Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Dell Avamar vs Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell Avamar
Ranking in Deduplication Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
87
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (12th)
Dell PowerProtect DD (Data ...
Ranking in Deduplication Software
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Disk Based Backup Systems (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Deduplication Software category, the mindshare of Dell Avamar is 8.9%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is 29.1%, up from 29.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Deduplication Software
 

Q&A Highlights

it_user113067 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 11, 2016
 

Featured Reviews

Sebastien Chene - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 30, 2022
Stable, integrates well with other solutions, and has a good price, but its UI needs a refresh
What would make Dell Avamar better is if it can do faster backups because right now, PowerProtect Data Manager is better in this area with its new UI and a new way to implement backups. Customers nowadays also expect more up-to-date solutions, and this is another area for improvement in Dell Avamar. It's not as up-to-date, so I'm counting on PowerProtect Data Manager, but customers who have Dell Avamar don't want to switch because you don't have as many backup problems in Dell Avamar compared to other solutions. What I'd like to see in the next release of Dell Avamar is an updated UI and a different way to manage backups because currently, backup management is a bit heavy for customers using Dell Avamar.
GopalSetia - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 2, 2024
Provides backups, including long-term retention with increased uptime and compatibility
I was looking for a virtual edition, and that is now available. Many customers struggle to find a solution for ransomware protection, but we can set up an enterprise recovery vault for that purpose. These features are now part of Dell's overall offering. The solution has matured, and while I don't criticize technology, most of our technical and business requirements are met with the Data Domain storage solution. We can meet customer requirements easily with Data Domain. Some feedback has been received from our operations team. There’s always room for improvement. For instance, there may be suggestions regarding enhancements to the reporting dashboard

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is one of the best solutions for backing up Oracle and other servers."
"We used Dell Avamar for backup and recovery of a virtual environment."
"The fast backup and recovery and the Full Backup features are valuable."
"The setup is very easy."
"It's stable and offers good performance."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The performance of Dell EMC Avamar is good."
"The entire system operates seamlessly, with minimal hands-on involvement, allowing us to focus on monitoring rather than constant adjustments or deployments, as seen in larger, more dynamic environments."
"It is a stable solution."
"The product, a disk backup solution, improves our data application tasks. We used tape libraries with Dev drives in legacy architectures, resulting in slow backups compared to modern drives like NVMe and SSDs. By transitioning to NVMe and SSDs, backups have become much faster. The tool's backup restoration is faster compared to other tools."
"Dell PowerProtect DD is a stable solution."
"The product provides good backup and compression services."
"The features that I have found most valuable with Dell EMC PowerProtect DD are its deduplication feature and its DD Boost protocol for fast transfer, which is amazing."
"It's very easy to use the domain once it's been set up. The interface is also user-friendly."
"The licensing model is the most valuable aspect of Dell PowerProtect DD"
"It is very fast as compared to the other competitors. Its simplicity and bit rate are also valuable. It takes less time if we compare it with the old solution that we have."
 

