Codebeamer Reviews

Vendor: PTC

3.8 out of 5

12 reviews
90% willing to recommend

276 followers

What is Codebeamer?

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

Get the Codebeamer Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and more!

Codebeamer is the #10 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites. PeerSpot users give Codebeamer an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Based on the analysis of the 12 most recent Codebeamer reviews, the overall sentiment is positive, with a sentiment score of 7.5. (Among the highest in the category). Codebeamer is most commonly compared to Microsoft Azure DevOps: Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps. Codebeamer is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 69% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 31% of all views.

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Gaurav Kandurwar

Solutions Architect at Capgemini

In my current company, we previously used multiple tools for requirement management, test management, and tracking, such as Arvines, a hardware list for test management, and Jira for tracking purposes. However, these tools were part of a segregated environment, and management decided to upgrade them due to their outdated functionalities. Consequently, my team and I evaluated various tools for requirement management and chose CodeBeamer for its flexibility. We found it is more adaptable to our organization's needs and processes, making it a suitable choice for our migration efforts. During the evaluation process, we considered features compatibility with our business processes and flexibility to accommodate changes. This aspect was crucial to minimizing adjustment time and ensuring a smooth transition to the new tool.

Read full review

Christian Wilmers

Process Method and Tool Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

There are a lot of bits and pieces that need to be improved. It's like a teenager. It's no longer a startup, yet not mature yet. It's still a fairly new tool that lacks maturity right now. For example, if you compared it to Jira, which is more mature, you can see that some things are done better due to the fact that Jira is older. It needs better integration for office documents, et cetera. There could be more user-friendly integration between office documents and requirements. Users might say the UI is complex, however, the solution covers so many items, you need to accept the complexity. It's an in-depth solution. For some people, it may be better to have special setups to set up the GUI to show only specific items to make it simpler. It would be nice to have some sort of mash-up GUI, which is possible in Jira so that we can customize to roles specific to, for example, problem management, testers, et cetera. They should have their own GUI related to their roles.

Read full review

Quoc Khanh Hoa

Project Manager Leader at VietSol Co .Ltd

Honestly, I don't think too much about what the product needs to improve. The product's UI is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's UI is not friendly. I just think that the product needs to have some other UI design to make it more friendly for users because the current UI makes it hard for new users to understand the system fast enough to be able to use the system in their jobs. The UI is not very intuitive.

Read full review

Codebeamer mindshare

As of December 2024, the mindshare of Codebeamer in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 7.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites	Dec 22, 2024	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Dec 22, 2024	Download
Comparison	Codebeamer vs Jira	Dec 22, 2024	Download
Comparison	Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps	Dec 22, 2024	Download
Comparison	Codebeamer vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)	Dec 22, 2024	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Microsoft Azure DevOps	4.1	21.0%	95%	130 interviews Add to research
Jira	4.1	23.7%	91%	274 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Codebeamer offers full traceability, seamless integration, excellent collaboration, and regulatory compliance. Users appreciate the various trackers, Smart Requirement View, Agile dashboard metrics, and easy customization without programming. Migration from on-premise to cloud is quick with minimal downtime. Its robust performance with increased material volumes and API-based integrations are valued. Flexibility in using industry-specific templates enhances process descriptions. Manufacturing and pharmaceutical industry users find it efficient, replacing tools like IBM DOORS effortlessly.

"Utilizing Codebeamer has helped my organization by saving time in our processes."
"Codebeamer is user-friendly"
"The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment."

Room for Improvement

Codebeamer's user interface is complex and less intuitive, impacting usability. Users face challenges with initial setups and language barriers due to limited documentation and support materials. Improvements are needed in data analytics, real-time reporting, and industry-specific features. Integration with office documents and compatibility with systems like Jira require enhancement. Market visibility is low, especially in China. There's a necessity for a more flexible and customized graphical interface, addressing glitches and better adaptation to user-specific workflows.

"Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup."
"The primary challenge is adapting the standard product to our workflows and specific needs."
"During migrations from other platforms to CodeBeamer, there have been instances where we encountered issues that required redoing certain tasks."

ROI

Pricing

Codebeamer offers competitive pricing for enterprise buyers evaluating ALM solutions. Users report that while not the cheapest, it aligns with industry standards and is moderately priced compared to similar offerings. Some rate its cost as high on a scale of affordability, indicating investment expectations in line with premium tools. User perspectives suggest that Codebeamer balances cost with value, appealing to businesses seeking robust application lifecycle management capabilities without exceeding budget constraints.

"Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
"They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
"It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Codebeamer for computer-based applications in regulated industries like pharma and biotech, as well as automotive systems requiring ISO 26262 certification. It is employed for lifecycle management, requirement management, task tracking, bug tracking, change tracking, and project management. Codebeamer supports the digitization and management of complex development processes, HR planning, and testing. It aids in understanding tools, mapping business requirements, and managing client modifications and test data. Some organizations utilize it for replacing other ALM tools.

Service and Support

Customer service and support for Codebeamer is largely viewed as good. Users appreciate the transparency of support cases and find technical support satisfactory, noting variability in response times based on issue complexity. Although a hotline chat could enhance service, emails typically receive replies within a day. Chinese documentation would benefit some users. Many rate support positively, with some giving it high marks for assisting with queries and resolving issues promptly.

Deployment

Some find Codebeamer's initial setup easy and straightforward, while others consider it complex without clear documentation. Users note setups on public, private, or on-premises clouds depending on security needs. Deployment often takes two days and does not require third-party aid. Those familiar with the tool appreciate its rapid staging environment setup. Developing a robust backbone, especially for automotive standards, presents challenges due to the lack of clear documentation and templates.

Scalability

Users find Codebeamer highly scalable, supporting multiple platforms without issues. Many prefer it over competitors like PTC Integrity, Polarion, and IBM for enterprise use. Customers rate scalability positively, some giving it a perfect score. They note it is user-friendly but acknowledge there might be a learning curve. While one appreciation compared to competitors is high, another suggests potential challenges in usage, highlighting differing user experiences.

Stability

Users express confidence in Codebeamer's stability, consistently describing it as stable and reliable. They report no significant issues, citing the platform's robustness. Codebeamer is frequently rated ten out of ten, despite some mentioning occasional glitches. Its stability is well-regarded, with ratings as high as ten. The consensus indicates a dependable tool for their needs.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Codebeamer Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.