Sophos EPP Suite Reviews

We are using Sophos EPP Suite for web and application control, and antivirus

The most valuable feature Sophos EPP Suite is that it protects the computer beyond the premise. Whether the user is at home, in the office, or traveling, you are able to apply the policies as the user moves.

Sophos EPP Suite could improve the way it can be installed. They used to have one installer and now they have two, one for the server and one for the client. I don't know the difference, it brings confusion.

I have been using Sophos EPP Suite for approximately five years.

Sophos EPP Suite is stable because once we do the deployment, rarely do you receive corruptions. Additionally, once you deploy something on the cloud, it automatically applies to the client as long as the system is online.

Sophos EPP Suite is highly scalable. We have close to 40 computers using this solution.

I have contacted the support and I am satisfied with the speed of the answers.

Sophos EPP Suite could be easier to implement and it is slow with the web installer. However, it depends on the internet speed.

There are licenses to use this solution and we are on a three-year license.

I would recommend this solution to others. The solution is highly scalable and we are using it in two companies and it works very well. You have control of what you want to be done or applied within your multiple sites.

I rate Sophos EPP Suite a nine out of ten.

We use the solution for endpoint security to protect critical positions within our organization. This involves securing connectivity and network access for these positions. Due to the pandemic, we had to limit on-site operations, but now we plan to extend this security to other users as well, including normal users. This expansion will include firewall protection for endpoints to ensure comprehensive network security.

We were concerned about the threat posed by malware. The product's effectiveness in addressing this threat and capturing it within the network has been quite helpful.

The product's resource utilization is a concern, especially regarding memory usage on systems with older specifications such as lower memory and less powerful processors. Installing the product on these systems can lead to slowdowns due to resource consumption. If the product's resource demands can be reduced, it would greatly improve the user experience, especially for end users with less powerful hardware. 

I have worked with Sophos EPP Suite for almost five years.

I would rate the stability eight out of ten. 

There are no issues with scalability, so I will rate it an eight out of ten.

We seek support for the product through a local vendor who in turn contacts Sophos.

Sophos is quite cost-effective for our organization’s needs. It also has local support and that is why we use it, compared to other software like Cisco. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

While currently, we don’t need assistance, in the future, we might require assistance from integrators or other solution providers due to the increasing complexity of our organization. As we move towards face-to-face setups, additional requirements might arise.

I would rate the price a seven out of ten, for its cost-effectiveness.

I would rate the product an eight out of ten, overall. 

I mainly use this software for managing my business operations and enabling efficient port forwarding to make my applications accessible on the Internet. It helps me handle my portfolio needs and occasionally aids in device management for monitoring network traffic.

Sophos EPP Suite stands out with its user-friendly dashboard and strong web filtering features for enhanced online security.

In terms of improvement, the main challenge is setting up VPN connections. I have tried online resources and even turned to Kubernetes for help, but the primary issue I face is the complexity of creating VPN connections, and I'm seeking ways to make this process easier. Additionally, I have also faced difficulties with web filtering. In future Sophos releases, I would like to see simplified processes. For example, make port forwarding setup take just two or three clicks, streamline web filtering to two or three steps, and ease the separation of PCs from mobile devices within five clicks. The aim is to make these tasks more user-friendly and less time-consuming.

I have been working with Sophos EPP Suite for a few years.

It is a stable solution. I would give it an eight out of ten for stability.

In my personal usage, I have set up Sophos EPP Suite for two scenarios. The first has over 50 users, and the second, in a hospital, has fewer than 60 users. The second deployment is still in the testing phase, with around 15 active machines on the network currently.

I usually turn to internet searches and Sophos documentation from their website for help when I face issues or have specific needs, so I haven't needed to contact Sophos technical support directly.

I have experience with SonicWall. I used it about twelve years ago.

The initial deployment is quite easy and it takes less than an hour to deploy the solution. Setting up the basic installation and getting internet access is straightforward. However, complexity arises when trying to apply specific rules to the system, which can be a real challenge. I'm not currently handling maintenance for this product in the client's environment. In the past, I attempted to do so by trying to renew licenses for two devices, but the response was negative. I'm considering trying again and hoping for a better outcome in the future.

I find the pricing of the product to vary in different ranges. While it is not overly expensive, it can be a significant cost from the client's perspective, which makes me cautious about spending the money. I would rate it as a seven out of ten in terms of affordability.

I would definitely recommend Sophos EPP Suite to others. Overall, I would rate it as an eight out of ten.

I am a managed service provider of the solution.

The solution’s price is very attractive for our customers. The product’s ease of deployment is its best feature.

The product must consolidate all the consoles. The product should improve support and provide more scalable clustering.

We have been using the solution for five years.

I rate the stability a seven out of ten. Sometimes we face issues because the clustering does not work.

The product is scalable. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. The product has to work on improving the hybrid mode. Our clients are small, medium, and large enterprises.

Support is good. It could be faster.

Neutral

The solution is easy to install.

The time taken for deployment depends upon the number of users. We can deploy the product in 15 minutes per client. We need one person to deploy the solution and maintain it. We need two hours a week to maintain the solution.

The product’s price is fine. I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product has a yearly licensing fee. There are no additional costs associated with the product.

The solution is a good choice for people who do not have a budget and want to have a good product. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

I use this solution to protect my endpoints from malware, ransomware, and viruses. My company also implements this solution for some of our customers. 

The web control and the application control are two good features. 

My use case is very, very simple. The solution gives me protection from the latest attacks, and visibility into the cloud. I don't have any integration use cases, so from our enrollment perspective, I would say maybe it could be a little lighter in terms of agent usage so that there is less computer utilization.

I started using this solution recently, about four or five months ago. 

It's a stable product. So far, I haven't had any issues from an endpoint perspective with it blocking something that I'm trying to use, or anything of that sort. 

