42Gears SureMDM vs IBM MaaS360 comparison

Why PeerSpot?

42Gears and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category. 42Gears is ranked #16, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. 42Gears holds a 2.1% mindshare in EMM, compared to IBM’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of 42Gears users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

IBM MaaS360 and 42Gears SureMDM are robust mobile device management solutions. 42Gears SureMDM seems to have the upper hand due to its flexible features and customization options according to user reviews.

Features:IBM MaaS360 offers strong security and integration capabilities, trusted by users for managing corporate devices securely. It provides seamless integration with other IBM and third-party services and a user-friendly interface. 42Gears SureMDM is praised for its extensive customization options, multi-platform support, and a flexible application management system that allows users to tailor the system to specific needs, making it highly adaptable.

Room for Improvement:IBM MaaS360 could enhance its reporting and analytics for better insights and improve the user experience in navigation and features. Users also note that the initial setup could be more intuitive. 42Gears SureMDM needs to streamline its setup process and could benefit from better user training materials. There is also feedback suggesting improvements in response time for customer support queries.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:IBM MaaS360 is noted for a straightforward deployment process and efficient customer service that provides quick resolutions. 42Gears SureMDM users face more complexities during deployment but find the platform's flexibility beneficial. Despite these challenges, customer service for SureMDM is also effective and supportive.

Pricing and ROI:IBM MaaS360 is considered cost-effective with transparent pricing and offers a swift return on investment. Users find it affordable given the robust features. 42Gears SureMDM, while more expensive, is deemed worth the investment due to its extensive features. Both solutions deliver a good ROI, though 42Gears SureMDM is perceived to have a higher pricing tier.

To learn more, read our detailed 42Gears SureMDM vs. IBM MaaS360 Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

42Gears SureMDM vs. IBM MaaS360

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,654 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 20.1%, down from 31.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of 42Gears SureMDM is 2.1%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM MaaS360 is 7.7%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	20.1%
IBM MaaS360	7.7%
42Gears SureMDM	2.1%
Other	70.1%

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

Featured Reviews

Anumula Hitesh

Senior Business Development Executive at Digitaltrack

Centralized device management has automated onboarding and improves remote security compliance

One thing I feel Microsoft Intune could improve is troubleshooting visibility. In many cases, when a policy or application deployment fails, the error messages are a bit generic. So, admins still spend time checking logs manually or testing on devices one by one. Compared to the simplicity of deployment, troubleshooting sometimes feels less mature. I also think reporting and real-time monitoring could be stronger. The dashboard gives useful information, but in large environments, many teams still depend on additional tools or scripts for deeper reporting and analytics. If I had to focus on one area first, I would probably choose troubleshooting and reporting. Deployment through Microsoft Intune is generally straightforward, but when something fails, identifying the exact root cause can still take more time than expected. Error messages are sometimes too generic, and admins often have to dig through logs, sync status, or multiple portals to understand what actually happened. I think user experience and policy management could also improve further. Microsoft Intune has become much better over the years, but sometimes the admin portal still feels fragmented because certain configurations open in different sections or redirect to older interfaces. For new admins, especially, it can take time to understand where everything is located. Another thing is policy conflict handling. In larger organizations, multiple device policies, compliance rules, and configuration profiles can overlap. When conflicts happen, the visibility is not always very clear, so admins spend time figuring out which policy actually won or caused the issue.

Read full review

Giridharan G

Head Of Department at Waycool

Used to control mobile devices

Remote Wipe is one of the vital options everybody looks for in 42Gears SureMDM or any MDM product. We are trying to get the latest product updates as much as possible, and it is mostly automated. Two to three engineers are involved in the solution’s maintenance. I would recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Abhijeet Chaskar

Cybersecurity Analyst at DigitalTrack solution pvt ltd

Centralized device control has improved security and streamlined daily management tasks

The best features IBM MaaS360 offers include centralized device management, policy enforcement, compliance tracking, and remote device actions. These features make managing and securing endpoints much more efficient. Another feature I appreciate about IBM MaaS360 is the visibility it provides. Being able to view device status, compliance, and security information from one console makes day-to-day management much easier. IBM MaaS360 has positively impacted my organization by improving efficiency and security across the organization. We can manage devices more efficiently, maintain compliance, and resolve issues faster. We save time for both IT teams and end users. The AI outputs from IBM MaaS360 have been reliable in our experience. They provide useful insights and recommendations that help with device management and security monitoring. Though we still review important findings before taking action.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's not working perfectly, but Microsoft's Autopilot offers great visibility into automated deployment solutions."

