It is very powerful, it is a lot easier to use and the new version has a very nice look and feel.
It also has the ability to simply create a dashboard and the data module lets you easily create many data models.
It is very powerful, it is a lot easier to use and the new version has a very nice look and feel.
It also has the ability to simply create a dashboard and the data module lets you easily create many data models.
We have the ability to create reports that monitor the organization in a very easy way.
I have used it for one year.
I have not encountered any stability issues.
I have not encountered any scalability issues.
Technical support is 8/10.
I did not previously use a different solution.
Initial setup was straightforward, especially with the new version.
The price is very low for the SaaS edition.
Before choosing this product, I did not evaluate other options.
It can do anything; you just have to study it a bit.
We use it for financial purposes, and simple reporting.
It's compatible with the whatever applications we have. That's why we got it.
The scheduling and reports.
It should be more user-friendly.
Stability is good.
Scalability is okay.
Not very good because we didn't get a deep, back-end partner fit.
The most important criteria when choosing a vendor would be that the product is the very user-friendly and that we can upload the files into the system for reporting purposes.
I give this solution a rating of five out of 10 because it's not very user friendly.
The product’s most valuable feature is the open environment where we can build from scratch without too many constraints on calculations because that allows us to have extensive customization.
I implement projects using the product, and every time we implement we end up discovering a lot of unaccounted cash that was either being paid to the wrong person or extra money being paid which was unaccounted for. This helps auditing the sales personnel's incentives and also analyzing what incentives show a correlation to an improved performance.
I have used it for 4+ years. I am certified in this tool and I primarily work on implementing this tool (among others) for various organizations’ ICM needs.
I have not encountered any stability issues.
I've encountered issues where calculation runs took upwards of six hours because of data storage and build issues.
Technical support is excellent.
I did not previously use a different solution.
It's simple enough to install because IBM takes care of initial setup.
Callidus is usually this product’s competitor.
The product is as good as the team implementing it.
Workspace Advanced and Workspace are very intuitive and simple to use for a basic user.
It improved sales monitoring, the enterprise business unit performance (costs, revenue, human resources, etc.) and other financial aspects. It also improved the responsibility for the data input into the transactional applications.
Report authoring is sometimes difficult for authors without specific computer knowledge with regard to concepts related to database, i.e., join, union, etc.
I have been using IBM Cognos BI since version 10.0 in 2012. IBM Cognos BI 10.2.2 was released on December 2014. So, I have been using IBM Cognos 10 for four years.
I have not encountered any stability issues.
I have not encountered any scalability issues.
I rate technical support 7/10, because the first help response is fast, even if the whole resolution of the problem might be slow. In any case, tech support is good.
I did not previously use a different solution.
Initial setup was simple. YouTube is a rich way to learn tips & tricks.
I'm a Cognos consultant. I work using only this solution.
The Cognos Analysis Studio and Cognos Query Studio user interface has room for improvement in the area of user experience. Some of the functions are hard to find and complicated to use, but we're talking about advanced functions rarely used.
I have used it for two years.
The product is very stable.
The product offers enough capabilities for a proper scalable setup.
Technical support is adequate.
We previously used Oracle Discoverer. Cognos' HTML user interface was the main reason we switched.
Initial setup is straightforward, with minor problems in the area of configuring data source connectors. Because the product uses a JDBC data interface, the administrator needs to be familiar with JDBC.
The licensing model had changed from the past and currently needs more flexibility in the area of advanced users. Other products make no difference between the user types. The licensing model should be usage based.
QlikView and Oracle OBIEE were tested.
With Cognos we are able to present and analyze the KPI's and outcomes our hospital needs to take decisions.
7 years.
No issues encountered.
No issues encountered.
No issues encountered.
Moderate,.
Technical Support:Good.
No previous solution used.
Initial setup can be straightforward but expertise is needed to fully benefit from the capabilities of Cognos.
One day was needed to implement the product, and this was done by an experienced consultant from the vendor.
No other solutions were evaluated.
Be willing to build up in-house knowledge of Cognos.
This is not a program for use by just anybody. Therefore, one must have some technical knowledge and skills background in order to learn how to use this.