Our primary use of this product is to automate our ERP system.
Unix Administrator at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have been working with them for a long time and we trust their products
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
- ECUs
- Easy scheduling
- Reliability
How has it helped my organization?
The benefit of this particular solution is that we are familiar with the product already. Therefore when implementing this system, it will have a lot of the same characteristics as the old one. So it is the ease of transition made easier rather than going to a new automation system.
For how long have I used the solution?
Still implementing.
Buyer's Guide
Automic Automation
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Automic Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is very good. We have not had any crashes or downtime with it in our testing. We are very happy with it and it runs pretty fast.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We are a small organization. We do not run that many jobs, so we do not plan on scaling it up much.
How are customer service and support?
I have used technical support and the community, as well. I have found to get answers quickly to solutions that worked - asking both the technical support and the community.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We actually have an older product AppWorks 6.0 that we currently use, and we are transitioning from AppWorks to Automation several months from now. We are currently in the developmental stage.
The current solution we have is not supported, which is why we are switching.
How was the initial setup?
I was initial in the initial setup. It was complex. We had a person come in from CA and assist us with the setup. It went smoothly. It took us about a week to get it up and running. However, it has been up and running, and we have not had any real issues with it since.
We still actually have not implemented this version as it is in its test phase.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It would be good to have some dashboards that come with the package rather than it be a cost to add them on.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at this solution and we also look at another company. The reason we went with this solution is because we had been working with them for a long time and we trusted their products. For us, our learning curve would not be as steep.
What other advice do I have?
They have gone from UC4 to Automic to CA in a very short amount of time, so they changed their face a lot. With those changes, they are actually doing a lot more technical advances. I think that they are a product that is continually growing, which is good.
Look at this product. Give it a shot, but also understand what your needs are. Look at several products before coming to a decision on what you want to do to resolve your ERP issues.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: A partner who is truly interesting in helping us meet our goals and who can provide a solution in a fast, reliable timeframe.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Systems Administrator at Athene Deutschland Service Gmbh
The scalability is good. We can scale it however we want.
Pros and Cons
- "The scalability is very good. We can scale it however we want."
- "We use it to automate our business."
- "We would like to have token-based authentication. Where we do not have to use a password, and can use tokens for authentication in other systems."
- "The new UI feels unready. It makes your browsers crash."
What is our primary use case?
We use it to automate our business.
While we have had some issues, it is mostly perfect. If it is set up, it is running.
What is most valuable?
It does its job.
What needs improvement?
Token-based authentication: Where we do not have to use a password, and can use tokens for authentication in other systems.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Apart from the new UI, it is very stable. The new UI feels unready. It makes your browsers crash.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is very good. We can scale it however we want. We have seen new add-ons, such as the event machine. There is always something to augment.
You have to improve your systems, but there are no seen limits.
How is customer service and technical support?
Sometimes, it is a bit hard get through the first level of support to the second level, then to the endpoint of the solution. Overall, it is a bit tricky.
How was the initial setup?
Our migration from a previous system was not easy. However, when we did a new implementation that was easy.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I do not remember.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend to try the product. Our competitors mostly use this product too.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: Getting things done better.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Buyer's Guide
Automic Automation
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Automic Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Architect & Technical Director at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Saves time and reduces human errors, but the technical support can be quicker
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of this solution is the scheduler."
- "I would like to see more types of Calendars in the next release of this solution."
What is our primary use case?
We are a reseller and solution provider, and this is one of the products that we provide for our customers.
This is a conversion product, and we use this solution to assist customers who are converting from another product. Our primary focus is one-for-one migration, bringing it up to the next level and getting it ready for the next phase.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution saves our organization time, in terms of management. It is also more systematic and gives us more control. It is easy to learn.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of this solution is the scheduler.
The workflow is object-oriented.
The source code is centralized, rather than being deployed to the individual servers.
What needs improvement?
There are always ways that technical support can be improved.
I would like to see more types of Calendars in the next release of this solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for less than one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In terms of stability, so far so good. We have not encountered any bugs in this solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Our proposal matches the average, so we have not needed the solution to grow.
The plan is to increase usage once this solution is stabilized. We are hoping that this is in the near future.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have worked with technical support, and we are pretty happy with them. The response time is long, but they have been ok so far.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Prior to this, we used other products from the CA Automation family, but with different branding. We used the AutoSys d-Series Edition.
How was the initial setup?
With respect to migration or conversion projects, the compilation is done with a conversion factory. This is done on-site, and after that, there is testing and production. The deployment time for a project is between three and six months.
What about the implementation team?
Many of the things are handled by the CA Compilation team. We are on-site, assisting the technical team. We migrate across from the remote site to the client site.
There is a lot of coordination that has to be done with the customer. The environment, including the data, has to be ready.
