Rancher Labs vs VMware Tanzu Platform comparison

Rancher Labs and Broadcom are both solutions in the Container Management category. Rancher Labs is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.3, while Broadcom is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7. Rancher Labs holds a 6.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 10.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rancher Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Rancher Labs

Read 14 Rancher Labs reviews

2,875 Views
2,731 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Platform

Read 23 VMware Tanzu Platform reviews

6,580 Views
4,277 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Rancher Labs

VMware Tanzu Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Rancher Labs and VMware Tanzu Platform compete in the realm of Kubernetes management solutions. Rancher Labs appears to have the upper hand in hybrid environment support without vendor lock, while VMware Tanzu shines in seamless integration within its ecosystem, appealing to enterprises requiring comprehensive VMware synergy.

Features: Rancher Labs is notable for its ease of deployment, management of multiple clusters, and persistent storage integration. Additionally, it supports hybrid environments and includes Rancher Fleet for continuous delivery. VMware Tanzu offers seamless integration with VMware products, provides robust management features, and supports multi-cloud environments with a focus on lifecycle management and CI/CD pipeline monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Rancher Labs could enhance stability, extend integration with tools like Longhorn, and improve observability. The upgrade process requires refinement, and advanced security features are needed. VMware Tanzu might benefit from better third-party integration, more intuitive networking controls, and reduced complexity, with pricing being a potential issue for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rancher Labs is straightforward to deploy on-premises and is supported by a robust community due to its open-source nature. VMware Tanzu is suitable for organizations firmly embedded in VMware ecosystems, offering comprehensive deployment resources and technical support across mixed cloud environments.

Pricing and ROI: Rancher Labs being open-source ensures significant ROI with minimal costs, charging only for premium support, making it ideal for smaller enterprises. VMware Tanzu is more costly, targeting larger businesses with bundled solutions like Cloud Foundry, offering substantial discounts for bulk purchases and ROI through enhanced deployment speed and operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Rancher Labs vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rancher Labs vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rancher Labs

Ranking in Container Management

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Storage for Kubernetes (2nd)

VMware Tanzu Platform

Ranking in Container Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (13th), PaaS Clouds (11th), Cloud Management (22nd), Development Platforms (3rd), Service Mesh (8th), Agile and DevOps Services (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Rancher Labs is 6.4%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Platform is 10.8%, down from 16.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Tanzu Platform	10.8%
Rancher Labs	6.4%
Other	82.8%

Container Management

Featured Reviews

RyanVassallo

Head of Systems and Infrastructure at Booming Games

Offers an open-source version along with a good UI

The product has multiple good features. One of the solution's good features is that it is the GitOps functionality known as Rancher fleet, which is used for continuous delivery. The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or on-premises, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations. The tool also has a feature that is still kind of maturing, but I think it has very good potential. This new feature is named Harvester, which is allows users to have virtual machines managed by Kubernetes engine. This is very new technology in the market. I think that Harvester needs to mature as a product, and I think that in the future, it will be very powerful. You have one tool that does many things for you.

Read full review

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

Has supported container-based deployments and improved infrastructure visibility through monitoring tools

Aria Operations, formerly known as VMware vRealize Operations, has been renamed to vROps. We are currently using this for monitoring purposes. For orchestration, we are using VCD to automate Telco Cloud. VCD is an automation tool, and we are also using VMware Tanzu Platform for the Kubernetes environment, alongside TKG, Tanzu Kubernetes Grid. These are also other solutions for the Tanzu Kubernetes environment. For Telco Cloud, we are using it to automate our company's operations, which is for a telecom company. We are familiar with these products, especially vCenter, ESXi, VCD, vCF, and vROps. It is very easy to integrate applications when we deploy vCenter and ESXi since we can enable vSphere with Tanzu feature. We can build namespaces and provide application developers the platform to deploy their applications on pods within containerization. We can easily manage, pull results, and create containers efficiently, making it a simple way to handle applications. We provide namespace labels for application developers, and we can manage their resources along with other aspects easily. Regarding security, we use many tools such as CDX and LDAP, AD for integrating our Kubernetes cluster with the developer teams. We can manage roles and permissions simply. It is very straightforward to integrate with EDX and other third-party tools, Active Directory, to the Kubernetes cluster, allowing easy access and management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable."

