Sophos Cyberoam UTM Reviews

We use the solution for VPN, network monitoring, and DHCP for offices with fewer people.

The product is okay. SD-WAN and IPSec features are valuable to me. I find them to be useful.

The product must make the documentation a bit more available. The documentation is not straightforward. We have to click a lot to navigate and set up the policies. The solution should incorporate one field that cascades down the policies that are needed.

I have been using Cyberoam for the last 11 years. However, I have been using Sophos for the last two years.

The tool is stable and good.

The tool's scalability depends on the model, the version, and the hardware we select. The product is used in our organization in almost ten locations.

We take care of customer support ourselves. If there’s an issue that we cannot solve, we raise a ticket to Sophos. The support provided by Sophos is good. However, the documentation is terrible. If we cannot solve things ourselves, we must rely on documentation.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. If we have Cyberoam, we can just migrate it.

If we already have a backup, we can restore it. If it's a fresh installation, where we have to set up even the basic policies, it may take 30 minutes.

The product is reasonably priced. Its cost is better than all the other tools available in the market. The renewal cost of XG 125 is $600 to $700 annually.

I am using versions XG 210, XG 125, and XGS 120 of the product. I will recommend XG 125 to small companies. I would recommend the bigger series from XG 210 onwards for bigger companies. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

The use cases for the solution are different. It is used by petrochemical companies, government companies, universities, private companies, hospitals, and hotels.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a very good solution for SMB companies and can handle their many requirements. The product is a simple and user-friendly UTM that can handle accounting, reporting, firewall, IPS, and antivirus for industries. It is a good solution for accounting and managing users.

The solution should improve its scalability because it cannot support enterprise networks.

Cyberoam was discontinued five years ago, and they have no new features. Sophos continues their products under the XG brand name. I would like to see Sophos XG features included in Cyberoam.

I have been using Sophos Cyberoam UTM for ten years.

Sophos Cyberoam UTM is a very very stable solution.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM ten out of ten for stability.

Our clients are small and medium businesses.

I rate the scalability a five out of ten.

The solution’s technical support is very very good. They have online chats and remote support.

Positive

The initial setup was very very simple. I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten.

The solution’s deployment takes one to two days.

The product has a very low price compared to other solutions.

I rate the solution’s pricing a two out of ten.

I have installed Sophos UTM for more than 100 companies in many countries. The XG model has good features and it continues with Cyberoam features. We can find new features in Sophos XG for Cyberoam.

The solution is not good for current times. We cannot find Cyberoam products in the market. It is discontinued. People should buy Sophos XGS.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I primarily use the product to implement secure VPN connections and manage bandwidth in various organizational environments, focusing on network security and efficiency.

The platform has significantly enhanced our network security posture by providing robust bandwidth management and reliable VPN capabilities. However, occasional hardware-related issues have necessitated upgrades.

The product's most valuable features include comprehensive bandwidth management and secure end-to-end VPN connections, crucial for maintaining efficient and secure network operations.

They could improve the product by enhancing hardware reliability, addressing occasional memory overflow issues, and improving scalability without compromising performance.

I've been using Sophos Cyberoam UTM since around 2007.

The technical support services generally meet expectations, but we occasionally encounter delays in response times.

The initial setup process was straightforward.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM an eight out of ten. 

We use Cyberoam just like a VPN, usually as a VPN channel.

I like the reliability and the price. But sometimes, my customer asks for cheaper solutions, though I propose we focus on reliability.

Aside from that, the port forwarding is good. Sometimes you hold some servers on-premise, and then you can have someone access another country or anywhere. The VPN is also good.

The blocking needs to be improved. Sometimes we need to block YouTube, Facebook, or something like that, and then we need to optimize our Internet. The Internet in the Philippines is very bad, and it's kind of expensive if you want a high-speed connection. We're getting to the next generation, but we must improve our Internet. We then have to make policies where users cannot access certain websites to optimize the Internet because sites like YouTube take a lot of latency, especially on HD. But sometimes Cyberoam doesn't work like that, and we must use another third-party solution like Trend Micro. Trend Micro does the job, but Cyberoam should be the one that does the job because it's the firewall itself. Cyberoam needs to improve that kind of security blockage.

I have used Cyberoam UTM for three months.

The firewall doesn't need any maintenance. We just have to leave it in the data center in a very cold environment. I have never experienced a firewall failing, and I have been working for almost 12 years. We can pay for maintenance since it's already included in the service.

It's not scalable, but that depends on the budget and hardware. The firewall does scale between 100 to 200 users, but that depends on the model.

The service could be improved here in the Philippines. We don't have a lot of problems with the US team for Cyberoam.

The initial setup is very easy because the GUI is easy for me to use. 

Deployment is very easy, we just have to connect to the ISP we have, set the support load balancing, and then we just have to connect to our core switches. Then we have to distribute it to any of the other users. The deployment can be done solo because there is a setup wizard. We can configure the settings and then put a static IP address through the ISP, but it's very easy.

With good security, you can expect it to be expensive. Cyberoam's pricing depends on the services you subscribe for. Most firewalls right now, especially UTM, focus on services and stagger all the services. If you want a particular service, you pay for it.

We don't have a lot of problems with Cyberoam. We don't face any issues if the IT or security administrators have a lot of experience. We can easily configure any firewall or security solution without any bugs. But I'm sure I won't encounter any bugs, unlike with Cisco.

