GitHub Reviews

Name: GitHub
Brand: GitHub
Rating: 4 (83 reviews)

4.3 out of 5

83 reviews
100% willing to recommend

516 followers

What is GitHub?

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Get the GitHub Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, SonarQube, Veracode and more!

GitHub is the #3 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions and #11 ranked solution in application security solutions. PeerSpot users give GitHub an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. Based on the analysis of the 83 most recent GitHub reviews, the overall sentiment is positive, with a sentiment score of 7.1. (Among the highest in the category). GitHub is most commonly compared to SonarQube: GitHub vs SonarQube. GitHub is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 66% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 13% of all views.

Helped 813,161 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

PeterKrall

Freelance Software Engineer + Director of a company at Peter Krall Consulting

Speaking of what can be made better in a solution is a difficult topic to discuss because it is not just technology. The tool could improve in the area of artificial intelligence methods. Recently, I made an error when I recently worked on a project since I was confused with some things, and it took quite some work to get it fixed again. Some kind of support in the area of merging should be considered for improvement. At the moment, any improvements in the aforementioned area would be something that I would appreciate as a user. Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings.

Read full review

Chinmay Banerjee

Advisor Adtech/Martech/API product/project Engineering at Fiserv

With fourteen years of experience with the product, I don't think I would face any challenges with it. For new users, it would be good if they could gather a detailed overview to understand the solution, and they could get information from YouTube or other social media platforms. I suggest that new users learn how to manage the product's setup phase. It is better to indulge in some self-study and do the homework, and parallelly consider using the support system offered by GitHub to learn about the product. I have an experience with one of the Big Four companies, EY, where GitHub is used frequently. I have already recommended the product to multiple clients, including PepsiCo, Kellog, Procter & Gamble, Bank of America, and Citibank. Sometimes, you have to manage all your codes locally, but it would be great to have everything managed on the cloud. As my company has been managing codes with GitHub for a long time, I always practice with the tool and get trained to figure out good ways in which certain things can be done with the product. I feel that there is a need to encourage people to use the product, and it can be a healthy thing since it will be possible for people in an organization to delete the local file once someone leaves the company, and it can be done at a global level. My company plans to start the AI development project in one of the upcoming quarters. GitHub is the technical platform from which we cannot expect more, but we can race a request with the support team and tell them about our company's expectations and inform them that we need their help to deal with the AI model in the solution. If my organization plans to use the AI part, I cannot force GitHub to help me, but I will check to the extent to which I can receive help from the tool's support team. If I am developing some new model with the help of AI, then it is my responsibility to bridge the gap by considering factors at a solution level. I believe in always going for an approach involving a handshake with the technology partners and service partners. During the initial days of usage, there won't be any cost savings possible with GitHub. I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.

Read full review

GitHub mindshare

Product category:

As of October 2024, the mindshare of GitHub in the Version Control category stands at 5.6%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Oct 9, 2024

Valuable Features

The most valuable features of GitHub, according to the reviews, are version control, continuous integration, the ability to track code changes, collaboration capabilities, robust security, high speed, code management, easy retrieval of deleted code, reduction of developer workload, detailed code log, integration with third-party software, cloud-based accessibility and backup of source code.

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."
"The support team is good."
"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

Room for Improvement

Improvements needed on GitHub include scalability, adding video guides and official guides for beginners, enhancing code management and automation features, improving the GUI design, resolving conflict issues, adding more security features, improving user-friendliness, providing better professional services and documentation, integrating with other tools like Jenkins and Jira, increasing storage capacity, improving search function, expanding limits of the free version, offering better onboarding process, integrating with AI and machine learning systems and providing better merging tools.

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."
"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."
"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

ROI

The use of GitHub has resulted in significant time savings and improved control over product releases, leading to a positive return on investment.

Pricing

The reviews indicate that GitHub offers both free and paid versions of their solution. The free version is open-source and allows anyone to see the code being worked on. However, purchasing a license provides the option to make the code private. Some organizations have a license and pay nothing for GitHub, while others are on the free tier. The licensing model is user-based, requiring a new license for each new developer. The pricing and licensing options for GitHub are considered reasonable by the reviewers.

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."
"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."
"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

Popular Use Cases

GitHub is a practical and advantageous platform for organizing information and facilitating collaboration among developers. The primary use case of GitHub is for code management and version control. It is used by organizations to coordinate the work of developers, maintain source code, and improve performance. GitHub is also used for code review purposes, allowing developers to comment on and edit lines of code. It serves as a central source for code, allowing multiple developers to work on the same projects. Additionally, GitHub is used for development environments, storing source code and managing development work. It is also used for project repositories, exchanging files, and managing different environments with the help of branches. GitHub is utilized for sourcing candidates, storing applications, and collaborating on projects. It offers features such as CI/CD pipeline integration and version control.

Service and Support

The customer service and support of GitHub have received mixed reviews. Some users have not used the support and have been able to find solutions to their issues through online forums and resources like Stack Overflow and Google. Others have found the support to be average, with some inconsistency and a desire for more responsiveness. However, there are also positive reviews, with users praising the excellent technical support and the availability of a large community of users who can offer assistance. Some users have not needed to contact technical support at all, as they have been able to solve any problems on their own.

Deployment

Some users find the initial setup of GitHub to be straightforward and easy, requiring minimal time and effort. They rate the setup process as simple and give it a high rating on a scale of one to ten. However, other users mention that the initial setup can be complex and require some knowledge of GitHub and code versioning. They highlight the importance of following specific steps in the correct order to avoid failure. Additionally, some users mention that the deployment time depends on the project size and can range from a few minutes to several days. The feedback suggests that the initial setup of GitHub can be relatively quick and easy for experienced users, but beginners may need to refer to documentation and tutorials for assistance.

Scalability

The solution of GitHub is highly scalable and can accommodate a large number of users. It has been used by organizations with hundreds of users without any issues. The scalability of GitHub is rated between seven and eight out of ten by different users. It is considered to be easily scalable and can handle an increase in usage or the addition of new developers. The solution is cloud-based, which further enhances its scalability. Users have not experienced any limitations in terms of storage or capacity.

Stability

Based on the reviews, the solution of GitHub is highly stable and reliable. Users have not encountered any issues with stability, and it performs well without crashing or freezing. The solution has been consistently stable over the years, and users appreciate its performance and lack of bugs or glitches. GitHub also offers additional features such as vulnerability scanning, which enhances its stability and security.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our GitHub Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.