SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

We perform a relatively detailed hunt in our environment for specific IOCs and indicators. Specifically in regards to compliance organizations or regulatory organizations that release data, we need to validate that no IOCs for those specific threats exist in our environment. We can go back to a specific period of time, so we can validate that things like that do not exist. We can also correlate activity in our environment with endpoint data with a high level of efficacy.

I have administered lots of different AVs in my long tenure as an AV EDR administrator. This is quite honestly the first one of this type. With a tool like Singularity Marketplace, getting an integration running is just a matter of creating an API key and plugging it in. It is really cool. With the Singularity data lake that we have been learning about during this conference, it looks like it is going to be pretty painless to ingest from sources that we are already collecting from and dump them straight into SDL. We have a higher level of visibility and a better grasp of the data we are collecting. There is a reduced time to detection and high efficacy correlations.

I am an analyst, and Singularity Complete definitely makes making a determination, researching a specific threat, or trying to correlate it much quicker. Instead of spending a whole day trying to research something, I can knock it out quickly and then move on to other tasks. It makes me capable of doing a job that would typically require another person at least. There is greater job satisfaction. I do not get burnt out.

Singularity Complete has helped us bolster our defenses, so the downstream impact is reduced alerts because we are able to not only triage issues but also proactively apply defense with STAR rules and things like that. We are able to reduce alerts just because we are getting protection on the front side. There is the granularity of the data that we can query through deep visibility in particular to refine our custom STAR detections. That does help decrease the work.

Singularity Complete has absolutely reduced our organizational risk. Compared to where we came from with the traditional endpoint protection, our ability to respond to emerging threats has really matured. The level of actual attacks that we have to respond to is drastically reduced. It is hard to quantify the reduction, but there is at least a 25% to 35% reduction.

SentinelOne is a big value-add to the organization. They are continually pushing forward and innovating. They are constantly developing new things. As I am learning about new features here at the conference, I am logging into the console, and some of those features are already there. I know they waited until this conference to release that, but they are still cool to see. It feels good to work with the product and to be learning a product that is not getting stale.

I really like deep visibility. Deep visibility is one of the coolest features of almost any tool that we use. The breadth of data that is collected there is valuable, and it gives us the ability to search back through literally tons of data going back a specific period of time. We typically go back 90 days for most things, but we could go back further.

The ability to pick it up is also valuable. It is very intuitive. It does not require a lot of training. For example, we had an intern over the summer who joined us. We were able to get him up and running in the visibility very quickly without a lot of hand-holding.

Something we are looking forward to is the ability of the SentinelOne backend to ingest data from other sources. Now that they are moving to the Singularity data lake, we are looking forward to being able to query data that is not just collected by SentinelOne endpoint agents. We are looking forward to being able to query against all data that we are ingesting into that backend.

I have been using this solution for between two and three years.

Its stability is excellent.

Its scalability is excellent.

I have dealt with a lot of support in my time, and SentinelOne's support is the most responsive one I have ever had. However, I currently have an ongoing support case, and I am struggling with getting that escalated, which colors my overall perception of it. We are getting active updates daily though, so they are engaged. Even if we have not found a fix yet, there is an active conversation or two-way communication. Overall, their support is superior to others that I have dealt with. I would rate their support a nine out of ten.

Positive

We were using another solution previously. The main reason for switching was the efficacy of the product. SentinelOne was tested against several competitors when renewal time came up, and it exceeded expectations and performed better than others. 

The previous product was a traditional endpoint protection. It was very signature-based. It always felt like we were behind with new types of attacks and new types of malware because we had to wait for signatures to come out and things like that. It felt like we were always trying to catch up. With SentinelOne, we feel like we are better protected from the start. 

There are cheaper options out there that I know are not as effective. I have administered several of them, not for this organization but for others. The thing I like about SentinelOne is that I know that if it raises an alert, it is worth looking at, so we are not dealing with a lot of false positives. It is rare.

We evaluated Cisco AMP, Microsoft Defender, and McAfee. SentinelOne exceeded expectations and outperformed all of those. We did a bake-off against those solutions and found SentinelOne to be the most effective.

Overall, I would rate Singularity Complete a nine out of ten.

We are an MSSP.

First of all, it helps us with a better response to the end users. Customers are depending on us to make sure we are making the right call, and then we are leaning on SentinelOne to make sure they are giving us the right call by giving us the right tools.

Singularity Complete has absolutely helped free up our staff for other projects and tasks. The amount of time that we are spending doing work that does not keep us on target is just a waste of time. The more it reduces that noise, the better it is for us and our customers. We have been using it long enough, so it is hard to tell how much time it has saved, but we feel that we have a better solution than most of the competitors that we are dealing with.

Singularity Complete has helped reduce alerts over time. We do not have a lot of the frustrations that some of our competitors do, which is our advantage. We have been using it for so long, so we do not have much to compare it to in terms of alert reduction. We are also partners with a competitor. We had to do that for a contract, and we get a lot of false positive noise coming out of that one.

Singularity Complete has helped reduce our organizational risk, but because we have been with it for so long, it is hard to compare it to others.

Singularity Complete helps us save on costs. We continue to get more volume, reduce our costs, and reduce our waste of time, but it is hard to compare the cost savings because we have been using it for so long. We have smooth operations, and we are just keeping it going. We are enjoying all the added features.

