We use it for file services, both CIFS and NFS.
Systems Programmer at a university with 10,001+ employees
Dedupe and compression save us significant space; it's so cost-effective we're considering reducing what we charge
Pros and Cons
- "The ability for our users to restore data from the Snapshots is very valuable."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
The university didn't have a centralized file service before we moved to NetApp. Now, departments can share information across 24,000 students, across 10,000 faculty and staff. They can share data without doing it through email, which was the old way.
It has definitely helped reduce the overall costs of storage. We actually started out with the IBM M-Series seven years back. We switched to NetApp. The same hardware from NetApp is a better price than it was through IBM, and the support is better. So it has reduced our expenses through that path. And since it's so easily supported, we don't need a lot of people to support it, so our support costs are lower.
We've had a lot of centralization going on. We have 13 schools, each of which had its own IT department. All those IT departments are now out of business because their work has been centralized into our department. Part of that was due to the economy changing and the school changing its business models, but that put our NetApp storage heavily into use. So it's hard to distinguish cause and effect.
I can't specify the amount of space saved, but the deduplication and compression in ONTAP are very effective. We're probably getting 35 - 40 percent savings because of dedupe and compression. And because every volume we put out is a quoted Qtree on a volume, we don't have wasted whitespace. I'm billing for 800 terabytes every single month, that's running on one petabyte of rotating disk. So, it's very good at saving me space. I'm running with about 20 percent available disk, above and beyond what I'm billing. So it's pretty good at that.
We're charging four cents per gigabyte per month and, unfortunately, I'm making money at that rate. We're not allowed to make a profit. I've been looking at reducing what we're charging our customers because it is so cost-effective.
What is most valuable?
The ability for our users to restore data from the Snapshots is very valuable.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see more cloud integration. NetApp had nothing for cloud integration about three or four years back and then, all of a sudden, they got it going and got it going quickly, catching up with the competition. They've done a very good job. NetApp's website has seen phenomenal changes, so I greatly appreciate that.
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's very stable. We've only had two outages with NetApp in seven years. One was a planned outage to fix a problem - that one was seven minutes long. The other was an unplanned failure, which caused us to be down for about five hours. Overall, we're still within our five- and six-nines of availability, so we're happy.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's completely scalable, as long as you're willing to buy the hardware. That's why we're looking at cloud for the future, so we can stop buying hardware and maybe use the cloud instead.
How are customer service and support?
It's excellent. The technical support has been very good.
One thing I find very annoying is the new web interface, where it takes you through a little AI assistant, a little robot thing, to try to answer your question first. That thing is infuriating because we've already done the research, we know we need support. Fortunately, there's a link so you can get past that quickly.
What I like about NetApp Support is that, generally, the person who takes your case is the one who works it to the end. There aren't a lot of handoffs or a lot of callbacks.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had always done block storage and we had a large IBM infrastructure, a large ESX infrastructure, physical servers. We knew that we needed a file service, so we set that up. It was really a first for our university. We switched from IBM to NetApp because we thought we'd get better support from NetApp, and we really have. IBM did a good job, but it was obvious that IBM and NetApp didn't always play well together. IBM was slower to put out patches and fixes compared to NetApp. When IBM was telling us to go to the NetApp site to find support, we figured we'd just switch to NetApp.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was quite straightforward because we knew what we were going to do with it and we hired Sirius on for a limited part of the job. We did most of it on our own.
What was our ROI?
I know we're providing our service very cost-effectively, and it's selling faster than we expected. Money is coming in faster than we expected and, therefore, I need to drop what I'm charging per gigabyte per month so I don't make a profit, because we're not allowed to. So it's obviously successful.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Our shortlist was really only NetApp. We looked at about a dozen other products, Hitachi and everything else, but NetApp really had the best product.
What other advice do I have?
Talk to any peer you can find about what products they looked at. We spoke to a dozen peer institutions - universities, colleges - about what they were doing for file services. We found a lot that were failing and a lot that were successful. The successful ones were mostly on NetApp.
