Pure Storage FlashArray has significantly improved our data center performance. It handles high workloads efficiently, providing better performance in the environment. With increased storage capacity, it has led to improved overall system performance. The tool's technology is a standout feature. It has helped me reduce storage costs by 15 percent.
Datacenter Systems Engineer at Logicalis
Improves data center performance and pricing is competitive
Pros and Cons
- "Pure Storage FlashArray has significantly improved our data center performance. It handles high workloads efficiently, providing better performance in the environment. With increased storage capacity, it has led to improved overall system performance. The tool's technology is a standout feature. It has helped me reduce storage costs by 15 percent."
- "The product should improve its response time. I have also encountered issues with its configuration."
What is most valuable?
What needs improvement?
The product should improve its response time. I have also encountered issues with its configuration.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the product's stability a ten out of ten.
Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashArray
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Pure Storage FlashArray. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Dell EMC before.
How was the initial setup?
The tool's deployment is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pure Storage FlashArray's pricing is very competitive.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the product a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Team Lead for Storage and Back-Up at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
User-friendly, high performance, and reliable
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of Pure Storage FlashArray are management and administration user-friendliness, provisioning, and performance."
- "Pure Storage FlashArray could improve in the area of cryptographic information in the consoles. The user-friendliness could improve. The Pure Storage FlashArray team should come and log into the system with their maintenance credentials and then pull out the information as evidence of cryptography."
What is our primary use case?
We are using Pure Storage FlashArray for VMware data storage.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of Pure Storage FlashArray are management and administration user-friendliness, provisioning, and performance.
What needs improvement?
Pure Storage FlashArray could improve in the area of cryptographic information in the consoles. The user-friendliness could improve. The Pure Storage FlashArray team should come and log into the system with their maintenance credentials and then pull out the information as evidence of cryptography.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Pure Storage FlashArray for approximately one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Pure Storage FlashArray is highly stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Pure Storage FlashArray is scalable, but it has a 5 GB ratio for data which helps with the reduced need for more investment for it to be more scalable.
We are using the solution with approximately 20 VMware hosts.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used other solutions.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Pure Storage FlashArray is straightforward. The time it took for our complete implementation took one week. However, it could be done in one day but we had some challenges.
What about the implementation team?
We used the Pure Storage FlashArray team to do the implementation.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend this solution for production because it has good performance and capacity management.
My advice to others is they need to fit the solution to their needs. There are many models available and the one they choose is going to depend on the front-end data that they're going to accommodate in storage. Additionally, the latencies needed are important to consider, such as how many milliseconds they can tolerate and overall performance.
I rate Pure Storage FlashArray a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Pure Storage FlashArray
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Pure Storage FlashArray. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Chief Technology Officer at perfekt
High performance, efficient deduplication, and maintenance is not difficult
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Pure Storage FlashArray is the all-flash storage performance, low latency, and efficiency of their de-duplication technology. Additionally, the ease of use is good compared to other storage systems. The features in data protection, snapshotting, and replication between data centers and sites are superior to other solutions."
- "Pure Storage FlashArray could improve the recent file storage capabilities because it is lacking a lot of features."
What is our primary use case?
Pure Storage FlashArray is used for hosting applications, such as Vmware, HyperV, and virtualized applications.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Pure Storage FlashArray is the all-flash storage performance, low latency, and efficiency of their de-duplication technology. Additionally, the ease of use is good compared to other storage systems. The features in data protection, snapshotting, and replication between data centers and sites are superior to other solutions.
What needs improvement?
Pure Storage FlashArray could improve the recent file storage capabilities because it is lacking a lot of features.
The integration with other vendors, such as antivirus and security vendors they are lacking.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Pure Storage FlashArray for approximately seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Pure Storage FlashArray is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Pure Storage FlashArray is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
I have used the support from Pure Storage FlashArray.
I rate the support from Pure Storage FlashArray a nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Pure Storage FlashArray is very simple and it takes four hours for a new system.
What about the implementation team?
Pure Storage FlashArray is not difficult to maintain.
What was our ROI?
My customers have received a return on investment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of Pure Storage FlashArray could always improve. They are still more expensive than some alternative offerings. Cost is always a concern and when there is a battle they tend to be more expensive.
