GitHub Reviews

Name: GitHub
Brand: GitHub
Rating: 4.4 (92 reviews)

Vendor: GitHub

4.4 out of 5

92 reviews
100% willing to recommend

523 followers

Post review

What is GitHub?

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Get the GitHub Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and more!

GitHub is the #3 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions and #7 ranked solution in application security solutions. PeerSpot users give GitHub an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Based on the analysis of the 92 most recent GitHub reviews, the overall sentiment is positive, with a sentiment score of 7.5. (Among the highest in the category). GitHub is most commonly compared to Bitbucket: GitHub vs Bitbucket. GitHub is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 67% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 13% of all views.

Helped 825,399 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

PeterKrall

Freelance Software Engineer + Director of a company at Peter Krall Consulting

Speaking of what can be made better in a solution is a difficult topic to discuss because it is not just technology. The tool could improve in the area of artificial intelligence methods. Recently, I made an error when I recently worked on a project since I was confused with some things, and it took quite some work to get it fixed again. Some kind of support in the area of merging should be considered for improvement. At the moment, any improvements in the aforementioned area would be something that I would appreciate as a user. Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings.

Read full review

GitHub mindshare

Product category:

As of January 2025, the mindshare of GitHub in the Version Control category stands at 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Version Control	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	GitHub vs Bitbucket	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	GitHub vs Bitbucket Server	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	GitHub vs Git	Jan 2, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Bitbucket	4.2	36.2%	98%	47 interviews Add to research
Bitbucket Server	4.1	28.0%	85%	26 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

GitHub's most valued features include version control, code collaboration, Git Hooks, SSH keys, advanced security, integration with Microsoft Azure DevOps, and various CI/CD platforms. The community support, user-friendly interface, seamless code management, branching strategy, collaborative workflows, automation capabilities, and public/private repositories offer flexibility and time efficiency. Developers appreciate GitHub Actions, extensive documentation, and easy integration with Jenkins. The platform's scalability and security are also frequently highlighted.

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."
"GitHub has improved the productivity of my team by simplifying code merging and enabling effective branching strategies."
"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

Room for Improvement

GitHub requires enhancements in security, user interface, integration with other tools, and project management capabilities. It faces challenges with large file handling, learning curve, and branch management. Improved automation, search functionality, conflict resolution, and language support, especially for Arabic, are needed. The platform could benefit from better CI/CD, LDAP sync, and AI-assisted conflict resolution. Users find the interface outdated, impacting user-friendliness and ease of use. More comprehensive documentation and customer support are crucial.

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."
"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."
"The sign in process is a bit difficult. Signing up was challenging at that time."

ROI

Users save time and money using GitHub, benefiting from efficient code management and better version control. Improvements in release control and feature rollout speed enhance productivity. While initial cost benefits are not apparent, broader adoption leads to savings. GitHub offers value, ensuring code security and facilitating easy access across devices. It helps streamline operations, reducing disputes and inefficiencies. Some users incur no initial costs, as GitHub is available for free.

Pricing

GitHub offers both free and paid plans, with private repositories available without cost on lower tiers. Licensing is user-based, requiring additional licenses as team sizes increase. Many users find the pricing reasonable, comparable to competitors. Some report challenges managing licenses, particularly with user transitions. Enterprise users pay annual fees, often unaware of specific costs due to internal management. Price points typically range from approximately $7-$10 per user per month for upgraded services.

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."
"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."
"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

Popular Use Cases

Teams primarily use GitHub for version control, code storage, and collaboration. It serves as a centralized repository for managing distributed code systems, supporting tasks such as branching, merging, and CI/CD automation. GitHub is utilized for DevOps processes, documentation, and training, facilitating development across multiple environments and cloud platforms. Organizations value its cloud-based nature, enabling seamless code sharing, testing, and integration, while also handling security checks and project management.

Service and Support

GitHub customers often don't need direct support due to comprehensive community resources and user-friendly interfaces. Some have interacted with technical support, describing it as satisfactory with prompt resolutions. However, there are mentions of delays and inefficiencies in response times. Many rely on the active community for issue resolution. GitHub's community engagement is generally viewed as positive, offering ample online documentation and resources for troubleshooting, though some desire quicker, more direct professional support options.

Deployment

Users find GitHub's initial setup straightforward and simple, often taking between 5 to 15 minutes. Many appreciate its intuitive process, especially for those with basic Linux knowledge. Some users mention potential complexities with advanced configurations or private repositories but consider the vast online resources beneficial. Organizations often highlight its user-friendly nature, ease of integration, and lightweight design, making it suitable for various deployment scenarios and development environments. It receives positive feedback for efficiency and accessibility.

Scalability

Users report GitHub is highly scalable, supporting from small to large user bases without performance issues. Organizations utilize it extensively, mentioning thousands of active users. GitHub handles substantial code volumes and complex projects effectively. It's cloud-based, offering flexibility and support for increased usage. Some rate scalability highly, with few potential conflicts noted in large-scale environments. Overall, GitHub is well-suited for diverse organizational needs, efficiently accommodating expanding teams and projects worldwide.

Stability

Users generally find GitHub very stable, reporting minimal to no issues such as crashes or glitches. Many rate its stability between eight to ten out of ten. While some occasional performance hiccups are noted, they are rare and typically addressed swiftly. GitHub is praised for its reliability, making it suitable for small to large teams. Though stability is highly rated, some mention a growing complexity with newer features and terms, which might affect overall perception.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our GitHub Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.