It's a very solid product. I've been using if for about seven years, and it's been mostly bulletproof. They have very good support and a very good quality hard drive.
We use it for mission-critical applications but less than we used to. A lot of our mission-critical stuff is now going out to cloud. That's why I'm here at NetApp Insight 2018, to see how we can tie this into the cloud. Absolutely, all of the university's "crown jewels" used to be on NetApp storage. Now, some have gone out to AWS and we're integrating into AWS more and more. For example, Blackboard is no longer running off out NetApp storage. It's now running out of the cloud. The same is true for all the financial stuff, all the Workday and the like. They've moved off of NetApp and out to the cloud.
In terms of machine-learning, AI, real-time analytics, and those kinds of ground-breaking apps for storage, that's more the research support side. We're not doing that. We're doing more of the general file systems support, for general-purpose use.
I don't have any opinion about NVME over Fabrics, I haven't researched it yet.
We bought our equipment through Sirius Computer Solutions, and we're very pleased with that. They care. We've had a couple different senior salespeople with them over the years and they've both been excellent. They're very committed to their customers.
I rate NetApp ONTAP Cloud at eight out of then. I won't give a ten. There's always something that's better out there, but you're going to be paying double or triple for it. For the price, the quality of the hardware, the quality of the support, the features it offers, I'm thrilled with NetApp.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Presales Specialist at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
A software-only solution on cloud compute instances managing cloud storage that capability enables you to build a virtual storage solution directly on cloud resources
Pros and Cons
- "So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage."
- "The product is more restricted with underlying cloud."
What is our primary use case?
We use it mostly for distributed files. For example, one of our customers is in construction. So they have centralized NetApp storage and set up replication with the Cloud volume ONTAP. Several branch users access the Cloud instance. And whatever work that they do on the Civeo instant gets replicated to the client's data center on the on-premise NetApp storage. And they use GFC with Seavio for a seamless experience.
What is most valuable?
So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.
So one of the clients had an on-premise 100 terabytes. When that same data went to CVO, he was able to reduce it to somewhere around 20/25 dB. So he was able to reduce using DTO compression, the consumption of this underlying cloud storage. And, obviously, with the licenses, now you need only 25 terabytes instead of 100 terabytes.
What needs improvement?
There's not much scope for improvement. I think the solution is more restricted with the underlying cloud. The performance of the single instances depends on the performance of the underlying cloud resource.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
NetApp is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
NetApp is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team is wonderful.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
It is easy because Blue XP makes it very easy. Just a few clicks. It's a little bit tricky for customers who are very new to Cloud. While they are the traditional customers who use their data center, if they are not well versed with cloud, they might face challenges in setting it up because that's more dependent on public cloud vendor, not the NetApp.Sometimes the internal support renewal is an issue because the NetApp system sees it as an expired license. So when you try to renew it, it is not reflected in the NetApp portal. So the flow of the support could be improved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
For enterprise customers, it's a very cost effective. But in the SMB segment, yeah, pricing is a little bit challenge for your time.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Systems Analyst at a university with 10,001+ employees
Exceptional performance and seamless scalability while providing reliable data management
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is its exceptional performance and storage efficiency."
- "There is room for improvement in tier one support, especially with potential language barriers and communication challenges."
What is our primary use case?
We rely on NetApp Coud Volumes ONTAP for a wide range of purposes, including VMware, SQL, Oracle, and file storage. It serves as our go-to storage solution for almost every use case.
How has it helped my organization?
The transition to the AFF storage solution significantly improved our organization by reducing our physical footprint. We went from a FAS system with two controllers and twenty drive shelves to just four controllers and two drive shelves with the AFF. This led to substantial reductions in power consumption and space requirements in our data center.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is its exceptional performance and storage efficiency. This efficiency translates to significant cost savings for us.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in tier one support, especially with potential language barriers and communication challenges.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We've experienced a few minor issues with stability, but we haven't encountered any significant outages.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability has been a trouble-free experience. When we decided to increase our storage capacity by incorporating an additional drive shelf, the engineer collaborated with us, and the expansion process was executed smoothly, ensuring there was no downtime or interference with our production operations.
