We use Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers for running SQL and Oracle DB.
Cloud Infrastructure Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The processor and management-related features are very easy to manage but it does not have the in-process memory encryption technology
Pros and Cons
- "Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers is a user-friendly solution that provides performance stability."
- "Currently, the solution does not have the in-process memory encryption technology."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers is a user-friendly solution that provides performance stability. The solution's processor and management-related things are very easy to manage. The other valuable feature of the solution is the disk mirroring and RAID 5.
It's flexible to include additional memories in the solution. It's a hot-pluggable thing where we can remove and add something without switching up the whole system.
What needs improvement?
Currently, the solution does not have the in-process memory encryption technology. All Intel and AMD processors are now integrating with their CPUs. Dell can add that to the processor so that whenever it does any processing, it will just encrypt those into the memory. That is a new technology most cloud providers are following through with right now.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers for six to seven years.
Buyer's Guide
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers is a scalable solution.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used some of the IBM Power Series to host Linux-based operating systems. We also use NetApp storage.
How was the initial setup?
The solution’s initial setup is easy.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a monetary return on investment with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers.
What other advice do I have?
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are better suited for database applications, and they support a lot of applications.
The solution's Cyber Resilient Architecture approach to security has good features like file integration and monitoring. Since a lot of ransomware and cybersecurity attacks happen nowadays, the data should be encrypted end to end. That will give more security to the customer or whoever is using it.
The solution is more suited for database applications. It gives more efficiency in processing CPUs and gives constant improvements in performance.
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers has reduced our unplanned production downtime by 5% to 10%. We have annual maintenance, where we easily do a lot of software and firmware upgrades.
Overall, I rate Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Professor at a university with 1-10 employees
Processes massive data sets and improves the performance of our targeted workloads
Pros and Cons
- "We were running out of memory, and that was the first time we heard of a solution that supports a terabyte of core memory. That was the primary reason we got the first box. We've stayed with it since then because we have so many Dell workstations."
- "Capacity and performance could always be improved."
What is our primary use case?
I work at a university in a research environment. We use PowerEdge powered by Intel servers to run geophysics simulations that stay in the system for a long time. The servers are used to image and process massive data sets. We develop code that requires a moderate amount of power, so that's why we use the racks.
We currently have between five to ten units, but some of them are down. It's mostly graduate students and a few faculty using them, and we primarily run Linux. The built-in security features aren't really an issue because everything is behind the university's firewalls. We don't have to worry about it because they have a dedicated IT security department. We can dial in from the outside, and we have all kinds of VPN solutions.
The university provides us with batteries and power supplies. They often run for more than a year without any failures, so power isn't a problem.
We are working with Intel's Xeon scalable processor, but I'm not sure which models we are using. We typically buy the most advanced processor available when we purchase the racks.
At this time, we have no plans to switch to cloud servers because it's not as comfortable as having an on-premises rack. Also, there are some security restrictions associated with some of our applications, so we can't transfer the data to the cloud. We work with a lot of data, so we prefer local resources because of the security and the speed.
It does the job for us. We know it's not a high-end product, but it's good enough. We are looking at getting another box. The next series should be 940. The step is not as big as we expected after having the 930 for several years now. We're thinking about getting another one from Dell, but I'm waiting to see what will be available. We are looking for a 4U rack, fully loaded with CPUs and disks. And we have a disk farm outside that we connect to the server, so we can store a lot of data locally.
How has it helped my organization?
We've had no problems with high-performance workloads on our Dell racks. We use the standard software like Intel compilers plus our in-house code, OpenMP, Pilot Processing, and MPI. Intel's Xeon processors improve the performance of our targeted workloads, which is crucial for us.
We buy the strongest CPUs and run the Intel compiler. We usually run heavy code, so we're working on traditional software languages like Fortran and C. These are heavy applications that run on this cluster.
What is most valuable?
We started working on Dell servers more than a decade ago. I think it was the 910 version, and its main advantage was the ability to load a lot of in-core memory into the box. It's irrelevant today because everybody can provide as much as they want, but we had memory issues in the beginning.
We were running out of memory, and that was the first time we heard of a solution that supports a terabyte of core memory. That was the primary reason we got the first box. We've stayed with it since then because we have so many Dell workstations.
Dell servers are easy to use. We've never had a problem. We do more hardware work with workstations, including adding and replacing cards. It's easy compared to what we used to do with screwdrivers years ago.
What needs improvement?
