Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Rapid7 InsightVM vs SecurityScorecard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Rapid7 InsightVM is valued for preventing cyber attacks, saving costs, and improving system operations despite potential enhancements.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Rapid7 InsightVM's customer service receives mixed reviews, being knowledgeable yet occasionally slow, with satisfaction varying by individual experience.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
InsightVM is highly scalable, supporting thousands of assets, adaptable to organizational needs, and ideal for extensive enterprise networks.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Rapid7 InsightVM is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues and responsive support, performing best on Linux systems.
Sentiment score
7.8
Users rate SecurityScorecard as highly reliable, 99.99% stable, with minimal issues and smooth operation reported.
 

Room For Improvement

InsightVM needs enhanced reporting, integration, and user experience; addressing false positives and support efficiency could improve satisfaction.
 

Setup Cost

Rapid7 InsightVM's asset-based pricing is competitively priced, flexible, and cost-effective for larger environments, despite higher costs.
Rapid7 InsightVM is expensive, possibly one of the highest in pricing among similar products.
 

Valuable Features

Rapid7 InsightVM is praised for vulnerability management, ease of use, integrations, and cost-effectiveness with robust features and scalability.
We have integrated our SIEM solutions and antivirus with each other through Rapid7.
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 InsightVM
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (4th)
SecurityScorecard
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Rapid7 InsightVM is designed for Risk-Based Vulnerability Management and holds a mindshare of 19.8%, up 14.2% compared to last year.
SecurityScorecard, on the other hand, focuses on IT Vendor Risk Management, holds 11.8% mindshare, up 11.1% since last year.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
IT Vendor Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

Shakeel Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
Brilliant audit report and scorecard but scans often get blocked by firewalls
The solution cannot scan third-party tools that have firewalls within them. The firewalls detect and block the solution. Conversely, Nexus is able to bypass firewalls because it has low detectability. We use Nexus when the solution cannot bypass a firewall. The solution can scan 60% of the time but Nexus can scan 90% of the time. The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results. Nexus has a good, long range and a good database for finding CVC numbers. We need this level of security detail but the solution does not seem to provide it.
Hadar Eshel - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services
Our organization relies on numerous SaaS services for critical business functions, such as CRM and monitoring solutions. In a hypothetical scenario where a security breach occurs in the CRM database, potentially exposing our data and our clients, SecurityScorecard proves invaluable. It provides a security score, typically a percentage, based on extensive data collection from various sources, including the dark web and social networks. Let's say our CRM solution receives a security score of 78%, indicating a relatively safe status according to the information gathered by SecurityScorecard. One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements. Additionally, it provides valuable insights into vulnerabilities within an organization, utilizing tools such as CVE details. For instance, it can assign a score based on vulnerabilities detected, such as 60%, and specify each vulnerability by its identifier. It offers scalability and can handle large volumes of real-time data. The continuous monitoring feature significantly enhances the ability to manage risks by providing real-time data collection on suppliers. We can observe fluctuations in their security levels over time, sometimes even every month. We can create alerts for high-risk situations, enabling organizations to respond promptly to potential security threats or vulnerabilities identified within their supplier network. The product's security ratings are helpful. While there may be occasional false positives, it does not function as a scanning solution. Instead, it presents the same information that hackers could potentially exploit. While I haven't worked with other cybersecurity rating solutions, I can attest to its strengths based on my experience. One notable advantage is their extensive data collection capabilities, surpassing many competitors in the market. They gather a wide range of information, resulting in a vast database that includes many suppliers or companies. It is easy to integrate with other tools. I rate it a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
41%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Nessus?
You have full visibility across cloud, network, virtual, and containerized infrastructures with Rapid7 Insight VM. You can easily prioritize vulnerabilities using attacker analytics. Overall, Rapid...
What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightVM?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?
The pricing of SecurityScorecard is fair. I would rate it a seven. It's a bit more on the expensive side. In Brazil, for example, making a payment to the vendor involves wire transfers and high tax...
What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
The pricing of the product needs improvement in Brazil.
 

Also Known As

InsightVM, NeXpose
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACS, Acosta, AllianceData, amazon.com, biogen idec, CBRE, CATERPILLAR, Deloitte, COACH, GameStop, IBM
TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.