How are customer service and support?
We rarely encounter performance issues, and we prefer to handle most of our troubleshooting internally. Our experience with tier-one support from NetApp has been somewhat lacking, and it varies depending on the support representative. We aim to resolve issues ourselves whenever possible, despite paying for support. On an overall scale of one to ten, I would rate the support as average.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Over the years, we've tried various storage solutions like Nessus, Nimble, and IBM. However, about a year ago, we made the switch to NetApp, and we've been quite satisfied with their performance and have remained loyal to their products ever since.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup has been quite straightforward.
What was our ROI?
Cost reduction has been a significant benefit. We've been able to lower our expenses by minimizing the number of devices and drive shelves needed. Instead of having twenty drive shelves, we now only require two. This reduction in hardware has had a positive impact on power consumption, cooling, and maintenance costs, leading to overall cost savings.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We find the pricing to be favorable due to the educational sector we belong to.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Systems Administration at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Improved uptime, easy to use, and good support
Pros and Cons
- "The ease of use in terms of how the product works is valuable. We are able to work with it and deploy the storage that we need."
- "The dashboard is a little bit clunky. I like to see it a little bit more on the simplistic side. I would like to be able to create my own widgets and customize what I want to see a little bit more versus what is currently there. That would be helpful so that when I log in, I go straight to my widget or my board without going to multiple places to get to what I need to find or build."
What is our primary use case?
It is for our databases and for Linux. We also use it for backups. We are replicating snapshots across, so we have different scenarios.
How has it helped my organization?
By implementing this solution, we wanted to achieve simplicity. We were trying to get away from reconfiguring everything all the time to work so that we could just get down and implement things within a very small window of time. They would not require a lot of reconfiguring each time.
The main benefit is accessibility. We are able to access it from anywhere. We are able to move things to what we need or are able to pull back the data when it is needed very quickly. We can restore the databases when I need to.
We have a single pane of glass. It helps a lot because time is always the essence. The simplicity comes in handy. It saves quite a bit of time. I do not have to sit down and do all the things. I am able to go in and hit a couple of things. I can deploy, modify, or do whatever needs to be done. It takes seconds versus hours. Once you learn the tool, it is very simple to work from the same point. When it first came out, it was very clunky. It took some time. It took some learning, whereas now, you can catch up pretty quickly. After you start to fine-tune it a little bit, you are able to work with it. Earlier, it was a pain.
I can see how much storage I have left and what I am working with. I can see the alerts. It gives me time to start working on what I need to procure at that point.
It has helped to right-size our workloads. It has been great. It has significantly dropped our downtime for volumes and improved the access for clients. It has helped out a lot in those aspects, so I can stay ahead of the game instead of behind the game. That is where that tool comes in handy.
It is great when it comes down to pinpointing problem areas. It catches things before they become a problem, so I can keep my clients up and going and functioning. It has been great in that aspect.
I am a big fan of analytics because they give me the chance to be able to keep the clients up and going. That is my biggest thing because when they are down, we lose a lot of money, and we lose a lot of clients, so the ability to make sure that I am up almost 100% percent and being able to stay ahead of the game is a huge win for us.
What is most valuable?
The ease of use in terms of how the product works is valuable. We are able to work with it and deploy the storage that we need.
What needs improvement?
The dashboard is a little bit clunky. I like to see it a little bit more on the simplistic side. I would like to be able to create my own widgets and customize what I want to see a little bit more versus what is currently there. That would be helpful so that when I log in, I go straight to my widget or my board without going to multiple places to get to what I need to find or build.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using NetApp ONTAP for 18 years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is very easy to scale. It takes next to no time to be able to do that. It is very simple and easy to do that part. You just need to get a license and add the storage.
How are customer service and support?
