Technical Manager Of Microsoft 365 Platform & Modern Workplace Applications at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2024-08-13T11:49:00Z
Aug 13, 2024
Microsoft Power Apps is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.
Global BIM Lead W&M at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
2023-05-16T12:58:00Z
May 16, 2023
Usually, the free licenses of Power Apps come to normal corporate users for free. If you do not use the premium workspace and are employed in a big company already using E3 or E5, then Power Apps would be something for free, and that's a trick. For normal users within a corporate firm with licenses, it's totally favorable. But I don't know how it would be if you were outside a company or using it yourself.
Oracle eBS Solution Architect at Raiffeisen Bank International AG
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-09T22:00:49Z
Mar 9, 2023
Our enterprise contract with Microsoft Power Apps includes the application feature platform in our subscription package, so we are not incurring any extra expenses. All of our other subscriptions are also part of our license agreement.
Owner & Senior Azure Developer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-01-20T15:32:47Z
Jan 20, 2023
The license for the solution comes with my professional license, so I'm not sure actually if you pay by the user. For me, it was free to develop with a professional license, which is about 70 euros a month. That said, if you get a lot of users using it, it's not included. I don't know how much that would cost. Whether it is worth the cost or not depends on the use case.
Head of Software Engineering Department at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
2023-01-20T12:44:58Z
Jan 20, 2023
We would advise organizations that this solution has a high-price point. However, the cost is justified for how comprehensive the package is, and all components of the solution are available under the standard license plan; there are no hidden costs involved.
Associate Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-10-19T11:26:38Z
Oct 19, 2022
Right now, we are using an enterprise license without the premium connectors at this point. For Power Automate, we are definitely going to need some licenses which we're exploring. Depending upon the user requirements, we're still exploring the licensing requirement. Most of the applications that we leverage are without any cost other than the normal license which we are paying for as part of Office 365. We'll take additional licenses depending on the solution and the need.
The licensing is restrictive and can get expensive as you have to pay per user, not per app. It's a range of users. For example, if you go above 50 users, you need to pay more. If you compare it with competitors like Google, they are more expensive than Google. Google has another option that's a PowerApps competitor called AppSheets and AppSheets is cheaper than PowerApps.
Founder & CEO at Logesys Solutoins India Pvt Ltd
Real User
2022-06-06T16:41:10Z
Jun 6, 2022
I don't have any comments on the cost or licensing. It's fine. It's cheap compared to other RPA tools. It was about $40. There are people that are lower than that, however, they don't give you the features.
The solution is quite expensive because if you have, say, 100,000 users or more, that can add up. Licensing works on a tier system but I don't have the details.
Power Platform Advisor and Head of Power Platform Team at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-04-12T11:44:18Z
Apr 12, 2022
The cost is fair, based on everything you get. I'd rate it at a four out of five as I see that the customers raise constraints. They sort of say it's a bit expensive. I don't know how expensive the other platforms are, however, from what I heard, it's a fair price for PowerApps considering what it comes with.
The pricing of Microsoft PowerApps is neutral, because it's completely based on user requirement. If your requirement is simple or less complex, then the basic licensing model can work, e.g. the free model, or else, you need to go for some premium features or model. The cost will be completely based on your product, and what app license is going to work for you. If per user license is going to work, then you can go for that. Microsoft PowerApps is not that expensive, but for a small organization, getting the license could be tough, because if you have a team of five people, then it's going to cost you.
EVP, Solutions at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-11-29T14:49:35Z
Nov 29, 2021
The pricing is a subjective thing. Whenever we are positioning PowerApps to an enterprise that is already into Dynamics 365 ER PCRMs, it is very easy to position it as they have already made initial investments there. It is just simply that the number of users that are based on the number of applications and it can be scaled. For them, I've never faced any issues. For example, for a hospital with it, we were already reaching out to, say, 40 units. When they wanted to scale to their smaller units, the 70 of them, it was a cakewalk. Then we had a plan to extend it to their pharmacies, say, 50 of them. That, again, was a cakewalk as they were already on that platform. However, when I go and reach out to a smaller business SMB segment, the challenge over there is that we are faced with competition - with other software which has been built on PHP. If we host it on-prem, of course, then that discussion of cloud versus on-prem and those fundamental discussions creep in and then there is the minimum unit price per license, meaning per user or per app. When you look at it that way, an SMB will see it as expensive compared with open-source options.