Capacity and performance can always be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Dell servers for nearly 15 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PowerEdge servers powered by Intel are highly stable. Some of them have stayed on for two years without ever rebooting. Usually, they only reboot for maintenance or something happening in the building, but it is not due to a failure of the machine. Stability is essential because we have jobs that sit on the system for a couple of days.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't used Dell's technical support much. Usually, when I have a problem, we search online for a solution. Sometimes we use the Dell knowledge base or community groups, but we rarely need to contact someone.
How was the initial setup?
Deploying the PowerEdge Rack Servers wasn't a problem. We just plug it into the rack with help from the university computer center. They let us know where to put it and connect it to the required network.
We take care of all the software, like the operating system, permissions, local security, data access, etc. This is all Linux-based, and we have experience, so it's straightforward. For maintenance, we use Dell's OpenManage console a little to tweak the configuration for performance, but we generally set up the system and let it go. We only update the operating system once a year and upgrade the environment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price is reasonable. You have to pay if you want quality. When we purchase something, we have to do some market analysis, and I haven't seen a significant difference compared to other solutions.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I'm used to Dell equipment, and the local network is mainly based on Dell workstations connected to the servers. The other servers are usually IBM and HP. I haven't seen any major difference that would justify switching to other vendors.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Manager of IT at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
We utilize them heavily, 24/7, and they never stop; very reliable
Pros and Cons
- "The management portal is essential because it gives you a lot of flexibility. You don't have to be at the location to manage the server. You can power it on and off remotely or start an installation remotely. All you need to do is connect it to the network and you can do things from thousands of miles away."
- "While I wouldn't call it a problem, physically mounting the servers into the rails that come with the servers can be a challenge. They could be engineered to be a little bit easier to use. It's not that significant, we can manage it, but you need at least two people to do it together because they're a bit heavy."
What is our primary use case?
We mostly use them for managing our testing environment. They manage a different brand of blade servers, not Dell, but the Rack Servers powered by Intel are monitoring and managing the queues that run the tests. Developers are submitting tests to the system 24 hours a day, and nodes on the blade servers run the tests. Our PowerEdge servers manage the test queues.
What is most valuable?
The management portal is essential because it gives you a lot of flexibility. You don't have to be at the location to manage the server. You can power it on and off remotely or start an installation remotely. All you need to do is connect it to the network and you can do things from thousands of miles away. That is essential when working with data centers. You don't want to be there but you want to have full control remotely.
Another valuable feature is that it's a Dell and that means it's a reliable product.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers powered by Intel for the last 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It has performed the way that we expected it to with no technical problems. I don't recall any problems with the server itself that required us to call support or get replacement parts. It does what we expect it to do.
It's stable. It's working 24/7, 365. We don't ever stop it. We have two offices in Israel, and each has two PowerEdge Rack Servers. They're monitoring our testing environment and that environment is running 24 hours a day, so the servers are very heavily utilized.
We usually keep them for four years or stretch them to five years with a warranty extension. We wreck them and have never had to deal with any problems. The PowerEdge servers we have are the third generation that we purchased for this specific role. I'm assuming the integration team that requested these models specifically is satisfied with the outcome.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We got them in a configuration that hasn't required us to make any changes in terms of scalability.
How are customer service and support?
Dell's support works. Here in Israel, Dell works with a third party that handles the contact with the customer. I don't recall if that third party handles servers, but in general, a lot of improvement is required there.
We are a corporate environment. When I call Dell support and give them my credentials or customer number, I expect the guy on the other side to understand who he is talking with. He should immediately see that I have at least 500 laptops, desktops, and more than 1,000 Dell monitors. I'm not just a private customer calling from home. I expect the service to work accordingly.
Don't ask me, "Did you reboot the machine?" or "Did you update?" We only call Dell support when we cannot solve the problems ourselves. By the time we call, we have done all the testing and all the updating. We have done everything on our side and that's when we need professional, technical support. But when we call them here in Israel, we get what seems like very consumer-oriented customer support. There is a lot of room for improvement in this area.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had HP ProLiant in the past, but we haven't used them for quite a while. Our entire organization is using Dell for end-user machines, laptops, workstations, and desktops. The PowerEdge Rack Servers powered by Intel deliver what we need. It's easier to work with the same vendor and have a unified environment.
How was the initial setup?
While I wouldn't call it a problem, physically mounting the servers into the rails that come with the servers can be a challenge. They could be engineered to be a little bit easier to use. It's not that significant, we can manage it, but you need at least two people to do it together because they're a bit heavy. You have to slide them exactly into the rails. It's a little bit challenging, but not serious.
From unboxing it to preparing the rack and sliding the server into it, connecting everything, and powering it up, it takes about 30 minutes or so.
Integrating it into a particular environment is very simple. We set up an IP, connect it, and install a server operating system. It's a very rapid process. Within about an hour, it is up and running in the environment.
What was our ROI?
In terms of handling the evolving needs of high-performance workloads, you get your money's worth. When you buy something, you need it to perform and deliver and these servers do that. It's a very good product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
PowerEdge pricing is equivalent to that of all the others in the market. We always try to get a better price, but I don't see any problem with the pricing and licensing of Dell's servers. It's not the case, when I compare them to other vendors, that they are extremely more expensive or that the licensing is much more complex.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at HP and Supermicro. We went with Dell, in part, because we are a Dell shop, but price was one of the most critical aspects. We also looked at what we needed to gain from the server. When we connected all these factors, we decided that Dell was the best solution for us.
What other advice do I have?
Before you approach procurement, you should know exactly what you are looking to get out of the product. If you're looking for a reliable vendor and performance, have all your information ready first. Then check the pricing and make sure that you have the budget. It's not like buying a PC for your home. It's a professional server and it costs. You'd better have all the information beforehand, and then you can evaluate whether the purchase of a PowerEdge is suitable for your requirements.
We don't use Dell's OpenManage console. When we need to make changes that don't directly apply to the operating system but to the server itself, we only go into the iDRAC management interface and do it from there on.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Lab Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Architecture enables quick replacement of parts, but server health info should be displayed on the front
Pros and Cons
- "For us, the most valuable feature is the iDRAC. It helps us to solve problems when a server is stuck or hung or we don't have any network access."
- "I would like to see more information about server health and the server's state, on the front. HP has a little screen that shows server utilization, how many disks there are inside, and the power consumption. HP also shows an alert if there is a malfunction of any device inside."
What is our primary use case?
We have a 1U and a 2U PowerEdge Server. We're using them to scale storage devices. They provide a platform for our software that involves managing multiple, high-speed disks. We're using them to connect Mellanox and Intel NICs, which are very fast network interfaces.
What is most valuable?
For us, the most valuable feature is the iDRAC. It helps us to solve problems when a server is stuck or hung or we don't have any network access.
It's also easy to deploy new firmware or a new update to the servers remotely.
We're also able to manage multiple servers in one place.
Also, the way the hardware is architected, you can replace parts in no time. It's very quick and easy to replace a fan, disk, CPU, or insert a new card into the server.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see more information about server health and the server's state, on the front. HP has a little screen that shows server utilization, how many disks there are inside, and the power consumption. HP also shows an alert if there is a malfunction of any device inside. Those kinds of features would be useful for Dell customers.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers powered by Intel for about seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers powered by Intel are very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is a bit of a downside because of our technology. In our environment, the scalability comes from the network and not from adding another server. We are adding a lot of NVMe devices and when we reach capacity we need to add another server. This is what determines the scalability.
How are customer service and support?
Dell provides very good support. It's very fast and they answer in a professional manner. That's what I need.
I would rate their support at nine out of 10. It's not a 10 because they have to improve by answering even faster. They also need to give local distributors more permission or to provide hardware parts faster. If you have a malfunction with the device, you usually have to send it abroad, and they investigate it and then bring it back. That takes a long time.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We are currently using Lenovo, AIC, Tyan, and Quanta servers in addition to the Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers powered by Intel, because we need some OEM equipment to reduce the cost. PowerEdge has a high price tag. The price is a critical factor in our company. We don't have a lot of budget for acquiring servers and that is why we look at other vendors.
But the flexibility of the PowerEdge servers and the approach to resolving problems really quickly make it more convenient to work with. I like working with PowerEdge. Solving a problem on a PowerEdge will take, say, a few minutes, while with the other vendors it will take 10 to 20 minutes to investigate and debug the problem.
What other advice do I have?
We are using both Intel and AMD technology with our Dell servers. We are comparing the performance of both. While there are some issues and challenges on the Intel side in some areas, the overall impression of the Intel technology is that it is working well. I expect we are going to use it for the next few years.
The Dell platform works very well. We are very happy with it. If price isn't a concern, I would recommend Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Platform Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Good performance, intuitive user interface, and helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "The real advantage to Dell when I look at some of the other competitors is the support."