I love NetApp support. If the first level cannot help you, then the next level can. We can get to them fairly quickly. If not, the reps or the sales can jump in and help us as well. We have never gone without some kind of help in one way or another. If there is a problem, they will jump on and bring on tier two and tier three, and write a script, or do whatever needs to be done. I would rate their support a nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have been mostly using the NetApp tools. We have been trying to stay native as much as we can for a long time.
How was the initial setup?
It has been a while. From what I remember, it was not too bad. It could be a little bit more simplistic, but it was not too bad to be out. Once you learn it, it gets easier.
What was our ROI?
It is a great product. It gives you the heads-up for what you need. You can move clients around and access the clients from different locations. You can also do a restore when you need to be at different locations. That has helped enormously. It has helped drive the cost down. Our clients are able to stay up and function consistently. There are a good 30% to 40% savings.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did evaluate other products, but that was a long time ago.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Manager, IT CloudX at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Cloud Manager enables us to automate scheduling of data synchronization
Pros and Cons
- "We're using snapshots as well and it's a pretty useful feature. That is one of the main NetApp benefits. Knowing how to use snapshots in the on-prem environment, using snapshots on the cloud solution was natural for us."
- "The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible. We need to bring up an additional NetApp in that other region and create a Cloud Manager automation to copy the data... I would prefer it to be a more integrated solution like it was in the NetApp solution about a year ago. I would like to see something like AltaVault but in the cloud."
What is our primary use case?
We are using it for storing files, to get high-performance access to files. We are also using NetApp for DR. We copy the information to the same system in other regions.
How has it helped my organization?
The solution's high-availability features are cost-effective for us because we are able to use the cloud benefits to reduce the cost of DR. For example, if we have it in one region, we can copy the data to another region. They keep it powered off and then they power it on for a few minutes, copy the data, send the data again, and shut it down again. That reduces the costs by approximately 80 percent.
Similarly, the data protection provided by the solution's disaster recovery technology is cost-effective and simple.
We're using Cloud Manager to automate some of the management. We use it for bringing the DR environment up and down as well as for scheduling data synchronization between different regions, worldwide. It's almost impossible to do that manually. Compared to an engineer doing it manually, it's about 90 percent faster. That's specifically for this kind of operation. In reality, the automation is enabling such capabilities. It's not actually reducing the time taken. If it didn't exist, we would never do it. That's even better than saving time.
Overall, NetApp has standardized and certified file services, both on-prem and in the cloud, corporate-wide. In addition, by using the automation, it has provided us cost-effective DR and management. In the cloud it has enabled us to provide tailor-made storage solutions for each of our cloud customers. The storage efficiency has reduced our storage footprint because we are offloading all the data to the storage account. So it has reduced the cost of corporate storage. And the data-tiering has also saved us money.
What is most valuable?
What is most valuable is that the system is the same as what we use on-prem. So the guys who are responsible here for managing NetApp feel comfortable with it& and that they have enough knowledge to manage the system in the cloud. We are able to& keep the same standards that we have on-prem in the cloud.
The usability is& great. We don't have any issues with it.
We're using snapshots as well and it's a pretty useful feature. That is one of the main NetApp benefits. Knowing how to use snapshots in the on-prem environment, using snapshots on the cloud solution was natural for us.
What needs improvement?
The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible. We need to bring up an additional NetApp in that other region and create a Cloud Manager automation to copy the data. So we do that once, at night, to another region and then shut down the destination. It's good because it's using Cloud Manager and its automation, but I would prefer it to be a more integrated solution like it was in the NetApp solution about a year ago. I would like to see something like AltaVault but in the cloud.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using it for about half a year in production; longer when we include the PoC.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been great. We haven't had any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We still haven't needed to scale up, but I think the scalability is good.
We are using it for a system which stores files and parts of databases, but the system is used by hundreds of customers. NetApp is not used directly by them, rather through the system. We may plan to increase NetApp according to the usage of the system but we still have no specific plans.
How are customer service and technical support?
We are using NetApp engineers and they are great.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before NetApp we used a home-grown server in the cloud, a Linux server with a big disk. It was less simple to manage.
