Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Trellix DLP vs Zecurion DLP comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Trellix DLP
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
18th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zecurion DLP
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
25th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Trellix DLP is 5.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zecurion DLP is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

Nishant Singh Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful in the area of data security and is easy to deploy
The negative part of the product stems from the area revolving around certain browsers. The solution does not support Mozilla Firefox. Mozilla Firefox has multiple architectures while Trellix is a product that does not support multiple architectures. When it comes to the parts where improvements are required in the product, I feel that Trellix needs to verify data through the SSL inspection process. The support team's response time during the night is an area of concern where improvements are required.
Anton Anton - PeerSpot reviewer
A next-generation DLP tool with camera detection feature
I like the camera detection feature, which other DLP tools don't have. The content discovery is similar to other platforms like Symantec, using techniques like regular expressions. It's enough for my use case. Zecurion DLP is a next-generation DLP tool with great investigation features. If someone breaches a rule, it can capture desktop screenshots and user photos as evidence. I don't need to invest in additional tools for features like watermarking.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."
"Trellix DLP has an agent that continuously scans the endpoint and sends the data to the portal. From there, it continuously leverages data from its threat intelligence."
"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."
"Trellix DLP offers many features, using EDR, EPP, disk encryption, and other features."
"It is a very stable solution."
"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."
"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."
"Trellix DLP helps handle false positives, but it depends on your configuration. It is quite overwhelming in terms of its dashboard."
"I like the camera detection feature, which other DLP tools don't have. The content discovery is similar to other platforms like Symantec, using techniques like regular expressions. It's enough for my use case."
 

Cons

"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."
"The support team's response time during the night is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."
"The bugs need improvement."
"It's not very user-friendly for a beginner, so it would be easier if the platform or console were manageable or user-friendly. The dashboard could be simplified."
"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."
"Trellix needs to improve customer support."
"Virtualization is complex and requires proper training. However, once you get trained, it is a very good product."
"One area for improvement is the lack of pre-built rules for compliance in Indonesia, so I have to define rules myself."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing depends on the number of users in a company."
"Zecurion DLP is cheaper than competitors like Symantec."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Trellix?
Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature.
What needs improvement with Trellix?
It's not very user-friendly for a beginner, so it would be easier if the platform or console were manageable or user-friendly. The dashboard could be simplified. It should improve its quality and o...
What advice do you have for others considering Trellix?
They should conduct more simulations. We have not been able to explore the dashboard fully, so it is important to familiarize ourselves with where DLP features are located and what steps to follow....
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zecurion DLP?
Zecurion DLP is cheaper than competitors like Symantec.
What needs improvement with Zecurion DLP?
One area for improvement is the lack of pre-built rules for compliance in Indonesia, so I have to define rules myself.
What is your primary use case for Zecurion DLP?
I use Zecurion DLP to protect PII in our company.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.