As the solution is cloud-based, we always use the latest version.
We use the solution for our web platform business needs.
As the solution is cloud-based, we always use the latest version.
We use the solution for our web platform business needs.
We like everything about the solution except for the general price. Most of Amazon's products are quite expensive.
We have been using Amazon AWS for five years.
The installation is quite straightforward.
We only need a single administrator for the implementation.
We are not happy with the general price and find most of Amazon's products to be quite expensive.
There are 50 users making use of the solution in our organization.
I would recommend the solution to others.
I rate Amazon AWS as an eight out of ten.
AWS is easy to manage.
Some features may be better in Azure or some other portal. AWS could add some of those features.
I've been using AWS for three to four years.
So far, I've had no issues with stability or scalability.
AWS was already installed when I started working at this company, so I don't know.
I rate Amazon AWS eight out of 10.
We use Amazon AWS for storage, networking, and remote computing.
I like S3, load balancers, and Route 53.
The price could be better.
I have been using Amazon AWS for six years.
Amazon AWS is quite stable.
There are so many references that I can refer to, and their technical support is great.
The initial setup is straightforward.
The price, in general, could be better.
I would recommend this solution to potential users.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS an eight.
In my role as an IT architect, I design solutions for many clients. We use the solution in mobile applications with a back-end solution
The response time of technical support could be better. It is not so good. While this can likely be attributed to our lack of a premium support contract, they should still show more consideration in their response time towards first time clients.
Moreover, as things grow, the solution will need the scalability of Amazon services for it to be very secure. More scalability will be essential. It will be important for us to incorporate certain architecture-based ideas or configurations of the signature that would need to be included in our solutions or designs.
As an example, we developed a mobile application that will reach 10,000 users of Amazon services within its first year. The following year, it is projected to reach around 100,000 users.
I have been using Amazon AWS during the last 12 months.
I am very impressed by the solution's stability.
The scalability is very good, although having good security will require that its growth be in line with that of Amazon service.
Technical support is not so good.
Use of the four quarters service posed a problem for us during the initial setup. The setup of the initial quarters of service should be more transparent and clear to the user. Certain limits should be set up to match the varying needs of the users.
There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees.
I feel the solution has been working very well.
We have worked with around eight companies over the past year involving a variety of solutions. For some of these we implemented solutions that will be utilized by a large clientele.
My role is that of an integrator. Editors and designers are other roles. As of now, we do not have a partner relationship with Amazon.
I rate Amazon AWS as a nine out of ten.
Web developers use the solution for application building, modernization, cloud transformation, new development, and budget solutions. It has a wide variety of use cases.
The solution is very easy to use.
The product is nice and stable. Its performance is great.
The technical support has been good.
The solution could offer better integration capabilities.
The pricing is a bit high. It's an aspect they could improve upon.
I don't use it in my current organization. I used to use it in my earlier organization. In fact, I don't really use it, however, we used to consult on it. I've been a consultant for about a year or so.
The product is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. The performance is great.
At my organization, there are around 100 users on the solution.
Technical support has been good. I have not heard of any customer complaints. It's my understanding that they are helpful and responsive and users are satisfied with their level of service.
I was not a part of the installation process. I cannot speak to how easy or difficult the implementation was. I have no visibility on that aspect. I'm not sure what the makeup of the technical team was or how many people were used to deploy it.
The price of the solution can get expensive. They could work to lower it for their clients.
Those that use the licensing do need to pay a fee. It can be paid on a yearly or monthly basis.
I've worked as a consultant.
We've been quite pleased with its capabilities. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten.
I'd recommend the product to other users or companies.
I use Amazon AWS for backing up our data from the customer relationship management solution of SalesForce. For the moment, we have not made use of it for the restoration of any routes or data that is involved.
The solution should me made friendlier to use.
As far as the automation is concerned, the backups should be scaled.
The pricing of Amazon is higher than that of SalesForce. We thought that things would be cheaper when it comes to Mexico and that a connection would be made between the facilities and SalesForce.
I rate Amazon AWS as a nine out of ten.
We run everything on AWS. You can run anything on this, such as web servers, application servers, and containers as a service.
They are enterprising and pretty good in terms of features. It has good security. Its availability is also pretty good. It is available everywhere in the world.
It has pretty good integrations, and it is working well. They have done a lot of improvements, and its UI has improved a lot.
They currently have fewer regions in Asia, especially in India, China, and other places. They can maybe put more data centers in this region.
I have been using this solution for three to four months.
It is very stable. They keep on improving it continuously.
It is scalable. A lot of people are using it, especially DevOps.
Their support is pretty fast and good. They provide worldwide support, and everything is taken care of.
It is straightforward. You have all the documentation, so it is pretty good. For its deployment, two or three people should be more than enough.
Everything is good in this solution. They are number one, and they have done everything. The number of services is very huge, and they have taken care of everything. We plan to keep using this solution.
I would rate Amazon AWS a ten out of ten.
We are a solution provider and we use this solution to host applications for our customers. Their use cases are related to legal and advisory matters.
The most valuable features are load balancers, databases, and S3 buckets.
I have found some problems related to the database.
The price of this solution could be reduced to make it more competitive.
There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us. If we work with an application that is set up in New York, for example, then it has to be able to work in Pakistan.
I have been using Amazon AWS for between six and eight months.
We have not experienced any issues in terms of stability.
Scalability is not a problem. We are currently extending our use of Amazon AWS and have acquired a partnership with them. With this, we are creating a cloud department for which we will offer Amazon Web Services.
I did not have to call technical support.
Our deployment took between five and ten months.
I find that Amazon AWS is expensive.
I recently evaluated the Oracle Cloud Platform, and I find that Amazon is more expensive.
My advice to anybody who is researching AWS is to consider their budget. If the budget is available then it is a good choice, whereas, for those who want to spend less, I would suggest using Oracle instead.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.