Intercept X Endpoint Reviews

Our primary use case for this solution is to offer a complete and monitored solution regarding ransomware protection to all my clients & servers.

Sophos improved our organization allowing us to setup a very efficient solution, cloud managed, introducing a new modern concept: Syncronized Security (between Firewall and end-point)

A valuable feature offered by Sophos is called Naked Security and it entails the control managed by the firewall on the site regarding the desktop client interfacing with our cloud client. So we have a central management console where we can observe and act and manage all our customers. It's like a proper perfect solution.

Something that could be improved is to better integrate all different platform available at the moment (not only allow pcs, servers but also other o.s. platforms, Android & IOS and so on too). It should be more user-friendly, automated and able to manage and analyze the logging of the operation, provided that Intercept X is one part of a more complete security solution (Syncronized Security - between firewall, endpoint, mobile devs). Logging & reporting is very important for us, especially in Italy.

I am satisfied with the program's stability. There were some maintenance problems, but very rarely. We generally receive an alert from Sophos when there will be maintenance operations, so we can plan accordingly.

The program is very scalable. We have about 300 computers, servers, work stations and mobile devices in our company. We have one staff member who is responsible for maintenance. We are all system integrators in our office and we plan to increase our usage soon.

The support wasn't very good initially, but they became better. Compared to other brands' support, I'm quite satisfied about the support we get now.

We used a few different products to achieve one objective, but now, with Sophos Intercept, we've solved our problem, reducing dramatically manual monitoring activities.

The initial setup was not very user-friendly, but it improved during the evolution. It was rather difficult at first. Our deployment took half a day. Especially if we consider the Intercept X inside the final solution. We had to plan the setup. It all depends on the number of clients, of course. We did everything by ourselves because we are certified partners; we don't need external consultants.

We pay an annual license fee.

My advice to others would be to get certification over time because without certification, it's not so easy to setup and use. Users should familiarize themselves with all the features of the program. On a scale of one to ten, my rating is nine, because of the few missing features that I think should be added in a close future.

The solution is useful for protecting against ransomware and malwares.

The performance is very slow and should be faster. 

Data resources will be consumed, affecting the performance, when there is a concurrent login involving a server with multiple RDP users. 

The installation of the solution will start the 17 services involved. 

While the tech support is knowledgeable, it's response time should be faster, as it will only get back to us the day after raising a ticket. 

We have been using Sophos Intercept X for around two years.

Technical support, while knowledgeable, is not adequately responsive, as it will take a day from when the ticket was raised to receive a response. This needs improving. 

The solution is easy to install. Downloading time takes only 15 minutes.

Our technical team consists of a team leader, team manager and administrators.

The solution has around 60 licenses. 

It is cloud-based.

We have around 10 clients making use of the solution.

We would recommend the solution to others.

I rate Sophos Intercept X as a seven out of ten.

We're currently implementing this solution in our company, but we generally implement it for our clients. I'm a director and we are resellers of Sophos Intercept X.

The product is very stable which is great. 

The after sales service and support could be improved, particularly on the technical side. The solution has room for additional features. 

I've been using this solution for two years. 

The product is stable, although one of my clients suffered a bit from downtime. The clients are happy with it. 

We purchase different boxes according to the needs of the client, because every single box  has a limitation on number of users. The lowest one, which is 110, supports up to 20 users, 10 to 20 users. 125 supports around 30 users and so on. Most of our clients are medium and enterprise size companies. 

I'd like to see the price lowered. 

Although this is quite an expensive solution when you compare it to products like Automate or Cisco, Sophos does better on pricing.  

I rate this solution a seven out of 10. 

We primarily use the solution in order to check the correct flow of the workstations.

We have the complete solution. We try to see if we have any malware, ransomware, in our workstations, and detect and respond. It's very good at detection. 

The solution has very good usability.

So far, it's working quite well for us and we've been very happy with it.

We don't often need support, however, when we do, they've been quite helpful.

If you have good hardware and a good memory, you won't have a problem with this solution's performance at all.

The solution is pretty complete and works well for our organization. I can't recall not having any specific feature on hand.