Around 10 people are using this solution in my company. It's definitely scalable. I know people who are using it for over 500,000 users.

I don't plan to increase its capacity because my number of users won't be increasing much, so I would rather look at moving from endpoint protection to VDR. Then I would have the basic protection, and on top of that I would get the Zero-day endpoint protection and advanced protection for user-less attacks.

If we require any support for integration, performance, or product-related issues, we reach out to technical support. We have been surprised that they have continued to improve their services in terms of response time and everything else.

I would rate the support as a five out of five. 

I used McAfee before I switched to this solution. I wanted to use this product to get our team used to it since we give it to our customers. Our renewal for McAfee came up, and I started looking for something we could install and manage centrally because previously, we were working with single-user legacies and standalone endpoints. I wanted something that was corporate-friendly and manageable.

The setup was very straightforward. First, you need to have an account, and then you just install the agents, and communication between the cloud and the agents happens.

I'm the technical person, so I did the implementation. It took me about a day. I would rate the setup as a four out of five because there is always room for improvement. 

Since it is a cloud product, updates happen automatically. The only thing is that from time to time, an update happens, and the agent does not automatically restart, so it requires a restart.

If you compare this to other solutions from a pricing perspective, the enterprise version of Sophos turns out to be cost-effective. For example, if you currently have endpoint protection from Felix, Sophos would be comparatively cost-effective. In terms of the difference, I would say around 15% to 20%. I would rate the pricing as a four out of five. 

My advice to those considering this solution would be to look for compatibility with the operating system. If you have a heterogeneous environment like Linux or Aqua, make sure they're compatible in terms of version support and everything. Nowadays, endpoint protection is quite mature for almost all of the ends, so the only thing you need to look at is the compatibility. Otherwise, it's simple because most of the time the server management is the most difficult thing, but it's all taken care of in the cloud version, so you don't have to do anything. You just install the license and push the policies on the central server. 

I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten. 

It's an antivirus that can protect users and servers. It protects you from malware, from exploits, from viruses. 

It's like any other antivirus solution, however, it's an advanced one. It has AI, Artificial Intelligence. It's lightweight, it doesn't affect your PC or your server, so it's something good to have. It's a must to have in this era. It's something very important to have for your users or even for your home, although they do offer Sophos Home for home. The normal one is for the business.

It works great. 

It's easy to deploy.

The product gives you a full picture of what's happening on your endpoint, on your PC, or your server. You can trace where the virus came from, you can put rules in place, et cetera. You have full control.

The solution is stable.

The scalability is great.

We have found the technical support to be quite helpful.

There are no missing features. We're fine with its capabilities.

It would be ideal if the price could be lowered a little bit.

I've been using the solution for eight years.

We've found the product to be quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The solution is easy to scale. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

As a partner, currently, we have about 30 customers using the solution. It all depends on the partners in my region. I'm in Kuwait. Every time you have to deploy, the customer would need to get three quotations, and then they choose the better price. 

Technical support is great. We have no complaints. 

The initial setup is easy. it takes about ten minutes to deploy. It's very fast and easy.

One person is enough in terms of the amount of personnel you need for implementation. However, if you have a large environment, you might require more assistance. For example, if you have hundreds of computers, you'll want more help. Likely you would need three for an enterprise setup and one for an SMB.

As an integrator, we can implement the solution for our clients.

Every organization, including Sophos or Microsoft, has its own pricing scheme. For Sophos, they have discounts for partners. That said, when looking at other markets, there are places they could reduce costs a bit. Mostly, the price is affordable, yet having more discounts will definitely bring more customers.

Customers must pay a yearly licensing fee. You can go monthly, however, it's cheaper to choose a yearly payment option. All of our customers go for annual licensing, not monthly.  

As a customer, you can choose whether to go on cloud or on-premise. We prefer to be on the cloud as it has better features now.

We are a partner and integrator.

I'd rate the solution to other companies. We recommend it to clients all of the time.

I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. 

We use EPP Suite for a lot of things including DLP, EDR, device management, and application control.

The most valuable feature is data loss prevention.

The rollback feature that SentinelOne has would be a great addition to Sophos.

If we could bypass the first couple of levels of support when we have a problem then it would be easier and quicker when we need an issue resolved.

I have been using the Sophos EPP Suite for about six months.

This product has been very stable and we haven't had any issues.

We have been scaling its use to other parts of the organization and so far, that experience has gone fairly well. We have about 700 people using it at this point. The users include administrations, first-level users, who are reviewers, and the support team. The security team uses it for reporting purposes.

Technical support is very responsive and also very timely in their responses. It does take time to get through the first, second, and third-level calls, but for the most part, they are timely.

This is our first EDR product.

The initial setup is very simple.

Our in-house team deployed it. We did have a conversation with Sophos on how to get it deployed and testing it in our environment.

We purchased a three-year license, which gave us a large discount.

I have seen CarbonBlack and McAfee, although I have not worked with them enough to know the differences.

My advice for anybody who is implementing EPP Suite is to work with their integration team to learn the ins and outs of the product. They have got to spend a lot of time planning the process with Sophos, and Sophos has a team in place to help with that.

Overall, I would say that it is a good endpoint solution. I think that we're using every feature that they have. That said, I'm sure that there are some things that I'm missing.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Before Sophos, we had a lot of intrusions and software antivirus impressions but we haven't had such issues since we brought in Sophos.

Sophos provides an extra layer of protection.

The user interface is not responsive.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

1000 users are using this solution.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The initial setup may be done in a day with the help of one person.

I rate the initial setup a six out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

The solution is expensive.

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

You need to have your Sophos EPP Suite license, software, and services ready to deploy.

Sophos is a good tool, but it is expensive.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.