Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AmitSingh2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Microsoft Azure Engineer at Sycomp
Real User
User-friendly with a nice GUI and helps to streamline multifactor authentication
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution can scale very well."
  • "Support could be a bit faster."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for our single sign-on applications. It resolves password issues.

We use it for authentication and 90% of our SaaS app. 

We use it for on and off-boarding users. It syncs with our on-premises master directory to set them up and take them off.

What is most valuable?

We like that the solution helps us to streamline multifactor authentication.

It's got great SSO and good provisioning and de-provisioning. 

The product is easy to set up. 

It is stable.

The solution can scale very well.

What needs improvement?

I've been pleased with its capabilities overall. 

Support could be a bit faster.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for five years. 

Buyer's Guide
Okta Workforce Identity
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Okta Workforce Identity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. I'd rate its reliability ten out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's extremely scalable. It'd rate the solution's ease of expansion ten out of ten. 

We have 1500 users on the solution currently.

How are customer service and support?

Support is good. However, sometimes it takes them a bit longer to deal with issues. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used a different solution. We moved to Okta as the GUI is very user-friendly, and the solution is simple to use. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very easy. It's not complex. 

The deployment took a matter of three to four days for our hybrid setup.

What about the implementation team?

K+Okta's team helped us deploy the solution. They made it very easy.

What was our ROI?

We have gotten an ROI in terms of time savings. We've seen 20% to 30% ROI, as it is saving us a lot of time. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is a bit expensive. I'd rate it four out of ten in terms of affordability. It's a bit more expensive than our older solution.  

Okta charges per user, and that can make it costly if you are a big company.

What other advice do I have?

We are customers and end-users. 

I'm using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. The pricing is a bit high, and they do charge per user. There are other options that are a bit less expensive. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1415214 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Application Services at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Secure environment, helpful support, useful feature sets
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
  • "Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."

What is our primary use case?

Okta Workforce Identity is used for MFA and SSO and it satisfies application authentication.

How has it helped my organization?

Okta Workforce Identity has helped our organization by allowing us to work remotely in a secure environment.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets.

What needs improvement?

Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft.

Okta Workforce Identity acquired Auth0 and they should have a solution with integration between the two.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Okta Workforce Identity for approximately five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Okta Workforce Identity has been stable in our usage.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of Okta Workforce Identity is good, it scales up well. We do not have any issues with slowness, outages, or when we need to increase users.

We have approximately 2,500 users using this solution and their roles vary from administrators, end-users, and highly-trained individuals.

We plan to increase usage, and it will be global.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is good, we have always had an effective response.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment took approximately two months.

I would rate the initial implementation of Okta Workforce Identity a four out of five.

What about the implementation team?

We used Okta to do the implementation. Our experience with them was good, everything went well.

We have two people who do the maintenance and support of the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of Okta Workforce Identity is competitively priced. We pay annually for the use of the solution.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Microsoft Azure before choosing Okta Workforce Identity.

Microsoft Azure was not closely compatible with their features and support.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others is to look for an independent tool that goes across applications because you have to look at Apple and Microsoft toolsets. A good independent solution that is hardware agnostic is Okta Workforce Identity.

I rate Okta Workforce Identity nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Okta Workforce Identity
March 2025
Learn what your peers think about Okta Workforce Identity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Reliable platform with simple setup process
Pros and Cons
  • "The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
  • "It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."

What is our primary use case?

We use the product to manage access and identify several applications.

What is most valuable?

The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication. It has an easier integration and configuration management process than Microsoft Entra ID. We can integrate it into different platforms.

What needs improvement?

An area for potential improvement in Okta lies in the absence of a dedicated feature for backing up the configuration of our tenants. It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup. We have to manually document all the configurations. They could provide a built-in tool for creating backups mitigating potential issues or crises.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Okta Workforce Identity for five years.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support services are good. They respond to the queries immediately.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID is challenging to use in terms of integration and troubleshooting.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple. I rate the process an eight out of ten. It takes a few weeks to complete the integration for different projects. It is a reasonable time.

The deployment team includes administrators for the applications, as they are responsible for configuring integrations from their side. The administrator plays a crucial role in integrating the Active Directory. The project may require a collaborative effort of approximately three to five individuals. It requires two engineers for maintenance.

What other advice do I have?

The single sign-on (SSO) capability in Okta has significantly streamlined the user experience. It provides an ease of accessing applications. The subsequent access to other applications within the same browser is automatic, eliminating the need to initiate the multi-factor authentication (MFA) process repeatedly. We can define trusted sources and policies depending on the security requirements.

