Amazon AWS Reviews

The primary use case of this solution is for hosting your infrastructure.

It's very easy to use.

The activation process can be improved. Sometimes, the activation takes a lot of time. There are many components of the infrastructure.

Integration with in-house applications could be simplified.

We have been dealing with Amazon AWS for one year.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable solution.

It is a scalable product. We have 30 users in our organization.

We plan to continue to use Amazon AWS.

We have never had a problem with technical support.

There is no installation for this solution. It's a cloud solution.

There is a cost for any components you get.

AWS is not an expensive product.

I absolutely recommend this product.

I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

Elastic Load Balancer: AWS completely manages ELB with less configuration from the users' side. Setting up the load balancer manually is really a headache.

Deploying to the elastic cloud is much easier now with AWS. This makes the go-live process easy.

Billing: They should make billing more simplified. It would be great if they could explain how deploying to elastic cloud is much easier now with AWS. Elastic beans command line interface [eb cli]: You can easily deploy code straight from your code IDE.

The billing calculator has lot of options which confuses the user. If they could provide some template for billing and directly execute those template, that would be great.

For example, the billing template for the standard WordPress Server with Load Balancer and S3 Connectivity: Users could just change the parameters inside the template and execute to see their estimated billing.

We have been using this solution for three years.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

We were using only AWS.

The setup was straightforward in all ways.

Free tier is always there for demo and testing. Pricing is based on the usage.

We evaluated Microsoft Azure.

AWS is good for any kind of requirements.

I use this solution to build IoT products.

I am a customer and I have a reselling agreement.

We use this product to build our products and services, which is what we sell.

I like that all of the features are complimentary. I use all of the features together.

It's very user-friendly.

There is nothing that needs changing.

The interface could be improved.

I have been using Amazon AWS for two years.

It is a very stable product.

Amazon is based on scalability. You can scale as you require. We have no issues with scalability.

The technical support is very good.

The initial setup is easy.

I completed the installation myself.

Pricing is good.  It's average.

I also evaluated Microsoft Azure.

I would advise others to use the platform.

I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

• RDS: Because of its auto-scaling, multi-zone availability, and its quick spin up of database servers.
• EC2 Servers: For the agility of server provisioning and the AMI automations.
• Lambda: Because of AI capabilities by writing functions that trigger on events.
• Route 53: For traffic engineering.
• WAF: For security and multiple other features of AWS.

Rolling deployments, quick time to market;

From one day deployment time, it came down to 15 minutes.

Easy provisioning means quick time to market when a new environment is required.

The console's UI could be a little better, a fluid User Experience is missing.

For example, in order to see the instance details properly, we have to scroll the description part up or down, which is not a recommended way of doing it.

Three years.

Just once, when MongoDB infrastructure could not mount to EBS.

No.

Excellent. 10 out of 10 for this.

IBM Softlayer and Azure. Both are not automated to the level that AWS is automated.

Straightforward.

Pay per use.

Yes, RedHat OpenShift.

Migrate to AWS for speed and agility, combined with its security features.