Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SpecFlow vs TestRail comparison

Tricentis and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Tricentis is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Tricentis holds a 1.8% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 13.1% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Tricentis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IDERA users who would recommend it.
SpecFlow
Read 4 SpecFlow reviews
  • 382 Views
  • 160 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
TestRail
Read 21 TestRail reviews
  • 2,655 Views
  • 1,214 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

TestRail and SpecFlow are tools in the software testing and behavior-driven development category. TestRail generally has the upper hand in terms of user satisfaction with features, while SpecFlow is noted for its strong integration and flexibility.

Features: TestRail is appreciated for advanced reporting capabilities, test case management, and seamless integration with other tools. SpecFlow offers strong behavior-driven development support, ease of use in writing and managing tests, and effective Cucumber integration.

Room for Improvement: TestRail could benefit from better performance speed, enhanced search functionalities, and additional automation features. SpecFlow users suggest improvements in documentation, a more intuitive initial setup process, and better community support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestRail is often commended for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. SpecFlow is highlighted for its smooth integration process but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support.

Pricing and ROI: TestRail users feel that the tool is fairly priced for the range of features provided and often see a positive ROI. SpecFlow is valued for its cost-effectiveness and the significant productivity boost it gives to development teams.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SpecFlow vs. TestRail Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
SpecFlow vs. TestRail
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
SpecFlow users praise prompt, knowledgeable, and professional customer service, with clear communication and detailed guidance aiding efficient troubleshooting.
No sentiment score available
TestRail users had mixed support experiences, with some finding it responsive but ineffective, while others relied on online resources.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
SpecFlow needs better reporting, ALM integration, test data management, feature linking, chain testing, and easier setup and automation methods.
Sentiment score
6.1
TestRail users seek better integration, enhanced reporting, improved usability, faster support, UI improvements, and more competitive pricing.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
SpecFlow is scalable and reliable for various teams, though converting requirements to scenarios can be time-consuming.
No sentiment score available
TestRail is efficient and dependable for small to medium user bases, easily scalable, though minor issues may occur at larger scales.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.8
<p>SpecFlow's tiered pricing includes free Community, paid Professional, and premium Enterprise options, balancing cost with advanced features.</p>
No sentiment score available
TestRail is priced annually per user from $300 to $400, with discounts and monthly plans available, plus extra costs for on-premise.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
SpecFlow is highly rated for stability and reliability, with users noting no bugs, glitches, crashes, or freezing.
No sentiment score available
Users rate TestRail's stability highly, experiencing no significant issues, and are satisfied with its performance.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
SpecFlow enhances programming with Gherkin scenarios, easy setup, stability, risk identification, unit testing, and Microsoft integration.
Sentiment score
7.5
TestRail excels with robust reporting, JIRA integration, user-friendly interface, flexible test management, and effective real-time tracking tools.
 

Categories and Ranking

SpecFlow
Ranking in Test Management Tools
10th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TestRail
Ranking in Test Management Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of SpecFlow is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 13.1%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KreshenAmourdon - PeerSpot reviewer
An automation solution with good integration capabilities that needs to focus on providing an option for chain testing to its users
In our company, we need to maintain the scripts of the product daily, and in case of failures, we need to check out the scripts. I would recommend the product to those planning to use it based on both they are planning to build. If you are going for unit testing or small scripts, then you can go with SpecFlow. I don't have much experience with the solution. It is a good and straightforward product. It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
Read full review
StuartBarker - PeerSpot reviewer
A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities
I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Healthcare Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SpecFlow?
One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SpecFlow?
SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SpecFlow?
In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up migh...
See all answers
What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?
I use the solution for test management.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?
The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?
TestRail should improve its pricing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow
Compared 61% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs SpecFlow Logo
Tricentis qTest vs SpecFlow
Compared 21% of the time
More SpecFlow Competitors
Tricentis qTest vs TestRail Logo
Tricentis qTest vs TestRail
Compared 21% of the time
TFS vs TestRail Logo
TFS vs TestRail
Compared 16% of the time
Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail Logo
Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail
Compared 13% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs TestRail Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs TestRail
Compared 10% of the time
PractiTest vs TestRail Logo
PractiTest vs TestRail
Compared 3% of the time
More TestRail Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SpecFlow
October 2024
SpecFlow reportDownload SpecFlow product report
Buyer's Guide
TestRail
October 2024
TestRail reportDownload TestRail product report
 

Also Known As

SpecFlow+
TestRail by Gurock
 

Learn More

Tricentis
IDERA
 

Overview

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung
Buyer's Guide
SpecFlow vs. TestRail
October 2024
Free Report: SpecFlow vs. TestRail
Find out what your peers are saying about SpecFlow vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SpecFlow vs. TestRail report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.