SpecFlow vs TestRail comparison

Tricentis and IDERA are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Tricentis is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.5, while IDERA is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Tricentis holds a 2.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to IDERA’s 12.8% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Tricentis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

SpecFlow

Read 4 SpecFlow reviews

347 Views
145 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 21 TestRail reviews

2,491 Views
1,139 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SpecFlow

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

TestRail and SpecFlow are tools in the software testing and behavior-driven development category. TestRail generally has the upper hand in terms of user satisfaction with features, while SpecFlow is noted for its strong integration and flexibility.

Features: TestRail is appreciated for advanced reporting capabilities, test case management, and seamless integration with other tools. SpecFlow offers strong behavior-driven development support, ease of use in writing and managing tests, and effective Cucumber integration.

Room for Improvement: TestRail could benefit from better performance speed, enhanced search functionalities, and additional automation features. SpecFlow users suggest improvements in documentation, a more intuitive initial setup process, and better community support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestRail is often commended for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. SpecFlow is highlighted for its smooth integration process but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support.

Pricing and ROI: TestRail users feel that the tool is fairly priced for the range of features provided and often see a positive ROI. SpecFlow is valued for its cost-effectiveness and the significant productivity boost it gives to development teams.

To learn more, read our detailed SpecFlow vs. TestRail Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow vs. TestRail

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

SpecFlow

Ranking in Test Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TestRail

Ranking in Test Management Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of SpecFlow is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestRail is 12.8%, down from 13.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

KreshenAmourdon

Software Automation Test Engineer at I2era

An automation solution with good integration capabilities that needs to focus on providing an option for chain testing to its users

In our company, we need to maintain the scripts of the product daily, and in case of failures, we need to check out the scripts. I would recommend the product to those planning to use it based on both they are planning to build. If you are going for unit testing or small scripts, then you can go with SpecFlow. I don't have much experience with the solution. It is a good and straightforward product. It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

StuartBarker

Managing Director at Corecom Quality Engineering

A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities

I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira where the status of tests is not displayed (in Jira) due to I suspect security settings on the browser. In a large corporate environment, it is not easily changed. The support wasn't particularly helpful. It would be great if I could create custom reports, ideally with a tool designed specifically for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework."

"The initial setup is easy."

"One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."

"SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."

"The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run."

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."

"Integration with Confluence and JIRA."

"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."

"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."

"I use the solution for test management."

"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files."

"SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool."

"SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."

"Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow."

"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."

"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."

"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."

"This solution has room for improvement. For example, some particular projects need to adjust access or add additional members and this isn't always possible. Role-based access would improve this."

"The reports should be more user-friendly."

"It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."

"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."

"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."

"SpecFlow is an open-source product."

"My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SpecFlow?

One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SpecFlow?

SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SpecFlow?

In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up migh...

See all answers

What do you like most about TestRail by Gurock?

I use the solution for test management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

TestRail should improve its pricing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SpecFlow

Compared 61% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs SpecFlow

Compared 21% of the time

More SpecFlow Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 21% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 17% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs TestRail

Compared 8% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow

November 2024

Download SpecFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

November 2024

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

SpecFlow+

TestRail by Gurock

Learn More

Tricentis

IDERA

Overview

SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

SpecFlow vs. TestRail

December 2024

Free Report: SpecFlow vs. TestRail

Find out what your peers are saying about SpecFlow vs. TestRail and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SpecFlow vs. TestRail report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.