"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."

"Microsoft Intune is a good solution and it is purely based on Azure cloud, so I can use all the benefits of Azure cloud in Microsoft Intune and several good features in Microsoft Intune to manage devices."

"The initial setup is not complex."

"For Windows services, there are multiple options within Intune to modernize it to be more internet-facing and dynamic."

"Intune's compliance features are valuable because they allow immediate visibility into ongoing situations."

"Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management."

"Microsoft Intune reduces the time of our engineers, cuts down costs for the deployment of our endpoints managed by Microsoft Intune, and helps to improve compliance and the security policies we wanted to apply on endpoints, which was not happening earlier."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"We use the solution primarily to control mobile devices."

"The solution's customer support is good."

"Its dashboards are valuable. It is easy to access dashboards and implement policies."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution is very scalable, you can do many things at different times and it requires only one staff person for maintenance."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The most valuable features of 42Gears SureMDM include tracking location and pushing applications."

"This solution is very dynamic. I can do what I need to do with it."

More 42Gears SureMDM pros

"The implementation phase of IBM MaaS360 was pretty easy."

"IBM MaaS360 gives us the ability to remote wipe, control, and block code from models and features we do not want on devices we have."

"MaaS360 helped us to have the console ready in less than 10 minutes and start enrolling devices immediately."

"Customer Service: It's excellent. Technical Support: It's excellent."

"The most important aspect of the solution is the fact that the platform is unified, and that it covers all the mobility services - that includes not only the MDM components or services."

"The product’s most valuable feature is email, browser, and application security."

"It helped us reduce the number of support incidents by limiting users' access to device configurations."

"The solution is easy to implement."

More IBM MaaS360 pros

Cons

"Customer support is decent overall, but not perfect. Most issues get resolved but sometimes response time can be a bit slow or require multiple follow-ups."

"It would be better if I could integrate it with my core group policy. I would like to have a group policy in my current environment, which has strict control, but those things are still missing. Although it has maximum compliance and security, it's not available on-premise."

"In terms of the admin experience, it is straightforward, but the Windows enrollment experience could be improved. Sometimes, for enrollment, we have to reset devices and re-enroll them. Just configuring Windows, Azure, or Active Directory doesn't enroll the devices. We need easy enrollment for Windows."

"I also hope the cost of Remote Help will decrease because it's a much-needed Intune function."

"Microsoft Intune lacks the ability to provide seamless remote assistance or remote control."

"We are facing issues with Apple products. With macOS and iOS, there are some difficulties with the updates because we cannot get full control of Apple products. In the case of Windows, it is fine, but in the case of Apple, we have some difficulties. We cannot control everything through Intune."

"Microsoft Copilot in Microsoft Intune is absolutely useless for protecting my environment."

"However, I dislike how it lags sometimes. I cannot work on multiple processes at the same time."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"The product is not so convenient to deploy or to configure."

"User creation on Mac must be improved."

"As a partner, we consider 42Gears to be a unified endpoint management (UEM) solution. So, we should be able to manage users with this particular solution. This is something that is currently not there. It is probably an area for improvement for 42Gears."

"The dashboards could be improved."

"Online information regarding used cases specific to 42Gears SureMDM will help us do configuration changes more comfortably."

"The solution’s pricing could be made cheaper."

"The user interface and customization features are not the best and could be improved."

"42Gears SureMDM needs to improve support because it may take around one to two days to receive a revert."

"IBM MaaS360 can improve the information provided for DLP control. Some of our customers would benefit from this."

"Sometimes I would like to have local support because a company that provides 24/7 support means that the technical support staff are not always fluent English speakers."

"User interface is basic and not very intuitive."

"We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment."

"When we have MaaS360 installed on smartphones, it consumes the battery of the device at a much faster pace. This is one of the areas of improvement that I would like to highlight. We have also observed that in the contact list, a lot of duplication is happening. A single contact is duplicated three or four times, which also consumes more memory resources. If they can work on improving it for these aspects, it will have a more positive impact not only on the way the application is being consumed by the user but also on user satisfaction. A lot of new features are being deployed or rolled out by companies that are competitors of IBM MaaS360. IBM will have to ensure that all those features are on board so that we have a complete suite of features in the platform, rather than deploying multiple diverse solutions to cater to the requirements of our customers."

