Amazon AWS Reviews

We are using AWS for storage for the database server and data. 

Its scalability is powerful. We are providing services for people to schedule an appointment for the vaccine and for COVID testing to see whether they are positive or negative. In one night, we can have 240,000 people in one minute to schedule an appointment. I am very happy with the scalability.

The dashboard can be improved a little bit to provide more information.

I have been using this solution for more than one year.

We open the services at midnight, and we have many people taking our services, and it has been very stable.

Its scalability is wonderful. It is suitable for enterprises.

I don't directly take support from Amazon. We have a company for technical support, and their suggestion was great. The technical sample that they gave was very easy. It helped to resolve the problem quickly.

It was very easy.

I did it myself.

It is not the cheapest one, but there is a good ratio between the quality of service and the pricing. Its price is good for me.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate it a nine out of 10.

Amazon for DevOps is fantastic. Amazon has fast clouds, and the process and the Dev is very good. 

Amazon tools are for more mature DevOps. The process and the Dev is very good, but it doesn't compare to the ease of using the Google Cloud Platform. Google Cloud Platform is easier for the developer since it has many automation features. You can use the many tools to automate your info or create machines. Personally, I like using both.

I have been using AWS for two years.

AWS pricing is higher than other services.

I would rate AWS a ten out of ten.

We use Amazon AWS because it has really advanced parameters and suits our business.

I like that it helps us do everything really fast, and its advanced services.

The price could be better.

I've been using Amazon AWS for about four months.

Amazon AWS is stable, and there aren't any issues that I know about.

Amazon AWS is scalable.

I didn't notice any problems or issues related to this area, and everything was fine.

The initial setup wasn't easy because we implemented this process over two months, and it was a complex process.

It's an expensive product.

My company considered not only one provider, and it was really a complicated process to review all the providers. We had our checklist of all necessary requirements, and it was quite complicated. We chose AWS because of its advanced features that let us do everything quickly.

I would recommend this solution to new users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS a nine.

We are running everything on the cloud. That's our primary use case. All the servers we are using are on AWS. The only thing we have on SAP's cloud is the analytics part. Everything else is running on AWS.

The scalability of the product is the solution's most valuable feature. It expands very, very easily.

I don't have any complaints about the configuration capabilities or the interface.

The pricing seems to be good.

The technical support should be better than what is on offer right now.

I've used the solution for a while now. It's been about four years in total, from what I recall.

The solution scales very well. If a company needs to expand it, it's very easy to do. It's one of the solution's most striking features.

The support could be better. It's an aspect of the solution that isn't as good as everything else. We aren't satisfied. They need to be more helpful and responsive.

We also use SAP. In terms of SAP, I'm running all my servers on this IP at this moment. We have our development, our quality, and also production sites on it.

We can't complain about the pricing. So far, it doesn't seem to be too expensive.

We are a customer and an end-user. We don't have a business relationship with Amazon.

Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten overall. We've been very, very happy with the capabilities we've been able to experience so far.

We have migrated on-premises infrastructure for a customer to the AWS cloud with different workloads, such as Windows, Linux, Oracle, and SQL Server. It is a public and hybrid cloud deployment.

It has several valuable features, but the load balancer, auto-scaling, and RDS database are the main ones. It is a complete cloud infrastructure solution.

In terms of technical features, I don't see anything missing. The only two points in favor of other providers are the price and local support.

The main problem that we see here in Brazil is the price. It is much more expensive than any other cloud provider.

Their local support can also be better. We get more support from some of the other providers here in Brazil as compared to AWS.

It is very stable. There are no problems with its stability.

Its scalability is perfect and great. We have around 300 users.

Their technical support is okay, but it can be better. This is something for which there is room for improvement. We get more support from some of the other providers as compared to AWS.

It had medium complexity. It was not too complex, but it is never simple to migrate to the cloud. It took three months. 

Several people were involved in its deployment. We had 13 people in total. There were about eight people from our side and maybe five people from the customer side.

It is much more expensive than any other cloud provider.

I would rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.

Almost everything is good. It is a whole ecosystem. It is not only the storage, computing, or networking. It is interesting in the way all things are combined to form this ecosystem. It is a very well-built and logical ecosystem that has some small building blocks. These building blocks can be used in the right way to build a much bigger ecosystem that is robust, secure, scalable.

Its interface could be better because there are so many services right now in the product that it is quite difficult to navigate around in this. Its interface could be a subject of improvement.

I have been using this solution for six years.

It has good stability. In six years of working with Amazon AWS, I had only two major incidents, which are very few.

It is very scalable. Our clients are enterprise businesses. There are some customers who put only a part of their business on Amazon AWS, and there are some customers who put everything on Amazon AWS. In some cases, a few applications are going to the cloud, whereas in other cases, everything is going to the cloud, and the migration is huge.

Their technical support is good.

Its initial setup is straightforward. You just need to create an account.

I would recommend this solution. It is a cloud leader, and it is a safe bet. 

I would rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case is an end-to-end cloud solution and design.

As a service vendor, we have helped clients to achieve faster "go to market" on their products, and have provided highly flexible cost-effective system management solutions.

The most valuable features of this solution are Compute, Security, Database, Media, Management, and Governance.

This solution would be improved with the inclusion of hybrid Kubernetes management.

AWS provides a lot of solutions to design secure, elastic and serverless software architectures.

More than 30 BBVA Group web pages are working without servers, saving costs and reducing security problems, with AWS services like CloudFront, WAF, S3, Lambda, SQS, and API Gateway.

All our infrastructure is defined in JSON files, thanks to CloudFormation, which makes maintenance and creation of new clone environments easier.

Lambda@Edge, for example, it's new and has a lot of room for improvement.

Four years.

It is usual with new functionalities, but AWS does resolve stability issues quickly.

With CloudSearch; the service finally autoscales but in excessive time. You never lose information, but you can't access new data when there are peaks of requests for creation of new documents.

Seven out of 10.

Yes, I used OVH and other cloud providers like Azure or Google. AWS is much better. It is a complete platform.

Required some service, but in general there is a lot of documentation and there are training courses.

AWS is appropriate for professional solutions. For other types of projects it's a bit expensive.

Azure, Google Cloud. AWS is years ahead of its rivals.

Think "serverless". With AWS you can design your architecture, thinking distinct and oriented to events, decoupling processes, solving possible errors, multi-region or Multi-AZ.