Two or three people are required, on-site, for the deployment. One of them is an architect and two of them are engineers.
Once this solution is deployed, the customer takes over the operation, including the maintenance.
What was our ROI?
When our customers have a lot of manual processes, the automation will reduce the number of human errors that occur. This will reduce the cost.
What other advice do I have?
I began using this product just after it was acquired by CA. We have four to five people who have been trained on CA Workload Automation across all of the developing nations.
My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to carefully look at the environment. Some manual processes can be converted, but some are best left done using human manual input. If this is the case then you have to convert these into a scripted document image.
I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller.
Supporter at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
We are able to control and change our processes when necessary
Pros and Cons
- "We are able to control and change our processes when necessary."
- "Support is good and it works fine."
- "The workflows should be clearer and more expressive."
What is our primary use case?
We use Workload Automation to control all our processes and the batch control.
We are working with version 10, and need to upgrade to version 12.2.
How has it helped my organization?
- The product is clear and very visual.
- We receive feedback right at the moment that we need it.
- We are able to control and change our processes when necessary.
What is most valuable?
At the moment, we have clear batches to see workflows to control.
In the next version, I do not know what is coming up for us.
What needs improvement?
The workflows should be clearer and more expressive. I need this going forward.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have downtime during every upgrade. In the normal process, it works fine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable.
How is customer service and technical support?
We are now in extended support. We are now in the change process, so we needed extended support.
When we contact support, we can get through to the right person to receive the correct answers.
What was our ROI?
The product has helped save, time, money, and resources. It has given us a competitive advantage in our industry.
What other advice do I have?
Use the product. Support is good and it works fine.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
It saves my customers time, money, resources, and efficiency
Pros and Cons
- "It saves my customers time, money, resources, and efficiency."
- "For power users, it does not work well for them at the moment."
What is our primary use case?
Our customers use it for scheduling.
It performs quite well. It depends on the customer. Some customers do not use it with all the features that the product offers. They only use a small set of what the product can do.
How has it helped my organization?
Reliability: You can count on it.
It has saved my customers time, money, resources, and efficiency.
What is most valuable?
Monitoring is very good.
What needs improvement?
For power users, it does not work well for them at the moment.
The event monitoring is very good. It has become a great part of the product suite. However, most customers rarely use it.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
At the moment, it is working quite well. Version nine's stability was not good. Now, it is stable again.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is very good.
How is customer service and technical support?
Mostly, we get a standard answer. Sometimes, the support is not very good.
Maybe it is problem with some customers and the tickets that they are opening, as the tickets are not very well designed. Still, as an experienced user, when I open a ticket, I put in all the needed information. Yet, the support for me is still not great and could be better.
How was the initial setup?
It is straightforward for me. Those new to this business find the initial setup complex.
It is a complex product, so you can't do the setup with a click.
What other advice do I have?
It is a good product for solution automation.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Production Services at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is a way to test the system from production and a very strong instrument for job scaling
Pros and Cons
- "We have seen a cost improvement from it."
- "It is very difficult to migrate. The release automation should be in one package."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case is release automation.
We did a PoC last month, and are planning on probably implementing the product.
How has it helped my organization?
We have seen a cost improvement from it.
What is most valuable?
It is a way to test the system from production, which is nice.
What needs improvement?
It is very difficult to migrate. We want to buy one package. The release automation should be in one package.
For how long have I used the solution?
Trial/evaluations only.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable product. It is a very strong instrument for job scaling.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support has been good with quick responses. Their last response was for the product license. It was delivered within two days.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were not previously using another solution.
How was the initial setup?
I was not involved in the initial setup.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate anyone else.
What other advice do I have?
It is a nice product. We have been looking for this type of product for many years.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Automic Automation Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Workload AutomationPopular Comparisons
Control-M
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
AutoSys Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation
Redwood RunMyJobs
Stonebranch
Tidal by Redwood
ActiveBatch by Redwood
Rocket Zena
ESP Workload Automation Intelligence
HCL Workload Automation
AppWorx Workload Automation
Dollar Universe Workload Automation
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Automic Automation Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Comparing Automic Workload Automation, Automic/Appworx Applications Manager, and OpCon
- Does Automic offer automation-as-code capabilities, allowing developers to directly code automation artifacts?
- Can I improve workload automation in my company without changing our scheduler?
- Can Automic Automation be deployed on Kubernetes? And what exactly is Kubernetes?
- Does Automic Workload Automation work with Oracle Fusion Cloud?
- Which is Best: Scheduler Control M, CA or Tidal?
- When evaluating Workload Automation, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What should businesses start to automate first when starting off with an enterprise scheduling tool?
- What is the best workload automation tool in the market?
- How does Control-M rank in the Workload Automation market compared with other products?
The amount of plugins and action packs available and for various products and technologies, really offers this flexibility.