SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

We use the solution for those with access to sensitive or confidential data. The cost of the solution is prohibitive for all of our users, but we do want to make sure that those with access to critical data have higher levels of protection. 

Users who have SentinelOne are very pleased with the solution and its protection, no complaints.

The forensics analysis feature provides substantial help in determining the extent of the problem and how it affects the machines.

The SentinelOne is one of my daily consoles and I use it regularly to identify the root cause of some infections.  However, when a file is flagged as suspicious it would be very helpful to have the system highlight precisely what event or characteristic of the file SentinelOne considers potentially dangerous.  In this way it would help focus our investigations on the specific characteristics or actions of the file.

We have had 100% uptime with the solution.

Given the way the solution works, I see no issues at all with scalability — both in the number of users or incidents as well as the degree of sophistication of the attacks.

Technical support has attended to our issues quickly and with a good sense of the need to communicate continually throughout an issue.

Yes, we continue to use Kaspersky for our other users.

The setup is very straightforward and simple. Our users who have the solution have spoken so highly about SentinelOne that other users who are not on the target list ask if they too can use the solution.

Our in-house team implemented the solution, working with our local engineers in the different countries where we have offices.

The pricing is rather elevated. However, the solution is the most transparent for the uses I have ever encountered as well as being normally very informative and accurate for our engineers.

We evaluated several other options, including Bromium, Carbon Black, CrowdStrike, Cylance, Forcepoint, Invincea, and some others.

If you have the budget, this is a top-notch solution. We have used the solution for over a year now, and we plan to continue using the solution for our most critical users (those with access to sensitive or confidential data). Truly an excellent solution.

Before it was a challenge for us to know who had an existing endpoint issue or who had the most attacks within the corporate network. Since SentinelOne was introduced, it has provided overall endpoint status visibility for us. Giving us the ability to easily pinpoint endpoints which had the most attacks and respond at a faster rate.

SentinelOne’s Rollback is its best feature. No solution can ever provide a 100% protection, but their rollback feature closes this gap in endpoint security giving end users a ray of hope in the event of a worst case scenario endpoint breach, especially in ransomware attacks.

They need to improve their UI and the way they show that the scanning is running on the endpoint. Sometimes users wanted to see whether their AV is working via visual context.

They could add “right click>scan” where most users were trained to do so in handling flash drives.

Also, add remote code execution via the management console, application control, device control, and all other common features found on the legacy antiviruses. This would help administrators to fully shift from legacy to Next Gen EPP without sacrificing usable features.

There have been a few cases where the agent cannot report to the management console, thus this requires a manual restart of the agent via a command prompt.

There are no problems with scalability, I could say that the product is easily scalable, since it is not limited to a physical server.

The technical support is quick and very helpful. They often response within the day or by the next business day.

As of now, SentinelOne still serves as an augmentation for our existing AV, but some of our devices are now using it as their sole endpoint protection.

The setup is very easy and straightforward. It is just like installing an ordinary program and it automatically reports back to the management console.

The price for it is very competitive compared to other Next Gen EPP. You can really get a great value for it when it is integrated with EDR.

No, since we already had experience with other products. As of today, we have tested one of its competitor using AI, but their overall protection still cannot be compared to how SentinelOne protects your endpoint. 

They have an impressive product.

Understand how endpoint protection technologies work, since they do not rely on signature databases anymore. Also, follow deployment guidelines, such as initially deploying it in their production environment using a monitor only policy and giving the agents maturity of at least one to two weeks to allow the management console to build a solid behavior base for their environment.

If I am breached, they will pay the ransom on my behalf.

Cybercrime is growing in the world of technology, the defense in today’s world has no accountability. If breached, all that is said is that it is zero-day, and you still pay license fees to those vendors. The solution can search for hidden and dormant threats on encrypted traffic in your environment.

With automation, the time wasted on malware, like ransomware, is dealt with on a scale where everything is centralized. The IT Technician does not have to wait for a user to bring the machine to IT, as all they need is an active internet connection.

