Veritas Backup Exec Reviews

We use it for backing up all servers and user data.

I'm very familiar with it because I've been using it since we, as an organization, started using it. I'm very familiar with the software package itself and how to set alerts, how to know what's going on, how to recover stuff. So familiarity is probably the best thing for me right now. 

How does it help our organization? It's the recovery of data and the assurance that we know it's there and it's safe.

• Automation
• Restore

It does what it says it's going to do.

As I start getting into the newer releases - I'm not at the most current release - I'll start taking a look not only at backing up on-prem data, but also the stuff that's in the cloud, stuff that's in Office 365, that's in Azure. We need to start reaching out and grabbing our data that's out there and successfully backing it up.

I've used their technical support. If you can get somebody who knows what they're doing, it's good; and if you get somebody that you can easily understand.

The issues are the language barrier, as well as: You finally get somebody to call you back and you start talking with them. All of a sudden, they say, "Oh, this belongs to a different department." They shove me off and I have to wait again for somebody to call me back. It's not a very streamlined and not a very efficient way of providing support.

At first, because it was such a new product at that time, there was a huge learning curve. But once I understood how they back things up, all the versions that followed after that were pretty straightforward and there wasn't much of an additional learning curve.

I would like to see a better licensing model. They changed it and it's just horrendous.

If you're seriously looking at Backup Exec, take a hard look at their licensing model and compare that. Also, experience their tech support before you jump in.

Right now, the two big hitters are Backup Exec and Veeam. But the document that I've downloaded now from IT Central Station has introduced me to other vendors that I also need to take a look at.

In looking for a vendor to go with, the important criteria for me are:

• cost
• ease of use
• options, especially trial-based options.

The current version that I'm at, and I have to base my rating on it because it's the only one that I've been using, I would give it a seven out of 10 because it doesn't have the cloud options, the licensing has gotten worse instead of better, and technical support is iffy at best. I'm using version 16.0.

Veritas is used for standalone servers. such as physical servers We also use it for backups.

Veritas is good for small environments.

It's a good product.

In one console, you will see a variety of things. In my opinion, it should be simple and straightforward. It is currently a little complicated. 

It is not straightforward to click the drives. 

Even assigning the tapes to the media pole is difficult when compared to Veeam.

Some of the steps, are to assign, create a set, then a media set, for example.

In the future, their console should not be complicated. For example, When you compare with Veeam it has multiple columns on one side itself where you can browse all of the features. With Veritas, it is not like that at all, it goes to the next window, then the next window, and continues that way to view the features.

Veritas Backup Exec is a stable product.

The scalability of Veritas Backup Exec is good.

Technical support is adequate, but it could be improved.

We are also using Veeam and Symantec.

Veeam is completely different when it comes to virtualization, such as virtual machines.

We use Veeam for the majority of our backups.

If I had to rate Veeam, I would give it a ten out of ten.

It is not an expensive product.

I would rate Veritas Backup Exec a six out of ten.

We use the solution for the backup capabilities of our whole system, including our applications. We don't use it as a VM backup, however. We're able to handle daily backups of everything and we tend to back up quite regularly.

The solution is very fast. It does not take a long time to backup everything.

We have a backup operator and admin that can handle the back up of the files on the database. They're able to handle all aspects of the solution quite easily.

It's very good at allowing us to back up the servers.

We had issues during the installation.

The solution is affected by internet congestion. It requires quite a bit of bandwidth in order to really work effectively.

The pricing of the solution is a bit high.

We've found the scalability to be a bit limiting.

I've been using the solution for about five years at this point. It's been a while.

The solution isn't really giving us what we need. We're seeing some limitations and we're finding it doesn't support us in the way we need it to. Therefore, we are looking at potentially moving off of it in the near future.

Normally we have about 17 people on the system, and three core people that handle the solution directly.

I'd advise a company, if it is smaller, or needs a comprehensive solution or a virtual environment, that Veritas may not be the best option.

We mostly worked with technical support via a portal for customer support. Largely, we've been happy with their level of service. They call us when we have issues and they help in whatever way they can.

The initial setup can be a bit complex. We had to adjust some settings on one server in order to finalize the deployment.

The solution operates on a subscription basis. A company pays yearly. They also need to pay extra for technical support access.

We're currently looking at other options We're considering moving away from the solution.

We're just customers. We don't have a business relationship with the company.

The solution is a bit expensive. The trade magazines seem to imply that you can do a virtual environment for almost the same price, which would be better.

Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. It's okay. It could be better in a variety of ways.

We have two use case types. We do onsite and offsite. Onsite, we need some conversion and backups. Offsite, for example, similar to Symantec, it is based on the volume, and we sell this solution to clients. 

We've used the solution for ten years, and everything has worked very well.

There are many settings, and after working on it for so long, we have a good understanding of the configurations that make sense. 

It's easy for us. It's like a legacy of predictability. We've used it for a long time.

The initial setup is easy.

It's stable.

The scalability is good. 

We need to have duplication and better compression. We don't really get that with Veritas. There's customer demand for it. 

We'd like to see some better synchronization between the office and other sites. There's room for improvement in off-site syncs. 

I've used the solution for ten to 11 years. 

The solution is stable. I haven't noted any issues. It doesn't have bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

It is a scalable product.

Maybe in the early years, we used to seek support, however, now, since we are quite versatile with it, we deal with any issues ourselves. We normally don't seek any support now. When we used them, maybe ten years ago, they were quite helpful.

