SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

We use the solution for those with access to sensitive or confidential data. The cost of the solution is prohibitive for all of our users, but we do want to make sure that those with access to critical data have higher levels of protection. 

Users who have SentinelOne are very pleased with the solution and its protection, no complaints.

The forensics analysis feature provides substantial help in determining the extent of the problem and how it affects the machines.

The SentinelOne is one of my daily consoles and I use it regularly to identify the root cause of some infections.  However, when a file is flagged as suspicious it would be very helpful to have the system highlight precisely what event or characteristic of the file SentinelOne considers potentially dangerous.  In this way it would help focus our investigations on the specific characteristics or actions of the file.

We have had 100% uptime with the solution.

Given the way the solution works, I see no issues at all with scalability — both in the number of users or incidents as well as the degree of sophistication of the attacks.

Technical support has attended to our issues quickly and with a good sense of the need to communicate continually throughout an issue.

Yes, we continue to use Kaspersky for our other users.

The setup is very straightforward and simple. Our users who have the solution have spoken so highly about SentinelOne that other users who are not on the target list ask if they too can use the solution.

Our in-house team implemented the solution, working with our local engineers in the different countries where we have offices.

The pricing is rather elevated. However, the solution is the most transparent for the uses I have ever encountered as well as being normally very informative and accurate for our engineers.

We evaluated several other options, including Bromium, Carbon Black, CrowdStrike, Cylance, Forcepoint, Invincea, and some others.

If you have the budget, this is a top-notch solution. We have used the solution for over a year now, and we plan to continue using the solution for our most critical users (those with access to sensitive or confidential data). Truly an excellent solution.

I use the solution for EDR. We're in the process of deploying so log collection will be a use case later on.

We are certain it will improve our organization later on because today our cloud has limited AD and zero EDR. SentinelOne is replacing our current legacy and we're also getting the EDR functionality. 

The tool's most valuable feature is EDR. 

I have been using the product for two months. 

I rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security's stability a four out of ten. 

I rate the solution's scalability a four out of five. 

We chose Singularity Cloud Workload Security because our team wanted a cloud-native solution instead of a legacy. 

The tool's deployment is not complex. Our team got complex information, which made it complex. 

SentinelOne's team helped us with the deployment. We had an awesome experience working with them. There were some miscommunications also. 

The product is reasonably priced. 

I rate Singularity Cloud Workload Security an eight out of ten. 

We are using SentinelOne within our company in servers and endpoints and we have deployed it for some of our clients.

The most valuable feature of SentinelOne is the EDR functionality. We are protected against threats, such as ransomware.

SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price.

I have been using SentinelOne for approximately one year.

The stability of SentinelOne was fine.

SentinelOne is scalable.

We have approximately 300 users using this solution.

The initial setup of SentinelOne was straightforward.

The price of SentinelOne is on the higher side compared to other solutions, such as Symantec.

We have one person who maintains the solution.

I rate SentinelOne a seven out of ten.

My client uses the solution for endpoint security and email security.

I have found the most valuable feature to be the rapid threat detection. 

We need to analyze the threats and make decisions based on that, so the analytics could be better at analyzing exactly where the threats are coming from.

One of my clients has been using the product for about three years.

My client has said that it is stable. 

It is a scalable solution.

We received a response from technical support within 48 hours. The support is great.

I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.

We primarily use it for identifying and mitigating zero data.

The remediation and rollback features are pretty impressive.

I would like to see category-based web filtering.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity for about three years now.

The stability is excellent.

There is high scalability currently. We have around two hundred individuals in the organization.

Technical support is on point and very good.

Positive

We previously used Kaspersky but it lacked visibility onto zero. That was the main reason that we switched SentinelOne Singularity.

The initial setup was very straightforward and convenient and it took a couple of minutes to deploy.

We are certified and our engineers can do the deployment in-house.

The pricing appears to be pretty affordable.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity a nine out of ten.

I use SentinelOne for security.

We function as an internal red team and do numerous tests of attack simulations. SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones. 

SentinelOne's best features are test automation, playbooks, incident response, use-case improvement, and compliance with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

SentinelOne's performance and the accuracy of its incident filtering could be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for five years.

SentinelOne is stable.

SentinelOne is scalable.

The initial setup was straightforward because we created an implementation plan and did some diagnostics before starting.

We used a third-party team. 

SentinelOne's pricing could be lower.

I would give SentinelOne a rating of eight out of ten.

We have been protecting more than 100 companies (with no infections) since the product was installed.

• The rollback functionality.
• Its capacity to prevent new threats.

The management console.

No.

No.

Very fast and accurate.

Yes, Kaspersky Lab. They don't have a good next gen endpoint in order to protect against new threats.

Very easy. You can start your deploy with a single executable file or a massive deployment (GPO, etc.) with a MSI.

The price is competitive, if you compare it with other solutions on the market.

Sophos Intercept X, Cylance, Traps and a few more.

It's very important to understand how industry-wide endpoint security solutions work to avoid possible issues.

We are a system integrator. We provide this solution to the end-users.

Most of the features are valuable. As a system integrator, agent deployment is valuable. It also fits the requirements of most of the clients.

They can improve the administrative interface. They can make it more user-friendly.

Its price can be lower.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

Its setup is of medium complexity. It is not complex, and it is also not straightforward.

Its price can be lower because I'm seeing competition from another vendor who beats it on commercials.

I would advise others to go for it. It is a good product, and it fits the requirements of most of the clients. It is very flexible.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.