SentinelOne is our main strategic partner when it comes to the protection of our customer's data. We have not had a bad incident, and with the reputation that SentinelOne has in the vertical we deal with, it is the gold standard. We start with that, and then we are viewed as more of a serious partner than some of the lesser products that are out there.

In terms of Singularity Complete’s interoperability with other SentinelOne solutions and other third-party tools, we are an MSSP, so we have to deal with a lot of other tools. The integrations are huge for us. It sounds nice to say this is the only solution and you have to use x tools, but it does not work in the real world, so you have to have those integrations.

The overview is valuable. There are a lot of instances out there, but Singularity Complete cuts the noise down by giving us graphics and color-coding information instead of massive tech dumps. It helps us concentrate on what is actually needed versus just the noise. There is just so much noise. It brings us the information we need to look at quickly.

The improvement could be in terms of reducing more noise and continuing to cut that down. AI seems to be the big thing with Purple. We are excited to get our hands on that.

I have been using Singularity Complete since its inception. It was probably 2016.

Its stability is fantastic. We have no problems.

We have not hit the top end. We are probably running 10,000 agents and have not seen any degradation in the portal.

Their support is very good. We have not had anything come up against that, and our staff has learned to depend on SentinelOne, which, as management, is a little uneasy because we are operating without a net besides SentinelOne in some cases. What we are paying for it is worth it. There is this peace of mind. I would rate their support a ten out of ten.

Positive

Years ago, we were probably running four to five solutions, but then we kept comparing it with them. We were like, "This is the noise we are getting from X. Let us load SentinelOne." The noise reduced with SentinelOne. That proof of concept worked for us.

We currently have an agreement with a competitor where we have to pick up the remaining part of their contract. That is not a place where we are going to increase our expenditure, but we are waiting for that contract to come to an end. The customer knows SentinelOne, but they are tied into another solution till the end or mid of 2024. We are just waiting for that. What makes SentinelOne Singularity Complete different from others for us is the peace of mind. We know we are covered, and we feel that we are covered. Anytime we have had an incident or event, they have always been there for us. They have responded quickly, and we have not had any flashbacks or second attempts at it. Usually, we could stop it the first time, and that has worked for us in all the years we have been with SentinelOne.

It is easier now than it was back then. We deploy it every month on somebody new. We have enjoyed that. 

Just yesterday, we had a customer convert from a separate partner to us, and that migration from company to company within SentinelOne was flawless. It was just us doing the migration. We have been there for so long, so we just bring it straight across. The process is very straightforward and easy. This partner of SentinelOne was going to uninstall the agents, and I paused them and asked them to just transfer. They had never gone through that before. We took that over and moved all the agents over without any loss of coverage to the actual customer.

For deployments, we have a staff of 40, but onboarding is a no-brainer.

We have seen an ROI. It is a very profitable investment for us. SentinelOne is very valuable, and with our price being lower than the expectations gives us a great margin.

We have not been beaten in the market by pricing, so we have been feeling good about that. The discussions we have had over the years keep us at a very low price per unit. It can always get better, but we also know there is a cost to the backend.

To someone who is researching Singularity Complete, I would say that you can read all the information, but the proof is in the actual work and the history that it has so far. We have got no complaints about the quality and maturity of this solution. 

Make sure you are comparing it to whatever you have because that gives you comparative data. If you walk in, sometimes, you do not know you are getting the best of breed right there.

It is a ten out of ten for me, and it gives me peace of mind.

The primary use case for us is to use the lightweight SentinelOne agent on our endpoints. Our previous vendor's agent was heavier, which caused performance issues when scanning our systems. We were impressed with how lightweight the SentinelOne agent is and how few resources it consumes. We also use it for some of our infrastructure, which includes machines with limited resources. We wanted to find a solution that would not impact the performance of these machines.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has streamlined the mitigation process and the time it takes to analyze and understand whether I have a true positive or a false positive. This has definitely saved me some time. The rollback feature is also a nice addition. Previously, our old solution would link out to services like VirusTotal, but it was difficult to follow these links to determine if an alert was a true positive or a false positive. For example, an alert might be labeled as a potentially unwanted application, which might not be as critical as a true positive. SentinelOne has made it easier to determine the severity of an alert. I have also noticed that SentinelOne has cut down on the number of false alerts. Our old solution would alert us to things like Chrome browser updates, which would download and make registry changes. With SentinelOne I have only encountered one alert that I didn't need to worry about.

We have definitely saved a lot of time. We had to spend some time setting up the environment correctly, scaling up the protections, and setting any exemptions. After that, the most I need to do is troubleshoot issues that are not related to SentinelOne, such as removing the SentinelOne agent if I need to troubleshoot another issue on an end-user device. Application updates, such as when a new installer is released, are the only other times I need to access SentinelOne, besides when I need to review an incident.

It has helped us reduce our MTTD. We are notified of threats quickly, and being able to see the threat on our dashboard has simplified the process. Once a threat is identified and I am on the screen, I can click once to view the visibility and see if the threat is anywhere else on our network. This is fantastic.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has helped us reduce our MTTR.

Although it is difficult to quantify the direct financial savings of SentinelOne Singularity Complete, we have saved money indirectly through time saved.

Visibility is one of the most valuable features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete. It does not directly replace a dedicated SIM solution, but it works well for our environment and gives us the visibility into our systems that we need.

I appreciate that it is easy to review incidents that have been detected by the behavioral AI or the SentinelOne Cloud. From the notification we can click into the incident to start reviewing, it is just a few clicks. I have all the data in a single pane, and I can pivot to other sources of information, such as VirusTotal, with a single click. I can also hunt for the incident on the network with a single click. This makes things much easier and saves me time from having to review logs.

One way to improve and get additional benefits would be for SentinelOne to host the updated installer files for us, rather than us having to download and host them ourselves. This could be done in cloud storage or through our mobile device management platform. When they release a new package, whether it's an early release or a general release, I believe they could provide more value by hosting those packages directly. Currently, when they release a new package, I get notified, which is great. However, I then have to go to the portal, download the package, and replace the package that we have posted on our own cloud storage. This is time-consuming. If they could simply provide me with a link to the latest general release installer, that would be fantastic. Even if the link changes, I would only need to change the URL in our cloud storage. This would save me a lot of time.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for five months.

I keep the central tab open in my browser. If I click Sign in instead of being signed in, the page refreshes, and I have to sign in again. I think this was just a session token expiring. I have not experienced any stability issues with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, such as crashing or downtime.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable to our infrastructure and endpoints. Once we figured out the deployment hurdle for Windows and Mac, we were able to push it out to all of our endpoints without any problems. I can break out devices into different sites and groups, and some of those groups can be dynamic. For example, if I'm looking for a Mac computer versus a Windows computer, I can just click on the group and see all of them there. I can also add tags for anything, such as the OS version or if the person might be a specific risk. These are non-relational attributes and values that we can set, so we can define whatever schema we want. It's fantastic.

The technical support team was quick to answer my question and their answer was precise. I didn't have to go back and forth with them or explain things multiple times. They gave me exactly what I needed.

Positive

We previously used BitDefender and Malwarebytes. SentinelOne Singularity Complete was priced similarly, and we felt that it had better support. When we had a support issue, it was answered and resolved quickly. Additionally, the visibility and ability to traverse the logs of all the other devices in our network were invaluable. This allowed us to see if a threat might be present elsewhere in our network. This is what ultimately led us to choose the complete solution over the other SKUs that they offer.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a lightweight agent. Additionally, some of our servers are running older operating systems. The agents from our previous vendor did not work well with these older systems. I specifically looked for a new solution that would not be a watered-down solution and would function across our legacy architectures as well as our current modern setup.

Another benefit of the Singularity Complete solution is the increased visibility it provides. We are able to collect data on endpoints that are connecting to specific IP addresses or installing specific files with similar hashes. This allows us to see how far a threat has propagated through the network or if anyone else has it installed. This is something that we could not do with our previous solution.

We use Windows and Mac computers. Deploying SentinelOne on Windows was fairly easy. We were able to do it through our remote management solution. The installation was straightforward and simple. The most difficult part of the process was that the device had to reboot in order for SentinelOne to connect to the visibility service and bring everything online.

Deploying SentinelOne on Mac was a bit different. This is primarily due to the way the macOS operating system works. We need to grant specific privacy permissions to applications in order for them to have full disk access or screen recording capabilities. We found that if we installed SentinelOne on the user profile of a Mac computer, the user's administrator could remove it. This is not ideal, so we had to go back to the drawing board and deploy SentinelOne through our MDM solution.

The biggest headache was that, in order to deploy SentinelOne through MDM so that users did not have to grant privileges to the application, we needed to create a Privacy Preferences Policy Control profile with the specific permissions granted for the SentinelOne bundle ID. We then pushed this profile out to all users. Once we did this, the installation was seamless.

A few colleagues and I completed the implementation in-house.

We have seen a return on investment in the form of time savings. We used to spend more time on incidents, but now we can quickly triage them and move on to other things. This has freed up our time so that we can focus on more important tasks.

We did receive a competitive price for SentinelOne Singularity Complete. However, I believe the retail pricing, or MSRP, is a bit high. I hope we can get the same competitive pricing through our reseller when it comes time to renew. I still believe there are benefits to the solution, even if we had to pay the list price. However, I think they could be more competitive with their upfront pricing.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete eight out of ten. The room for improvement is to add some additional features, such as Ranger, which they sell separately. I see a lot of value in Ranger, and I wish it was included with the complete purchase.

We do not have any direct plugins for SentinelOne Singularity Complete, such as Ranger. Ranger is an add-on that I believe can be purchased through SentinelOne to expand our visibility. We do not have that, and I wish it was included because there are quite a few nice features that I would hope to see eventually included or trickled down to the complete solution. I feel like those are just a few other cherries on top that would really put this package over the top. One of the struggles I have in a Mac environment is creating a custom application creating the Privacy Preferences Policy Control profile and setting everything correctly so that users do not need to interact with the application when it is pushed to them. SentinelOne has clear documentation and works with a few MDM vendors that have documentation already published. So when we were running a POC for a few of these vendors, it was very easy to get that set up, which is not something I can say for other applications.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is an intuitive product. I found the getting started guide and active preparation checklist to be very helpful. The checklist is well-documented and comprehensive, and it covers everything from the initial purchase to GoLive. The support team was also able to answer any questions I had about navigating the application. The interface is mature and user-friendly. I have not encountered any major issues so far. Overall, I am very happy with SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is definitely valuable as a strategic security partner. SentinelOne Singularity Complete was our top choice, and we are happy with it. I would definitely recommend it to my colleagues if they were looking for a solution for their company.

Maintenance is only required when the vendor releases a new general access version of the installer. I need to download the new version, upload it to our servers, and make sure it deploys successfully to our machines. This is the extent of my maintenance responsibilities. I do not need to directly interact with the application itself.

I would recommend that people evaluating SentinelOne Singularity Complete try it out to see if it is right for their environment. SentinelOne offers a trial that can be set up for their environment. When an organization purchases the product, they will flip a switch and there is no need to set anything else up. This was beneficial for us because we did not have to waste time setting up and deploying the product to a few devices in our environment only to have to do it again after we purchased it. I would also recommend engaging with the resources that SentinelOne provides to get a good understanding of the product. We can tweak the settings and see how it responds to different threats. If organizations have any specific needs, they can talk to an engineer during the trial. This was helpful for us because the engineer was able to make changes to the settings to meet our needs. Overall, I would recommend taking a look at SentinelOne Singularity Complete. I was initially overwhelmed by the different SKU offerings, but I was able to work with sales to find the best package for our needs. The SentinelOne team has been very helpful.

This is our main endpoint and detection response platform. 

It's our antivirus for all of our endpoints, including workstation servers, Linux Windows, Macs, et cetera. We're also deploying it to some of our mobile endpoints as well. We also do incident threat hunting here so that if we see an incident in our environment, we can use it to hunt down that incident and try to get a better analysis of it. We're using it to scan our active directory environment. 

We just wanted a better antivirus. It fixed a lot of problems that we were facing.

We get a lot of benefits from them, including its ease of use. We don't have to really go digging or spend hours a day trying to configure something. 

They have a really good knowledge base. That eliminates a lot of the time having to do manual research. The time it cuts down is great. It removes a lot of time from doing some of these manual and tedious tasks.

Their basic endpoint and detection platform is pretty much their bread and butter. The features that it comes with get a lot of love. You can add custom solutions, rules, et cetera. 

The mobile device management platform is also really good.

They have a lot of integrations with a lot of common platforms that we use. We integrate them with three or four other platforms including data analysis platforms. We haven't really come across too many instances where we had to create custom APIs for them. 

Our impressions of the solution's ability to ingest correlated data across our security solutions are good. They do it really well. They tend to take a lot of the data that they ingest and do a really good job showing you exactly what you need to do or utilizing that data the better way than just receiving it and then manually parsing it. 

We can consolidate our security solutions. It's nice. We have a lot of our security solutions right in the platform itself. They don't offer everything that we need as a security team, yet they do offer a lot. We've been acquiring more of their products as the years go on.

We use the Ranger functionality. That was something we acquired a little over a year ago, and we had quite a lot of endpoints in there, and we actually reduced that number down to under 20 recently. So we're working our way through it, and it's made a lot of progress in our environment.

It provides network and asset visibility for us. Ranger scans our network. It does a really good job of identifying that. In correlation with some of our other network tools, it does a really good job of evaluating what's out there and also being able to provide a proper review and analysis of those endpoints.

We like that Ranger requires no new agents, hardware, or network changes. It's actually really nice. Every time we want to do something that involves the installation of an agent, we have to put in a change request, and we have to wait for the proper easy to improve it. The nice thing about it was we just alerted a couple of teams. We were going to do some scans, and that was it. We've never had any issues. Agentless is definitely the way we've been trying to go moving forward.

We have more insight into our environment. While it doesn't cut down on alerts, we gain more visibility.

The solution, on average, saves us a couple of days' worth of time in total.

It's helped reduce our company's mean time to detect. In correlation with the SOC, we've seen quick alert times. We get an alert almost immediately after an incident.

It also improved the mean time to respond. It does depend on the situation.

From the standpoint of having to suffer through an attack, the solution has saved money in saving us a potential loss. We're paying for the product. The savings are all hypothetical numbers, however, we are definitely saving money. It's helped us reduce organizational risk. We were in bad shape before. We're looking a lot better now. 

The grouping feature needs improvement. There are many times I've wanted to do blacklisting or exclusions for specific people in a group, however, I don't want to remove them from the group itself. 

I'd like to see an auto-update feature. 

I've been using the solution for about over three years. I've been dedicated to it only for a year or two.

They are pretty stable. The company is expanding at a good rate and they are releasing new features to maintain the stability effectively.

We have almost 3,000 endpoints. We have a spike of 500 to 600 endpoints in the summer to December season. We are primarily Windows and also have about 200 Linux endpoints. They are all deployed across the same organization. 

Scaling is flexible. They do a really good job.

Technical support is helpful. Sometimes Level One support may not be the greatest, however, you can push to someone higher. Issues are always resolved. 

Positive

I don't have any personal experience working with other solutions. 

We are at about 98% deployment. There are endpoints that pop up that don't have the agent to get it, however, we're past the deployment phase or past the initial configuration phase. It's all just maintaining and tweaking, and as new features come out, we adjust.

I wasn't here for the initial deployment process. I've done a lot of configurations for new features that they've implemented.

Our team does general maintenance. They do a really good job of giving you the information you need to troubleshoot. Their knowledge base is really good. 

We've definitely seen an ROI. I'm not sure where we would be without it right now. 

The pricing is fair. It's not cheap, nor is it expensive.

The solution seems to be quite innovative. They are coming out with network products. Every month we have a webinar on new features coming out.

The quality and maturity of the solution are both great. The stuff they give us is really detailed.

There are instances of the solution on the cloud, however, all the endpoints are on-premises. 

I'm pretty satisfied with the product as a security partner. I'm happy with where we are with them. 

This is a great product. If a company is unhappy with its current EDR, SentinelOne is a good choice. They are acquiring a lot of companies and solutions to add to their roster in order to provide a more centralized platform.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's going to be a good one-stop-shop and I enjoy working with them.

We used it only for six months. Initially, it turned out to be a good product, but then we had an issue, so we stopped using it. We are now using CrowdStrike.

From an endpoint perspective, we have a heterogeneous environment. We have Windows, we have Mac, and we have Linux endpoints. We deployed it on all the endpoints, all different operating systems, and cloud instances as well. Our AD was also integrated along with the identity solution, but the issues specifically get reported on the endpoints for open-source or Linux. That is why we decided not to move forward with it.

By implementing SentinelOne Singularity Complete, we wanted security for our endpoints. After COVID, endpoint security became even more critical because our perimeter was more exposed. It was expanding wherever the end users were, so endpoint security became much more critical. Previously, in terms of endpoint security, the traditional antivirus, anti-malware, and endpoint protection were disconnected systems. We did not have any offline correlation, log collection, or policy management, whereas SentinelOne, as well as CrowdStrike, come with a central console. For compliance requirements, such as ISO, SOC 2, or PCI, we have to provide evidence in terms of the status of the endpoint patches and security posture. That is possible through the central console. That was the motivation for us to move to one of these products. SentinelOne was our first choice, but we ran into a specific issue.

We had not specifically signed up for any risk management, but we were also looking to expand that to a completely managed SOC where we do the log correlation as well. When we initially started, we only started with the endpoint, identity, and cloud.

The main reason for getting this solution was that it was a new-gen endpoint solution for having an organization-wide view of security vulnerabilities or abnormal behavior. That was the main reason we got started with SentinelOne Singularity Complete. It gave us a lot of that information. It also helped us with compliance requirements. In the case of any specific instance or any abnormal behavior, its reports certainly helped us with the root cause analysis and collection of logs. It helped us in providing or collecting the evidence that we could use in our compliance reports to ensure proper reporting for relevant legal entities.

The ranger product helped us to do discovery of endpoints. We could identify our rogue devices.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete helped to reduce alerts. It groups the alerts. If you have similar alerts coming from the same server or a couple of servers at a similar time frame, it groups them and sends a single alert along with the device ID. This way, you have less number of alerts for the team to work on. If the agent itself is not in the running state or does not have the latest signatures available, it basically groups the alerts and tries to create a single alert. You have all the endpoints listed out, and you can take action against that particular issue rather than the same issue being reported from thousands of machines together. It is hard to provide the metrics, but generally, it helped quite a bit. I had around 8,000 endpoint licenses, and if 20% of the services started reporting the same issue, there would have been 1,500 to 1,600 alerts in a minute. It merges them into a single alert. We can also define a real-time action. A single alert helps our backend team to take action easily. The same is applicable to the SentinelOne support as well. If certain patches or certain actions are required to mitigate an issue, their team can do the mitigation in one shot and the fixes get pushed to all the servers that were reporting that particular issue. In one shot, you can automate and orchestrate your mitigation.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete helped reduce the mean time to detect and the mean time to resolution. There was at least a 10% reduction.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete did not help us save any direct costs, but there is an opportunity in terms of manhours saved in the backend because of having all these features integrated. There were indirect cost benefits. We saved a lot of hours because our engineers did not have to keep an eye on all the alerts. They could automate certain actions. That was an indirect cost benefit. I cannot list any direct cost benefits. These are costly products.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete absolutely helped reduce organizational risk. It is meant for that. We had different levels of reporting available. We could have an executive view. We could view the standards or framework that we were using. We could see the level of compliance to various standards in terms of percentage. We could also define the actions by accepting something as a risk or mitigating that by orchestrating.

There is centralized reporting and view. We can have role-based access management where technical people or monitoring people can have a central dashboard with a single view of all the endpoints. Whether our endpoints are running on Windows, Mac, Linux, or any flavor of operating systems, and even mobile devices, we can have a central dashboard through which we can do complete user management and policy management. We can have a complete security posture organization-wise, department-wise, or business-wise.

They have a good data lake kind of feature where you can ingest all the security logs. They can be from your endpoint, your identity management system, or your cloud. They can be from any of those services, so you get to do log analytics. That is one of the features that I liked about it. The same capability is also available with CrowdStrike which we are now exploring because of the issue with SentinelOne. However, at the time, with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, because of log analytics, we could do threat intel or sandboxing or have custom logic written for any specific kind of reaction. Those kinds of things were quite easy.

Log analytics and a couple of other things were also pretty good.

We ran into production issues related to CPU utilization on Linux endpoints. Our production environment's performance got degraded like anything. After a lot of debugging, we figured out that because it consumed a big percentage of the CPU and memory. Some of the applications were restarting automatically or randomly. We had an auto-healing infrastructure, so if the system memory was available, the application would restart on its own. When this issue got prolonged, we could see a lot of service failures because of being out of memory. This issue started hitting us wherever we had persistence connection requirements. Because existing connections were breaking completely, any transaction that somebody was doing online got terminated, and that was a big issue.

They should improve it for the open-source or Linux endpoints. They can provide customizations where we can limit the on-access CPU utilization or memory utilization. It should honor the specified limit and use only a limited percentage of CPU and memory rather than utilizing all the CPU or memory available on a system. 

Other than that, I do not have any input. There is a lot of potential. There are a lot of possibilities for orchestration and sandboxing. Because we hit one particular issue, we were not able to continue using it, but I see a lot of opportunities there.

