most useful features in Microsoft Intune are the policy enforcement and conditional access. These features make our operations easier from a company perspective."
"The feature I like the most is that we can perform remote tasks. If we want to retire or wipe out personal data or corporate data from a device, we can use Microsoft Intune remotely, and with the click of a button, data is removed automatically. Nothing needs to be done from the end-user side."
"It is helpful for managing devices anytime and any place without requiring dependency on the local networks."
More Microsoft Intune pros
"The main purpose for this automation tool would be: deploying, controlling, ordering change for the system and IT Infrastructure."
"Puppet Enterprise is a stable solution."
"Puppet3 and 4 series provides optimum deployment solutions for infrastructure and applications."
"The versatility is great."
"I rate the stability of Puppet as ten out of ten."
"Anything that we manage through Puppet always runs perfectly."
"The most valuable features are the agent, high load balancing, and overall robustness and features."
"Puppet Enterprise has good functionalities."
More Perforce Puppet pros
"It is very easy to use, and there is less room for error."
"I like Ansible's ease of use. If you have Linux skills, you can create a reusable template for the dependencies and other configurations. I can store the templates in a repository and share them with my customers or other developers. It's a popular solution, so there is a large user base that can share templates."
"It enabled me to take the old build manifest and automated everything. So when it came time to spin everything up, it was quick and simple. I could spin it up and test it out. And then, when it came time to roll production, it was a done deal. When we expanded to multiple data centers, it was same thing: Change a few IP addresses, change some names, and off we went."
"On the network side, I already have a lot of our firewall related processes automated. If it's not automated all the way from the ticket system, our network team members, our tier-one guys in India, can just go into the Tower web interface and fill in a couple of survey questions."
"Role-based access control and agentless architecture are the main features which may attract users."
"The automation capabilities streamline deployment processes, providing reliability and reducing manual intervention and errors."
"I like the agentless feature. This means we don't install any agent in worker nodes."
"It has an easy-to-use interface. It is REST API driven, and it integrates with Active Directory. It provides the ability to grant permissions to other users who would not necessarily have those permissions via the GUI so that they could run other people's jobs. For example, you could have the Oracle team grant permissions to the Linux team so that they can use each of those playbooks or each other's code. It is called shift-left."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pros
 

