Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SQL Server vs Tibero comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SQL Server
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
272
Ranking in other categories
Database Management Systems (DBMS) (1st)
Tibero
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
29th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of SQL Server is 11.9%, down from 18.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tibero is 2.1%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SQL Server11.9%
Tibero2.1%
Other86.0%
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Peter Larsson - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Warehouse Lead at Resurs Bank AB (publ.)
Ledger and seamless integrations have strengthened trusted analytics and unified workloads
SQL Server's high availability and disaster recovery features work for supporting mission-critical applications, but there is much more to wish for. These features are not quite ready yet, although they do function. However, they could be significantly better. High availability and disaster recovery features should be improved in the next releases. I have noticed that everything could be improved or enhanced in the future, particularly temporal tables and window functions. Sometimes, I believe Microsoft releases features to stay ahead of competitors, but they do not make them feature-rich or feature-complete. They release something to be ahead of leaders and then seem to forget to maintain and upgrade them. I want Microsoft to pay more attention and be more mindful about the things they implement. It is fine to do a first release that works, but you cannot simply abandon it in the following years without service packs and improvements. You must continue to build on features rather than forgetting about them.
CL
Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC
A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle
We are a solution provider and Tibero is one of the database products that we implement for our customers. All applications for Oracle work with Tibero and don't need to be customized The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database. If you have knowledge of Oracle then you…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the whole solution with all its features wonderful."
"Very stable relational database management system that offers ease of management, querying, and scaling. It has well-designed databases."
"It is the latest technology and pretty powerful in terms of the high availability of the virtual server."
"SQL Server is definitely easy to use, and with the volume that we have, it's also stable."
"In Poland, SQL Server is the most popular database engine, and overall, our customers like it."
"Scalability, cluster ability, ease of use, ease of implementation — these are all great."
"SSAS is the most interesting feature to organize the data and let the users play with it."
"We are using the net for our environment. We're using the ADF Azure data factory for our analysis services, and it is pretty good."
"Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc."
"Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast."
"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."
"Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."
 

Cons

"The solution could use better governance on the management side, especially around data governance."
"It would definitely be better if SQL Server were free."
"Only one CPU core can be used. Can’t move a database between servers easily. Can’t use triggers."
"In the next releases, I would only like more enhanced backups and more restore points."
"It will be very useful to have high-level database monitoring. It should also have built-in business intelligence reporting."
"Our biggest problem with SQL Server is latency. The communication between the cloud and the on-premises environment is slow. The data needs to be encrypted for security, and you have to exchange data certificates between environments. You can adjust the configuration to improve performance, but it would be nice if SQL Server had some templates to resolve problems."
"Improvements to the indexing, columnstore indexing, and high availability groups are good improvements for future versions."
"The integration could be better. They are not open-source, so the integration with other platforms is not that easy."
"In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."
"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The enterprise-level license agreement is very complicated."
"We are on a monthly subscription and the price could improve. However, the price has worked out well in some deployments. The problem is you never know what kind of services been installed and you have to be in touch with many people, such as which servers are active or which are not. I did face a couple of issues in terms of subscriptions and the pricing model. They have improved over time."
"The product’s price depends on the specific server requirements."
"It is expensive."
"SQL Server's pricing has proven satisfactory for our market range."
"The licenses are really expensive. Their licensing model should be more simplistic."
"There is an annual license and it is priced reasonably."
"The price could be better. Aside from the basic features, if you need any additional features that can be extended, for example, if you want to connect with the heterogeneous databases, they are being managed as separate services and not included in the package. If you manage a database in Azure, it's not providing SFS and reporting services. However, on-premises, if you purchase the SQL Server license, it includes SFIS and SFRS services. If you take Postgre SQL and MySQL, they provide almost all the same features even though they are both open source databases."
"The price of Tibero is cheaper than that of Oracle."
"The overall costs are very low compared to Oracle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
883,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
39%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Government
16%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business119
Midsize Enterprise59
Large Enterprise115
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?
SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...
Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?
SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...
Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?
My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
NSPK, Indian Financial Technology & Allied Services (IFTAS), fonePaisa Payment Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about SQL Server vs. Tibero and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
883,824 professionals have used our research since 2012.