What is our primary use case?
A general use case would be providing a secure environment for accessing an organization's email. The compartmentalization that MaaS360 provides allows the organization to make sure that the information remains secure.
What is most valuable?
One valuable feature is the ability to provide a secure environment. Another is the kiosk mode where MaaS360 can be used over a tablet or mobile device to ensure that a single application is used. We make sure at the organization level that a device is not misused.
It is stable, scalable, and easy to install.
What needs improvement?
From an improvement perspective, I would say that it could be more granular. MaaS360 could take features from both AirWatch and Jamf and integrate them into their solution.
Zero day support is something they can work on. They can make it a little bit more user-friendly as compared to Jamf or AirWatch.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with it for the past four years.
It is a cloud based solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable and reliable. I have clients who use it on a daily and hourly basis. So, their whole deployment is actually dependent on the stability of this product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is fairly easy to scale. You can easily scale from a hundred to a thousand in a couple of hours. It doesn't take much time.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is good. There have been a couple of cases where the timeline was a little bit elongated as compared to what was expected by the customer, but these cases have been very minimal.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is a fairly simple process. For 5-10 devices, the deployment may take not more than an hour or one and a half hours.
From a maintenance perspective, there is nothing much locally that can be done. As it is cloud based, the maintenance is predominantly taken care of by IBM.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
MaaS360 is priced at a balance. It is not as expensive as AirWatch or Jamf and is not a cheap solution like a few of the local products. For any organization that is looking for a balanced product, MaaS360 is a good solution.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We work with Jamf and AirWatch. Jamf is predominantly targeted only towards Apple customers. It works only on Apple devices; that is their main USP.
AirWatch is more detailed as compared to MaaS360. It gives you more control over your devices as compared to what MaaS360 gives.
Apart from these, there are a couple of local players, like 42Gears, that we work with, but these are more like MBM solutions. They only provide wipe out solutions if the device is compromised and not much more than that.
What other advice do I have?
It is predominantly for mid to large enterprise customers with a couple of hundred deployments.
It's a fairly balanced solution. If you leave the backing to an organization like IBM, you can rest assured that it's a good solution. It actually takes care of your defense endpoint to get rid of pollution. Your laptops, Android devices, and Apple devices could all be secure with this solution. It provides a fairly good level of control and monitoring to suit your needs.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate IBM MaaS360 at six.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner