Amazon AWS Reviews

We are using Amazon AWS for security and for backups.

The most useful feature of Amazon AWS is it can be accessed from anywhere.

Amazon AWS could improve on security.

I have been using Amazon AWS for approximately six months.

Amazon AWS is reliable.

I have not tried to expand Amazon AWS at this time.

The installation was not complex. However, it could improve.

We pay for Amazon AWS annually.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

This solution can be used to set up a cloud infrastructure and DevOps practices, such as Agile. It can be on-premises or in the cloud.

AWS has many integrations and plenty of tools available for anyone to take advantage of. There are new features being added all the time.

The solution could have better security and more integration with other platforms.

I have been using this solution for approximately eight years.

I have found the stability very good.

This solution is scalable.

I have previously used Microsoft Azure DevOps and we prefer Amazon AWS.

We are currently paying for the solution on an annual basis.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution to deploy our systems in the Cloud. It could be virtual machines, containers, and servers as well. 

We've been using EasyTune for elastic computing and it has been very helpful. It's the feature we're using the most right now.

In general, the solution works quite well.

The product is very easy to set up.

The stability of the solution is very good.

The solution scales well.

Overall, the solution is quite complete. There aren't any missing features.

The cost management is too complex right now.

The pricing of AWS is very unclear. They make it quite confusing. They need to make the cost structure easier to understand.

We've been using the solution for two years or so at this point. It's been a couple of years.

The stability is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

The solution is quite scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so relatively easily.

We have around 50 or so users on the solution currently.

The initial setup is not overly complex or difficult. It's very easy. The setup is straightforward.

Being on the cloud, the deployment is very fast. It only takes a few minutes.

The pricing is confusing. Sometimes there are hidden charges.

We are AWS partners.

We're always using the latest version of the solution. As a cloud-based solution, it constantly updates itself to the latest version.

I'd advise users considering the solution that they really need to understand the costs and how they work with AWS. At some point, it can get confusing and it can lead to companies dealing with hidden charges.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. If it wasn't for cost management, I would rate it higher.

The ease of use is the solution's most valuable aspect for us at this point.

You can manage everything from the console, which is very convenient. 

The high level of technology of the database services being served to the customers is impressive. 

The security is excellent. We feel very protected by the solution.

The solution is very easy to set up.

The product is highly scalable.

There is very good documentation available to users for troubleshooting, et cetera.

From a technology standpoint, the solution is almost perfect. We don't feel that anything is lacking in that sense.

The feedback we are getting from our customers, especially here in Turkey where the exchange rate fluctuates regularly, is that the solution is quite expensive. Other cloud competitors are less costly. From our country's point of view, I would say that it needs to be cheaper.

When the solution faces downtime, it can be for hours or half a day. This is far too long.

I would say that I started using AWS around 2017.

The solution is stable. That said, there are some instances that some of the services in some of the regions might go down. The downtime sometimes will last longer than you expected. We expect that occasionally the downtime maybe a few minutes or half an hour. That's not always the case. Sometimes it can be hours. Sometimes it can even be half a day. For us, the downtime is a problem. 

The solution is highly scalable. You can create thousands of servers in minutes or something like that, so it's very scalable. If a company needs to expand, it can do so with ease using this solution.

The types of businesses we typically deal with are rather small. 

I haven't used technical support. I haven't yet had a need to. Therefore, I can't discuss anything in regards to their helpfulness or knowledgeability. That speaks to how good their product has been overall.

That said, if you run into problems, most of the issues that you are having in terms of technical difficulties can be solved within the documentation.

The solution is very easy to install. If you start short-term with the database services, and if you then get the Web Services, it's very easy. A company shouldn't have any trouble setting everything up. It's not complex.

I tend to manage the solution for my clients once it is installed.

Due to currency fluctuations in Turkey, we find the product to be on the more expensive side. There are other, cheaper options on the market.

I'm a consultant. If the customer wants an AWS solution or AWS consultancy, I give these services to them. If they want some local provider, I also work with them.

We are using the latest version of the solution.

Most of my clients don't know the technology and don't want to get into deep technical knowledge in terms of the solution itself. They don't want to manage AWS. They just want to let someone manage their infrastructure and AWS services for them. There aren't too many large companies dealing with AWS on a massive scale in Turkey. I don't really deal with larger entities anyway.

So long as an organization's focus is not on pricing, I would recommend the solution.

In general, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

The RDS renders deployment agility and there is an on-demand database-as-a-service for MySQL, Oracle, and SQL Server.

Among other benefits, one salient benefit for many Pythian customers is the option of spinning up a new instance whenever needed. This can be done with a few clicks.

RDS doesn't have shell access, which could be especially beneficial for Oracle databases.

I have used this solution for the past 2 years.

I have not really encountered any issues with stability.

I have not really encountered any issues with scalability.

The tech support is good and prompt.

For many of Pythian's clients, this solution is an amalgmation of on-premis and the cloud. Pythian enables its customers to reap the benefits of both worlds.

Due to Pythian's expertise and experience, the initial setup was a breeze.

Read the fine print carefully and always engage experts to carry out migration.

Having your database on RDS doesn't mean that you don't need DBA anymore. Mission critical and important databases must be handled by a DBA, even if the database resides on the cloud like RDS.

We use Amazon AWS for storage, networking, and remote computing.

I like S3, load balancers, and Route 53.

The price could be better.

I have been using Amazon AWS for six years.

Amazon AWS is quite stable.

There are so many references that I can refer to, and their technical support is great.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The price, in general, could be better.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS an eight.

It's quite stable and scalable. The price is good as well.

It would be good to see integration with a low code platform. They have one, but it is for intervention. It would be interesting to see it more developed.

I've been using Amazon AWS for a year and a half.

It's quite stable.

It's a scalable solution. It is used by our entire organization.

Our experience with technical support was as expected; they responded fast.

The price is quite good; it is a pay-as-you-go option.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Amazon AWS at eight.