Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 16.6%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
Rahul Sharma. - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task
UiPath Process Mining is as lightweight a tool as it is new. It's not able to handle a lot of logs in one go at high speed. The solution's speed is fairly good, but it should be further increased to make it more powerful to process large amounts of logs. Logs should be as much as possible. We have taken one year's and sometimes two years' logs to understand the behavior. We are not here solving small problems because a lot of money is invested. I have observed that handling a large amount of logs slows down the solution's performance. This area is improving because we are now observing a new version of UiPath Process Mining with improved speed. As a developer, I'll be happy to see that happening more quickly, and I am sure the solution is heading there.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"We find the solution to be really easy not just for development purposes, but also for its use and ability to be understood."
"UiPath Process Mining is scalable."
"Process mapping tool is most valuable tool."
"The best feature of UiPath Process Mining, compared to a process discovery tool or mining tool I forgot the name of, is that UiPath Process Mining supplies more details about your current workflow and how it influences the business, including what's the delay or roadblock. The other tool doesn't give you detailed information, so UiPath Process Mining has a significant advantage."
"UiPath Process Mining is definitely stable."
"The reporting features of ProcessGold are the most valuable. It creates things in a manner by which they can be easily represented to the business. Business can easily understand what actually happened in the process."
"We are able to identify which processes can be automated more easily, and then work with teams, thus saving a significant amount of time."
"The most valuable feature is the AI center for document understanding."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"I used to be a trainer and an instructional designer. I think the training has to be more specific — it's a little scattered."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Process Mining is that its pricing is too expensive, particularly when compared to Power Automate."
"We found that the flow chart is not very clear for some of the complex processes."
"Setting up UiPath is relatively complex. It potentially involves multiple business units. First, you need to set up the connectors. If you want to analyze enterprise performance, you will have to do enterprise connectors, which means you must deal with different system owners, security, and things like that. That can get complicated."
"The cost should be improved with variable models to help different types of users afford the product."
"Its license structure is complex."
"Integration with new technologies should be kept up-to-date so they can be adopted as they are released."
"UiPath Process Mining is not as user-friendly as Celonis."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"UiPath Process Mining is not very expensive, and that is where it beats Celonis."
"The licenses are flexible, they start once they are activated. The license is purchased annually. The cost of the solution is very good compared to other similar solutions."
"I found the pricing for UiPath Process Mining expensive when you compare it against the pricing for Power Automate."
"We pay yearly, and I believe a support fee is paid monthly."
"The pricing for the product is high. You pay a licensing fee and an additional 20% for support and maintenance."
"The product is affordable. It depends on if you are looking for some capabilities from time to time."
"The cost of UiPath Process Mining is costly but there are no additional costs in addition to the licensing fee."
"The licensing cost depends on the enterprise, and the discounts and offers available at the time. The price of the solution is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
23%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
Educational Organization
69%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Manufacturing Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Process Mining?
I would rate the stability of UiPath Process Mining a nine out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
UiPath Process Mining is positioned on the expensive tier, with enterprise-level plans being costly. Compared to other solutions such as Power Automate, UiPath is significantly more expensive, with...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
One area for improvement is the integration with legacy systems, which can be challenging, especially with older and in-house developed systems that lack good event logs. The setup for process mini...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.