Vice President - Information Systems at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-11-11T13:14:38Z
Nov 11, 2021
The pricing is pretty good. Microsoft offers very good value for money. Apart from the licensing, storage is actually the costliest part. One needs to actually look at how to optimize the use of storage as ultimately it's on the cloud. It's part of the Dataverse storage now, with Dynamics 365, Power Apps, et cetera. That bit of the offering is the costliest part. The product license and platform licensing are good. That's definitely value for money compared to some of the other vendors. Microsoft is placed well. It's just the storage, as I said, that's costly.
The pricing is excellent. It's not too expensive. However, once you get into adding non-internal users, the solution can get pricey. It's only reasonable if you are trying to create internal team-based apps.
Sr. Digital Experience Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2021-03-18T04:43:30Z
Mar 18, 2021
One of the main things about this solution is the price. The cost for Salesforce is $35, $25, or $10 per user per month. PowerApps costs much less than that. It is at a good price point. It may change in the future, but at this point, its price is pretty fine.
I don't directly deal with the actual billing. Therefore, I don't know the exact cost or the licensing structure. That's an aspect of the solution someone else handles. That said, it's Microsoft, which tends to be a bit more expensive. It might now be the best option for smaller customers.
Senior Programmer Analyst at Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
Real User
2020-12-29T20:02:34Z
Dec 29, 2020
I don't have too much information on licensing It is likely per application we use, or per machine. I don't deal directly with billing and therefore don't have the exact pricing.
We use the Office 365 package, and Microsoft PowerApps is a part of the package. We don't pay any separate price for this. There are no additional costs. We just pay for the Office 365 package.
Technical Manager at Coming Computer and IT services
Real User
Top 10
2020-11-04T23:19:56Z
Nov 4, 2020
The solution is subscription-based, however, I don't handle billing, and therefore don't have insights into the costs. We don't have any extras that we pay for. We just have a standard subscription package. I'd recommend the solution. Overall, I'd rate it eight out of ten. If the reporting and pricing were better, I'd rate it higher. I've definitely learned about the power of the cloud. Before everyone used to use the VPN connection to the head office. When we pushed into the cloud and everyone can just see everything and the system is very sound. It also allows our developers to see what they can change. It's been great.
Business Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2020-10-14T06:36:58Z
Oct 14, 2020
I'm using a trial version right now. I'm still learning the system, so I haven't moved into a paid version yet. It's my understanding that the pricing isn't too bad. I've heard other people mention it's not as expensive as Azure in comparison with Linux. One or two licenses may not be too expensive, however, I don't know the exact pricing.
Cloud Application Architect, Senior Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-09-29T05:58:00Z
Sep 29, 2020
I was using a free version. The company has a subscription where you can use certain features for free, but there are features that require a premium subscription to use. I am not certain, but I suspect they would be expensive.
Senior Product Manager Data Science at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-09-27T04:10:17Z
Sep 27, 2020
The solution is free if you have a Teams account, or Office 365. If you start to use any premium connectors that are not stored in a SharePoint list or on an Excel workbook, then it costs $4 per user per month. If you want unlimited, it's about $16 per month for unlimited apps and unlimited connectors. There might potentially be a few other extra fees, however, I'm not sure what they are. Microsoft is one of those organizations that manage to nickel and dime its customers on everything.
The setup costs depend on the organization (it's professional knowledge) and it's assets location once the basic data and application is in Azure the setup effort will be very cost effective. For organizational internal users the prices are fair. But for external users It's negotiation. The the long term is vague.
If I want to use Power Apps with Singalab, then I have to pay $10 per month. But if I want to have unlimited access to Power Apps that is $40 per month per user. Prices may have changed.
Business Intelligence Consultant at FumAstra Management Consulting
Consultant
2019-12-09T10:58:00Z
Dec 9, 2019
The pricing is pretty good. Right now, I'm paying for a two or three-month trial that is priced well. This trial period gives a company time to try an application, develop it, test it, and decide as to whether they will go ahead and pay for a modular plan. I find their pricing quite affordable.
I have no idea about licensing costs. I tried contacting Microsoft about this because the information isn't easily available and it was unclear where I could search for this. My guess is that the cost is dependent on the company and product needs. I tried to make a calculation and it looks like it's going to be much cheaper to purchase the product than if I were to hire an engineer, get him to develop an app, and have it maintained. This is a much more scalable and less expensive solution.
Microsoft Power Apps is a rapid application development software and low-code development platform. The solution consists of a suite of apps, services, connectors, and a data platform. It provides an environment for building custom apps which is suitable for different businesses.