I cannot recommend Cyberoam because navigating the graphical user interface is very difficult. It's not so familiar. I'm not gonna recommend it unless there's someone who already knows how to use firewalls. I used to focus on Cisco firewalls, but the Cisco firewall is much harder than Cyberoam. If you're going with Cyberoam, that's good because every security administrator or any information technology manager knows how to recommend the latest trends. Cyberoam is not the top trend in the Philippines.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

When we use Sophos products, we haven't encountered any problems. Some attacks happen, but our customers haven't been affected. No one has attempted to hack their data and steal Bitcoin.

The dashboard is very good-looking and offers maximum features. If a customer's website has a problem, we can guide them over the phone because they can easily find the specific option on the dashboard. That's why we suggest buying Sophos.

One key feature is the personal security dashboard. Most features are available on the dashboard, making it easy for customers to manage their security. However, it's a complex task, so we can't add too many features currently. So, the dashboard is currently the main focus.

The price is obviously a more sensitive area to focus on when selling it. 

I have been using it since 2011. 

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It is a scalable solution. We have lots of customers using this solution. 

We have 6,000 to 7,000 customers across India. And we are using and providing Cisco, Netgear, McAfee, and other products to them. 

We often use NETGEAR for layer two configurations because NETGEAR  doesn't have firewall software like Sophos, and we use Sophos for layer three configurations.

The response time is very good. The customer service and support are good. 

The setup is good. The deployment time depends. We need to create some policies first. So, it could take half an hour, depending on the complexity. We can then deliver the product to our customers.

We know all the deployment steps and can guide your client over the phone. The customer can then install it themselves, and if they have a dedicated technical team, they can handle it independently.

For example, we need to know what kind of internet connection they are using, such as Broadband, IOL, or something else.

We need to know why they are using a firewall because we have to create policies and define the bandwidth, how much bandwidth they want to use, and what they are trying to protect. So, we need such details for the deployment. 

We have 25 employees with different designated roles. And they can provide online support. Mostly engineers. We have different versions of the product.

Overall, the price of Sophos is very good. But I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, where one is the cheapest and ten is the highest. 

There are different licensing models. For example, one customer pays yearly, while another pays every three years. 

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. I would recommend using the solution. The deployment is easy, and support is very good. 

We use a lot of Sophos Cyberoam UTM's features depending on the customer's needs. The overall solution is good. In some circumstances, the malware functionality is the most important feature, and in other cases, some other features.

The solution's pricing could be a problem for some small businesses.

I have worked as a reseller with Sophos Cyberoam UTM for ten years.

The stability of the solution is very good.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM a nine out of ten for stability.

The solution scales very well for us. We have 20 clients using Sophos Cyberoam UTM. Our customers are usually small and medium-sized businesses.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM an eight or nine out of ten for scalability.

The solution’s technical support is very good because we have good connections to Sophos.

Positive

Since we are technicians, Sophos Cyberoam UTM's initial setup was quite easy for us.

Depending on the difficulty and customer requirements, the solution's deployment could take a few hours or a couple of days.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM ten out of ten for the ease of its initial setup.

The solution's pricing depends on the customer size. We have small and medium customers, and it's not so easy for them to finance this product. Although it's not a very cheap solution, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is in a good price range considering its feature set. Considering what you can solve with the solution and what you get for your money, the solution has valuable pricing.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM's pricing seven out of ten.

The primary solution in the future will be the Sophos XGS firewall solution that will replace Sophos Cyberoam UTM.

Overall, I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM a nine out of ten.

I am using the solution mostly internally for security, a firewall and internet. We have a lot of users with many user policies. Additionally, we use it for a DOS-specific file exchange.

The solution is easy to integrate.

I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them. You normally can just right click and block them but in this solution, it was not working in the firewall settings.

I have been using the solution for 10 years.

I was running the solution for seven years and I did not have issues. I would rate the stability a four out of five.

For a medium-sized organization, the scalability was good.

The support was good. Whenever I needed to contact to support to create tickets, they contact me within a reasonable time and they resolved the issues.

The setup was easy.

On a yearly basis, it cost me approximately $1,500. While having 400 users and comparing the price to other solutions, what I was paying yearly was good.

Cyberoam is going to end this year. They already have announced last year if you are an enterprise and have the support it will end.

What I have learned from using this solution is when choosing another product in the future I will do more technical feature comparisons. Having done the comparisons I most likely would not have been having some of the issues I was having because I would have gone with another solution.

I rate Sophos Cyberoam UTM a seven out of ten.

I reside in a small country with no particular big companies or leading businesses. The solution is mostly used in small to medium-sized companies. If the solution is used in big companies, a couple of thousands of users use the solution.

It provides the first layer of protection against any kind of attack. It is also important to note that Sophos UTM is easy to use for the end customer. Along with its endpoint and server software, provides synchronized security as its endpoint solution connects with network protection to provide a multi-layered defense to users.

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a very strong product with good support. I haven't faced any significant issues during the time I have worked with Sophos.

Network visibility of the connections is an area in the solution where improvements can be made.

I have been using Sophos Cyberoam UTM for more than ten years. My company sells the solution in Uruguay, and we have had a partnership with Sophos since 2001, which was even before Sophos entered the UTM market.

It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I rate the technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

My company even deals with those customers who use other brands like Fortinet or Check Point.

The initial setup of the product was straightforward.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The return on investment that I see from the use of Sophos Cyberoam UTM is good.

I consider Sophos Cyberoam UTM to be a competitively-priced product. Since my company has a partnership with Sophos we can achieve good pricing when facing the competence.

I recommend the solution to those who plan to use it.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.