SAP Cloud Platform Reviews

We use the product for process integration, data integration, etc.

The product provides native integration to enterprise resource planning software. It becomes easier for customers to leverage the product instead of developing or writing integration from the beginning.

The product needs improvement for serverless native integrations. They should opt for serverless features as all the customers worldwide choose cloud-based products.

We have been using SAP Cloud Platform Integration for 20 years.

The product is very stable. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.

We have enterprise businesses as our customers for SAP Cloud Platform Integration. The product is highly scalable. I rate its scalability a nine out of ten.

The initial setup is simple enough. I rate the process an eight or nine out of ten.

SAP Cloud Platform Integration is an expensive product. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten.

I recommend SAP Cloud Platform Integration to others and rate it a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for mobility purposes.

The cloud is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's the future of IT. 

SAP has provided very good support.

The solution is very scalable.

We need to connect our ERP solution via the VPN. We need to make sure our ERP solutions aren't exposed to the outside world. Our teams really struggle with this.

We've been using the solution for a year. We're a leading subscriber of it.

We haven't had any issues so far in relation to stability. However, we're still working to deploy the solution.

I'm not sure how scalable the solution is. We're not yet fully deployed, so we haven't yet devised a scaling strategy that our application hardware will work on.

We've been in contact with technical support. We find them very good. We use their ticketing mechanism which is quite effective. They provide good response times.

The initial setup is complex. Right now, SAP does offer the best kind of solution on the market. 

There is some sort of SMS needed to authorize the code. However, the VPN connectivity isn't there because some of the solution is on the public cloud.

I'm not quite sure how long deployment takes. It depends on the environment and the requirements of the business. It's different from deployment to deployment. However, we're not fully deployed just yet.

Our data center is on SAP's cloud platform. SAP is our cloud.

I'd recommend the solution. The future is in cloud platforms. Other companies should start using it if they aren't already.

The enterprise portal's end of life is 2024. However, the solution's extending into HANA Cloud Technology.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Our primary use is for the cloud platform identity authentication, whereas this serves as a proxy between Azure AD and our SAP cloud applications.

It has improved our speed to bring our mobile applications into productive use in a cost-effective way. The deployment of the Fiori Cloud Edition eliminated the use of an on-premise infrastructure, for example, to provide an SAP Gateway installation.

To be able to define multiple sub accounts in order to accommodate and separate development, test, and productive environments.

The product could be improved for consistent user interfaces. Although it is one platform, the user interface logic (e.g., where buttons are defined on the screen) differs from service to service.

I run all of my servers on SAP at the moment. We have our development, our quality, and also our production sites on it.

We actually upgraded this solution in December 2020, so we're using the most current version. We're looking forward to incorporating SAP analytics within our company.

The ability to expand it whenever required has been great — it's very simple. The performance is good as well. We haven't experienced any issues yet. 

I have been using SAP Cloud Platform for four years. 

The cost when it comes to monitoring can be difficult. We have to be very, very careful and aware of any changes so the price won't go up too much.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight. 

We use hybrid-cloud, on-prem, and cloud models of this solution. The primary use case of this solution is for our customer's. We integrate it for them. 

The integration flows are the most valuable feature of this solution. 

The source controller needs improvement. There are some disadvantages to it. Versioning also needs improvement. 

I would like for it to have integration to GitHub. 

It is stable. We haven't had any big issues. 

It is scalable. The number of staff members we will need for a deployment will vary on the project. We need one for a smaller project. 

We have never needed to contact their technical support. 

The initial setup is straightforward. The time it takes to deploy will depend on the requirements. It takes around a couple of days. 

My advice to someone considering this solution would be to check the standard capabilities and leverage existing standard features. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. Not a ten because it is missing features.