Cons

"The solution should improve its tape-connectivity features."
"It's not the best solution for big databases."
"More integration would be helpful, as well as the addition of more applications."
"It is very scalable, and that's its claim to fame, but that also makes it hard to make changes. Anytime there is a large piece of software, changing that piece of software is harder. You've got a larger install base, so you can't just rapidly change. We also use another product called Veeam, and it has this new feature called Continuous Data Protection, which basically lets you get very close to the way the system was in time. We have a system or two up there on which we have set 10 minutes Continuous Data Protection. So, we can roll it back to whatever it was 10 minutes ago, 20 minutes ago, or 30 minutes ago. This feature doesn't exist in Avamar Data Domain. That's the one feature I'd like to see first."
"I think they could also move more towards cloud solutions. It already has some cloud tiering, but I think that could be more extensive. They should work with all cloud providers and I think in the future they will be on all cloud platforms."
"Avamar is dependent on the hardware. It can't be implemented with ordinary storage. It can only be implemented with an EMC product. We want to have a backup solution that allows us to use independent storage and other hardware. It would be good if they can simplify its technology and make it possible to implement it with another storage. This is probably not possible because Avamar is an EMC product, and EMC would like to sell its own products."
"If you need to pull data out of it to offload to tapes, that's messy. You have a mechanism for it, but it is painful."
"If you don't have DPA, the reporting features are not as user-friendly, so reporting is something that they can improve on."
"The licensing is not cost-effective, and the pricing could be better."
"EMC is very expensive for small customers."
"The usage of this solution is a bit difficult to develop processes, and it takes a long time to market permits."
"I would like to see some kind of integration with the ransomware in the next release."
"Installation and deployment for this product need improvement. These processes need to made easier. Currently, it's not an easy installation for customers. This product needs to be installed by professionals."
"The pricing should be adjusted. Customers continuously talk about the price. They know it is a good solution and they really need the type of storage the solution offers, but it costs somewhere around $100,000 and up. It's not cheap, but it's very important for data vendors."
"Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) is expensive. Also, it has a sort of a big physical footprint that data domains have, and that's part of the problem."
"When you use Data Domain, you have to have at least 20% free space so it can work properly. Sometimes we struggle with that, because we wanted to use all the free space, but then Data Domain becomes really slow. I understand that 20% is needed to process all the data, and doing the duplication and compression and all that, but it would be a big improvement if they did not require that 20%, because it is just too much to have available."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"Dell Avamar is free when we deploy the data protection. When we order data protection, this software is included in the hardware."
"The cost is high."
"Its price should be reduced. It would be good if you could pay as per usage, and there is a subscription model like VMware. There should be some flexibility because sometimes, the customer only uses the backup for one month or three months. Currently, I have to pay whether I use it or not. Its licensing should be flexible and based on consumption."
"The price of this product should be lower."
"It was approximately $70-80,000 when it was under support, but right now EMC has not been supporting this product for two years."
"When it comes to competition the price is not what is important, it's not the problem."
"It's a very high-end solution and comparable to Rubrik and Cohesity."
"The price is really high compared to other vendors. The licensing cost is huge. Normal, mid-tier companies or small-scale companies wouldn't be able to afford it easily."
"We usually buy products at the end year, and the license is included."
"The price of the solution and support for Dell PowerProtect DD is expensive. We have customers that cannot upgrade to a newer version of the solution because the support is too expensive."
"The price may be a bit higher than other products in the market, but you will receive ten out of ten support with next-business-day delivery on parts' availability."
"If we do not move to the cloud solution and stay with our on-premise version we will miss some new features."
"Its price is reasonable."
"The yearly subscription is very affordable for our customers, but the price could be a little cheaper overall."
"It could be more competitively priced. Its licensing was for five years. Obviously, the support will get renewed at some stage, but that's it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Deduplication Software solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

it_user113067 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 11, 2016
Feb 11, 2016
Avamar supports Extended Retention Media Access nodes -- A Media Access node exports backup data from an Avamar server to a tape library (physical or virtual) for long-term retention purposes. It has an HBA port that allows a tape device to be connected directly to the node via fiber-optic cable. It is not part of an ADS Gen4S server (not connected to the Avamar system’s internal network).
2 out of 4 answers
RI
May 18, 2014
TSM? Druva?
it_user8967 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 19, 2014
http://www.hds.com/products/storage-software/hitachi-data-instance-manager.html
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Dell EMC Avamar and Dell EMC NetWorker?
From the very beginning, Dell EMC NetWorker considers users and those who might potentially become users. In terms of both pricing and setup, this product offers an experience that is significantly...
What do you like most about Dell Avamar?
Easy to configure and highly reliable for backup.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC PowerProtect DD (Data Domain)?
There are many different licenses, so you pay for what you need. There are various aspects you can add on, like extra speed, or something just for reading data. There are licenses to do replication...
What needs improvement with Dell EMC PowerProtect DD (Data Domain)?
Nothing comes to mind in terms of improvement. It serves its purpose. That said, if they could develop higher algorithms to make it more efficient, that would be great. Usually, with the backup, th...
 

Also Known As

Avamar
DataDomain, Dell EMC Data Domain, PowerProtect Data Domain
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Dodge County, St Laurence's College, FieldCore (a GE Company), Comanche County Memorial Hospital, Getronics, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Cincinnati Bell Technology Solutions
The US Army, City of Houston, Lloyds TSB, TiVo, Teck, Ingram Entertainment, The New York Mets
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Avamar vs. Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.