Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SECDO Platform vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #69, while Trellix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5. Palo Alto Networks holds a 0.1% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
SECDO Platform
Read 3 SECDO Platform reviews
  • 369 Views
  • 72 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews
  • 3,582 Views
  • 2,760 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SECDO Platform and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) are two competing products in endpoint security. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) appears superior due to its valuable features, and users feel it is worth the higher price.

Features: SECDO Platform is highly praised for its threat hunting and incident response capabilities. Trellix ENS stands out for its advanced threat prevention and machine learning. The main difference is SECDO's emphasis on response tools, whereas Trellix focuses on preventive features.

Room for Improvement: SECDO Platform needs enhancements in scalability, user training resources, and integration with other software. Trellix ENS requires improvements in the speed of its updates, compatibility with third-party applications, and user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SECDO Platform users find deployment straightforward but encounter occasional delays with customer service. Trellix ENS has a more complex deployment process but provides prompt customer support.

Pricing and ROI: SECDO Platform offers competitive pricing and a good ROI due to its comprehensive features in incident response. Trellix ENS's higher cost is justified by user reviews highlighting its robust security features and effective threat prevention.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,476 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.0
The SECDO Platform enhanced incident response, threat detection, and operational efficiency, providing significant cost savings and improved security posture.
Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust protection with reduced threat response time and ROI, despite high costs and occasional inaccuracies.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
SECDO Platform's customer service is responsive, knowledgeable, fast, effective, and appreciated for technical expertise and courteous support across various channels.
Sentiment score
7.9
Trellix ENS support is praised for 24/7 access but criticized for delays, regional disparities, and module compatibility issues.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SECDO Platform report
They were fairly responsive and able to resolve the issue.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
SECDO Platform scales efficiently, handling increased loads and varying data volumes, suitable for small businesses and large enterprises.
Sentiment score
8.5
Trellix Endpoint Security is praised for its scalability and ease of deployment, though expertise is needed for optimal configuration.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
SECDO Platform is reliable, integrates well, detects threats effectively, enhances efficiency, and maintains stability without frequent downtime.
Sentiment score
7.5
Trellix Endpoint Security is generally stable and reliable, with deployment challenges but receiving regular updates and solid ratings.
 

Room For Improvement

SECDO Platform requires improved integration, simpler setup, seamless reporting, enhanced customer support, and better scalability for optimal user experience.
Trellix ENS needs improved compatibility, UI, performance, customization, support, integration, pricing, and automation to meet user expectations.
 

Setup Cost

Trellix ENS offers competitive pricing and value, with scalable discounts and essential features, despite not being the cheapest.
 

Valuable Features

Users praise SECDO Platform for automated investigations, seamless integration, advanced forensics, and user-friendly design aiding efficient security event handling.
Trellix Endpoint Security provides comprehensive threat protection, centralized management, and AI-driven capabilities for robust network security and usability.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SECDO Platform report
Trellix Endpoint Security seems to do a good job in terms of protecting my infrastructure from malware.
For more quotes and insights, download the Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report
 

Categories and Ranking

SECDO Platform
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
69th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Security Incident Response (10th)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of SECDO Platform is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1643085 - PeerSpot reviewer
Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth
The initial setup can be complex. I would advise users to leverage all of the access with Palo Alto, in terms of setting up with the technical account management teams. They need to ensure that what they have in mind for the product is actually going to be what happens. I have not run into any problems with deploying the product. Any of their security products are well-documented, either with open source intelligence or the documentation from Palo Alto. We had a client with less than a thousand users that received a dedicated engineer and a technical account manager that was able to walk them through the first 90 days of ownership. The support is certainly there.
Read full review
Shreyansh Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool
The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs SECDO Platform Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs SECDO Platform
Compared 58% of the time
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs SECDO Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR vs SECDO Platform
Compared 42% of the time
More SECDO Platform Competitors
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 17% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 14% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 11% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Compared 7% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Security Incident Response
April 2025
SECDO Platform reportDownload SECDO Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
March 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

SECDO enables security teams to identify and remediate incidents fast. Using thread-level endpoint monitoring and causality analytics, SECDO provides visibility into every endpoint along with the context necessary for understanding whether a suspicious activity is a genuine threat. Unique deception techniques force threats like ransomware out into the open early, and trigger automated containment and remediation.

SECDO provides the most intuitive investigation experience available so you can quickly unravel complex incidents across the organization.  You can investigate incidents detected by SECDO as well as alerts from the SIEM. SECDO visualizes the attack chain so you immediately understand the “who, what, where, when and how” behind the incident. Then, based on an analysis of exactly how endpoints were compromised, SECDO surgically remediates the incident with minimum user impact.

Palo Alto Networks

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response. 

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints. 

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Valley National Bank, IDT Corporation
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Buyer's Guide
SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
April 2025
Free Report: SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
Find out what your peers are saying about SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,476 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SECDO Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.