The centralized approach to managing everything from a central point has streamlined administrative tasks, eliminating the need to navigate through different systems for user and role management. It is one of the best solutions. We find a lot of information on their support website.

The overall reliability is commendable, as the platform strategically replicates its systems across various clouds, minimizing the likelihood of service disruptions. Over the past five years, we have not encountered any problems with the service.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Chief Technology Officer at Windval Technology Solutions LLC
Real User
Easy to implement and manage, and the cost benefits are valuable
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
  • "The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We are a solution provider and Okta is one of the products that we implement for our clients. I am a solution architect and help to design the system.

Most of our clients have a hybrid architecture where they want to use a single sign-on. They have some applications on-premises, whereas others are on the public cloud. This means that they have a two-tier or three-tier architecture.

How has it helped my organization?

Our clients are happy because prior to implementation, they had a very distributed architecture. Okta has allowed them to consolidate with respect to identity management, which increases their operational efficiency.

This product has the features that every customer is looking for.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility.

This product is easy to deploy and easy to manage.

There are cost benefits to using this solution.

What needs improvement?

The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved. Mainly, the open-source APIs for Splunk would be helpful, as that is where they aggregate most of the data. If this process can be streamlined then it will definitely help.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Okta for the past three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is scalable. Our clients are large, Fortune 500 businesses.

How are customer service and technical support?

Okta has very good support and I would score them high, at nine out of ten. I am definitely happy with them.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to working with Okta, our clients had native solutions.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward.

We currently have one customer deployed on AWS and another on Azure.

What about the implementation team?

I am the solution architect and our in-house team does the implementation.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

As part of the process, our clients did a couple of POCs. Symantec was one of them, Okta was another, and there was a third product that they evaluated. During this process, they had success criteria defined, and Okta did well with most of it.

The metrics included the operation and cost benefits, the business value, and the support.

What other advice do I have?

Every customer has a different need and a different requirement. For anybody who is considering this product, I think they should do a pilot POC to make sure that it works well in their environment. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
PeerSpot user
reviewer2591397 - PeerSpot reviewer
Module lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Protects the applications by avoiding cross-site scripting
Pros and Cons
  • "You can only log in if you have the access, which protects the applications by avoiding cross-site scripting."
  • "The most valuable feature of Okta is its security."
  • "Whenever I write Cypress test cases, we encounter problems with logging in through Okta."
  • "There is no proper documentation on integrating test cases with Okta, and this issue is troubling whenever I try to implement it."

What is our primary use case?

I have used Okta for security purposes. It grants access only when you have the proper credentials, which I find essential for utilizing new technologies and web applications.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Okta is its security. You can only log in if you have the access, which protects the applications by avoiding cross-site scripting. Hackers cannot access the system directly. Only after receiving a message from Okta, you can log in, making it highly secure.

What needs improvement?

We are facing one issue with Cypress test cases. Whenever I write Cypress test cases, we encounter problems with logging in through Okta. There is no proper documentation on integrating test cases with Okta, and this issue is troubling whenever I try to implement it.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Okta is a stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Currently, scalability is a top priority, but there are no issues with adding many users to Okta.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Okta, I manually created portals using a username and password stored in a database. Okta introduced a different process.

How was the initial setup?

Initially, it was complicated to set up since I was a beginner and there was no proper documentation. Now that I am more experienced, it is easier to handle.

What other advice do I have?

I need to analyze fully in the future, and if I do not have any concerns, I will share any with you via LinkedIn. As of now, I do not have any additional advice.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
DevOps Team Lead at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Real User
Simplifies user lifecycle management and provides SSO
Pros and Cons
  • "The tool provides a single place of contact for managing users. We only need to manage users in Okta Workforce Identity, eliminating the need to duplicate efforts across different systems. For example, if a user needs to be decommissioned, we don't have to go through all the systems and cloud services; we delete the user in one place. This process is automated with our HR system for both organizations, simplifying user lifecycle management."
  • "We faced some challenges during the Okta Identity Workforce deployment. Integrating with AWS and other cloud services posed some limitations with federated options. For instance, features like automatic user addition from AWS to the tool were missing, requiring manual intervention. The API is limited compared to the manual configuration possible through the UI."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use cases are SSO, user management, and SSO integration with various cloud services, including AWS, GCP, GitHub, etc.

What is most valuable?

The tool provides a single place of contact for managing users. We only need to manage users in Okta Workforce Identity, eliminating the need to duplicate efforts across different systems. For example, if a user needs to be decommissioned, we don't have to go through all the systems and cloud services; we delete the user in one place. This process is automated with our HR system for both organizations, simplifying user lifecycle management.