We're also using Avere, a storage solution that was purchased by Microsoft a month or two ago. It's mainly responsible for real-time data synchronization between on-prem and the cloud environment. It's different than NetApp which doesn't provide the kind of synchronization solution that Avere does. It's two-way, real-time data synchronization between the Oracle storage solutions which we have on-prem and the Avere solution that we have in Azure. NetApp does not help with such requirements.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very simple. It was quite easy to set up the environment in just one day. We started with a small implementation and then added more and more parts of the solution. We started with just one desktop and then added additional ones and then added tiering.
It required a small number of staff members. That's all we needed because it was pretty simple. We did a few sessions online and one or two onsite, for the entire solution. For our specific case it requires almost no maintenance. It only requires management to expand the disk capacity or perform the management operations, per-request. Generally we wouldn't require an increase to our storage team to manage the solution.
What about the implementation team?
We used a NetApp engineer to help us.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer. The DR environment is billed by the hour and paid to Azure directly and NetApp is paid on a yearly license.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We checked Dell EMC and HPE but we chose NetApp. The Storage team made the decision. One of the main reasons they chose NetApp was the existence of NetApp on-prem and the knowledge of it the team had. We are familiar with NetApp and the products are good, so we decided to extend the success to the cloud as well.
What other advice do I have?
Implement it. Do not think about it. It's very simple and very useful.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor. The reviewer's company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
SysAdmin at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
The workload migration was seamless
Pros and Cons
- "Snapshots are one valuable feature within ONTAP, but CVO's appeal is that it acts just like the on-prem solution. It's the same OS, but in the cloud. We can continue to use ONTAP as we did on-premise."
- "I would want more visibility and data analytics where we can see anomalies within the shares within the GUI."
What is our primary use case?
We use CVO for NFS data storage, NFS sharing, and SMP sharing.
How has it helped my organization?
CVO helped us migrate to the cloud. We were already using the same software on-prem. We just migrated it to the cloud, so it helped us with that.
The workload migration was outstanding. It was seamless. We have on-premise CVO within BlueXP. We just drag and drop the on-premise workload to the cloud workload. It just migrated and cut over. That was it. The time required depends on the volume size. Our largest volume took us three-and-a-half weeks. It takes some time to migrate the data from on-prem to the cloud.
We have on-prem NetApp AFF, and we're looking into using NetApp Data Sense or Blue XP Data Sense for the backup servers as well. Everything integrates perfectly. We have some on-prem workloads that run on NetApp, and CVO on a cloud. We can migrate between the two if needed.
What is most valuable?
Snapshots are one valuable feature within ONTAP, but CVO's appeal is that it acts just like the on-prem solution. It's the same OS, but in the cloud. We can continue to use ONTAP as we did on-premise.
What needs improvement?
I would want more visibility and data analytics where we can see anomalies within the shares within the GUI.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used CVO for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CVO is highly stable, and the performance has met our expectations. It does exactly what it needs to do.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scaling CVO is straightforward. It's super easy to grow the cloud environment compared to the on-prem solution. It's easier to scale.
How are customer service and support?
I've had no issues with NetApp support so far. It's been excellent.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We had the on-premise version of ONTAP. We also have a Nutanix array for our hypervisor.
How was the initial setup?
I've set up four NetApp CVOs. They all took around five minutes to set up. It's super easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing is good. They make it easy for you. You go to the sizing site. It's a bar that you drag and drop.
What other advice do I have?
I rate NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP nine out of 10. If you're a fan of the on-prem version, you'll like CVO on the cloud.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Server and Storage consultant at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
User-friendly, easy to set up and scale, and provides control over configuration and retention
Pros and Cons
- "It's very easy to set up, and within 40 minutes, you can apply storage notes in Azure."
- "NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs to have customizable pricing options such as 10 TB increments. They seem to have only two options: 10 TB or 250 TB."
What is our primary use case?
Companies that want to move to the cloud want to have a DR in the cloud. However, moving a file share is very tough and requires a lot of work from scratch. If you have NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and if you have an on-premises storage scenario, it's very easy to replicate the workload from the cloud using the native application tool. You don't need to reengineer everything. It's very useful, and efficient.
