UiPath Test Suite Reviews

Name: UiPath Test Suite
Brand: UiPath
Rating: 4 (18 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

18 reviews
83% willing to recommend

What is UiPath Test Suite?UNIXBusinessApplication
Price:

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

Get the UiPath Test Suite Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about UiPath Test Suite, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!

UiPath Test Suite is the #6 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools. PeerSpot users give UiPath Test Suite an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. UiPath Test Suite is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca. UiPath Test Suite is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 72% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 15% of all views.

Helped 790,002 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Deborah Yarosh

VP Technology Automation at Finance Of America Mortgage LLC

Automating our regression testing with Test Suite saves our QA Analysts many hours of testing whenever we receive vendor updates, or we make configuration changes. We receive vendor updates monthly and quarterly. QA analysts no longer need to perform end-to-end regression tests and can concentrate their manual testing efforts on testing the new functionality. Our automated regression tests have found problems with new vendor releases almost immediately, while manual testing might have taken a couple of weeks to find the same issues. We are finding the issues faster so we can open tickets with the vendor, who can then fix them and send us a new release. Under manual testing, it could be a couple of weeks before we would find the bug, and then we would have to open a ticket, wait for the vendor to fix it, and then deploy the fix, which could delay the release to production. This way, as soon as the bug is found, we open a ticket with the vendor and then simply run the test again when they provide a new version. The best thing about Test Suite and UiPath in general is that they are easy enough for business users to use. Our QA analysts, who are not technical, have been trained to use Test Suite to automate regression testing because the tool is easy enough for them to use. UiPath has excellent training resources, including free training resources on its website. As a result, we are no longer paying expensive developers to create the regression tests. Instead, the QA analysts can automate regression testing themselves.

Read full review

Atul Trikha

Account Chief Technologist at Peraton

UiPath Test Suite helps us automate our testing. Other tools like Selenium require you to learn the language, or you need a specialist to write the scripts. With UiPath, we can automate manual testing using team members who are not that technical. It's easy to learn and requires no coding skills. So we were easily able to achieve our objectives. Web applications are always easy to automate. The challenge is implementing or automating a Windows application, but we can do that successfully. UiPath Test Suite has freed staff to work on other projects. It's hard to quantify, but the initial time savings was high because it runs 24/7. One manual tester works 40 hours weekly, and we had four testers, so that's 160 hours. We can now complete the same work with around four hours of manual work. It's easy to integrate UiPath with other tools like Azure DevOps for running those bars and generating the test history. It also comes with out-of-the-box Jira integration. Hundreds of tools are available, and it integrates with most of the popular ones. Some tools, like Micro Focus Octane, don't have native integration, but UiPath has connectors for those. UiPath has also reduced the time spent on maintenance. Otherwise, when we make changes, we need to test all the steps manually. We're progressing toward becoming fully automated, but it has cut maintenance time in half so far.

Read full review

Deepak Digar.

QA Manager at Quorum Software

We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file. It gives the test cases and other things up front, and everything is already defined. I don't need to write any test scripts. We only need to change the parameter. It will help to create our test cases. That increases productivity compared to our other tool Selenium. The UiPath Community is helpful for my day-to-day issues. When I have a problem, I can find an immediate solution in the community. The UiPath Academy lets anybody start using the solution after getting the basic training to understand.

Read full review

UiPath Test Suite mindshare

As of June 2024, the mindshare of UiPath Test Suite in the Test Automation Tools category stands at 5.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Key learnings from peers

Last updated May 24, 2024

Valuable Features

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

Room for Improvement

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."
"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

Pricing

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."
"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."
"It represents good value for the investment."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our UiPath Test Suite Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.