The main features we find most valuable are the single sign-on and the OTP authentication. The ability to connect via a PC or a mobile phone makes the process seamless.

The MFA feature enhances regular authentication through the user portal and utilizes one-time passwords generated from QR codes on mobile devices.

What needs improvement?

We faced some challenges during the Okta Identity Workforce deployment. Integrating with AWS and other cloud services posed some limitations with federated options. For instance, features like automatic user addition from AWS to the tool were missing, requiring manual intervention. The API is limited compared to the manual configuration possible through the UI.

I think Okta Workforce Identity could improve by making its API more robust, ensuring that all UI capabilities are exposed in the API. This is particularly important for integrating with other applications, such as AWS and other cloud providers.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the product for six years. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing model is fine for general service usage. However, the charges for API features and API tokens can be quite high.

What other advice do I have?

I would give Okta Workforce Identity a solid eight out of ten. There's always room for improvement, but overall, the tool performs well and meets our needs. The solution was my first experience with such products. Previously, I had used internal tools like Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Active Directory services within Azure, which were excellent for corporate environments. However, I find Okta Workforce Identity more suitable for startups.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1415214 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Application Services at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Reliable, good multifactor authentication and single sign-on functionality, and helpful support
Pros and Cons
  • "It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
  • "The guest user access could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution for MFA and single sign-on.

It's our enterprise-wide identity management system. It identifies all of our users prior to accessing any of our applications.

How has it helped my organization?

It assures us that everybody is authenticated prior to accessing any corporate applications.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are multifactor authentication and single sign-on.

It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do.

What needs improvement?

The guest user access could be improved. How do we authenticate people that aren't in our Active Directory?

In the next release, I would like to see passwordless access.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for four years.

We are working with the current version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This product is very stable and is one of our best applications. It's the most reliable application and it never goes down.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's a scalable solution and we are able to add users as needed.

We have about 4,000 users and it's all employees and contractors within the company.

Every employee uses this solution every day, multiple times a day, and we plan to increase usage.

How are customer service and technical support?

They meet our needs. 

We haven't had a problem with technical support answering any of our questions.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We went from using nothing to Okta Workforce Identity.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

It was a week-long process to deploy.

We need one and a half persons to do the configuration, maintain this solution for administrators and the development.

What about the implementation team?

We completed the implementation in-house.

What was our ROI?

We have seen a return on investment by using Okta Workforce Identity.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I can't discuss pricing.

What other advice do I have?

Follow along with what Okta recommends.

I would rate Okta Workforce Identity a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2134212 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager IAM at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 10
Easy, secure access for your workforce but team access management can be better
Pros and Cons
  • "Workforce Identity offers a comprehensive access management solution with multi-factor authentication, total control, and features like app access management, identity governance, and administration tools such as certification and access request management. These are typically found in identity management solutions, but Okta integrates them seamlessly into its user interface."
  • "They should focus on improving them to provide top-notch team access management while still offering those typical features."

What is our primary use case?

We have been using this tool for access management. Our client has connected their app's security with Okta Workforce Identity. We have used LinkedIn's libraries to integrate it with various apps, including Oracle and others.

What is most valuable?

Workforce Identity offers a comprehensive access management solution with multi-factor authentication, total control, and features like app access management, identity governance, and administration tools such as certification and access request management. These are typically found in identity management solutions, but Okta integrates them seamlessly into its user interface.      

What needs improvement?

They should focus on providing top-notch team access management to companies.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Okta Workforce Identity for the past 10 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has proven to be stable in the time I've used it. If there are any challenges, their support team has been responsive and helpful. Overall, my experience with them has been positive.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's scalable, but we need to coordinate with Okta's support team or our account manager if we want to increase our workload. Since it's a complete SaaS solution, they can make the necessary adjustments accordingly.

How are customer service and support?

As premium customers, we have the opportunity to schedule calls directly with Okta's expert team members for discussions and support. It's a valuable perk of being a premium user.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

I haven't personally handled the deployment, but I've worked on configuring the printer, which wasn't too complex. As for deployment time and manpower, it's a bit different since Okta Workforce Identity is a cloud-based platform. We don't need dedicated servers as Okta manages integration. We work on our own tenants, and Okta provides preview environments for testing new features. As for maintenance, it's not too difficult, especially for premium customers who can raise support tickets if needed.

What other advice do I have?

I received good support for addressing some bugs, although there were delays in fixing them due to the product backlog and prioritization process at Okta. The resolution time depended on how they prioritized issues, which sometimes caused delays. Overall, I would rate it 7 out of 10.  

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Okta Workforce Identity Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Okta Workforce Identity Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.