Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Targetprocess comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ServiceNow Strategic Portfo...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (1st)
Targetprocess
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Value Stream Management Software (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is 5.0%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 0.6%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Srinivasa Neelapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Strategies and goals are aligned with demands and partners, making it a strategic approach for the enterprise but the finance part needs improvement
SPM is definitely strong for project management, but its finance capabilities are not as robust. While there is a separate Financial Management product, it would be beneficial to have more out-of-the-box support for finance integrations within SPM. I’m not suggesting replacing systems like SAP for finance, but there should be better support for financial integrations. Currently, connecting to SaaS solutions is complicated, and getting into detailed financial calculations is challenging. Forecasting is manageable, but handling actual financials is not as straightforward. The finance area needs improvement, specifically making finance application integrations easier. Generic finance capabilities should be more user-friendly and integrated into SPM. Although they have started this journey, it hasn’t been fully released yet. There seems to be a roadmap, and once complete, it will be very useful. Additionally, incorporating a Q&A feature for entire strategies or project demands and enhancing text analytics within SPM would be beneficial.
Use Targetprocess?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Educational Organization
39%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
The pricing is average. They always have some extra options to add. I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
If we have enough information, we can address issues from the cloud to the top level of the organization. This allows us to see if our resources are being allocated properly from an executive persp...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

IT Business Management, ServiceNow IT Business Management Suite, ServiceNow ITBM Suite, ServiceNow ITBM
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Proximus, UNT SYSTEM, SAP SuccessFactors
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.