The initial setup can be difficult if you don't come in with at least some knowledge about the product.

The solution can run slower on older computers. When you do a scan, you need to configure the scan to run in the time not when your traffic is high. The performance can be affected if the traffic is high and you are trying to scan. This isn't really the solution's fault. It may be an issue with the robustness of the machine

I've been using the solution for around two years now. It hasn't been too long.

The stability is very good. We have no complaints in this area. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's not buggy. It's reliable.

Personally, I have not tried to scale the solution, and therefore can't speak to the scalability itself. For our organization and its size, it works well. We have approximately 100 people in the company. 

We've used technical support in the past. I've found them to be very good. We're quite happy with their level of service, even if we very rarely need to call on them. I'd give them very high marks - maybe 9.5 out of ten for the level of support they provide.

The initial setup can be challenging for those that come in blind with no prior knowledge of the solution. That said, we're pretty knowledgable, so we went in knowing the product and therefore we didn't really have trouble in that sense.

You need to make the deployment, and you need to put the agent in the workstation. That is the most difficult part of the solution. If the company is not centralized, the deployment of the solution is hard. That can be true for any product, actually. However, if you have some solution, for example, to make the deployment of different software for you, you can make the deployment easier. That way, you can centralize the configuration, and set the configuration for the complex platform. 

For us, it took two weeks to a month to deploy the solution with the assistance of a software platform. However, that can vary according to the company and its size and environment.

We're partners with Sophos.

I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using.

When implementing Sophos Intercept, other organizations need to know that the deployment can be a bit difficult. It's a good solution with a challenging implementation. YOu really need to centralize your deployment. If you have a solution that can help ease the deployment process, it's worth it.

Overall, we are very happy with it. I'd rate it at a ten out of ten.

We use it mostly for software protection. 

It's quite simple to use and user friendly.

The EDR could be improved, and perhaps the User Interface. EDR machine learning could be included.

We have been using Sophos Intercept X for about two years. It is the latest cloud version. We have about 200 people using it, daily. We are a Sophos customer.

It is a stable product.

It is reasonable scalable. So, somewhere in the middle in terms of scalability.

We have not needed to use support so far.

We have been using Sophos since day one.

The setup was simple. It took us about one day to set up and configure the software.

The setup was done internally. We also perform maintenance internally.

The pricing is average for software like this, but you can purchase additional services if you wish.

In the future, we may evaluate SentinelOne.

I would recommend this to other users, and I would give the product 7 out of 10.

We primarily brought on the solution to replace Symantec's product, as Symantec was purchased by Broadcom. The company in question has a lot of stuff, and 40 users, and is a pure Windows environment. They don't do anything on Mac or Linux, for example.

So far, the solution has been working quite well.

Sophos offers a manuscript response. 

The product has three tiers that you can choose from when you buy. The highest is a Managed Threat Response. We chose the middle range, which offers Intercept X and is more than just Malware protection.

This solution is a kind of Next-Gen anti-virus.

The product has some web filtering, which blocks people from going to websites they shouldn't be going to. 

It supports the Windows 10 server platform. 

The solution offers a centralized view of the status of protection, via a central console for users to check the status or the health of the endpoints.

So far, the solution has met all our expectations. It's blocked malicious websites effectively and stopped people from going to places online that they shouldn't be going to. It's automatic. We simply took the default settings and we were finding people right away that were going to illicit sites, and we were able to see that easily in the console.

The package we use also comes with spam filtering features, which are quite useful.

We're still new to the solution. We haven't come across any weakness yet. There aren't features that are missing.

The initial setup can be a bit challenging.

I just deployed the solution a few weeks ago. It's quite new at this point. We've had it now for a little over a month.

The solution is extremely stable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs and glitches. It's kept us safe. Nothing has gotten through. It's reliable.

Currently, the company only has 40 users, and therefore there are no scalability issues so far. However, it's a cloud-based centralized console, so that will help with scaling in the future if the company decides to expand. It wouldn't be hard to do. It's completely achievable.

Technical support is okay. I'd give them higher scores if I didn't have to contact them about the initial console setup. That said, they were helpful. Their service so far has been about average.

