GitHub Reviews

Users save time and money using GitHub, benefiting from efficient code management and better version control. Improvements in release control and feature rollout speed enhance productivity. While initial cost benefits are not apparent, broader adoption leads to savings. GitHub offers value, ensuring code security and facilitating easy access across devices. It helps streamline operations, reducing disputes and inefficiencies. Some users incur no initial costs, as GitHub is available for free.

GitHub offers both free and paid plans, with private repositories available without cost on lower tiers. Licensing is user-based, requiring additional licenses as team sizes increase. Many users find the pricing reasonable, comparable to competitors. Some report challenges managing licenses, particularly with user transitions. Enterprise users pay annual fees, often unaware of specific costs due to internal management. Price points typically range from approximately $7-$10 per user per month for upgraded services.

• "I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."
• "Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."
• "GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

Teams primarily use GitHub for version control, code storage, and collaboration. It serves as a centralized repository for managing distributed code systems, supporting tasks such as branching, merging, and CI/CD automation. GitHub is utilized for DevOps processes, documentation, and training, facilitating development across multiple environments and cloud platforms. Organizations value its cloud-based nature, enabling seamless code sharing, testing, and integration, while also handling security checks and project management.

GitHub customers often don't need direct support due to comprehensive community resources and user-friendly interfaces. Some have interacted with technical support, describing it as satisfactory with prompt resolutions. However, there are mentions of delays and inefficiencies in response times. Many rely on the active community for issue resolution. GitHub's community engagement is generally viewed as positive, offering ample online documentation and resources for troubleshooting, though some desire quicker, more direct professional support options.

Users find GitHub's initial setup straightforward and simple, often taking between 5 to 15 minutes. Many appreciate its intuitive process, especially for those with basic Linux knowledge. Some users mention potential complexities with advanced configurations or private repositories but consider the vast online resources beneficial. Organizations often highlight its user-friendly nature, ease of integration, and lightweight design, making it suitable for various deployment scenarios and development environments. It receives positive feedback for efficiency and accessibility.

Users report GitHub is highly scalable, supporting from small to large user bases without performance issues. Organizations utilize it extensively, mentioning thousands of active users. GitHub handles substantial code volumes and complex projects effectively. It's cloud-based, offering flexibility and support for increased usage. Some rate scalability highly, with few potential conflicts noted in large-scale environments. Overall, GitHub is well-suited for diverse organizational needs, efficiently accommodating expanding teams and projects worldwide.

Users generally find GitHub very stable, reporting minimal to no issues such as crashes or glitches. Many rate its stability between eight to ten out of ten. While some occasional performance hiccups are noted, they are rare and typically addressed swiftly. GitHub is praised for its reliability, making it suitable for small to large teams. Though stability is highly rated, some mention a growing complexity with newer features and terms, which might affect overall perception.