Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Selenium HQ vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Selenium HQ
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (4th)
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.3%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 0.6%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Abhishek-Tiwari - PeerSpot reviewer
An open-source solution that has significantly reduced costs for the company
One limitation of Selenium is that it is purely focused on web application testing. For example, if there is a webpage where we need to upload some documents or emails in the webpage and I want to automate that scenario with the help of Selenium, it will not be possible. I can not upload any documents because when I am clicking on the browser the Windows pop up will appear. It would be beneficial if Selenium HQ would develop integrated plugins, and inbuilt features, which would help us to automate Windows based applications. With the help of other third party plugins, like AutoIt, Robot Class, or Sikuli we can integrate Windows based applications. Another limitation of Selenium HQ is that we can not automate the capture part. EML processing is not available in Selenium, particularly if a website requires some capture kind of validations before logging into the application. To overcome this situation, we can disable the capture part from the application side, so we can get access to the database directly.
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development
Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is it provides support for third-party tools, such as screenshots, and automates Windows-based applications."
"The most valuable features are the ability to test and debug."
"Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to catch content from website."
"It supports most of the mainstream browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, IE and etc."
"Data parametrization and parallelization are the most important features in any automation tool."
"Selenium is an open-source tool."
"It supports most of the actions that a user would do on a website."
"The stability has always been very good."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"Visual Studio Test Pro is super helpful for my Microsoft app work."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."
 

Cons

"The most significant issue with Selenium is its difficulty in adapting to changing locators, which can hinder testing."
"Selenium HQ can improve the authorization login using OTP, it is not able to be done in this solution."
"The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing."
"The initial setup was difficult."
"They should add more functionality to the solution."
"The stop control needs to be improved with a configuration tool to enable desktop support."
"Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"The performance could be faster."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The interface should be made attractive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"I have been using the open-source version."
"The product is open-source and free."
"Selenium HQ costs around $1000 per month, which is a bit high based on what they're offering."
"The pricing is open source."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."
"Currently, Selenium HQ is free for customers."
"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."
"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
"There is a paid version of the solution as well as a community version that is free."
"The pricing is expensive."
"It is a price-effective solution"
"Users have to pay a licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."
"The product is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
Selenium is easy to install and mostly free, so there's no need for a license. This lack of costs makes it an attractive option.
What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
There are not any specific areas for improvement since there are so many libraries and frameworks already available, and we have not even touched everything yet.
 

Also Known As

SeleniumHQ
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Find out what your peers are saying about Selenium HQ vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.