There are no licenses outside of the storage. When you buy the solution, you receive all the software capabilities and license with the box.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
One of the advantages of Pure Storage FlashArray to other solutions is the Evergreen Program. The program allows you to never have to purchase storage that you already purchased again. For every terabyte that you purchase, you don't have to purchase it again, they will replace it. As you maintain the solution, even if the old storage becomes at the end of life, it will replace with newer technology as part of the maintenance.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others is they should try the solution, it works well.
I rate Pure Storage FlashArray a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
IT Manager at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees
Works fine for us, and is good in terms of access speed, power consumption, and support
Pros and Cons
- "Access speed and power consumption are most valuable."
- "It is way in excess of what we need. If anything, we could see a bit more speed. I'm just comparing it with what some of my colleagues who are implementing their own systems do."
What is most valuable?
Access speed and power consumption are most valuable.
What needs improvement?
It is way in excess of what we need. If anything, we could see a bit more speed. I'm just comparing it with what some of my colleagues who are implementing their own systems do.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We did not have to do that, but it looks like it is.
How are customer service and support?
It is very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
It is our first solid-state array.
How was the initial setup?
It is very easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It could always be lower, but it's okay.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others to have a go at it because it has worked fine for us. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Platform Technologies Lead Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Easy to use, has excellent support, and a large variety of features
Pros and Cons
- "The speed is one of the most valuable features of Pure Storage FlashArray."
- "The price could be better."
What is our primary use case?
Pure Storage FlashArray is our main SAN solution. It's for SAN for service for data storage.
What is most valuable?
It is very easy to use.
The speed is one of the most valuable features of Pure Storage FlashArray.
It's a brilliant solution with brilliant support.
Pure Storage FlashArray has a lot of features.
What needs improvement?
The price could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Pure Storage FlashArray for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Pure Storage FlashArray is an absolutely stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a highly scalable product.
In our organization, we have 1,500 users.
We have plans to increase the usage.
How are customer service and support?
The support is excellent.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were also using other technologies such as EMC, and Hitachi. We were using various other SAN storage systems. It was approximately three years ago.
We switched to Pure Storage FlashArray because it was easier to administer, and it is very powerful and fast.
How was the initial setup?
It is not difficult to install.
It only requires one admin to maintain this solution.
What about the implementation team?
As it's a SAN, it's a corporate solution, that requires experts.
What was our ROI?
It can be costly, but the return on our investment is extremely high.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Price is always an area that could be improved.
There are no licensing fees or other costs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have reviewed other solutions. We looked at a variety of options.
What other advice do I have?
I would encourage them to try the solution.
I would rate Pure Storage FlashArray a 10 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Enterprise Account Executive at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Reliable and user-friendly with good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "It's just very easy for general block storage."
- "The file functionality could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for general block storage. Usually, the storage product owners are the users.
What is most valuable?
It's just very easy for general block storage. Generally, the ease of use is what customers comment on. It's very user-friendly.
The initial setup is very straightforward.
Scalability is possible. You can expand the solution.
The stability and reliability are great.
Technical support has been helpful in general.
What needs improvement?
The solution needs an integrated NAS platform, file platform. The file functionality could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been dealing with the solution for a couple of years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and reliable. The performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We find the product to be quite scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.
The solution is extensively used. Likely usage will increase in the future.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is great. They are helpful and responsive. We're quite satisfied with the level of support they offer customers.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used to work with Hitachi and switched to this product for ease of use and for performance.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward and simple. It's not overly complex.
The actual startup and deployment take about half a day.
What was our ROI?
From an ROI standpoint, if you consider compression and de-duplication and all that, you get a pretty good ratio.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing of the product is very competitive to others in the market for Flash and NVMe storage. That covers the cost of hardware and support.
What other advice do I have?
I'm a reseller.
I'd advise potential users to try it out and consider it as an option.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten based on the overall performance, scalability, and reliability.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Soporte TI at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Easy to set up and deploy with a good user interface
Pros and Cons
- "Support has been helpful."
- "We would like to be able to connect to data tape for backup, specifically to the LTO backups."
What is most valuable?
The experience has been very good so far for the company. It's very fast and it's very easy to configure the storage.
