What is our primary use case?
I have implemented a couple of Dell PowerProtect Data Domain at the premises and we have integrated that appliance with Veeam backup solutions only.
Apart from that, I already worked on Avamar which was earlier part of EMC.
The cost is high now due to things such as SSD and memory prices being high in the current time. Earlier it was good and it would have been the best fit in the customer budget. So due to international price increases for the memory and the SSDs, it is currently a little bit costlier than the earlier one. But it doesn't matter. If we have an enterprise customer and their data is critical for them, then I think the price being high or low doesn't matter.
What is most valuable?
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain has a protocol which is a very good protocol. With the help of that particular OST protocol, we can take the backup in a very fast manner over the FC. That appliance is very good in comparison to HP StoreOnce. We can restore the data in a very minimal time because the data is transferring over the FC protocol, which is 32Gbps. I always recommend it to others who have huge data and they are continuously taking the backup onto external devices.
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain data backup transfer throughput and deduplication are exceptional because it works on the variable blocks. When we are using variable blocks, we can take the backup in a very fast manner and then we can save the storage space due to the deduplication functionality. The deduplication is very good, with a 20:1 ratio of deduplication, which is not available in other solutions such as HP.
The benefit of Dell PowerProtect Data Domain is that we are storing the data in a very small footprint. Huge data can be stored in a very small storage capacity because the deduplication and the compression ratio is very good. This is the beauty. We do not need to spend more money, and then we can achieve cost saving at the drive level.
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain is a perfect solution. I don't think we have to make any improvement to it. It is completely perfect for the enterprise-class customers. It is not meant for the smaller customer. When the data size is huge, it is always good for them to store the data in the terabyte or petabyte form.
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain can be integrated with other third-party backup software. We can integrate it with Commvault, we can integrate it with Veritas, we can integrate it with Veeam backup solutions, or Dell's own solution as well. It is a very good solution to integrate with others.
It is reducing the backup window since the backup transfer rate is very high, so we can complete the backup in very minimal time. The data is always transferring in a very fast manner over the iSCSI, FC protocol, iSCSI protocol, NFS protocol, or CIFS protocol as well. It depends on the customer environment. It can be easily fitted in their environment and then transfer the data for a shorter period of retention and a longer period of retention.
The data reduction policy is supposed to be 20:1. It is supposed to have a very good deduplication and compression ratio.
What needs improvement?
I think we have to involve the immutability functionality within the system so that we can use these storage boxes for the immutable purpose to store the data for a longer period of retention and to protect from ransomware attacks.
For how long have I used the solution?
I'm working on Dell PowerProtect Data Domain since approximately eight years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I think because it is a secondary storage, the downtime doesn't matter, because it is always available. It is a backup appliance only. Critical workload is not running on it. The critical workload always runs on the primary data storage, which is basically PowerMax or PowerStore. If it is not available, then it is a backup solution. Whenever it is available, then we can restore the data. I have not faced any challenges in the past with Dell PowerProtect Data Domain such as shutting down or stopping.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We can easily scale. We just have to get the capacity-based license for Dell PowerProtect Data Domain from Dell, and then we have to add disks to the physical appliance. If the physical appliance disk is full in that array, then we have to add another array and then put the disk within that particular array system. It is very easy to scale up to petabytes.
How are customer service and support?
It is fantastic. We just have to raise a ticket, and immediately, we can get the response from them. There is no challenge with that.
For Dell PowerProtect Data Domain support, I will assign a nine for the support. Sometimes, earlier there was an issue where we had to call to the A&T and then we had to connect to Dell. Nowadays, we can connect directly to the Dell team and in a very minimal time, we can get the support from them.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I worked on PowerStore as well.
How was the initial setup?
It is not complex. It is very easy. Nothing is tough in doing the setup of Dell PowerProtect Data Domain. Basically, we just have to access the Dell PowerProtect Data Domain appliance through the URL, then we can integrate it with any backup solution. It is not a complex solution.
What about the implementation team?
We are getting the complete ROI. As I mentioned earlier, with the help of deduplication and compression, we have to invest less money than with other competitors. If the number of days or the footprints of the data are less than others, then obviously we can get the best ROI in that kind of situation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
This is very good and it can be integrated with any third-party backup solution. I always recommend going with it if the customer is an enterprise customer or it is basically a big SMB. I always recommend going with Dell PowerProtect Data Domain and then you can keep the last retention on to tape devices or some others for the longer period of retention. But initially, we have to keep the backup on Dell PowerProtect Data Domain. I always recommend that to others.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The pros are much more than the competitors. There is another competitor that is ExaGrid. The cost of the ExaGrid is a little bit lower than Dell PowerProtect Data Domain. That is the con. They have to reduce the cost. But when you talk about the deduplication and compression ratio, then obviously Dell PowerProtect Data Domain is at the highest level. We can get the highest level of deduplication and compression and then reduce the footprint. If we reduce the physical footprint, we can save money and we can save energy. These are basically the pros of Dell PowerProtect Data Domain. Apart from that, when we have to compare it with StoreOnce, then again, it can be integrated with other protocols apart from Catalyst. Catalyst is the main core protocol which is basically part of HP StoreOnce. Dell PowerProtect Data Domain can be more feasible to run with any other OEM backup solutions.
What other advice do I have?
We are using Dell PowerEdge server, which is a rack-based server, that is 760 and 760xs, and some servers are 660 and 660xs as well.
I work with the physical Dell PowerProtect Data Domain boxes. There are multiple versions. It is available in the VE format, which is a virtual format. Another one is the physical appliance. For the testing purpose or for the POC, we can use the VE version. If the data size is not huge, then again, we can use the VE version, which is a virtualized appliance. If the data size is heavy, then we have to always recommend going with the Dell PowerProtect Data Domain physical appliance only.
I would rate this product a ten out of ten.