"A great UI with very good integrations."

"The customized deployment process is the most valuable feature in Rancher Labs."

"The most valuable feature of Rancher Labs is its user interface, which makes it easier to work with containers and deployment."

"The scalability potential is very good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is an open-source solution that is easy to deploy."

"The initial setup is simple and straightforward."

"This solution is not vendor-locked, which means that we we are able to use it across all of our resources; this feature is of great value to us."

More Rancher Labs pros

"The valuable feature I have found to be the management of Kubernetes clusters in a private cloud or public clouds, such as Azure or Google Cloud Platform."

"The most important feature of Tanzu Mission Control is its integration with the other products, especially with ESX and vSAN. This is a strong part of Tanzu Mission Control. In other solutions, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes, you can find similar features, but they don't have similar integration. With Tanzu Mission Control, you get a total solution with only one provider. You have the integration with the infrastructure, virtualization of networking, and virtualization of storage. You have a natural integration, and you don't have the problem of integrating it with different products or providers. Sometimes, different companies have good integration, but it is not always guaranteed. For example, many years ago, Cisco and VMware were good partners in networking, but when VMware started to sell ESX, the relationship was broken. This is the problem that you can face when you are using solutions from two different companies."

"We can build namespaces and provide application developers the platform to deploy their applications on pods within containerization, and we can easily manage, pull results, and create containers efficiently, making it a simple way to handle applications."

"The Tanzu platform is highly available, scalable, and flexible."

"Defining security metrics has proven beneficial for customers in maintaining a safe environment."

"We feel very good about these features."

"We never experienced any problems with scalability."

"The most important thing about the solution is its flexibility."

More VMware Tanzu Platform pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by adding more features in the dashboard, such as monitoring, scanning, and security. This would be a great benefit."

"Could be more intuitive."

"If you have poor infrastructure, you will have issues with the tool."

"The biggest room for improvement in Rancher Labs would be to have a proper upgrading plan."

"There needs to be an improvement in observability and microservice monitoring tools in Rancher Labs."

"We have found that the auto-secure feature of this solution doesn't always work, and could be improved to be more reliable, particularly when working with business critical applications."

"One area for improvement in Rancher Labs is the development aspect."

"We'd like their monitoring tool to be integrated by default."

More Rancher Labs cons

"This product doesn't have a GUI. In order to use it properly, I need to connect it to a new GUI or build a GUI to manage it — it's pretty difficult."

"It is not easy to build a solution with containers. It has a graphical user interface, but you need to have a lot of knowledge of Linux and how to work in the command mode. Its support can also be improved. Currently, its biggest disadvantage is that it is a new product, and the clients prefer to go for a solution that has been in the market for a long time. There are not that many people who know this product."

"The implementation is not easy, it is very complex and can take a day or two to complete."

"Customers have noticed a considerable price increase after VMware's acquisition by Broadcom."

"The product should support integration with Google Cloud Platform (GCP)"

"The solution's initial setup process was complex...The solution could benefit from improved customization and visibility for its users."

"Tanzu could provide more granular control over whatever networking is being done on the containers. I would also like to see a slightly more detailed view of application-level tracing. I'm referring to the connections between different microservices. If they added a service-matching feature, that would be helpful for the customers to build or be more effective."

"Addressing the high upfront costs could improve the product. Implementing a subscription-based model with tiered service options could make it more accessible to a broader range of customers."

More VMware Tanzu Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no hidden charges attached to the product unless a user opts for the premium support offered by the solution."

"The pricing of the solution sits in the mid range, not high and not low. It has a fixed price that you pay every month."

"The solution is free and open source but there is a fee for support."

"The cost is reasonable since it's open source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge."

"There is an annual subscription. The price of the solution should be cheaper and have better pricing flexibility."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved."

"Although Rancher Labs is an open-source solution, they also offer a paid version, where you buy the support when needed."

"The least expensive licensing cost for VMware is around $350 per core."

"The product is not expensive, but it is not cheap."

"One of our Spanish customers told us that VMware Tanzu Service Mesh is a very expensive product for their data center."

"Its pricing is very competitive. We get around 70% or 75%, sometimes even 80%, discount on the product. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"I would recommend that businesses look into the full price for their requirements. The price is high, but there are some open-source add-ons that can be used for customization while keeping costs down, although these might not be suitable for everyone."