Microsoft Power Apps allows users to not only build applications, but also connect them to Microsoft's other sources, including the underlying data platform Microsoft Dataverse, as well as online and on-premise...
In terms of pricing, Power Apps is cost-efficient.
Microsoft Power Apps is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten.
The tool is neither cheap nor expensive. The tool's cost is manageable.
On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
The platform's pricing is reasonable compared to competitors like Apigee. It offers good value for the quality of the product.
The product is inexpensive. I rate its pricing a three to four out of ten.
Power Apps is relatively cheap compared to other low-code and no-code systems like OutSystems and Mendix.
Usually, the free licenses of Power Apps come to normal corporate users for free. If you do not use the premium workspace and are employed in a big company already using E3 or E5, then Power Apps would be something for free, and that's a trick. For normal users within a corporate firm with licenses, it's totally favorable. But I don't know how it would be if you were outside a company or using it yourself.
Our enterprise contract with Microsoft Power Apps includes the application feature platform in our subscription package, so we are not incurring any extra expenses. All of our other subscriptions are also part of our license agreement.
The license for the solution comes with my professional license, so I'm not sure actually if you pay by the user. For me, it was free to develop with a professional license, which is about 70 euros a month. That said, if you get a lot of users using it, it's not included. I don't know how much that would cost. Whether it is worth the cost or not depends on the use case.
We would advise organizations that this solution has a high-price point. However, the cost is justified for how comprehensive the package is, and all components of the solution are available under the standard license plan; there are no hidden costs involved.
I rate Power Apps seven out of 10 for affordability.
The Power Apps comes included with the Office 365. When you purchase a business standard license, the Power Apps comes included.
I have an MSD end subscription; it's a flat rate subscription.
Right now, we are using an enterprise license without the premium connectors at this point. For Power Automate, we are definitely going to need some licenses which we're exploring. Depending upon the user requirements, we're still exploring the licensing requirement. Most of the applications that we leverage are without any cost other than the normal license which we are paying for as part of Office 365. We'll take additional licenses depending on the solution and the need.
I don’t have any details in relation to the pricing or licensing.
The licensing is restrictive and can get expensive as you have to pay per user, not per app. It's a range of users. For example, if you go above 50 users, you need to pay more. If you compare it with competitors like Google, they are more expensive than Google. Google has another option that's a PowerApps competitor called AppSheets and AppSheets is cheaper than PowerApps.
Whatever the cost of licensing is, it is in the millions. I would rate the licensing costs a one out of five.
I don't have any comments on the cost or licensing. It's fine. It's cheap compared to other RPA tools. It was about $40. There are people that are lower than that, however, they don't give you the features.
The price of Microsoft PowerApps is reasonable compared to other solutions.
The solution is quite expensive because if you have, say, 100,000 users or more, that can add up. Licensing works on a tier system but I don't have the details.
The cost is fair, based on everything you get. I'd rate it at a four out of five as I see that the customers raise constraints. They sort of say it's a bit expensive. I don't know how expensive the other platforms are, however, from what I heard, it's a fair price for PowerApps considering what it comes with.
The pricing of Microsoft PowerApps is neutral, because it's completely based on user requirement. If your requirement is simple or less complex, then the basic licensing model can work, e.g. the free model, or else, you need to go for some premium features or model. The cost will be completely based on your product, and what app license is going to work for you. If per user license is going to work, then you can go for that. Microsoft PowerApps is not that expensive, but for a small organization, getting the license could be tough, because if you have a team of five people, then it's going to cost you.
It depends on the subscription of Office 365 that customers have. With some subscriptions, it's possible to use PowerApps.
The pricing is a subjective thing. Whenever we are positioning PowerApps to an enterprise that is already into Dynamics 365 ER PCRMs, it is very easy to position it as they have already made initial investments there. It is just simply that the number of users that are based on the number of applications and it can be scaled. For them, I've never faced any issues. For example, for a hospital with it, we were already reaching out to, say, 40 units. When they wanted to scale to their smaller units, the 70 of them, it was a cakewalk. Then we had a plan to extend it to their pharmacies, say, 50 of them. That, again, was a cakewalk as they were already on that platform. However, when I go and reach out to a smaller business SMB segment, the challenge over there is that we are faced with competition - with other software which has been built on PHP. If we host it on-prem, of course, then that discussion of cloud versus on-prem and those fundamental discussions creep in and then there is the minimum unit price per license, meaning per user or per app. When you look at it that way, an SMB will see it as expensive compared with open-source options.