Cons

"There should be more support for macOS. Even though macOS is supported by Intune and Microsoft is working very hard to get more features into Intune to manage macOS, that's one thing they can give a lot more attention to."
"I think that there is room for improvement with the reporting. If this is done, it will be a better product."
"Intune should be much more granular in terms of supporting more Android cellular devices."
"We only have major classifications for iOS and Android, but there are different brands that have different cycles of updates. If they can fine-tune it to make it more brand-specific, that would be even better."
"Intune could be improved by expanding its third-party patching capabilities for a more comprehensive solution."
"Microsoft Intune needs to improve the initial login process."
"I rate Microsoft support four out of 10. Support is one area where Microsoft needs to improve a lot. I recently raised a ticket for a Microsoft Azure issue, and it took two and a half weeks for support to reply. They need to improve support across their entire catalog of products."
"The security aspect could be more effective. We are using other applications to manage network devices and groups, so if Microsoft Intune could improve in this area, especially on a network level, it would be a real advantage."
More Microsoft Intune cons
"Puppet Enterprise is more complex and difficult to configure."
"The solution has really complex code, you have to understand the Ruby language. However, once you know the code then you can move ahead without any problems."
"We would like Puppet to add more integration for applications."
"Puppet Enterprise should improve the general extensibility for places where they can't install it."
"At the beginning the initial setup was kind of complex."
"It's a bit of a pain point to make sure that everything works once we've upgraded it because Puppet has been evolving pretty fast."
"There's a lot of scope for enhancement on the DevSecOps side. They should definitely include features for compliance, for both the Linux and Windows side of the devices, as well as for network devices. Compliance is something they need to work on."
"Clients with less technical expertise may find Puppet complex to configure. Our team may struggle if technical team members leave the organization, leaving others uncertain about using the tool."
"It should support more integration with different products."
"I have seen indications that the documentation needs improvement. They are providing a "How to Improve Your Documentation" presentation at this conference."
"Performance has been an issue on larger environments, but it has gotten a lot better over the past two years."
"In Community, there's a lot of effort towards testing, standardizing, and testing for module development to role development, which is why Molecule is now becoming real. Same thing with Zuul, which we are starting to implement. Zulu tests out modules from third-party sources, like ourselves, and verifies that the modules work before they are committed to the code. Currently, Ansible can't do this with all the modules out there."
"The scalability of the solution has some shortcomings."
"There should be consistency. I know that it is always changing, but when we are trying to get some users to do something in basic Ansible that they are not really interested in doing but their job requires them to do it, they start finding inconsistencies."
"Improvements should be made in terms of execution speed, which is, I believe, the most lacking feature. Aside from that, re-triggering a failed task is another useful feature."
"If we have a problem with some file and we need to get Red Hat to analyze the issue and the file is 100GBs, we'll have an issue since we need to provide a log file for them to analyze. If it is around 12GB or 13GB, we can easily upload it to the Red Hat portal. With more than 100GBs, it will fail. I heard it should cover up to 250GB for an upload, however, I find it fails. Therefore, Red Hat needs to provide a way to handle this."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a license needed for this solution and it is either included in one of the enterprise license agreements. Microsoft licensing is a mathematical institute, it could be quite complex. We tend to ask specialized organizations to research what the most profitable way it would be for us to use licenses in the organizations."
"Microsoft Intune is reasonably priced for large organizations that already have Microsoft Enterprise licenses, but it is less affordable for smaller businesses."
"Microsoft Intune is not cost-effective as a standalone product."
"The pricing is competitive, but it is not cheap."
"It's a part of Microsoft 365 and E5 licenses. Microsoft's strategy of making every feature in Microsoft Intune paid needs optimization. Remote control is one of the basic features, not a luxury feature, yet we must pay for it. I"
"We spend a lot of money on Intune licensing, and some of our users have to be double licensed just because of how our dev and corporate environments are segmented."
"Microsoft Intune is available for individual purchase at a low per-device cost."
"The solution is cost-efficient."
More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice
"Depending on the size of the organization there is a point when the price of Puppet Enterprise should be lower. However, they provide really good functionality, features, and capabilities."
"Puppet Enterprise’s pricing is competitive."
"The main thing that we noticed when we switched from the enterprise version to the community version was the difference in cost — the infrastructure is pretty expensive."
"Puppet Enterprise can be an expensive solution for smaller businesses."
"The pricing is okay."
"We use the open-source version of the solution."
"We're charged between $8 to $13 a month per license."
"You don't need to buy agents on servers or deploy expense management when using the solution, which affected our decision to go with it."
"Ansible Tower is pretty expensive."
"It’s an open-source tool."
"The cost is high, but it still works well."
"We have to be mindful of how we use Ansible because of the licensing model. I am not saying that it is unfair or we do not find value in it. Because we are trying to automate so many different things, we have to be mindful of what we are doing and how we are doing it because we are trying to stay in compliance with it."
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user185772 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user185772
Senior Software Architect with 5,001-10,000 employees
Oct 27, 2015
Docker v. CFEngine v. Puppet Data Center Automation v. Chef v. Ansible
Originally posted at http://technologyconversations.com/2015/08/26/configuration-management-in-the-docker-world/ Anyone managing more than a few servers can confirm that doing such a task manually is a waste of time and risky. Configuration management (CM) exists for a long time and there is no…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business122
Midsize Enterprise48
Large Enterprise160
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise48
 