"Since we were at a large data center, the price might not have been a concern for us."

"The solution is only for large or medium size enterprises because it is expensive."

"The price of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is greater than that of Red Hat's competitor solution"

More VMware Tanzu Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

43%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Rancher Labs?

The tool's UI is very convenient enough to help you manage multiple clusters in the cloud or the company, making it a product with which you can manage different clusters and locations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rancher Labs?

The cost is reasonable since it's open-source. Rancher effectively addresses container orchestration trends, especially for those with some Kubernetes knowledge.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rancher Labs?

While Rancher Labs provides some level of security, it's not considered very robust. We found it to offer basic security features, which met some of our requirements, but we also relied on other op...

See all answers

Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

It definitely gives the end customer a good overview and perspective of running applications in terms of overall workload footprint. TMC provides a very detailed description of your cloud-native ap...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Mission Control?

The price of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is greater than that of Red Hat's competitor solution. I would rate the pricing of VMware Tanzu Mission Control as four out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Rancher Labs

Compared 11% of the time

Komodor vs Rancher Labs

Compared 8% of the time

HashiCorp Nomad vs Rancher Labs

Compared 7% of the time

Docker vs Rancher Labs

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Rancher Labs

Compared 6% of the time

More Rancher Labs Competitors

Kubernetes vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Docker vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs VMware Tanzu Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rancher Labs

October 2025

Download Rancher Labs product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Platform

October 2025

Download VMware Tanzu Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tanzu Application Catalog, Application Platform, Application Service, Hub, Mission Control, Service Mesh, Build Service, Concourse for VMware Tanzu

Overview

Rancher Labs build innovative, open source software that makes it easy to deploy and manage containers in production on any infrastructure. We enable organizations to accelerate all aspects of their software development pipeline, from writing and testing code to running complex microservices-based applications.

Rancher, our flagship container management platform, allows users to easily manage all aspects of running containers in development and production environments, on any infrastructure. With well over four million downloads, Rancher has quickly become the tools of choice for teams serious about running containers in production. This includes large enterprises such as Sony, IBM, Tyco, Align Technologies and more.

Rancher Labs

VMware Tanzu Platform is designed for cloud-native development and management of Kubernetes, CI/CD processes, microservices, and containerized workloads. It supports deployments both on cloud and on-premises, providing centralized management via Mission Control.

VMware Tanzu Platform offers seamless integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN, supporting centralized cluster management and lifecycle management. The platform provides a GUI for monitoring CI/CD pipelines and network policies, enhancing multi-tenancy and Day 2 operations. Users can easily manage Kubernetes clusters, monitor applications, and integrate with tools such as GitHub, GitLab, Cloud Foundry, and Azure. It ensures compliance and security for service providers, financial institutions, and businesses.

What are the key features of VMware Tanzu Platform?

Integration with vSphere, ESX, and vSAN: Enhances compatibility and flexibility.
Seamless Cluster Management: Centralized control over Kubernetes clusters.
CI/CD Pipelines and Network Policies: Simplifies monitoring and management.
Multi-tenancy Support: Facilitates resource sharing among multiple users.
Comprehensive Lifecycle Management: Streamlines deployment and scalability.
Observability Platform: Provides enhanced visibility and control.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in VMware Tanzu Platform reviews?

Centralized Management: Simplifies operations and reduces manual effort.
Enhanced Compliance and Security: Meets regulatory requirements.
Flexibility in Deployment: Supports both cloud and on-premises options.
Seamless Integration: Works with multiple vendors and tools.
Developer-Friendly Environment: Improves productivity and innovation.

Industries such as financial institutions, service providers, and businesses requiring rigorous compliance and security deploy VMware Tanzu Platform. These entities benefit from centralized management, streamlined DevOps processes, and integrated tools, enhancing their capabilities in cloud-native developments and containerized workloads.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Albert Heijn, Bell, BMC, Samsung, WindStream, Johnson & Johnson

Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq

Buyer's Guide

Rancher Labs vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

September 2025

Free Report: Rancher Labs vs. VMware Tanzu Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Rancher Labs vs. VMware Tanzu Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rancher Labs vs. VMware Tanzu Platform report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.