"IBM MaaS360 needs to have stronger points when it comes to the area of BYOD."

"They should allow for the building of custom reports with graphics."

"It does seem that the more devices we added, the slower the management console operates."

More IBM MaaS360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing seems reasonable."

"I am not that aware of the pricing, but as compared to other MDM solutions, Microsoft is providing a lot of things at the organizational level. So, it is quite reasonable as compared to other MDM solutions."

"Its price is fair. It's a normal price. It isn't too expensive or too cheap."

"Microsoft Intune has been incorporated into our Microsoft E5 licenses."

"I don't have any problem as far as cost is concerned. It is bundled with our license."

"While Microsoft Intune boasts a wide range of features, its user-friendliness and bundled licensing cost are key considerations for me."

"We work in the charity sector, so a lot of our clients get Microsoft Premium licenses or Business Premium for free. They get ten licenses free, and a lot of our clients do not have more than ten staff members. They are getting the tool for free, so its cost is not an issue."

"It's bundled with Business Premium and an E3 license, which is beneficial. If you have to pay extra, it's pricey, but with the bundled package, it's acceptable. They recently increased the Business Premium pricing, which we don't appreciate. The price increase and yearly commitment are causing some problems for us."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for 42Gears SureMDM, which is comparatively expensive for an enterprise license."

"Their pricing structure is very good against the competition. Pricing is definitely not a challenge here."

"I rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."

"There is an option to make yearly or monthly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. Price-wise, the product is okay."

"42Gears SureMDM is not an expensive solution."

"I am satisfied with the price of this solution."

"The tool is expensive and priced at 39 dollars yearly. The pricing is fixed and I would rate it a seven-point five out of ten."

"IBM products are a little pricey."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"Price is something for which we are always under pressure. If we have to look at the MaaS deployment, the price definitely has to come down. This is clearly one of the areas that we will have to work on, not only as a provider to our customers but also as a consumer of this service."

"Fees are monthly and it's approximately $8 per user."

"IBM products are expensive compared to the tools offered by its competitors. IBM MaaS360 is an expensive tool."

"There are other solutions cheaper than IBM MaaS360, such as Microsoft Intune."

"I feel the pricing to be very high."

"The solution is expensive."

More IBM MaaS360 pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Retailer

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	187

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Microsoft Intune vs IBM MaaS360 - which to choose?

Our organization researched both Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360 when considering the type of endpoint security tool...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM MaaS360?

The pricing for IBM MaaS360 was reasonable for the features provided. Overall, we feel the platform delivered good va...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM MaaS360?

I would appreciate a more intuitive interface and simpler navigation in IBM MaaS360. The platform offers a lot of fun...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 9% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

SOTI MobiControl vs 42Gears SureMDM

Compared 19% of the time

Scalefusion vs 42Gears SureMDM

Compared 9% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs 42Gears SureMDM

Compared 7% of the time

Miradore vs 42Gears SureMDM

Compared 6% of the time

Sophos Mobile vs 42Gears SureMDM

Compared 3% of the time

More 42Gears SureMDM Competitors

Workspace ONE UEM vs IBM MaaS360

Compared 8% of the time

Jamf Pro vs IBM MaaS360

Compared 5% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs IBM MaaS360

Compared 3% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs IBM MaaS360

Compared 3% of the time

Samsung Knox vs IBM MaaS360

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM MaaS360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

September 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)

September 2026

Download 42Gears SureMDM product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM MaaS360

September 2026

Download IBM MaaS360 product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

SureMDM

Fiberlink MaaS360, MaaS360

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

42Gears SureMDM is a Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solution that enables organizations to secure, manage, and monitor enterprise devices from a centralized console. Designed for businesses of all sizes, SureMDM supports a wide range of endpoints, including Android, Windows, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, VR devices, rugged devices, wearables, and IoT endpoints.

The platform helps organizations streamline device provisioning, application management, security enforcement, remote troubleshooting, device tracking, and compliance monitoring throughout the device lifecycle. SureMDM supports modern enrollment methods such as Android Zero-touch, Samsung Knox Mobile Enrollment, Apple Business Manager (ABM), Apple School Manager (ASM), Windows Autopilot, and Android Enterprise deployments.

