CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Reviews

The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers.

Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly. In the next release, CyberArk should add integration with PAM tools, blacklisting and whitelisting for applications, and adaptive MFA.

I've been working with this solution for five years.

CyberArk is stable, but upgrading or patching requires a lot of downtime.

CyberArk is scalable - we can fit it to different environments from small to large because it has been designed in a distributed way.

The technical support is quite good, but we have had issues with logs filling up and not always getting accurate resolutions.

This initial setup is complex even for small organizations and requires at least five to six days to complete, more for bigger organizations.

The cost for CyberArk is very high.

I would give this solution a rating of eight out of ten.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is used for compliance with password policies.

The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its ability to reset passwords every time that it is needed or periodically.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link.

I have been using CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for approximately five years.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is stable.

The scalability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is good. The capacity is not in high demand in the resources. When you set up a new server, you can use it for approximately 5,000 users of devices. When you buy the largest system, then you don't have to scale it anymore.

Best suited for medium to large enterprises.

I have not used the support from CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager.

The initial setup of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is straightforward.

The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive.

My advice to others is that CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not for small to medium enterprises. It is best suited for medium to large enterprises because it is not cheap. When you want to implement the password manager and your CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, you have to know what you are doing and what kind of a policy you want to implement in detail, otherwise, you will have no leverage in using the solution.

I rate CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a nine out of ten.

We use the solution as a Privilege Access Manager to manage user's passwords. 

I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good. 

The tool should be more user-friendly. 

I have been using the product for one year. 

The solution is stable.I would rate it an eight out of ten.

The product is scalable. I would rate it an eight out of ten. There are about 35 users for the solution in my company. The users are mostly sales managers. 

The product's technical support is only average. They need to improve their response time. 

Neutral

I have used ARCON before. It is not as user-friendly compared to CyberArk. CyberArk has got more visibility compared to ARCON. 

The product's setup was complex. I would rate its setup a seven out of ten. The tool's architecture is difficult. The product's deployment takes one to two months to complete. 

The tool is priced high. I would rate its pricing an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. The tool's performance is good. It is an enterprise product. 

The solution's pricing could be better.

I have been working with the solution for about six years.

The solution's technical support is good. We have a team of qualified and certified support engineers.

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.

It is an expensive solution.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

There are a lot of companies that have servers that want to monitor their members if they do something that violates their policy.

The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution.

The solution can be complex to use at times.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a lot of integrated APIs. Some of them are outdated and could be improved.

I have been using CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for approximately one year.

I rate the stability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a seven out of ten.

I rate the scalability of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a seven out of ten.

The support from CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is good.

The initial setup of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be complex. It took approximately six hours to complete the installation.

I rate the initial setup of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a seven out of ten.

The solution requires an annual license to use it. There can be some extra costs in some cases.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for this solution is to manage enterprise passwords and monitor session connections.

Prior to using this solution, we did not know where our accounts were being created. The DNS scanning is a very good tool that allows us to manage existing accounts.

While I find all of the features valuable, one of them that stands out is the DNS scanning. This provides information with respect to the locations of accounts that are created. We then get an overview of the location information. 

What I would really like to see improved is the AIM (Application Identity Manager). I think that it could be simpler to use, and much more straight forward.

In terms of additional features, I cannot think of any that I would like to see implemented at the moment.

I find the product to be very stable.

This product is very, very scalable. Currently we have about one hundred users, and we have plans to increase the usage.

I found the technical support to be good. They are always available and ready to answer questions and provide support.

No, beyond evaluating other solutions we did not use a different one.

I found the initial setup to be quite complex. You really have to pay attention to detail during the process, because any mistake will render the installation and setup useless.

For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days.

Once the deployment is complete, no staff is required for maintaining the solution. Everything is pretty much straight forward.

We take care of the implementation for our customers.

We have indeed seen a return on investment with this solution. I cannot put a monetary value on it, but it is valuable information that we are protecting. If it were to be leaked then it would result in damage to reputation, as well as a loss in confidence.

As I am the technical contact for this product, I do not have direct knowledge of the pricing. However, I can say that the licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record.

Yes, we evaluated three other products before choosing this one. They were Security from CA, BeyondTrust, and ObserveIT.

This is the number one product for privilege account security.

I suggest getting the best help available when it comes time to implement and deploy this solution. Once this is complete, everything else will fall into place.

I would rate this product eight out of ten. It is very good, but there is always room for improvement.

It has removed the need for the local admin.

It identifies the original source, and all instances of malicious applications in the environment.

Some technical admins create crazy rules, which allow the staff to run anything they want. Currently I'm reviewing our Viewfinity rules and I have noticed different kinds of rules, such as permitting any installation from "download folder." I would suggest that Viewfinity add a new feature which refuses these rules.

I've used it for four years.

There have been no issues with the deployment.

There have been no issues with its stability.

There have been no issues with the scalability.

9/10

8/10

It was complex to introduction the product to the end-users and the technical team.

We have better product management, review, and the training of our admins.

We're comparing Viewfinity to Bit9.

Keep the product managed by specialists and create global rules.