codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites | Apr 21, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 21, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Codebeamer vs Jira | Apr 21, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps | Apr 21, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Codebeamer vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) | Apr 21, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 17.5% | 95% | 132 interviewsAdd to research |
| Jira | 4.1 | 21.9% | 91% | 274 interviewsAdd to research |
Codebeamer was previously known as codeBeamer ALM.
Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
I find Codebeamer to be best suited for automotive projects in various automotive companies. It is very economical for medium-sized companies. It finds use cases in small, medium, and large enterprises. However, I strongly recommend it for medium companies.
The key features of Codebeamer include templates and basic structures, most of which are created and readily available for deployment out of the box, reducing deployment time. Additionally, its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
One improvement could be to reduce the system or server requirements. For a client with a medium configuration server, Codebeamer did not work initially until the system was upgraded. Additionally, the drag-and-drop feature has some bugs, as I identified two to three scenarios where it did not work. For tagging or traceability, I cannot update changes in bulk. If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
I have been using Codebeamer for almost six years.
Codebeamer is mostly stable. The performance might slow down if many applications are running together on a single server with Codebeamer. However, running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
Scalability is not an issue. In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
The customer support for Codebeamer is good. I usually receive responses to my emails within 24 hours, and if I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
Positive
The deployment is straightforward and not a big challenge. Typically, one person is sufficient for deployment within a week, and the project can be kicked off within that time frame, which is normal in my industry.
The solution has produced a return on investment. It has made the certification process much easier and more straightforward.
The solution is fairly priced.
Currently, I have not seen much AI integration into Codebeamer, but I would like to see features related to code traceability, requirement tagging, and missing requirement highlights in future updates. I rate my overall experience with Codebeamer as close to eight out of ten.