The price for the license could be more cost-effective. Customers have the option of monthly and yearly subscriptions.
The pricing is pretty good. Microsoft offers very good value for money. Apart from the licensing, storage is actually the costliest part. One needs to actually look at how to optimize the use of storage as ultimately it's on the cloud. It's part of the Dataverse storage now, with Dynamics 365, Power Apps, et cetera. That bit of the offering is the costliest part. The product license and platform licensing are good. That's definitely value for money compared to some of the other vendors. Microsoft is placed well. It's just the storage, as I said, that's costly.
Microsoft PowerApps is expensive, but there are many features included.
I pay nine dollars monthly for the subscription to this solution and the price of the is reasonable.
The cost for licensing could be lower.
The pricing is excellent. It's not too expensive. However, once you get into adding non-internal users, the solution can get pricey. It's only reasonable if you are trying to create internal team-based apps.
You have to be careful with pricing. It might be too complicated to continuously monitor the business consumption and what to pay.
Licensing is on a monthly basis.
One of the main things about this solution is the price. The cost for Salesforce is $35, $25, or $10 per user per month. PowerApps costs much less than that. It is at a good price point. It may change in the future, but at this point, its price is pretty fine.
I'm not sure of the cost of the solution. That's not an aspect of the solution I handle.
The pricing is too expensive and the licensing system is complicated. There are many pages of instruction on how to do the calculations for the price.
I don't directly deal with the actual billing. Therefore, I don't know the exact cost or the licensing structure. That's an aspect of the solution someone else handles. That said, it's Microsoft, which tends to be a bit more expensive. It might now be the best option for smaller customers.
It is not expensive. There is no licensing cost.
This is not an expensive product and there are no licensing fees.
I don't have too much information on licensing It is likely per application we use, or per machine. I don't deal directly with billing and therefore don't have the exact pricing.
There are two licensing costs, one is pay-as-you-go, or you can develop it for one year.
We use the Office 365 package, and Microsoft PowerApps is a part of the package. We don't pay any separate price for this. There are no additional costs. We just pay for the Office 365 package.
The solution is subscription-based, however, I don't handle billing, and therefore don't have insights into the costs. We don't have any extras that we pay for. We just have a standard subscription package. I'd recommend the solution. Overall, I'd rate it eight out of ten. If the reporting and pricing were better, I'd rate it higher. I've definitely learned about the power of the cloud. Before everyone used to use the VPN connection to the head office. When we pushed into the cloud and everyone can just see everything and the system is very sound. It also allows our developers to see what they can change. It's been great.
I'm using a trial version right now. I'm still learning the system, so I haven't moved into a paid version yet. It's my understanding that the pricing isn't too bad. I've heard other people mention it's not as expensive as Azure in comparison with Linux. One or two licenses may not be too expensive, however, I don't know the exact pricing.
The licensing fee at the enterprise level is expensive.
I was using a free version. The company has a subscription where you can use certain features for free, but there are features that require a premium subscription to use. I am not certain, but I suspect they would be expensive.
The solution is free if you have a Teams account, or Office 365. If you start to use any premium connectors that are not stored in a SharePoint list or on an Excel workbook, then it costs $4 per user per month. If you want unlimited, it's about $16 per month for unlimited apps and unlimited connectors. There might potentially be a few other extra fees, however, I'm not sure what they are. Microsoft is one of those organizations that manage to nickel and dime its customers on everything.
The setup costs depend on the organization (it's professional knowledge) and it's assets location once the basic data and application is in Azure the setup effort will be very cost effective. For organizational internal users the prices are fair. But for external users It's negotiation. The the long term is vague.
If I want to use Power Apps with Singalab, then I have to pay $10 per month. But if I want to have unlimited access to Power Apps that is $40 per month per user. Prices may have changed.
The pricing is pretty good. Right now, I'm paying for a two or three-month trial that is priced well. This trial period gives a company time to try an application, develop it, test it, and decide as to whether they will go ahead and pay for a modular plan. I find their pricing quite affordable.
I have no idea about licensing costs. I tried contacting Microsoft about this because the information isn't easily available and it was unclear where I could search for this. My guess is that the cost is dependent on the company and product needs. I tried to make a calculation and it looks like it's going to be much cheaper to purchase the product than if I were to hire an engineer, get him to develop an app, and have it maintained. This is a much more scalable and less expensive solution.