- "I've had some trouble where the customers are not happy with the Toshiba drives, and it's a challenge when it comes to specific requests for Dell to a non-deviate, and only use Seagate drives."
What is our primary use case?
We are a solution provider and this is one of the products that we implement for our customers. Their use cases can be everything from storage to simple computing to network traffic analysis. We have a lot of customers that just do everything with these servers, and it's difficult to keep track of.
We will architect and help the customer identify the best solution for their software, and then essentially modify whatever they need. This might include adding cards, deploying their software onto the server, and then managing their inventory.
How has it helped my organization?
PowerEdge is good when it comes to dealing with the evolving needs of high-performance workloads that our customers have. Whatever software they're developing seems to be able to take advantage of it.
The system's management frameworks have enabled at least one of our customers to progress toward full automation. Their internal scripting works with automation, which means that they can leverage the tools that Dell has created and merge them with their own software. This is something that's benefited them.
What is most valuable?
iDRAC is one of the most valuable features, as well as having BMC.
The real advantage to Dell when I look at some of the other competitors is the support. The support is better than Lenovo and HP. For example, it's much easier to get replacement components, and we can get service out to customers as quickly as possible. There aren't as many hoops to jump through. It's just not as challenging. This is one of the big reasons we stick with Dell.
The iDRAC telemetry for monitoring PowerEdge system data and providing analytics is a good feature. We have a lot of the sensor data that we capture, and it's very useful to our customers. Being able to pull that out and tell them the consistency of their product is a good value-add to sell.
What needs improvement?
The big problem that we have at the moment is with the supply chain. If it were more realistic then we'd probably be able to expand some of these systems a little bit more. This might be more CPU options, different memory, or overall consistency.
Certain customers have requirements that they prefer. I've had some trouble where the customers are not happy with the Toshiba drives, and it's a challenge when it comes to specific requests for Dell to a non-deviate, and only use Seagate drives.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers for approximately 14 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This product seems stable to me. Compared to products from other vendors, I don't have as many problems with them.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
From a scalability standpoint, getting more systems or expanding capacity has never really been an issue.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate Dell's technical support a nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Compared to other solutions, Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers are very good.
In general, the user interface on Dell's products, including iDRAC, is a little bit easier and more intuitive than those of competing solutions from vendors such as Lenovo and Supermicro.
What was our ROI?
Our customers have seen a return on their investment with this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for PowerEdge servers is reasonable. Our customers continue to purchase them from us. When it comes to pricing, often our customers are doing the work for us. They compare pricing and costs against other hardware vendors to see who is going to come out on top. More often than not, they choose Dell.
What other advice do I have?
We do a little bit of support for our customers, depending on the contract that we have with them. When there is a problem with a sever, some people just want to replace it immediately. They don't really care about trying to replace single components. They just want to get their server up and running, so they swap it out. It's very much done on a case-by-case basis.
My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is that it's the support from Dell that really makes things easier for us. There is always a little bit of movement when it comes to the costs and getting the numbers where they need to be. But, at the end of the day, dealing with Dell means it's easier to support a customer, especially with critical response times. This is something that's been really beneficial for us.
Overall, this is a good product, and judging by the feedback from my customers, there are very few additional features that they want or need. Dell seems to have done a pretty good job with what is currently released.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Web Design, IT & Organization of Art Events at Fluor Corporation
Compact and reliable storage solution that supports high performance workloads
Pros and Cons
- "PowerEdge Rack Servers offer good performance in handling the evolving needs of high-performance workloads and offer good value for money."
- "The security of this solution could be improved. We have very specific needs as an engineering company and require multiple layers of security. This is not offered when implementing the Dell hardware."
What is our primary use case?
We run the 900 and 700 models.
How has it helped my organization?
PowerEdge Rack Servers powered by Intel offer good performance in handling the evolving needs of high-performance workloads and offer good value for money.
The Intel Xeon scalable processor has helped to improve the performance of our targeted workloads. Dell's OpenManage console is easy to use.
PowerEdge Rack Servers has affected the overall flexibility of our operations. We are able to build our data centers with multiple clusters, and that provides sufficient scalability for us to do bigger deployments.
What is most valuable?
The support that you receive from Dell after buying this product is very valuable.
What needs improvement?
The long lead times in receiving hardware could be improved.
We have experienced issues with memory. We received help from the Dell team and this has been resolved.
The security of this solution could be improved. We have very specific needs as an engineering company and require multiple layers of security. This is not offered when implementing the Dell hardware.