We previously used Symantec.

We switched solutions for a few reasons. The first one is that Symantec was bought by Broadcom and there were some unknowns about what would happen with the product. Support typically gets worse when Broadcom buys a product, and we wanted to step away on the off-chance that could happen in the near future. 

We were also looking to consolidate and to find a replacement but to also get something that had spam protection and something that was easily obtainable for a small business. Sophos ultimately could hit all those checkmarks.

The initial setup with the centralized console was a little bit challenging. It wasn't complex per se, however, due to the fact that the instructions weren't clear, you can get stuck at certain points. I opened up a case for support, and at that point, I was able to get under the console. You could say the onboarding of additional administrators was a challenge. The centralized console was also a bit difficult.

After that, the implementation was pretty easy. You simply remove the old one, add the new one, and then, with the new one, you could send the user an email link, or you could send them a path to where the software is. 

I do not know the exact costs offhand, however, it's my understanding that their pricing is listed publicly on their site and would be easy to find. Sophos seemed surprised that their pricing was public. They were shocked that I could just Google it and it came up.

There are extra add-ons you can purchase over and above this product. The add-ons cost a bit more, however, they offer extra security advantages.

We are a reseller.

We deployed the latest version of the solution. I don't have the version number on hand, however.

It's a good product to consider if a company is looking to also do spam filtering. What Sophos has as well as a firewall, and it'll give a company a little bit of tighter integration, and that's good. Having those additional security tools as add-ons is an excellent option. We personally haven't gotten their firewall yet, however, it is nice that that is an option.

I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. Overall, in the short amount of time we've used it, we've had a positive experience.

The most valuable feature is the supervisory side of it where we can watch the throughputs and even the loading of the device, to see how much traffic is happening.

In terms of the site-to-site VPN elements, they tend to concentrate. It's quite simple when there are Meraki devices at both ends of the VPN but if there is another user at one end, on another device, it can be a bit tricky. So they could really simplify that process a bit.

So far, the solution has been very stable.

At the moment, we have no plans to expand further. We might in the next six months or so. I believe it will easily scale. We've just not gone into that yet but it looks promising. At the moment, we have around 50 users.

I've only had to deal with technical support in relation to site-to-site VPN problems. I did find them to be very helpful.

At the moment, we don't have ROI because we've been given a very generous period of trial for this machine, we've not had to actually spend any money so far. So, in terms of return of the investment, it's not really applicable at the moment.

In terms of advice, I would make sure that, in terms of capacity, to get the right version, to find the right level of device. MX64 is a fairly small business-scale device. We were a bit hesitant about going for that, given the scalability of it at that point. But, obviously, make sure that you go in with enough extra capacity to deal with any increases you have in traffic demand.

If you're setting up a VPN on the MX64, if both ends end up being a Meraki device, then it's simple to set it up. But when it isn't, it's a bit more complex. Eventually, it causes a lot of statistical information that they could provide if the devices are Meraki at both ends. If they could provide that same facility for setups where the network doesn't involve an MX64 or a Meraki device at both ends, that would be great.

I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

We develop software for brands and some enterprise companies. We need Sophos Intercept X to create hardware and software solutions. 

We need to create research for a next-generation firewall security solution. We offer software and hardware solutions for banks, enterprises, and big companies.

We had some technical problems. Maybe in the new update of this solution, they could fix some technical bugs. 

Sophos Intercept X has slow internal processes that could be better. Because of this, it hasn't improved our organization.

We most value the price and interface quality with Sophos Intercept X. We focus on solution quality.

This product has room for improvement in business areas for brand enterprises. Sophos Intercept X could improve in areas dealing with business, i.e. their internal processes.

For the stability of the solution, I had some problems with uptime.

Technical support could be of better quality.

The initial setup was complex. Our deployment took six months to one year. It took us around one year to fully set up Sophos and get it running to take action for work.

For the deployment, I set it up myself.

Sophos needs to create a YouTube channel with educational material for technicians or engineers.

I would rate Sophos Intercept X at seven out of ten because of the technical problems that we have experienced.