Top 10 Perforce Puppet Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

13 reviews
100% willing to recommend

760 followers

Top Perforce Puppet Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Perforce Puppet based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Perforce Puppet surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with DevOps pipelines, robust version control, and unparalleled scalability, empowering teams to automate infrastructure efficiently while ensuring consistent and reliable deployment across diverse environments.

Perforce Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Perforce, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

Perforce Puppet excels in complex automation and configuration, advantageous for development-focused environments. In comparison, Microsoft Intune's integration and device management capabilities offer seamless control ideal for IT admins focused on endpoint security. Each caters to distinct tech needs and deployment preferences.

Download Microsoft Intune vs. Perforce Puppet Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, highlighting a significant contrast in initial financial investment required between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Intune, highlighting a significant contrast in initial financial investment required between the two solutions.

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Perforce Puppet excels in automation and configuration, appealing to those prioritizing streamlined integration. In comparison, Microsoft Configuration Manager offers a comprehensive toolset for complex needs, making it ideal for users seeking extensive features and robust customer support, despite possibly higher initial costs.

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Perforce Puppet Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Configuration Manager requires higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Configuration Manager requires higher initial investment.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Perforce Puppet is preferred for its affordability, configuration management, and diverse compatibility. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers superior orchestration features and ease of deployment through its agentless architecture. Perforce Puppet's pricing appeals to cost-conscious buyers, while Ansible's higher upfront cost promises long-term efficiency gains.

Download Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has high setup costs, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a more affordable initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has high setup costs, while Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers a more affordable initial setup.

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

BigFix

4.3 out of 5

Perforce Puppet appeals to tech buyers for its cost-effective automation and continuous delivery capabilities. In comparison, BigFix attracts those prioritizing comprehensive security and endpoint management, justifying its higher initial cost with superior features and scalability for extensive networks.

Download BigFix vs. Perforce Puppet Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a minimal setup cost, while BigFix involves a higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in pricing strategies.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a minimal setup cost, while BigFix involves a higher initial investment, highlighting significant differences in pricing strategies.

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

Perforce Puppet excels in configuration management and affordability, offering scalability across platforms. In comparison, VMware Aria Automation emphasizes hybrid infrastructure management and robust cloud features. Perforce Puppet appeals with competitive pricing, while VMware Aria Automation attracts those prioritizing advanced automation and cloud capabilities.

Download Perforce Puppet vs. VMware Aria Automation Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet setup costs can be high initially, while VMware Aria Automation often offers more flexible and lower setup expenses. Different pricing strategies reflect unique cost considerations between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Satellite

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Satellite

4.1 out of 5

Perforce Puppet offers strong customization and scalability, appealing to diverse IT environments. In comparison, Red Hat Satellite excels in Linux integration and enterprise support, ideal for businesses using Red Hat's ecosystem. Costwise, Perforce Puppet is flexible, while Red Hat Satellite provides robust enterprise solutions.

Download Perforce Puppet vs. Red Hat Satellite Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a higher setup cost compared to Red Hat Satellite, which offers more budget-friendly initial expenses, making implementation cost a key difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a higher setup cost compared to Red Hat Satellite, which offers more budget-friendly initial expenses, making implementation cost a key difference between the two solutions.

AWS Systems Manager

4.0 out of 5

AWS Systems Manager

4.0 out of 5

Perforce Puppet appeals to cost-sensitive buyers with excellent scripting and compliance features. In comparison, AWS Systems Manager offers extensive AWS integration, making it ideal for organizations invested in AWS services, providing comprehensive management capabilities despite higher costs.

Download AWS Systems Manager vs. Perforce Puppet Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet's setup cost is higher, reflecting its robust enterprise features, whereas AWS Systems Manager offers a lower setup cost, appealing to cost-sensitive users.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet's setup cost is higher, reflecting its robust enterprise features, whereas AWS Systems Manager offers a lower setup cost, appealing to cost-sensitive users.

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Perforce Puppet offers cost-effective configuration automation and infrastructure management, appealing to teams seeking budget-friendly solutions. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager provides robust network optimization features, making it a preferred choice for organizations needing comprehensive network management tools within well-supported environments.

Download Perforce Puppet vs. SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet involves higher setup costs, making it less budget-friendly than SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, which offers a more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet involves higher setup costs, making it less budget-friendly than SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, which offers a more cost-effective setup.

BMC TrueSight Server Automation

4.1 out of 5

BMC TrueSight Server Automation

4.1 out of 5

Perforce Puppet offers affordability and strong customer support, excelling in configuration management. In comparison, BMC TrueSight Server Automation provides advanced features and a strong security framework, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive management capabilities despite a higher investment.

Download BMC TrueSight Server Automation vs. Perforce Puppet Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a cost-effective setup, while BMC TrueSight Server Automation requires a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has a cost-effective setup, while BMC TrueSight Server Automation requires a higher initial investment.

Chef

4.0 out of 5

Chef

4.0 out of 5

Perforce Puppet excels in scalability and environment management for large enterprises. In comparison, Chef's ecosystem integrates with various cloud platforms. While Perforce Puppet offers cost-effective deployment, Chef's flexibility justifies higher costs, appealing to those needing custom automation and infrastructure as code capabilities.

Download Chef vs. Perforce Puppet Report

Pricing

Perforce Puppet has higher setup costs compared to Chef, which offers a more budget-friendly option. Chef is often preferred for cost-effective budgeting, while Perforce Puppet provides extensive features with its premium pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Configuration Management

Remote Access

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)