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?
Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...
See all answers
What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...
See all answers
How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?
Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Puppet Enterprise?
Regarding the cost, I find it expensive, always. I don't know how much the license would cost per year or per user ap...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Puppet Enterprise?
I don't know what could be improved in Perforce Puppet to make this tool better for the next release. I can't think o...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Puppet Enterprise?
My main use case for Perforce Puppet is for configuration management.
See all answers
What is the difference between Red Hat Satellite and Ansible?
Red Hat Satellite has proven to be a worthwhile investment for me. Both its patch management and license management h...
See all answers
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform was very simple. There ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 10% of the time
IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune Logo
IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 8% of the time
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 8% of the time
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune
Compared 5% of the time
More Microsoft Intune Competitors
AWS Systems Manager vs Perforce Puppet Logo
AWS Systems Manager vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 12% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Perforce Puppet Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 11% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Perforce Puppet Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 8% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs Perforce Puppet Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 8% of the time
Chef vs Perforce Puppet Logo
Chef vs Perforce Puppet
Compared 7% of the time
More Perforce Puppet Competitors
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Red Hat Satellite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 6% of the time
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
BigFix vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 4% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Intune
February 2026
Microsoft Intune reportDownload Microsoft Intune product report
Buyer's Guide
Perforce Puppet
February 2026
Perforce Puppet reportDownload Perforce Puppet product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
February 2026
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform reportDownload Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform product report
 

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager
Puppet
Ansible, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Subscription on AWS
 

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?
  • Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
  • Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
  • Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
  • Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
  • Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
  • Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
  • Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
  • Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

Perforce Puppet provides robust features for configuration management, compatible with Linux, Windows, and UNIX. It simplifies infrastructure management with automation and role-based access control, though it requires mastering command-line operations due to limited GUI.

Perforce Puppet utilizes a hub-spoke architecture to enhance automation across production environments, excelling in provisioning and configuration management for on-prem servers. Its infrastructure as code approach eases deployment and maintenance, supported by community resources for stabilization. Support for diverse devices makes it adaptable for complex configurations, but pricing and integration gaps, especially with Infosec tools, pose challenges for some.

What are the key features of Perforce Puppet?
  • Remote Package Installation: Centralized server management for remote installations
  • File Management: Streamlined file operations from a single point
  • Infrastructure as Code: Simplifies infrastructure maintenance
  • Scalability: Grows with organizational demands
  • Role-Based Access Control: Ensures secure user management
  • Device State Control: Efficient device integration and configuration
What benefits should users expect?
  • Automation Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks with hub-spoke architecture
  • Versatility: Supports multiple operating systems
  • Community Support: Backed by a stable and organized community
  • Configuration Simplicity: Simplifies and streamlines setup processes

Puppet is implemented across industries for managing production servers, especially in regulated environments. Its security compliance checks ensure adherence to required standards, while public configurations assist in device network integration. Industries benefit from its ability to streamline Linux server automation and explore expansion into Windows systems to meet cross-platform requirements.

Perforce

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations with features like a simplified GUI and extensive module support. Its agentless architecture and YAML ease make it an adaptable choice for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a robust automation framework that supports multiple environments and integrates well with various applications. Its agentless Python-based architecture facilitates efficient server management and rapid update deployment. Users benefit from centralized management through Ansible Tower, role-based access control, and dynamic inventory. However, improvement areas include documentation, API integration, network support, and UI scaling. Enhanced community contributions could address module availability and compatibility gaps.

What are the most important features of Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform?
  • Agentless Architecture: Leverages Python for seamless management without needing local agents.
  • Extensive Module Support: Provides modules for managing multiple environments effectively.
  • Ansible Tower GUI: Offers a centralized interface for easy automation management.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Ensures user-specific permissions for improved security.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects with a variety of applications to enhance functionality.
  • Dynamic Inventory: Automatically updates inventory, simplifying large infrastructure management.
What benefits and ROI should one consider?
  • Automation Efficiency: Significantly reduces manual intervention, saving time and resources.
  • Adaptability: Easily integrates with cloud platforms such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
  • Security Compliance: Automates compliance checks, ensuring up-to-date security protocols.
  • Cost Management: Lower operational costs through streamlined processes.
  • Scalability: Supports infrastructure growth without requiring major adjustments.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is used for network management, security compliance, and configuration tasks. Organizations utilize its capabilities for cloud and on-premises deployment, infrastructure provisioning, and workflow orchestration. Many integrate it with tools such as Puppet or Terraform to enhance CI/CD processes, benefiting from its agentless design in adapting to cloud environments.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway
Los Alamos National Laboratory, GitHub, IP Commerce, Cedexis, Spiceworks, Server Density, Swisstopo, Chockstone, Constant Contact, NICS, Citrix
HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank
Buyer's Guide
Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
February 2026
Free Report: Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.