Dell's OpenManage console is easy to use but could be better by offering additional features. The console has not decreased the time it takes to deploy new data centers.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using PowerEdge Rack Servers powered by Intel for over 15 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service for this solution is very good. I would rate it an eight out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have used different solutions including Lenovo. We currently use Dell for all of our needs from our user hardware to our infrastructure data center.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. We had 10 staff members involved in the deployment. The server bill team set up the hardware and the DMR team ran the virtualization layer over it. The security team completed the checks. We have about 55,000 users supported by this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing is expensive and inflexible.
What other advice do I have?
For anyone looking for a reliable storage solution, I would recommend PowerEdge.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Vice President, Purchasing at Alltrade Ltd.
The solution provides great value and reliability for the price
Pros and Cons
- "The biggest value of PowerEdge servers is that Dell is a brand name. I also appreciate the flexibility of the platform. I know how to configure PowerEdge servers and build a solution from scratch."
- "Dell could increase the training. My ability to use the product improved vastly once I became more knowledgeable about it. The sales desk and presales service could also improve."
What is our primary use case?
PowerEdge servers are used in banking, finance, tech, service, and academia, covering the full range of applications.
What is most valuable?
The biggest value of PowerEdge servers is that Dell is a brand name. I also appreciate the flexibility of the platform. I know how to configure PowerEdge servers and build a solution from scratch.
What needs improvement?
Dell could increase the training. My ability to use the product improved vastly once I became more knowledgeable about it. The sales desk and presales service could also improve.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used PowerEdge servers for 10 to 12 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PowerEdge servers are highly stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PowerEdge servers scale well. I make tailor-made solutions for my clients, and I can build the capacity as much as they want. If they need storage, I can choose a rack server with a lot of hard drive space or a GPU with a high capacity.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
PowerEdge provides great value and reliability for the price.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers nine out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Last updated: Sep 25, 2024
Flag as inappropriateStorage & Data Protection Team Leader at TeraSky
Better than other solutions in terms of heat and power consumption
Pros and Cons
- "PowerEdge is flexible and adaptable. You can you can build whatever you want from it."
- "The GUI could be improved. I primarily work with the command line, which enables you to do many things faster."
What is our primary use case?
We use PowerEdge servers for backup and VxRail.
How has it helped my organization?
PowerEdge is flexible and adaptable. You can you can build whatever you want from it. It's used for Data Domain and many other purposes. Since Dell purchased EMC, you can use it for most solutions. It's better than other solutions in terms of heat and power consumption. PowerEdge servers reduce unplanned downtime for our clients.
What is most valuable?
It's easy to install. The GUI is user-friendly. Everything is well organized, and you can see everything. You can do the command line remotely. I've done 20 servers in bulk.
What needs improvement?
The GUI could be improved. I primarily work with the command line, which enables you to do many things faster.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used PowerEdge servers for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PowerEdge servers are highly stable. I haven't experienced any failures, and updates resolve all bugs.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We primarily use PowerEdge for other solutions, and the software combines everything. PowerEdge is a node in a bigger solution.
How are customer service and support?
I rate Dell support nine out of 10. We did not use professional services for deployment, but we contact support when we have issues we can't resolve ourselves. They are cooperative, and if the frontline support can't answer our question, they escalate it, and we get an answer later.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
PowerEdge servers are easy to install.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers eight out of 10. It has all the features our customers need.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Last updated: Sep 25, 2024
Flag as inappropriate
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Popular Comparisons
HPE ProLiant DL Servers
Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers
IBM Power Systems
HPE Apollo Systems
Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers
Intel Server System
Oracle SPARC Servers
Huawei FusionServer RH Series Rack Servers
Dell PowerEdge FX
Dell PowerEdge XE Servers
HPE Moonshot
Dell XR2 Rugged Server
Lenovo Edge Servers
Huawei KunLun Mission Critical Server
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What is the biggest difference between Dell EMC PowerEdge Rack Servers and HPE ProLiant DL Servers?
- Dell EMC PowerEdge Rack Servers vs IBM Power Systems: which product to choose and why?
- When shopping for a rack server, would you go with Dell EMC Poweredge or Lenovo Thinksystem?
- Does anyone have statistics on how often a fire occurs in a computer room?
- Are there any comparisons of HPE & Cisco servers using Benchmarks?
- When evaluating Rack Servers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What's the 2018 Market Outlook for Companies Selling Rack Servers?
- Why is Rack Servers important for companies?