QMetry Test Management vs TestRail comparison

QMetry and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. QMetry is ranked #16 with an average rating of 6.0, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. QMetry holds a 2.2% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 13.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IDERA users are willing to recommend the solution.

QMetry Test Management

Read 1 QMetry Test Management review

155 Views
127 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 21 TestRail reviews

2,194 Views
1,026 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

QMetry Test Management

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between QMetry Test Management and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

QMetry Test Management

Ranking in Test Management Tools

16th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TestRail

Ranking in Test Management Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of QMetry Test Management is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 13.2%, up from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

VinayKumar17

Team Lead at Graebert India

Helped with agile testing, provides exploratory testing and screen capture capabilities but visibility of test cases could be improved

QMetry has different aspects. It provides exploratory testing and screen capture capabilities while running tests. It has a recorder integrated. If you run a test on an application, it will record every aspect of it. For example, if you execute a user scenario, it will record what the user does within the application and generate a script. This can also be used for quick automation. Moreover, if we have an automation framework, QMetry can integrate with it. QMetry can also handle load testing in web-based applications. We have integrated it with a bug-tracking system, but not for automation. It was not difficult to integrate it. This integration was mainly for reporting purposes, such as creating reports directly from QMetry.

Read full review

StuartBarker

Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities

I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best benefit was for new hires. We used to write our test cases in simple English within QMetry, so anyone who knew English could understand them. This helped with training new hires."

"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that there are various test case templates and test artifact maintenance."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run."

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."

"I use the solution for test management."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"For me, the visibility could be improved. When executing a test case, you needed to open it separately to read the steps."

"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."

"The platform needs improvement regarding performance and creating links."

"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."

"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."

"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."

"Better prediction of text."

"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"The product is not much expensive."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QMetry Test Management?

QMetry was cheaper than Xray, which was based on the number of users. It was around $10d per user, while QMetry was closer to $4 per user. So it's about half the price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QMetry Test Management?

QMetry team upgrade features based on the number of users experiencing certain problems. If fewer users encounter an issue, they may not address it. They have a different concept where feature deve...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for QMetry Test Management?

We use it for test case management. We used it to define valid and invalid inputs and to create tests for both scenarios. This involved manual testing, such as boundary value analysis and exceeding...

See all answers

What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?

I use the solution for test management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

TestRail should improve its pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 19% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 16% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

CucumberStudio vs TestRail

Compared 5% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2025

Download QMetry Test Management product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

January 2025

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

No data available

TestRail by Gurock

Overview

QMetry is a suite of most comprehensive test management products to provide agile testing teams innovative technology platforms to deploy better Quality Software faster with confidence. It has more than 20 integrations. QMetry brand is trusted by 400+ customers globally across many industries including Finance, Healthcare Services, Travel & Hospitality, Retail, Education and High Technology.

QMetry

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

IDERA

Sample Customers

Healthland, Stanford University, Solid Fire, Proteus, Epocrates, Cognifide, Exo, Holmes Corporation, Global Communication, University of Sydney

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

January 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.