It's very efficient.
The snapshot feature is great. It's very easy to apply. You can see present error applications by going back using snapshot. It's very good for the company.
We haven't had any problems with it in the time we've used it.
I like the user interface.
Support has been helpful.
We have no issues with pricing.
Integration is easy.
The initial setup is simple. It's easy to deploy using the whitepapers on offer.
The compression is quite good compared to other options.
What needs improvement?
We would like to be able to connect to data tape for backup, specifically to the LTO backups.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is good and we haven't had any issues with it. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is possible. It's pretty simple to just add more storage as needed. We plan to do so next year. Our impression is that it will be an easy process.
We have about 2,000 users at this time. It may even be as high as 10,000 when you factor in academic users.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support has been good. We haven't had any issues so far with them. We are satisfied with the level of service.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In the past, we had an IBM storage device, however, when we compare this old storage with the Flash Pure, it's just so much better.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very simple. We have experience in using the storage and using the new Flash Pure Storage is even easier. It's quite an intuitive solution, which makes the setup process a breeze.
It takes about six months to move from old to new storage.
There are seven people on half that can handle the deployment process.
What about the implementation team?
Our organization did use an IT consultant to assist us with the implementation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is okay. We pay to license on a yearly basis. It's just a standard fee with no extra costs.
What other advice do I have?
We are a user and a customer.
While right now we are using an on-premises deployment, we likely will move to the cloud.
I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Project Deployment at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Fast performance, good read-response times, and all of the features are included
Pros and Cons
- "This is the best all-flash storage array on the market."
- "This product has only two active controllers, whereas other solutions can have more. This is something that needs to improve."
What is our primary use case?
We are a solution provider and the Pure Storage FlashArray is one of the products that we implement for our customers. I have installed three of them in the past month.
The primary use case for this product is high-performance storage.
What is most valuable?
This is the best all-flash storage array on the market. They were the first brand that provided access directly from CPU to memory to disk.
What needs improvement?
This product has only two active controllers, whereas other solutions can have more. This is something that needs to improve.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The Pure Storage FlashArray is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable product but not as much as the Infinidat InfiniBox. That solution is more expandable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have approximately 20 years of experience with enterprise solutions. These include various hyper-converged systems, all-flash storage systems, business continuity, and disaster recovery solutions for data assurance.
My experience is with products from a lot of different vendors. These include IBM, Dell EMC, Pure, Infinidat, and others.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The best features come included without any additional cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The InfiniBox is more expandable than Pure FlashArray. InfiniBox is more for big data than the Pure product.
The suitability of this solution depends on the customer's environment. Depending on the use case, we propose the right product. Pure Storage is not better than InfiniBox and InfiniBox is not better than Pure Storage.
In comparing products, I would rate Pure FlashArray an eight out of ten, InfiniBox a seven out of ten, Dell EMC products receive a six out of ten, and all of the other all-flash storage systems that I have experience with would be rated a five out of ten.
With PowerMax, there is a big difference in cost when you start adding more features.
The Pure Storage solution has only two active controllers and one passive controller. InfiniBox has three active controllers, and PowerMax can have up to six active storage controllers.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Pure Storage FlashArray Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
All-Flash StoragePopular Comparisons
Dell PowerStore
NetApp AFF
Dell Unity XT
IBM FlashSystem
Pure FlashArray X NVMe
HPE Nimble Storage
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
HPE Primera
Pure Storage FlashBlade
Dell PowerMax NVMe
Huawei OceanStor Dorado
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
VAST Data
Lenovo ThinkSystem DM Series
HPE Alletra Storage
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Pure Storage FlashArray Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Pure Storage or NetApp for VDI?
- Which is the best storage system for machine learning? Does Pure Storage hold up after two years of usage?
- How would you compare Dell PowerProtect DD vs NetApp FAS series?
- Has anyone tried Dell EMC PowerStore? What do you think of it and how was migration?
- Dell EMC XtremIO Flash Storage OR Hitachi Virtual Storage F Series
- Pure Storage or NetApp for VDI?
- When evaluating Enterprise Flash Array Storage, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- IBM vs. EMC vs. Hitachi Compression
- Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?
- What is the difference between thick and thin provisioning?