Codebeamer Reviews

Vendor: PTC

3.8 out of 5

12 reviews
90% willing to recommend

273 followers

What is Codebeamer?

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

Get the Codebeamer Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and more!

Codebeamer is the #10 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites. PeerSpot users give Codebeamer an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Codebeamer is most commonly compared to Microsoft Azure DevOps: Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps. Codebeamer is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 69% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 31% of all views.

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Gaurav Kandurwar

Solutions Architect at Capgemini

In my current company, we previously used multiple tools for requirement management, test management, and tracking, such as Arvines, a hardware list for test management, and Jira for tracking purposes. However, these tools were part of a segregated environment, and management decided to upgrade them due to their outdated functionalities. Consequently, my team and I evaluated various tools for requirement management and chose CodeBeamer for its flexibility. We found it is more adaptable to our organization's needs and processes, making it a suitable choice for our migration efforts. During the evaluation process, we considered features compatibility with our business processes and flexibility to accommodate changes. This aspect was crucial to minimizing adjustment time and ensuring a smooth transition to the new tool.

Read full review

Christian Wilmers

Process Method and Tool Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

There are a lot of bits and pieces that need to be improved. It's like a teenager. It's no longer a startup, yet not mature yet. It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now. For example, if you compared it to Jira, which is more mature, you can see that some things are done better due to the fact that Jira is older. It needs better integration for office documents, et cetera. There could be more user-friendly integration between office documents and requirements. Users might say the UI is complex, however, the solution covers so many items, you need to accept the complexity. It's an in-depth solution. For some people, it may be better to have special setups to set up the GUI to show only specific items to make it simpler. It would be nice to have some sort of mash-up GUI, which is possible in Jira so that we can customize to roles specific to, for example, problem management, testers, et cetera. They should have their own GUI related to their roles.

Read full review

Quoc Khanh Hoa

Project Manager Leader at VietSol Co .Ltd

My company uses the tool at our customer's factory site. The main purpose of the tool is for testing in the automobile industry The most valuable features stem from the tool's connection with a free trial condition, test result, and test specifications. Honestly, I don't think too much about…

Read full review

Codebeamer mindshare

As of November 2024, the mindshare of Codebeamer in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 7.4%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Sep 25, 2024

Valuable Features

"Utilizing Codebeamer has helped my organization by saving time in our processes."
"Codebeamer is user-friendly"
"The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment."

Room for Improvement

"Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup."
"The primary challenge is adapting the standard product to our workflows and specific needs."
"During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks."

Pricing

"Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
"They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
"It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Codebeamer Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.