What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for testing and preparation of the base URL which I generated for the first tokenization. I prepare the test suite and the XML or Java core that give the input parameters.
The major role is the pre-requisition of the scripts in Postman - which is mandatory.
We can input parameters into Excel and execute for the application.
We work in many environments, including QA, SAP, production, pre-production, and proof. We use Postman for each and every release.
Before anything goes to the master branch in GitHub, I'll completely check the code and unit test the complete scripting. I'll execute it one or two times, and once it's stabilized, I'll directly deploy it to the master branch.
What is most valuable?
The output has been very good.
There are lots of good features.
Its initial setup is easy, depending on the operating system.
It is stable and reliable.
The product is not expensive, although there is also the option for open-source, so it can be free to use.
What needs improvement?
We need better version compatibility. In open-source, the main drawback is when you go to integrate the plugins, it is entirely scripted. Sometimes the scripts aren't scripting.
The execution time should only be two or three seconds.
We'd like to see some better UI in newer versions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for 11 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. Before we deploy, we can check in for the local system. Once it is successful, then we'll go for the server side. That is a good practice to follow.
There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 13 people using the product. It's just my team using the solution, as we have maintained the SSL certification separately.
How are customer service and support?
I'm already an expert in the product and therefore do not need to contact technical support for help. If I have issues, I can troubleshoot on my own.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We chose this solution based on the project. Typically, the client requests something, and, depending on the client and the project's needs, we'll use what makes sense. We use the best tool for the job. If it happens to be this solution, then we use it. If it's something else, we use something else.
How was the initial setup?
If a file is in Windows, it is very easy to deploy the product. We can do configurations easily and handle test scripts well. It's all very straightforward.
However, other operating systems may be more difficult. The process varies depending on if you are using Windows, Unbuntu, or Linux, for example.
Depending on the scripting, the deployment hardly takes 30 seconds to one minute. It'll check for the E2E level in the checkpoints, and how to trigger in the checkpoints.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution has both open-source and licensing options. You can pay for monthly licensing. However, that's not always necessary. There are also plugins that are available that we can implement. It's not an expensive product, even if you go for the license. They do have multiple licensing options as well. They have options for freelancers and mid-sized businesses as well as larger businesses.
What other advice do I have?
We are a Postman partner.
I've been using an older version of the solution. I'm not on the latest deployment.
I'd advise others that it is important to have project middleware functionality, including for the access level. When I work with clients, I will ask for the certifications of the tool. Once the tool is initiated, 99.9% of the time, there is no management involvement here. It's signed off on.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner