Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.



| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 3.7% |
| Camunda | 16.3% |
| Temporal | 5.9% |
| Other | 74.1% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camunda | 4.1 | 16.3% | 89% | 78 interviewsAdd to research |
| Appian | 4.2 | 4.5% | 95% | 64 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 110 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 772 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 413 |
| Large Enterprise | 2867 |
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
Control-M was previously known as Control M, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, BMC Australia CTM.
The Bank of East Asia, LINE Bank Taiwan, Coop, Air Europa, Carrefour, Itau Unibanco, Snam, Embraer, ANZ Bank, EDP, Dominio's, Tampa General Hospital, W&W Informatik GmbH, Veterans General, Up Sí Vale, Sky Italia, REWE digital GmbH, Raymond James, Railinc, Navistar, Management Science Associates, Colruyt, CARFAX, Banpara, Aspiag Service, Amadeus, AG Insurance, ING Bank Slaski
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Batch Admin at NBC Universal | 4.5 | I've found Control-M to be a reliable orchestration tool that effectively integrates diverse systems, simplifies operations, and supports DevOps and DataOps, though improvements in user interface and broader integrations would enhance usability moving forward. |
| Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used Control-M for 24 years and find it stable, scalable, and great for automation and file transfers, though reporting needs improvement. It's cost-effective long-term but licensing changes may impact affordability for some companies. |
| Controller Administrator at a government with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've found Control-M to be a reliable, scalable solution that has automated our workflows, reduced errors, and significantly improved release speed, enabling us to support DevOps initiatives and handle complex data pipelines across multiple environments. |
| Control Administrator at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I've used Control-M for nearly a decade to manage scheduling and file transfers efficiently, appreciating its robust features despite occasional performance lags; it saves time, supports large workflows, and enables smooth operations across global environments. |
| ETL Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I've used Control-M for 5–6 years in banking; it's stable, visually intuitive, and better suited for large companies, though setting dependencies is complex. An ETA portal for business users and drag-and-drop features would enhance usability. |
| Sr Manager at Vodafone | 4.5 | I've used Control-M extensively for various workflows, and its GUI and file transfer features stand out, though support for legacy systems needs improvement. It's stable, scalable with planning, costly, but among the top technically. |
| Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I focus on ensuring Control-M operates without disruption, prioritizing its reliability for our application teams. Its standout feature is seamless API integration. While support is excellent, cost improvements would enhance value. We've used Control-M for decades with success. |
| Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I've used Control-M extensively for workload automation, finding it highly stable and scalable, though MFT lacks high availability. Integration with other tools is strong, but pricing is high and support quality varies. Overall, it's a solid, evolving solution. |