Okta Workforce Identity Reviews

• User provisioning
• User deprovisioning
• App assignment
• SAML integrations

We are able to deploy solutions rapidly and also have a better idea on licensing as we can easily see who has access, who has been accessing and also who is not using an app.

I would like to see further integrations with applications and services such as Office 365.

Between my last two jobs, I have used it for about seven years.

We have not encountered any deployment issues whatsoever.

We have not encountered any stability issues; this is a very stable platform.

With over 2500 users, we have not encountered any scalability issues.

Customer service is excellent. We don't have to worry when we have an issue; they are always on top of it.

Technical support is 9/10; very professional and solid.

I have had experience with Ping and ADFS but not at the places I have worked; only with customers.

We do a lot with Okta but the setup was still very easy.

An in-house team implemented it.

We do things much faster and have a much better understanding of utilization and licensing. We are more agile and, therefore, more productive and faster to act.

It's worth the investment. Make sure you fully utilize Okta, even if it takes professional services.

Before choosing this product, we evaluated Ping and ADFS.

As an Okta Identity engineer, I implement Okta for different clients such as banks, telecoms, and insurance companies. These companies need an IAM solution to manage their employees securely and provide them with access to the right applications. Okta is used to automate provisioning and support any errors encountered during and after deployment. 

Companies use Okta Workforce Identity to manage their employees' secure access to applications and to minimize the effort required by IT teams to manage identities. The solution helps organizations allow their employees to log into their applications without re-entering credentials and securely access their applications via MFA.

The most valuable functions are Single Sign-On (SSO) and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). These two modules serve as dual components, essential for securing application access for employees.

Okta could improve by making their learning materials more user-friendly. They could also enhance the flexibility of their MFA feature, allowing clients to implement preferred MFA methods without restrictions.

I've been handling Okta Workforce Identity for five years now.

There might be occasional glitches or bugs that need improvement, so I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.

Okta scores a nine out of ten for scalability.

Okta support is efficient, actively responding on time. They deserve a rating of eight out of ten for their technical support.

Positive

I handle CyberArk IAM solutions alongside Okta. I find Okta to be more user-friendly and flexible than CyberArk, especially regarding MFA and SSO features.

The setup process for Okta is relatively straightforward and not overly complex.

Okta is one of the more expensive IAM solutions, and I would rate it an eight regarding cost.

The main competitor to Okta Workforce Identity is CyberArk Identity.

I would recommend Okta Workforce Identity to other users.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use the solution for application security.

The solution is an open platform. It integrates with multiple applications simultaneously.

The solution's pricing needs improvement.

It is a very scalable solution.

The solution's pricing model could be better for SMBs.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

This solution has a lot of capabilities and features. 

The cost per user for this solution is really high and could be reduced. 

We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

We have been satisfied with their customer support.

Neutral

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

• Supporting SaaS implementations from corporate login.  
• I'm a consultant and have worked with Okta at two clients. Both had started to leverage Okta for single sign-on to SaaS services and internal systems. One was more advanced, the other was only doing limited federation and not taking advantage of the power of Okta.

Okta improved both organizations where I've worked with it: 

• Better Single Sign-On (reducing the number of passwords)
• Improved accountability (to know what users were doing, and where they were working on Identity and authentication services)
• Authentication (where Okta's own MFA solutions or work in combination with Duo were very useful for strengthening the security of major systems)

Okta's great for their federation capabilities where it lets the IT team enable business with anyone using common federation features across SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, and internal applications. The Multi-Factor Authentication capability lets you address one of the biggest challenges around security - MFA to make it hard for adversaries to get into your systems.

Better multi-factor authentication integration and support, it's around v2.0 and will need a 3.0 release for maturity.

Okta Workforce Identity is easy to use and has a lot of components.

The product's connector framework needs improvement. There should be automated aggregation and complete classification processes included in it.

We have been using Okta Workforce Identity for five months.

It is a stable product.

It is a scalable product. It provides flexibility to increase the number of users. Our customer environment has 5000 to 6000 users.

The initial setup is straightforward. We deploy it on the cloud. The product has good documentation to refer to for implementation. We require two engineers and one manager to execute the process.

The product has a user-based license model.

We evaluated SailPoint, IBM, and Oracle. Our customer migrated from Okta to IBM for more features.

I rate Okta Workforce Identity a five out of ten. If you don't have critical use cases and do not want a full-fledged IGA solution, Okta is a good product. However, if you want to use certification, access requests, and an extensive connector framework, Okta does not provide it.

I find the provisioning features and the integration with other applications useful.

The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible.

I have been using the solution for six months.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. We are a medium-sized company and we use it full scale. There are around 200 users for the solution. It also requires two admins.

The solution’s customer support is fast, reliable, and helpful.

We didn’t do the deployment because it was difficult. We had to rely on an in-house team.

Our in-house team deployed the solution.

The solution’s pricing needs to be reasonable. You are dealing with a lot of components and the pricing is component-based.

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am pretty much satisfied with the solution since it works properly. Anyone looking to implement the solution needs to read the documentation carefully. They also need to have a bit of experience before that.

We use this product to control access to applications.

The most valuable features are identity management and OpenID.

At this time, Okta is doing really well and covering every aspect. Everybody in the company knows Okta and how to work with it.

The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password. Everything is taken care of, automatically.

There are some issues with the interface that can be improved.

I have been working with Okta Workforce Identity for more than three years.

The stability is good.

This is a scalable solution and we have more than 10,000 users.

They provide a lot of support but there are still places where we get stuck.

Prior to Okta, we were working with Active Directory.

We are using Azure for authentication and I really like Okta compared to that. Okta is more extensive than the product from Microsoft Azure.

The initial setup is really easy.

We have three people for maintenance.

The price of this product could be lower. It's just like Box, where when it first came on the market the price was lower. Once people started using it, the price increased.

I am looking forward to seeing what Azure Active Directory has to offer. Microsoft is giving Okta competition in terms of pricing and other features.

In summary, this is a good product but it is not perfect. There are some areas that need improvement.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.