Beyond endpoint management, SureAccess is available as an add-on to SureMDM, enabling Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) for secure access to enterprise applications and resources based on device posture, user identity, and access policies. It helps organizations secure remote workers, contractors, and distributed teams while reducing reliance on traditional VPN-based access models.

SureIdP is also available as an add-on to SureMDM, providing Identity and Access Management (IAM) capabilities such as centralized authentication, Single Sign-On (SSO), user provisioning, and access control. It helps organizations simplify identity management while strengthening security and compliance across enterprise applications and services.

Widely adopted across industries including logistics, retail, healthcare, manufacturing, education, transportation, field services, and financial services, SureMDM enables IT teams to manage distributed device fleets while maintaining security, operational efficiency, and regulatory compliance.

Key Features

Unified endpoint management across Android, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, Windows, Linux, ChromeOS, VR, and IoT devices
Zero-touch and automated device enrollment
Application deployment, management, and updates
Remote support, remote control, and troubleshooting
Kiosk mode and device lockdown capabilities
Location tracking, geofencing, and asset visibility
Compliance monitoring and policy enforcement
OS and firmware update management
Secure remote access and unattended device management
Reporting, analytics, and customizable dashboards
Integration with enterprise identity and security frameworks
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) through SureAccess
Identity and Access Management (IAM) capabilities through SureIdP

Benefits

Simplified management of diverse device fleets from a single console
Reduced operational overhead through automation and remote management
Improved endpoint security through centralized policy enforcement
Secure application access using Zero Trust principles
Strong identity security with centralized authentication and SSO along with support for 3rd party SSO
Minimized device downtime with remote troubleshooting capabilities
Accelerated device deployment and onboarding
Enhanced visibility into device health, usage, and compliance
Scalable across global and distributed operations

Common Use Cases

Organizations use the 42Gears platform for:

Mobile Device Management (MDM)
Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
Rugged device management
Kiosk and digital signage deployments
Shared and frontline device management
BYOD and corporate-owned device programs
Remote workforce enablement
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
Identity and Access Management (IAM)
Secure application access
Healthcare mobility initiatives
Educational device deployments
Logistics and field service operations

With support for cloud, on-premises, and private cloud deployments, the 42Gears platform provides organizations with the flexibility to manage endpoints, identities, and secure access from a unified ecosystem while meeting their security, compliance, and operational requirements.

42Gears

IBM MaaS360 enhances mobile device management with tracking, security, app deployment, policy management, and integration with Apple DEP and Android Enterprise. It supports remote control, cost efficiency, and is user-friendly, suitable for both corporate and BYOD environments.

MaaS360 offers a comprehensive suite for managing and securing mobile devices. With features like encryption, passcode enforcement, and containerization, it ensures data security and compliance. MaaS360 simplifies app deployment via distribution groups and integrates seamlessly with Apple and Android systems. Its focus on kiosk mode, application security, and automated provisioning make it a strategic choice for companies prioritizing a robust endpoint management strategy. Though it offers extensive options, improvements in notifications, user management, and Microsoft integration are needed.

What are the most important features of IBM MaaS360?

Device Tracking: Enables efficient tracking and management of devices across an enterprise.
Security Features: Provides encryption, passcode enforcement, and containerization for data security.
App Deployment: Facilitates app installation through distribution groups and platform integrations.
Policy Management: Allows organizations to implement and enforce security policies efficiently.
Remote Control: Offers options for remote access and management of devices.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of IBM MaaS360?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces setup costs and offers scalable solutions.
Compliance Support: Helps maintain regulatory compliance with detailed management options.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management and operation through intuitive design.
Scalability: Supports growing organizations with extensive device deployment capabilities.

IBM MaaS360 finds applications in industries needing robust mobile device management and security. Enterprises deploy it widely to ensure compliance and safeguard corporate data, providing application control, data leak prevention, and secure email management. It is used for configuring policies for field staff and enabling efficient device enrollment, significantly cutting initial setup costs.

IBM

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

SmartLiberty, Hopi Holding, FIITJEE, Al Dhafra Private School, MRF Limited, Satin Creditcare Network Limited (SCNL), Alkem, Yelp Eat24

Bancroft, Garuda Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

42Gears SureMDM vs. IBM MaaS360

September 2026

Free Report: 42Gears SureMDM vs. IBM MaaS360

Find out what your peers are saying about 42Gears SureMDM vs. IBM MaaS360 and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our 42Gears SureMDM vs. IBM MaaS360 report.

See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.