With SentinelOne Singularity Complete, we did not work for a long time. We gave away this product within six months. There were some problems or issues reported, and that is why we discontinued using this product. We stopped using it nine to ten months ago. We have now migrated completely to CrowdStrike.

I discarded this product within six months. I would rate its stability a five out of ten.

Its scalability is fine. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability. 

We used it in a heterogeneous environment. We had about 8,000 endpoint licenses.

I would rate their support a six out of ten because the issues that I had reported were not resolved.

As a strategic partner, SentinelOne is pretty good. They are very proactive.

Neutral

Prior to SentinelOne Singularity Complete, we had multiple pieces. We did not have one single product for everything. For endpoint security, we had McAfee as an antivirus and anti-malware. For identity, there was a different application altogether. For SIEM, there was a completely different solution, and for log correlation, we had a different log management server. Dashboarding solutions were completely different. EPO was the tool that we had to orchestrate some of the endpoint and antivirus-related policies.

We were having some challenges with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, so we migrated to CrowdStrike. We are now also exploring CrowdStrike's SIEM solution.

From a maturity standpoint, both SentinelOne Singularity Complete and CrowdStrike are mature products.

We deployed it on-prem and on the cloud. Its deployment was straightforward. It was orchestrated via my backend tool.

It does not require much maintenance. The maintenance required is similar to an endpoint. One or two people are sufficient for 8,000 to 9,000 licenses because they need to just monitor the status. In case they find a rogue device, then only they have to take action. Otherwise, once they have a complete deployment done, they just need to automate reports and tasks. Those kinds of things certainly help.

It is expensive. There is no doubt about it. If one of the functions does not work, it becomes very difficult for any CIO to justify the cost.

I would not be able to share the exact price, but we had almost 8,000 endpoint licenses, and it was a huge cost.

CrowdStrike is not cheaper than SentinelOne. Both products go neck to neck. Both are costly products. 

I would advise going for this solution only if you have a clear use case.

I have only one recommendation. If anybody wants to use such a solution to its potential, they need to be very clear about their use case. They need to know whether they want to go for the complete solution or they are just focusing on the endpoint solution. If you have a complete use case that requires EDR, identity, cloud, and log analytics, then SentinelOne or CrowdStrike makes sense. If you only have an endpoint use case, then these solutions do not make sense. It would not be a cost-effective deal.

After the complete endpoint deployment, you have complete asset visibility. We never used the life cycle management piece. We were just using the EDR feature.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete did not help free up the time of our staff for other projects and tasks. It has a lot of potential to do that, but we used it for a very short duration. Because of the issue we had, we did not continue using this solution. However, it has a lot of potential.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete a six out of ten. After they improve the product and their support, I may increase the rating. At this time, I cannot rate it more than six.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is an MDR solution. It is used mainly to detect advanced threats in our teams and on-site teams.

I have used two different vendors before Singularity. Each had its pros and cons. However, Singularity is the most complete tool for EPP and EDR. From a financial, operational, and performance point of view, it is very efficient to have a single solution.

Ranger is a good feature. The XDR functionality provides the timeline of the attack. The product provides deep analytics for threat hunting. My team uses it to detect incidents and for threat hunting. I like the app inventory feature. It is very good for detecting unauthorized apps by our security policy.

I have raised a couple of comments regarding the speed of investigating incidents and performing analysis by the MDR service team. We are a telecom company. We are sensitive to the information of the users. The speed of investigation of the MDR service team must be improved.

I have been using the solution for one year.

The product is pretty stable. It didn't create any issues on the endpoints, laptops, and PCs.

We haven't tried to scale the tool yet, but the solution will be scalable after we increase our license.

The support team is very collaborative. We have a dedicated account manager who is also a part of our support line. We do not face any delays or major inconveniences from the support team. I rate the support an eight out of ten. I will give it a ten out of ten when SentinelOne has better coverage in the Middle East.

Positive

I have used Kaspersky, CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black. After using these solutions for a year, I chose Singularity Complete. The other solutions are existing products and are leaders. However, Singularity Complete is better than them from a financial and technological perspective.

The initial setup is not complex. It's similar to any endpoint solution implementation. We require one staff to deploy the solution. We mainly use AWS as our cloud provider. We also use GCP.

We did the implementation ourselves. It was like any other solution. We faced similar issues. They were not big issues, though. It doesn't require a lot of technical expertise.

We have seen a return on investment because we have saved at least 50% to 60% since we bought the tool. It is an achievement when we get one solution instead of two at 50% less cost. It improved our KPIs.

The licensing is convenient, straightforward, and very clear. I care more about the breakdown of the license than the licensing itself. Some vendors have very complex licensing schemes. SentinelOne's licensing scheme is very clean.

Carbon Black has a competitive version of Singularity Complete, but it is not at the same level as Singularity Complete. It lacks features like threat hunting and Ranger. So, I chose Singularity.

We didn't have any major issues related to the integration. However, we had some issues related to the implementation on the server site. It was solved by upgrading the agents. Initially, we had a couple of issues related to integration, but after that, it was solved.

The solution gives us more visibility into alerts but doesn't reduce them. It might help after we conduct the patching and vulnerability management, but we haven't tested it yet.

Singularity Complete has helped free up our staff for other projects and tasks. We have a full-fledged SOC team that uses SIEM tools. We use it to complement our SOC and our XDR and MDR solutions. We have Singularity Complete as a technology for further investigation and threat hunting.

When we get an alert from the SOC team, we use the tool to do the analysis and threat hunting in 30 minutes per incident. It is a considerable saving in the team's time because we have limited engineers and security analysts. The tool saves 50% of the staff's time.

The product has helped us save on operation and acquisition costs by 70%. We have replaced two solutions from other vendors with Singularity Complete. Singularity Complete has surely helped reduce our organizational risk. We had a lot of alerts from the previous vendors. Now, we see fewer alerts.

Compared to its competitors, Singularity Complete is very mature. It exceeds in some areas, especially in threat hunting. I have seen other solutions. They have very strong capabilities in detection but not in threat hunting. Singularity Complete makes a difference with our analysts when they perform threat hunting and threat analysis.

I like the product's vision very much. Everything has to be on a single agent, and the integration is very much worked on. It has a very good integration roadmap. It has a very complete and strategic vision. It doesn't sell only endpoint products. I like the completeness of its vision.

People who want to buy the tool must test all the features to see how they will get value from the product because it's very complex and feature-rich.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete as an antivirus product. We also use SentinelOne's product called Vigilance, which monitors and takes action on active threats in the environment. So, basically, if someone clicks a file, Vigilance recognizes it and takes action for us, providing recommendations and remediation steps. This is a huge value add, and it's in addition to Singularity Complete's ability to monitor threats on devices from the cloud and offer remediation steps.

Our previous antivirus solution was not providing adequate protection. Threats are evolving and mutating rapidly, making it difficult for older antivirus solutions to keep up.

We have not experienced any interoperability issues. Initially, SentinelOne flagged some older software that was trying to run, but we could allow an exception to continue using the software. SentinelOne would still scan the software's location, but it would not block the processes from running. This flexibility is very useful.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete gives us peace of mind when it comes to day-to-day threats, knowing that nothing will get past them and they are always vigilant in detecting and responding to active threats on the network. It helps us sleep better at night.

It does not produce many alerts, but it has reduced the number of threats we have. Alerts are good, but only if they are not too frequent. When there is an active threat, the alert is clear about what is happening, who is affected, and the name of the machine. The alerts are also concise.

It allows our staff to focus on other more important items.

SentinelOne has helped reduce our MTTD and our MTTR because we pay for Vigilance.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete reduces our risk of major attacks, lowering costs.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete has reduced our organizational risk.

The fact that SentinelOne is actively looking for threats and runs them against the hash on the Internet to determine if they are malicious or not, is what takes it to the next level compared to other antivirus products. SentinelOne is more than just an antivirus software, it provides insights into threats and shows the flow of attacks. It also allows us to set policies in the cloud so that any other system that is affected by the same bug or virus will be automatically killed, removed, and rolled back. Cloud automation is truly amazing.

I would like to see a privilege access management feature added to SentinelOne Singularity Complete. This would allow us to generate alerts when users try to run applications as administrators to approve or deny these requests and create policies within SentinelOne. I think this would be a great addition to the suite, as it would eliminate the need to purchase a PAM solution from another vendor. It would also give us greater visibility into user activity, as the SentinelOne portal is already very good.

SentinelOne needs to improve its endpoint deployment process. To illustrate, compared to ConnectWise, a remote management software that also has some security features. In ConnectWise, we can generate an installation package based on a group and deploy the software to all endpoints in that group without the need for a script.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for three years.

I would rate the stability of Singularity Complete ten out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of Singularity Complete ten out of ten.

We pay for Vigilance, which is a 24/7 instant response team. However, if we did not pay for Vigilance and I had a question for technical support, they would usually respond within a few hours or the next business day, depending on the issue. I feel that they ask too many irrelevant questions when we are generating a ticket, but I understand why they do it.

Positive

We were using Carbon Black before, but SentinelOne Singularity Complete is much easier to use. The portal is more intuitive, the email alerts are more intuitive, and everything about it is easier on the eyes. It has a simpler view. Their cost was comparable to Carbon Black, but the solution was much better.

The initial deployment was moderate. It would be much better if SentinelOne had a better way to induct the site token into the installation process, rather than requiring users to create a script.

The deployment took a couple of weeks to complete and required two people. We captured 80 percent of the endpoints within the first day, and then it took a couple of weeks to catch the more subtle ones.

Nothing good is cheap, and SentinelOne is no exception. However, as a market leader with a great product, they don't have to be so timid with their pricing. I would like to see lower prices, but I understand why they charge what they do. It is what it is when it comes to SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete nine out of ten.

I would focus more on how the product is delivered and maintained. Maintenance of any type of antivirus product is always an important question when it comes to how to maintain this product and how to use it without dedicating a lot of resources to it. SentinelOne has just introduced an automatic upgrade feature for their client agent that allows us to set a policy to always keep our agents on the general mobility version. This will automatically upgrade our agents for us, saving IT a lot of time. Before, we had to manually upgrade our agents from the cloud, but now this process is fully automated. This is a huge value-added feature, and the agent is not very disruptive.

We have SentinelOne Singularity Complete deployed on our Windows servers across the country. Around 15 people are using the solution.

We must constantly monitor the portal to review items that Singularity Complete has blocked. Occasionally, we must decide whether to allow or deny access. We must definitely stay engaged with the portal, as it is not a fully hands-off solution. This is appropriate, as some interaction is necessary. However, the level of interaction required does not bother me.