If you use deduplication and compression on-premises, you will be able to do the same on the cloud. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP also helps save money in terms of file shares and storage. For example, if you have 50 TB of data, you will be able to compress it and pay for 25 TB of data.
You have control over configuration and retention as well. You can keep data for longer because of the in-built backup feature.
What is most valuable?
It's very easy to set up, and within 40 minutes, you can apply storage notes in Azure.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP uses native replication, SnapMirror, for replication between two CVOs or from on-premises to the cloud.
The SnapLock feature helps with compliance, and even a rogue admin will not be able to delete anything.
The beauty of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is that it's very easy to use.
For how long have I used the solution?
I implemented NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP for an enterprise customer three years ago, and it's being implemented in my current organization as well.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP's stability at eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
You can scale vertically and horizontally, and I'd give scalability a rating of ten out of ten. The clients who use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP are enterprise companies.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP's technical support at ten out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy, and I would rate it at ten out of ten. It takes about 40 minutes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is not a cheap solution because we need to pay for the license and pay for Azure resources as well.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs to have customizable pricing options such as 10 TB increments. They seem to have only two options: 10 TB or 250 TB.
What other advice do I have?
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is a proven solution, and I would rate it at ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Enterprise Architect - Office of the CTO at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Helps us optimize resource usage in public cloud without overpaying, but we need a way to tie storage to our CMDB
Pros and Cons
- "It makes sure we have control of the data and that we know what it's being used for. The main thing for us is that we need to know what applications are consuming it and responsible for it. The solution helps us do that."
- "Something we would like to see is the ability to better manage the setup and tie it to our configuration management database. We manage our whole IT infrastructure out of that database."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case is for shared storage. We use the solution to support our ERP environment, where our teams want to share storage between different servers/apps. We're mostly using it for NAS.
How has it helped my organization?
It's meant to do the same thing in the public cloud that we were doing in our private cloud. In the private cloud we can control the infrastructure, whereas in the public cloud we don't have as much control. This gives us a way to optimize resource usage in the public cloud, without overpaying or wasting resources.
It also provides unified storage no matter what data you have. It makes sure we have control of the data and that we know what it's being used for. The main thing for us is that we need to know what applications are consuming it and responsible for it. The solution helps us do that.
In addition, it helps us because we know what it's used for, who owns something, and who's accountable for those storage costs. Ultimately, it helps us reduce our storage needs and that's where we get our savings.
Compared to native cloud storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP allows us to better manage shared storage.
What is most valuable?
I don't have a preference for any feature. It's meant to optimize storage and usage within the public cloud.
What needs improvement?
Something we would like to see is the ability to better manage the setup and tie it to our configuration management database. We manage our whole IT infrastructure out of that database.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP for about three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
As far as I know, everything is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's very scalable.
We focus on apps or IT services that are using it and currently the total is in the neighborhood of about five.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't used technical support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not have a previous solution.
How was the initial setup?
Our challenge is understanding all the different storage that we set up and being able to tie each storage that we create back to an IT service and, ultimately, a cost center. That piece was difficult to set up and we had to do some things manually.
As for the amount of staff required on our side for deployment and maintenance, it's very minimal.
What about the implementation team?
We used NetApp to help with the setup. We focused on just getting things up and running, rather than making sure everything was set up the way we wanted it to be. Part of that was the JCI issue, and part of that was that the vendor might have helped us better plan and better organize.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Make sure you investigate what your requirements are going to cost you using the native cloud solutions versus what NetApp is going to cost you, to make sure you have a business case to go with NetApp.
What other advice do I have?
The biggest lesson I've learned from using this solution is to make sure you have a proper foundation and design in place to manage everything from A to Z before you start deploying your first storage on NetApp.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Product Categories
Cloud Software Defined Storage Cloud Migration Cloud Storage Cloud Backup Public Cloud Storage ServicesPopular Comparisons
Portworx Enterprise
IBM Spectrum Scale
Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links