• Deployment strategy for large organizations that do not use active directory (AD).
• Windows updates have not been done on the client side, so minimum requirements stop the installation.

One year.

None.

None.

Excellent, they have customized reports on threats in our environment that we do not have knowledge of.

Yes, Sophos, I switched because SentinelOne does more things and guarantees against ransomware and can find hidden threats that other solution could not find.

It is both straightforward and complex to install.

Machines on Windows 10 are easy and seamlessly installed.

Users machines that are not updated require updates to be done first before the solution can be installed.

Spend money on the security for the endpoint. That is where the data lies and where hackers try an attack, not the network or firewalls.

Sophos, AVG, Avast, McAfee, Kaspersky, and ESET.

Ask about accountability for hidden and dormant threats that could be in your network.

We use the public cloud version.

We have a preference for their receptor. It's good at finding many EFC files. Normally, EFC files could have a virus, but we need to exclude some of them.

It corrects all of the EFC files with a virus. All the achievements, maximum EFC files. Many EFC files will be flagged as a virus. Some virus databases need to be updated. The model is good at finding many EFC files. The trouble is it needs to be updated. 

From the client-side, some scanning and other features can be enabled for scanning viruses better. If they want to scan for an individual reason other than viruses, such as scanning for legal files, they haven't been able to gather that from the client-side.

Some features could be more user-friendly. For instance, setting restrictions in the explorer for what level one must be to use it is not user-friendly. It is difficult to find what we're searching for.

The solution is stable.

Out of ten, I would give this solution 8.5 for scalability.

When we need partners, they support us well. There have been no issues with that.

It's okay. It's a better solution than other competitors.

I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.

We are using SentinelOne within our company in servers and endpoints and we have deployed it for some of our clients.

The most valuable feature of SentinelOne is the EDR functionality. We are protected against threats, such as ransomware.

SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price.

I have been using SentinelOne for approximately one year.

The stability of SentinelOne was fine.

SentinelOne is scalable.

We have approximately 300 users using this solution.

The initial setup of SentinelOne was straightforward.

The price of SentinelOne is on the higher side compared to other solutions, such as Symantec.

We have one person who maintains the solution.

I rate SentinelOne a seven out of ten.

We use it for antivirus.

In the past, we were not able to identify a few viruses, but now we are able to identify them because of the machine learning feature.

The machine learning module is the most valuable feature. 

The reporting needs improvement and I would like to see a more granular level of administrative privileges.

The initial setup was straightforward. It wasn't a long project, it took six months.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

We don't have a plan to increase the usage, it is purely based on our business requirements.

This product is nothing but different from a traditional anti-virus. We were very apprehensive to try it. Once we tried it, it gave us a good impression.

SentinelOne is for users wanting an enhanced level of endpoint security.

What I like about SentinelOne is that it sparks your curiosity. I also like its rollback feature.

The stability of SentinelOne should be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for three years.

We're using SentinelOne through one of our partners, and we have had some stability issues with it due to Windows 10 features updates. It should be more stable.

SentinelOne is a scalable solution.

Technical support for SentinelOne is fine.

The initial setup for SentinelOne is straightforward. Setting up the solution doesn't take long, e.g. on a per-device basis, it would take just 30 seconds.

We did the implementation of this solution ourselves.

Our customers pay for monthly for the license of SentinelOne.

We're an MSP, so we deploy SentinelOne for customers, e.g. 70 to 80 endpoints.

We've had some stability issues with the solution, and that's definitely a concern. I'm still pushing forward with SentinelOne, because it's the only kind of option we have in this space.

In terms of recommending SentinelOne, I'd give it a six out of ten.

We are a system integrator. We provide this solution to the end-users.

Most of the features are valuable. As a system integrator, agent deployment is valuable. It also fits the requirements of most of the clients.

They can improve the administrative interface. They can make it more user-friendly.

Its price can be lower.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

Its setup is of medium complexity. It is not complex, and it is also not straightforward.

Its price can be lower because I'm seeing competition from another vendor who beats it on commercials.

I would advise others to go for it. It is a good product, and it fits the requirements of most of the clients. It is very flexible.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.