We find the solution to be straightforward to set up. It's not overly complex or difficult. I'd rate it a ten out of ten in terms of ease of implementation. 

We always keep three people (engineers) on the solution. During the implementation, we have three people there, and they can handle maintenance once it is up. If, for a backup, somebody's not available for a particular reason, we'll be covered as we don't rely on one person.

We are resellers.

We use the latest versions to ensure we get support as older versions often lose support.

I'd advise potential new users to read the manual well and don't just go next, next, finish, et cetera. Read everything well to understand the options they are providing. I've seen many people fail to understand what options are offered or what the customer needs. If you don't do the right configuration, it becomes faulty. It slows down the process if it's not configured right. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

It's user-friendly, and, except in the case of AIX, it supports a wide variety of platforms. This includes Windows, VMware, Linux, et cetera. It's okay as a product.

The solution is stable.

It is a scalable product.

The solution is easy to set up.

It doesn't support the AIX platform.

I've had a little problem in the tape solution in the Backup Exec. When you use a tape solution, take a backup in the tape, not in the disc, and restore it, there is a little complexity. It's not really user-friendly in that aspect.

I've been using the solution for five years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There aren't bugs. It's not glitchy. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. 

You can expand and scale the product. It's not a problem at all. 

We might have five or six people using the solution right now. 

I didn't face any problems just yet. I have not reached out to support. Typically, I can just search the internet and find an answer to my questions. I'd, of course, reach out if I had a huge problem. 

The initial setup is straightforward and simple. It's not a complex implementation by any means. I'd rate it a four out of five in terms of ease of setup. 

I haven't followed any details related to there being an ROI. 

I'm not sure what the exact costs of the product are. 

I'm a customer and end-user.

I've enjoyed the product. It's a user-friendly and widely support platform and is flexible and scalable.

I'd rate the product seven out of ten.

We have been deploying this solution for our customers. They use it for the backup of their physical and virtual servers.

We are using its latest version. We recently renewed it for a customer.

It is a simple and flexible solution to work with.

The deduplication feature can be improved.

I have been using this solution for almost five years.

It is a stable product.

It is scalable.

Their support is good.

It is a bit complex, but it is a good solution to work with.

The deployment duration depends on the size of the project. For a big project, it takes around 7 to 10 working days to deploy it and do all the configurations.

We deploy it for our customers. The number of people required for the deployment depends on the project. It could be a one-person team, or it could be a five-person team. It is based on the complexity and the size of the project.

In terms of maintenance, two people can easily manage a setup of about 50 servers.

Its ROI is good.

Its price is a bit high. There is only the standard fee. There is no additional fee. 

You should have the right skill set because these are complex projects. If you have the right skill set and the right partner with you, it is easy to implement. You should check that the partner or the team you are engaging for this project is technically certified and experienced to handle such a project.

I would rate it an eight out of 10.

We primarily use Veritas Backup Exec for backup.

Compression is the most valuable feature.

Technical support could be better. In most cases, we must learn and resolve issues on our own. There is no training provided, and their technicians are unaware of the features that are available.

We have been using Veritas Backup Exec for one year.

So far, it has been stable. However, in order to prevent problems, you should use their most recent platform.

In terms of Scalability, we haven't done much with it. I'm not sure how scalable Veritas is because we only have three or four sellers on one site. 

We have multiple sites, and each one is managed by a different Backup Exec.

Technical support needs improvement.

It is difficult to find a technician, or even a knowledgeable person because most of their technicians are not well-versed in their product.

Veritas was already in place.

We installed Veeam for a new client a few months ago.

The installation of Veeam was hectic. It was difficult at first, and the process took longer than we had anticipated.

It required a lot of other applications. It has several dependencies, even at the client.

The initial setup is intermediate. You should at least be familiar with it before you install it. It's not easy.

We completed the installation with the assistance of a consultant.

The price is reasonable for the features it offers.

We are resellers. We offer products for our clients as well as installation.

I would rate Veritas Backup Exec a seven out of ten.

We use this solution for file backups. We use it for Veeam, Exchange, and Sharepoint.

Within our organization, roughly five people had access to this solution.

The ease-of-use in general is great.

What I didn't like about it is that sometimes, even though it says that it's successful, there are some bugs in it — it's not really successful. Sometimes, I would do a backup and it would say that it was successful but then when I tried to restore it, it's not in the catalog to restore. Then I have to go digging into my email to see if I have a copy of that catalog, then go and find it and restore it. In short, I think there is an issue with the cataloging.

Other than that, it runs pretty fine. If you keep it for too long and the catalog gets really big, the application tends to move slowly because of how big the catalog and the database is getting. We kept on upgrading to the newer version; after a while, it just began to move slow, even if we updated and imported the catalog and the data.

I have been using Veritas Backup Exec since 2015.

Veritas Backup Exec is quite stable.

For small enterprises, Backup Exec works flawlessly; However, they were trying to push us to their bigger enterprise backup, which was NetBackup. When I left my previous company, we were actually in the phase of implementing NetBackup. They recommend NetBackup for larger enterprises.

Overall, It scales up, but only to a certain point. If you want something bigger, you should look into NetBackup.

I would give the technical support a rating of seven. Sometimes it feels like their reps are not trained enough.

The initial setup was quite straightforward. I didn't try to make it any more complex than it already was.

Deployment is really quick; It took us less than one day.

It's very easy to use. It's easier than all of the other backup solutions available. In terms of ease-of-use, Backup Exec is the most straightforward one that I have dealt with.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight.