SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

We are a system integrator. We provide this solution to the end-users.

Most of the features are valuable. As a system integrator, agent deployment is valuable. It also fits the requirements of most of the clients.

They can improve the administrative interface. They can make it more user-friendly.

Its price can be lower.

I have been using this solution for three years.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

Its setup is of medium complexity. It is not complex, and it is also not straightforward.

Its price can be lower because I'm seeing competition from another vendor who beats it on commercials.

I would advise others to go for it. It is a good product, and it fits the requirements of most of the clients. It is very flexible.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

My client uses the solution for endpoint security and email security.

I have found the most valuable feature to be the rapid threat detection. 

We need to analyze the threats and make decisions based on that, so the analytics could be better at analyzing exactly where the threats are coming from.

One of my clients has been using the product for about three years.

My client has said that it is stable. 

It is a scalable solution.

We received a response from technical support within 48 hours. The support is great.

I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.

We primarily use it for identifying and mitigating zero data.

The remediation and rollback features are pretty impressive.

I would like to see category-based web filtering.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity for about three years now.

The stability is excellent.

There is high scalability currently. We have around two hundred individuals in the organization.

Technical support is on point and very good.

Positive

We previously used Kaspersky but it lacked visibility onto zero. That was the main reason that we switched SentinelOne Singularity.

The initial setup was very straightforward and convenient and it took a couple of minutes to deploy.

We are certified and our engineers can do the deployment in-house.

The pricing appears to be pretty affordable.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity a nine out of ten.

I use SentinelOne for security.

We function as an internal red team and do numerous tests of attack simulations. SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones. 

SentinelOne's best features are test automation, playbooks, incident response, use-case improvement, and compliance with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

SentinelOne's performance and the accuracy of its incident filtering could be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for five years.

SentinelOne is stable.

SentinelOne is scalable.

The initial setup was straightforward because we created an implementation plan and did some diagnostics before starting.

We used a third-party team. 

SentinelOne's pricing could be lower.

I would give SentinelOne a rating of eight out of ten.

We have been protecting more than 100 companies (with no infections) since the product was installed.

• The rollback functionality.
• Its capacity to prevent new threats.

The management console.

No.

No.

Very fast and accurate.

Yes, Kaspersky Lab. They don't have a good next gen endpoint in order to protect against new threats.

Very easy. You can start your deploy with a single executable file or a massive deployment (GPO, etc.) with a MSI.

The price is competitive, if you compare it with other solutions on the market.

Sophos Intercept X, Cylance, Traps and a few more.

It's very important to understand how industry-wide endpoint security solutions work to avoid possible issues.

The solution offers very rich details surrounding threats or attacks.

The price is a bit high. They should make their pricing model more affordable.

The solution needs better reporting on new threats and malware. The reporting is present, but I can't find the information easily.

The solution is stable.

It's hard to give an impression on the stability at this time. We haven't used it on a large scale yet. We're still testing.

We haven't needed to contact technical support yet.

We are currently using Webhook as we test this new solution.

We are using the public cloud deployment model.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten.

I use it for policy fine-tuning.

SentinelOne uses behavioral analysis and artificial intelligence to detect unknown malware. That is what all enterprises require today. They don't want to go with some normal anti-malware tool, which has less sophisticated detection. Even if something suspicious or a Zero-day enters the environment, SentinelOne will be able to identify it.

It has good visibility features and it's straightforward. It's not so complex.

There is not much flexibility in terms of policy fine-tuning. We can turn it off or turn it on, but there's nothing much else to do. Everything is predefined. It's good in a way, but you don't get much flexibility if you want to do something particular.

We do not have any issues with stability at the moment. Before I joined the company, I heard that there were some issues with the agent, that they were having some performance issues, a portlet application was crashing. There were minor issues which are fine now.

In my organization, we are planning to deploy some 30,000 agents. I would say that it's scalable. I don't see any problem with scalability.

I just had a conversation with a colleague who has bought McAfee ePO. He was saying that he was able to do much more in that tool than in SentinelOne. For example, he mentioned that he was able to see traffic on a particular port on a particular system, using ePO. We cannot do that using SentinelOne. In this tool, everything is already in place and there's not much that we can do.