If I were to recommend SentinelOne Singularity Complete to anyone else, I would definitely help them understand these types of products. People who are looking at cloud antivirus are usually coming from on-prem antivirus, so they may be shocked by the price. I would help them understand that yes, cloud antivirus products cost more than normal antivirus, but they offer peace of mind. Once they understand this, they can start to appreciate the value of the product.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete as an endpoint protection solution. It is our primary endpoint protection solution for our workstations and servers for protection from any kind of threats that may appear on those systems.

We have some localized virtual machines that it is running on. We do not have any cloud workloads.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is pretty good in terms of being able to fine-tune the alerting that you get. It is better than other solutions that are super noisy to the point that it is difficult to drill down. If you get an alert of something that is actionable, it is better than getting one alert and then getting five others right behind it. This solution is pretty good at not being noisy.

Luckily, I do not spend a ton of time with SentinelOne Singularity Complete unless there is an alert or a potential breach, but that just does not happen very often. Email security is the front door of protection, and that takes the brunt of any kind of security concerns. Luckily, most things are not hitting our network right now.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is pretty good at picking up things that are not necessarily malicious and alerting me that somebody or something is using something that needs attention. That happens instantaneously. It is pretty quick.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is as fast as we can ask. I can see the alert and get on it. It does not take very long, so I am not sure how we can improve more when it comes to our time to respond. We are a small enterprise. It does not take us too long to respond to things.

Being able to keep track of the endpoints and the data that is available from the endpoints is valuable. We can see the patch levels, whether Windows endpoints are active or inactive, and who is the last user that was logged on. We get a lot of granular information that is valuable even when we are not talking from a security standpoint.

The agent update is not the most intuitive process, but I understand why they do it. We have a pretty vertical 64-bit environment for Windows. That is pretty much all we have, but we get alerts for things like the new Linux endpoint or things that do not apply to us. That is probably the only thing that I do not like. There may be some way to turn that off so that I do not get endpoint update alerts from platforms that are not applicable to our system, enterprise, or network.

We have had it for a couple of years now.

I have not had any issues related to downtime, uptime, or responsiveness of their infrastructure. I have not seen any reports where something was not working the way it was supposed to.

They would far outpace the scale of what we would be looking at.

I contacted their technical support at the very beginning when I was rolling things out, but it was not a major issue. It was just about me getting up to speed with how they do things. I do not have a negative impression of how that interaction went.

SentinelOne is a good partner. I had a few other technical support questions, and they answered them pretty quickly. They were pretty minor things, and they were always pretty quick to respond. 

Positive

We were using another solution previously. It was long ago. We were using Berkeley, which was bought by Alert Logic. The Berkeley product was pretty good, but when they were bought by Alert Logic, I did not like the way they did things. It was complicated. It was not intuitive. Their sales program was a little shady. We got locked into a contract that was not intentional. It was not a great experience. They have a product that is not a direct competitor to SentinelOne. We tried it, and it was super noisy for alerts. If I tried to clear all the alerts in the system, I would not have time for anything else. We were not necessarily looking for it, but because of the platform that we were on, we tried the other offerings that were included in the platform, and it just was not a good fit.

SentinelOne is a much more robust platform than Berkeley or Alert Logic in terms of endpoint protection. In terms of the ability to be innovative, SentinelOne provides tools. If we had stronger security requirements, they have other tools that we could utilize, such as Ranger. 

The portal is cloud-based, but the agents are on-prem.

I was involved in its deployment. I am a one-man IT shop. It was pretty straightforward. You get the agent that you want to install, and there is a code that you put in that locks it to your portal. It installs pretty easily.

It requires very little maintenance. Occasionally, I check to make sure that the agent version is pushed out because that is not automatic. I get to choose when the agent gets pushed out. If there is an update, I update them when I want to.

We did not need any help at all. It was just me. 

We do not put a price on security, but we have to choose between different products that are on the market. We are constantly evaluating other products every year. Endpoint protection is not something with which there is a huge opportunity cost by moving from one vendor to the next. Our security stack is not so integrated with SentinelOne. If, for some reason, they were not the best option, we could move to another option fairly easily. The fact that we are sticking with SentinelOne is a testament that it is not broken. It is still working for us. It gives us good peace of mind about the product line, where it is going, and the protection that it provides.

It is very competitive with other solutions that are on the market. At least the last time we renewed, it was very competitive.

I try to stay abreast of different platforms. I reached out to SentinelOne, and they put me in touch with a reseller, so I went out and found it. 

The biggest thing was how well SentinelOne ranked versus the other platforms. There was also a cost-benefit of a solution like SentinelOne. We thought it would be effective for endpoint protection.

It certainly was a cost-effective solution as compared to some of the other endpoint protection solutions that were available at the time. I would not have gone with SentinelOne if it was not a good value.

It is a very robust platform. It is a great candidate to serve small business environments. They do not target small businesses. They do not market it to small business environments with 50 users or less, but being a little more technically-minded, I wanted something that was enterprise-ready. Even though our environment is small, it was a good fit for us.

It did not require a lot of in-place support from the integrator or the reseller, but they did provide a large amount of presale decision-making help in terms of what I was getting into and what they could provide. That was very helpful. Talking to an integrator or a reseller so that you can put a person to the discussion is helpful.

In terms of integrations, we have looked into some of the integrations, such as with Mimecast. We have had some interest in that, but we have not utilized any of those third-party integrations. We also looked at the possibility of using some things with log management and being able to have a single source of how protected we are across the enterprise, but we have not yet pulled the trigger on anything like that.

Overall, I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete a nine out of ten.